권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Title Page
초록
Abstract
Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction 9
1.1. The Requirements of High Performance and High Bandwidth System 9
1.2. Introduction to High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) 10
1.3. Signal Integrity (SI) Issues at the TSV Array in HBM 12
1.4. Necessities of Optimal Through Silicon Via (TSV) Array Design through Pattern Revision 13
1.5. The Conventional TSV Array Design Method for HBM 14
1.6. Introduction to Reinforcement Learning (RL) 15
1.7. Previous Works 16
1.8. Research Motivations and Objectives 17
Chapter 2. Proposal of Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Through Silicon Via (TSV) Array Design Optimization Method 18
2.1. Proposed RL-based TSV Array Optimization Method considering SI 18
2.2. Hyperparameters of Markov Decision Process for the Proposed Method 19
2.2.1. State: Representation of TSV Array as a Matrix 19
2.2.2. Action: Switching TSVs for Design Revision considering SI 20
2.2.3. Reward: The Eye Height of the TSV Channel 21
2.3. Eye Diagram Estimation Method for Reward 22
2.3.1. Equivalent Circuit Modeling of Multi-signal and Multi-ground TSVs 22
2.3.2. Eye Diagram Estimation using Equivalent Circuit Model 24
2.4. Learning Procedure of the Proposed Method 25
2.5. Optimal TSV Array Design Procedure 26
2.6. Key Features and the Advantage of the Proposed Method 27
Chapter 3. Verification of the Proposed Method by Comparison with Full Search Method 27
3.1. The Physical Dimension and the simulation setup of the Target Through Silicon Via (TSV) Array for Verification 27
3.2. Hyperparameters of the Proposed Method 29
3.3. Training Loss and Average Reward of the Proposed Method 30
3.4. Optimal TSV Array Design Procedure with Trained Agent 31
3.4.1. Optimal Design and Analysis of Case 1 31
3.4.2. Optimal Design and Analysis of Case 2 34
3.5. Comparison of the Consuming Time and Performance between Proposed method and Full Search Optimization 37
Chapter 4. Application of the Proposed Method for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) TSV Array 38
4.1. Target Application for the Proposed Method: 1 Byte of HBM TSV DQ Channel 38
4.2. The Physical Dimension of the Target Through Silicon Via (TSV) Array in HBM 38
4.3. Hyperparameters 39
4.4. Optimal TSV Array Design Procedure with Trained Agent at HBM 40
Chapter 5. Discussions and Conclusion 42
5.1. The Limitations of the Proposed Method 42
5.2. Further Work: Optimization using Policy-based RL Methods 43
5.3. Conclusion 43
Bibliography 44
Curriculum Vitae in Korean 46
Figure 1. The requirement of high performance and high bandwidth system 9
Figure 2. The trend of memory bandwidth and the neural network training requirement 10
Figure 3. HBM mounted on graphic modules and the data bandwidth specification of HBM 2E 10
Figure 4. Key features of HBM 11
Figure 5. TSV and TSV array in HBM 11
Figure 6. Signal integrity issues at the TSV array at HBM 12
Figure 7. Design methods for TSV array at HBM 13
Figure 8. Necessities of optimal through silicon via (TSV) array design through pattern revision 14
Figure 9. The conventional TSV array design method for HBM 15
Figure 10. The concept of reinforcement learning (RL) 15
Figure 11. The concept of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) 16
Figure 12. Previous work 1: TSV-aware analytical placement for 3-D IC designs 16
Figure 13. Previous work 2: Full-chip TSV-to-TSV coupling analysis and optimization in 3D IC 17
Figure 14. The concept of RL-based TSV array optimization considering SI 18
Figure 15. Schematic diagram of the deep q learning-based proposed method 19
Figure 16. State: Representation of TSV array as a matrix 20
Figure 17. Action: Switching TSVs 20
Figure 18. Reward: Eye height of the worst TSV channel 21
Figure 19. Eye diagram estimation method for reward 22
Figure 20. Inductance modeling of multi-signal and multi-ground TSVs 22
Figure 21. Capacitance and conductance modeling of multi-signal and multi-ground TSVs 23
Figure 22. Flow chart of eye diagram estimation from the equivalent circuit model 24
Figure 23. Learning Procedure of the Proposed Method 25
Figure 24. Epsilon-greedy policy process 26
Figure 25. Overall Steps of the Optimal TSV Array Design Procedure 26
Figure 26. The physical dimension of the target TSV array for verification 27
Figure 27. Target TSV array channel eye-diagram simulation setup 28
Figure 28. Training Loss of the Proposed Method 30
Figure 29. Average Reward of the Proposed Method 30
Figure 30. Optimal TSV array design procedure with a trained agent of case1 31
Figure 31. Eye diagram of optimal TSV array at case 1 32
Figure 32. Par-end crosstalk (FEXT) of each state at case 1 32
Figure 33. FEXT analysis of the design procedure of TSV array using the proposed method at case 1 33
Figure 34. Optimal TSV array design procedure with a trained agent of case2 34
Figure 35. Optimal TSV array design procedure with a trained agent at case2 35
Figure 36. Far-end crosstalk (FEXT) of each state at case 2 35
Figure 37. FEXT analysis of the design procedure of TSV array using the proposed method at case 2 36
Figure 38. The concept of the proposed method using RL the full search method 37
Figure 39. The target application for the proposed method: 1 Byte of HBM TSV DQ channel 38
Figure 40. Initial design and target TSV array dimension 39
Figure 41. Optimal 4x4 TSV array design procedure with the trained agent at HBM 40
Figure 42. Eye diagram of optimal 4x4 TSV array at HBM 41
Figure 43. Far-end crosstalk (FEXT) of each state at 4x4 TSV array 41
Figure 44. Limitations of the proposed value-based RL method 42
Figure 45. Advantage of the policy-based RL method 43
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.