권호기사보기
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
대표형(전거형, Authority) | 생물정보 | 이형(異形, Variant) | 소속 | 직위 | 직업 | 활동분야 | 주기 | 서지 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
연구/단체명을 입력해주세요. |
|
|
|
|
|
* 주제를 선택하시면 검색 상세로 이동합니다.
Title Page
ABSTRACT
Contents
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 13
1.1. Background and Research Objective 13
1.2. Research Structure 16
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 19
2.1. Researches of port and container terminal efficiency by using DEA 19
2.2. Researches of Vietnamese port and container terminal efficiency by using DEA 31
2.3. Research gap 35
CHAPTER 3. THE CONTEXT OF CONTAINER TERMINAL SYSTEM IN SOUTHERN VIETNAM 38
3.1. Overview of seaport in Vietnam 38
3.2. Overview of container transportation in Vietnam 43
3.3. Overview of container terminals in Vietnam 49
3.4. Overview of container terminals in Southern Vietnam 57
3.4.1. Current situation of seaports in Southern Vietnam 57
3.4.2. Current situation of targeted terminals in Southern Vietnam 61
CHAPTER 4. METHODOLOGY 69
4.1. Overview of DEA 69
4.2. DEA-SBM 72
4.3. DEA Malmquist 75
4.4. DEA Undesirable Output 76
CHAPTER 5. EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS 80
5.1. Variable Selection 80
5.2. DEA-SBM Analysis Result 84
5.3. DEA-Malmquist Analysis Result 91
5.4. DEA Undesirable Analysis Result 96
CHAPTER 6. CONCLUSION, LIMITATION, AND FURTHER RESEARCH 105
6.1. Conclusion 105
6.2. Limitation and Further Research 109
REFERENCES 110
Figure 1. Research Structure 16
Figure 2. Distribution of Vietnam's seaport system 40
Figure 3. The cargo throughputs of Vietnam port system (2010-2019) 42
Figure 4. The cargo volume by types (2015 -2020) 44
Figure 5. The cargo volume by types (2020) 45
Figure 6. Container transport corridors in the Northern Vietnam 46
Figure 7. Container transport corridors in the Southern Vietnam 48
Figure 8. Volume of containerized cargo through sea ports in 2000-2009 50
Figure 9. Volume of containerized cargo through sea ports in 2010 -2019 51
Figure 10. Compound Annual Growth Rate of some region (2010-2019) 52
Figure 11. The propotion of cargo throughput and vessel calls by region (2019) 57
Figure 12. Market share of container cargo through Southern Vietnam seaports 60
Figure 13. The geographic pattern of targeted container terminals 61
Figure 14. The efficient frontier and efficiency of decision units 70
Figure 15. Productivity change by region (2017-2019) 95
Figure 16. The efficiency value of targeted container terminals... 97
Southern Vietnam is a key economic region for the country, producing 45% of Vietnam's GDP, despite only accounting for 9% of the country's total landmass and 21% of its population (Vietna m General Statistics Office, 2020). Specailly, the Southern Region dominates seaport-based conta iner transportation, contributing 55% of Vietnam's total vessel calls and 74% of its total conta iner cargo volume, with the North and Central regions trailing far behind (Vietnam Seaports Association, 2019). Besides, the area is invested with the highest density of container terminal construction and development in Vietnam.
However, despite the sector's importance, the efficiency of container terminals in Southern Vietnam has not been evaluated by the literature in recent years. (between 2017 and 2019). This study fills that research gap by using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methodology to evaluate the development of the major conta iner terminals in Southern Vietnam in the period of 2017 - 2019. For the result of DEA Slacks-Based Measure, there are only two conta iner terminals(Tan Cang Cat Lai, Cai Mep International Terminal) which achieved the efficiency in three consecutive years and Tan Cang-Cai Mep International Terrminal finally achieved the efficiency level in 2019, while other container termina ls have been in ineffective status. As the DEA-Malmquist result, most of the container terminals got the positive productivity growth between 2017-2019, and that this mainly derived from advancements in catch-up operational efficiency and in technological innovation. For the DEA-Undesirable Output model results, Tan Cang Cat Lai, Cai Mep International Terminal, Tan Cang - Cai Mep International Terminal still were the efficiency terminal with score of 1 while other container terminals displayed severe operational inefficiency, with these terminals' efficiency values decreasing by between 9 and 40% when considering undesirable outputs. The ineffective terminals can therefore be categorized as consuming excessive inputs and lacking in the production of desirable outputs or creating large amounts of undesirable outputs. Therefore, using these results, port authorities and policymakers should be better placed to develop appropriate strategies for managing container terminals in Southern Vietnam.*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
전화번호 |
---|
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.