권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
표제지
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 14
1.1. 연구 배경 14
1.2. Disc Brake 면압 연구의 필요성 15
1.3. 선행 연구 동향 16
1.3.1. 1차원 Geometry의 COP 해석 17
1.3.2. 정적 Pad 면압 분포 연구 18
1.3.3. 동적 Pad 면압 분포 계측 연구 20
1.4. 본 연구의 방향 21
Ⅱ. 해석 대상 및 모델링 23
2.1. Air Disc Brake 동적 거동 해석 23
2.1.1. Pad 무게 중심 (COG, Centre of Gravity) 24
2.1.2. 등가 반경(Effective Radius) 25
2.1.3. Pad의 동적 거동 26
2.1.4. 동적 거동에 의한 Pad 면압 중심점 해석 28
2.2. Disc Brake 동적 거동 검증 방법론 37
2.2.1. Pad 물성 시험 37
2.2.2. 직교 이방재 (Orthotropic Material) 39
2.2.3. 횡 방향 등방재 (Transversely Isotropic Material) 41
Ⅲ. 유한요소 해석 및 실험적 검증 45
3.1. FE Analysis 45
3.1.1. 유한 요소 모델 45
3.1.2. 해석 조건 51
3.1.3. 해석 결과 58
3.2. Strain Test for Pad Surface Pressure 64
3.2.1. 정·동적 Pad 면압측정 방법론 64
3.2.2. 시험 장치의 구성 71
3.2.3. 면압 측정 결과 77
Ⅳ. Results and Discussion 80
4.1. COP 이론 산출 및 FE 해석결과 비교 80
4.2. FE Analysis and Strain Test 결과 비교 82
4.2.1. Inner Pad 결과 비교 82
4.2.2. Outer Pad 결과 비교 84
4.2.3. FE Analysis와 Test Results 오차율 분석 86
4.2.4. FE Analysis와 Test Results 상관 분석 88
4.2.5. FE Analysis와 마모 시험결과 비교 94
Ⅴ. 결론 95
Ⅶ. 참고문헌 97
Nomenclature 101
Abstract 102
Figure 1. Conceptual Model of brake squeal noise. by Ref. [24] 15
Figure 2. FE results showing the distribution of the surface temperatures (C) and the hot-spot development at the outboard disc surface by Ref. [20] 16
Figure 3. Free body diagram of brake pad assuming coplanar frictional forces and differing abutment by Ref. [29] 18
Figure 4. Load Distribution in Pad by Ref. [33] 19
Figure 5. Dynamic contact pressure distribution of test/ improved CAE model by Ref. [7] 19
Figure 6. Pressure sensitive film and Pad assembly with film laminate sandwiched within pad Ref. [12] 20
Figure 7. Strain measured by the FBG sensors and the PSP under static loading by Ref. [10] 21
Figure 8. Contact pressure distributions of smooth and flat pads by Ref. [8] 21
Figure 9. Braking Torque Mechanism of Air Disc Brake 23
Figure 10. Geometry of Brake Pad 24
Figure 11. Non-uniform Pad Pressure by Ref. [1] 27
Figure 12. Dynamic Behavior in Brake Pad 28
Figure 13. 1-Dimensional FBD (Free Body Diagram) of ADB Pad 29
Figure 14. 2-Dimensional FBD (Free Body Diagram) of ADB Pad 30
Figure 15. COP position change at each Clamping Force in Brake Pad 35
Figure 16. Braking Torque Comparison (COP vs Test Results) 37
Figure 17. Ultrasonic velocity measurements of Pad 38
Figure 18. Elastic constants of a transversely isotropic material 42
Figure 19. FE Model of ADB (Air Disc Brake) 46
Figure 20. Convergence of FE analysis results for each mesh condition 50
Figure 21. Contact Condition of each Components 53
Figure 22. Boundary Condition of Static State 54
Figure 23. Boundary Condition of Dynamic State 55
Figure 24. Test Point of Pad Surface Pressure 57
Figure 25. Static Surface Normal Stress of Inner Pad 58
Figure 26. Dynamic Surface Normal Stress of Inner Pad 59
Figure 27. Static Surface Normal Stress of Outer Pad 61
Figure 28. Dynamic Surface Normal Stress of Outer Pad 62
Figure 29. Air Disc Brake Mechanism 64
Figure 30. Specification of Air Disc Brake 65
Figure 31. Test Points of Pad Surface Pressure 66
Figure 32. Brake Pad with Strain gage attached at 8 points 66
Figure 33. State Diagram with Rosette Strain gauge Attachment 69
Figure 34. Test Bed for Brake Surface Pressure 71
Figure 35. Measurement and Analysis Program based on LabVIEW 73
Figure 36. Measurement Part about Strain gauge 74
Figure 37. Signal Processing by LPF 75
Figure 38. Calculation Part of Strain-Stress relation Matrix 75
Figure 39. Display Part of Strain Test for monitoring 76
Figure 40. Static Surface Normal Stress of Inner Pad 77
Figure 41. Dynamic Surface Normal Stress of Inner Pad 78
Figure 42. Static Surface Normal Stress of Outer Pad 79
Figure 43. Dynamic Surface Normal Stress of Outer Pad 79
Figure 44. COP of Theoretical Results and FE Analysis 81
Figure 45. Comparison of FE analysis and Test results (Static) 83
Figure 46. Comparison of FE analysis and Test results (Dynamic) 84
Figure 47. Comparison of FE analysis and Test results (Static) 85
Figure 48. Comparison of FE analysis and Test results (Dynamic) 85
Figure 49. Error Rate of Inner Pad 86
Figure 50. Error Rate of Outer Pad 87
Figure 51. Deformation of ADB 87
Figure 52. Static Correlation Analysis of Inner Pad 89
Figure 53. Dynamic Correlation Analysis of Inner Pad 91
Figure 54. Static Correlation Analysis of Outer Pad 92
Figure 55. Dynamic Correlation Analysis of Outer Pad 93
Figure 56. Comparison of Dynamo wear test and FE analysis results 94
The physical function of the Disc Brake of vehicle is to convert the rotational kinetic energy of the Disc Rotor into thermal energy due to friction. The key function of this device can be said to be stable friction behavior in contact area where friction occurs. Stable friction behavior can be achieved by a constant friction coefficient and uniform surface pressure distribution in the contact area of the Pad and Disc Rotor, which can secure excellent braking power, suppress braking heat, and ensure good NVH quality.
To analyze and explain this phenomenon, a number of papers and academic studies have been conducted on the distribution of brake surface pressure. Accordingly, this paper established a further improved two-dimensional center of pressure (COP) theory and FE analysis model, and presented a new test method to verify the surface pressure distribution of Pad in a static contrast dynamic braking state.
As a result, 1) COP two-dimensional theoretical formula was derived and correlation with FE analysis results was secured. 2) A test method was proposed that can measure the distribution of surface pressure in a dynamic state in which Disc Rotor friction-rotates with Pad, and the reliability of the results was confirmed. 3) An FE analysis model was developed to confirm the distribution of Pad surface pressure in a dynamic state, and its reliability was confirmed and verified with the results of the dynamic Strain test. 4) The elastic characteristics of the friction material, a representative anisotropic material, were derived through ultrasonic dynamic characteristic tests, and its physical characteristics were described to become the accurate basis of the analysis and test model.
The core of the Foundation Brake design is to optimize the Brake structure so that the surface pressure distribution is constant. In order to achieve these high-quality design goals, Brake Geometry's decision considering the COP presented in this study is an important factor.
Furthermore, a methodology that can analyze the surface pressure distribution in the Pad Surface and supplement the surface pressure to be distributed evenly was developed through this paper. In addition, a new idea was derived to confirm the distribution of face pressure in dynamic states by overcoming the limitations that previously remained in static surface pressure measurement, and its reliability was verified through theoretical formulas, FE Analysis, and newly designed Strain Tests.
Based on the reliable Disc Brake analysis model presented, it is expected that it will be able to develop into a more accurate analysis model of heat generation, wear, and NVH.*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.