본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

목차보기

Title Page 2

ABSTRACT 5

Contents 9

TECHNICAL TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 24

Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION 26

1.1. Surface and its important applications 26

1.2. Modelling and simulation of surface 28

1.3. Challenging for modelling surface and interface 31

Chapter 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 35

2.1. MLFF for searching stable surface 35

2.2. MLFF accelerating catalyst surface exploration 36

2.3. MLFF for surface reconstruction 38

2.4. MLFF for complex kinetic process on surface/interface 41

Chapter 3. METHODOLOGIES 45

3.1. Introduction 45

3.2. First principle calculation 46

3.2.1. Born-Oppenheimer approximation 47

3.2.2. Hartree-Fock method 47

3.2.3. Density functional theory 49

3.2.4. Exchange-correlation functional and dispersion correction 51

3.2.5. Ab initio molecular dynamics 52

3.2.6. VASP package 53

3.3. Molecular dynamics 53

3.3.1. Newtonian mechanics 54

3.3.2. Molecular dynamics workflow 54

3.3.3. Verlet algorithm 56

3.3.4. Statistical ensemble 56

3.3.5. Periodic boundary conditions 57

3.3.6. Cutoff 58

3.3.7. LAMMPS package 58

3.4. Empirical potential 59

3.4.1. Two-body potential 59

3.4.2. Many-body potential 60

3.4.3. Molecular force field 61

3.5. Machine learning force field 61

3.5.1. Kemal-based Method 62

3.5.2. Artificial neural network 62

3.5.3. Example of MLFF model 63

3.5.4. Data collection and preparation 64

Chapter 4. COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF CLASSICAL FORCE FIELD FOR CARBON MATERIALS 67

4.1. Introduction 67

4.2. Lattice constant for crystalline phase carbon 70

4.3. Cohesive energy and formation energy 71

4.4. Structure and formation energy of graphene defect 72

4.4.1. Single vacancy defect in graphene lattice 73

4.4.2. Double vacancy defect in graphene lattice 75

4.4.3. Stone-Wales defect in graphene lattice 77

4.4.4. Ad atoms defect in graphene lattice 78

4.5. Graphene edge energy 81

4.6. Interlayer interaction in bilayer graphene 82

4.7. Thermal stability of C₆₀ 86

4.8. Mechanical properties of graphene and CNT 88

4.8.1. Single crystalline graphene uniaxial tensile test 90

4.8.2. Carbon nanotube uniaxial tensile test 93

4.9. Conclusion 96

Chapter 5. HIGHT-TEMPERATURE HIGH-PRESSURE DIAMOND GROWTH MECHANISM 99

5.1. Introduction 99

5.2. Preparing the training set 105

5.2.1. Initial training set 105

5.2.2. Training set expropriation 106

5.3. Diamond growth in iron carbides 109

5.3.1. Diamond nucleation in iron carbides 109

5.3.2. Morphology of the HTHP diamond 111

5.4. Growth kinetics of diamond surfaces 114

5.4.1. MD setting for diamond surfaces growth 114

5.4.2. Growth kinetics of (100) surface 115

5.4.3. Growth kinetics of (110) surface 117

5.4.4. Growth kinetics of (111) surface 119

5.5. 2D nucleation on (111) surface 121

5.6. Conclusion 127

Chapter 6. THE RECONSTRUCTION OF PT(004) SURFACE AND THE VICINAL PT(001) SURFACES 129

6.1. Introduction 129

6.2. Training set preparation 134

6.3. NNP training and validation 135

6.4. Driving force of the quasi-hexagonal reconstruction 140

6.5. Pristine Pt(001) to Pt(001) quasi-hexagonal reconstruction 145

6.6. Surface deposition and step induced reconstruction 148

6.7. The reconstruction of vicinal Pt(001) high-index surfaces 152

6.8. Conclusion 154

Chapter 7. CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVE 156

REFERENCES 159

List of Tables 22

Table 1.1. The energy and force error for molecules in MD-17 data set, predicted by various MLFF... 33

Table 4.1. The lattice constant of the crystalline carbon predicted by the empirical bond order potential,... 71

Table 4.2. Defect formation energy and geometry information of SV in graphene, predicted by empirical... 75

Table 4.3. The formation energy and atomic structure of DV, predicted by DFT and potentials 76

Table 4.4. Defect formation energy and geometry information of SW defect in graphene, predicted by... 78

Table 4.5. Formation energy and atomic distances around the single ad-atom defect, represent top site 79

Table 4.6. The structure information (atomic distances and angle) around the add dimmer defect and the... 81

Table 4.7. The edge energies of graphene and CNTs predicted by CBOPs, GAP-20, and DFT 82

Table 4.8. The theoretical strength of the single crystalline, bi-crystalline, and polycrystalline... 89

Table 4.9. The mechanical properties of graphene along armchair (AC) and zigzag (ZZ) direction,... 93

Table 4.10. The mechanical properties of CNT (5,5) and CNT (10,0), including graphene failure strain,... 96

Table 5.1. NEP training parameters in nep.in (the input file for NEP training.) 108

Table 5.2. The edge energy of ZiaZag edge and Armchair edge of (111) surface 123

Table 5.3. The edge energy of different edge direction in (100) and (110) surface 125

Table 6.1. The mechanical properties of FCC Pt crystal calculated using different method. All results... 138

Table 6.2. The formation energies of some pristine Pt surfaces calculated by DFT, NNP and MEAM,... 140

Table 6.3. The surface stress of pristine Pt(001), (5×1), (5×N), (6×N), (7×N) surface alone the [110] and... 142

List of Figures 12

Figure 1.1. (a) The single crystal CVD epitaxial growth graphene on the A3 size Cu(111) surface. (b)... 26

Figure 1.2. (a) Controlling the orientation of CVD graphene by crystallographic orientation of Cu... 27

Figure 1.3. (a) The Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm applied in global surface structure... 29

Figure 1.4. (a) Growing defect-free graphene on twin-grain boundary catalyst surface shows a lower... 30

Figure 1.5. (a) The carbon nanotube-metal catalyst interface and carbon diffusion path revealed by DFT-... 31

Figure 1.6. (a) Machine learning methods provide an effective combination of the accuracy of ab initio... 33

Figure 2.1. (a) The stages of strategy for developing a MLFF from small structure to large scale unit... 35

Figure 2.2. (a) The workflow of the Automated Search for Optimal Surface Phase (SOAP) includes... 37

Figure 2.3. (a) The high-precision Au MLFF exhibits root mean square errors (RMSE) of only 0.85... 39

Figure 2.4. (a-b) The STM image and atomic structure of Si(100) dimmer reconstruction and Si(111)... 40

Figure 2.5. Using MLFF-enhanced molecular dynamics simulations, the quenching process of the... 41

Figure 2.6. (a) The free energy as a function of structural factor of Si under different temperatures. (b)... 42

Figure 2.7. (a) The phase diagram of Ga predicted by MLFF and experiments. (b)The nucleation size... 43

Figure 2.8. (a) The snapshot the defect-free (6,5) carbon nanotube growth on Fe₅₅ catalyst. (b) The... 44

Figure 3.1. Multi scale simulation methods for modelling battery system as the example, different scale... 45

Figure 3.2. The workflow of a MD simulation. The main steps are constructing a simulation model,... 55

Figure 3.3. The schematic diagram of the periodic boundary conditions in two-dimensional simulation... 57

Figure 3.4. The schematic diagram of the cutoff. The interaction are calculated when the particle... 58

Figure 3.5. The total, repulsive, and attractive energy of LJ 12-6 potential as a function of distance 60

Figure 3.6. In A, the red and blue points theoretically cannot be distinguished using a linear method.... 62

Figure 3.7. Schematic diagram of the multilayer nueral network structure. The first and last layer... 63

Figure 3.8. The energy as a function of ethanol OH bond distance, predicted by different MLFF, and... 65

Figure 3.9. The workflow for two sampling methods, (a) adaptive sampling and (b) metadynamics... 66

Figure 4.1. The sketch map of training set used in the GAP-20, including the crystalline carbon... 69

Figure 4.2. The atomic structures of some specific crystalline carbon materials, inculding graphite,... 70

Figure 4.3. (a) The cohesive energy predicted by potentials and DFT. (b) The formation energy of carbon... 72

Figure 4.4. (a) The single vacancy in graphene observed via TEM and STM experiment。 (b) The... 74

Figure 4.5. (a) The atomic structure of double vacancy in experiment. (b) The atomic structures of... 76

Figure 4.6. (a) The atomic structure of SW defect in experiment. (b) The atomic structures of the... 77

Figure 4.7. (a-c) The atomistic structure of the adatom defect in graphene, the red ball represents the... 80

Figure 4.8. (a) The vdW interaction in bi-layer graphene system against the interlayer spacing with AA... 83

Figure 4.9. (a-c) The 2D potential energy surface for bilayer graphene sliding at fixed 3.4 Å interlayer... 84

Figure 4.10. (a-b) The 2D PES predicted by ReaxFFC₂₀₁₃ and LCBOP, shows a similar PES shape, but... 85

Figure 4.11. (a) The potential energy per atom of the C₆₀ as a function of MD simulation temperature.... 86

Figure 4.12. The atomic configurations of C₆₀ at 10 ps for varying temperatures are depicted using DFT,... 87

Figure 4.13. (a-b) The nano indentation experiment measure the mechanical properties of single... 89

Figure 4.14. (a) The diagram of uniaxial tensile test applying along the armchair direction. (b-c) The... 91

Figure 4.15. (a) The diagram of uniaxial tensile test applying along the zigzag direction. (b-c) The stress-... 92

Figure 4.16. (a) The diagram of uniaxial tensile test applying on CNT (5,5). (b-c) The stress-strain and... 94

Figure 4.17. (a) The diagram of uniaxial tensile test applying on CNT (10,0). (b-c) The stress-strain and... 95

Figure 4.18. Accuracy of CBOPs and GAP-20 in various test including cohesive energy, graphene defect,... 97

Figure 4.19. The overall accuracy of the CBOPs and GAP-20, indicating that MLFF, GAP-20 performs... 98

Figure 5.1. (a) Schematic diagrams of carbon crystal structures from 0D to 3D, including fullerenes (0D,... 100

Figure 5.2. (a) Phase diagram of graphite and diamond, as well as the temperature and pressure ranges... 101

Figure 5.3. (a) BARS is a device that creates the necessary high pressures and temperatures for preparing... 102

Figure 5.4. (a) Concerted transformation of graphite to diamond. Pathways for rhombohedral graphite... 103

Figure 5.5. (a-b) Microstructural topological features of six different types of amorphous carbon... 104

Figure 5.6. The workflow of the training set exploration. The workflow includes three main steps,... 106

Figure 5.7. The sketch map of the training and test set. The colour represents the energy per atom of the... 107

Figure 5.8. The global loss function, L1, L2 regularization loss functions, and energy, force, and viral... 108

Figure 5.9. The regression plots the energy per atom and atomic force based on the test set. The RMSEs... 109

Figure 5.10. (a) Schematic diagram of diamond nucleus of different sizes in iron carbides. (b) The... 110

Figure 5.11. (a) The G* and Ncr against the ∆μ. The inset shows the nucleation free energy profile of... 111

Figure 5.12. (a) Schematic diagram of the diamond nucleus in theiron carbides. The bule atoms... 112

Figure 5.13. The atomic structure of the diamond particle in iron carbon when 1000 C (a), 2000 C (b),... 113

Figure 5.14. Illustrating the morphological evolution of the diamond particle. An image capturing the... 114

Figure 5.15. The atomistic structure of the Diamond surface/iron carbides system, the entire simulations... 115

Figure 5.16. (a) The evolution of CC@carbide, cumulative carbon atom introductions into the diamond...[이미지참조] 116

Figure 5.17. The top-view of the diamond (100) surface, the black and red atoms represent the first and... 116

Figure 5.18. The composition of the buffer layer on diamond (100) surface and its specific atomistic... 117

Figure 5.19. (a) The evolution of CC@carbide, cumulative carbon atom introductions into the diamond...[이미지참조] 118

Figure 5.20. The composition of the buffer layer on diamond (110) surface and its specific atomistic... 119

Figure 5.21. (a) The evolution of CC@carbide, cumulative carbon atom introductions into the diamond...[이미지참조] 120

Figure 5.22. The composition of the buffer layer on diamond (111) surface and its specific atomistic... 121

Figure 5.23. The atomistic structure of the buffer layer on (a) complete diamond (111) surface and (b)... 121

Figure 5.24. The 2D nucleation process observed on (111) surface. The white atoms represent the... 122

Figure 5.25. The atomic structure of the edge free model, ZigZag edge, and Armchair edge for diamond... 123

Figure 5.26. The nucleation free energy profile, as a function of N, is depicted with ∆μ set to -0.1 eV.... 124

Figure 5.27. The G* (red lines) and Ncr (purple lines) as a function of ∆μ. The γₐᵥₑ are used in this...[이미지참조] 125

Figure 5.28. The nucleation free energy against the number of diamonds. The bule and orange line... 126

Figure 5.29. (a) The nucleation free energy of the (100) and (111) surface, (b-c) The G* and Ncr as a...[이미지참조] 127

Figure 6.1. (a) The natural Pt metal. (b) FCC crystal structure of Pt. (c-d) The Pt catalyst in car catalytic... 129

Figure 6.2. (a) The activities of ammonia synthesis over different Fe crystal surface. (b) Prediction of... 131

Figure 6.3. STM image of various 5d metal surface reconstruction. (a-b) Au(111) herringbone... 132

Figure 6.4. (a) STM image of hexagonal reconstruction Pt(001) surface, two reconstruction unit cell are... 133

Figure 6.5. (a) The surface energies change as the function of the relative packing density of hexagonal... 133

Figure 6.6. The sketch map of the training set, and atomic structure represent the key structures of the... 135

Figure 6.7. The regression plot of the energy per atom and atomic force predicted by PtNNP (red and...[이미지참조] 136

Figure 6.8. The phonon dispersion (a) and equation of states (b) of Pt FCC crystal, the red square and... 137

Figure 6.9. The melting point calculated by NNP (top panel) and on the fly MD (bottom panel), The... 139

Figure 6.10. The surface energies (a) and surface stress (b) of the Pt(001), (111) and (M×N)... 141

Figure 6.11. The reconstruction patterns of the (5×1) and (5×20) surfaces, while colours represent the... 143

Figure 6.12. (a) The four-layer slab atomic model used to calculate the distance between Pt atoms, the... 144

Figure 6.13. (a) The function relationship of the coordination numbers (2D in-plane coordination) of... 145

Figure 6.14. The top view of the reconstructed surface shows that the quasi-hexagonal top layer... 147

Figure 6.15. Holes of different geometries on a reconstructed (5×20) lattice (a) starting configuration... 148

Figure 6.16. (a-e) Snapshots of Pt atoms introduced into the surface during the MD simulation, the... 149

Figure 6.17. (a) The minimum energy path for incorporating 4 atoms into the square surface obtained... 150

Figure 6.18. (a) Schematic diagram of step peeling off from terrace, triggering introducing surface... 151

Figure 6.19. (a-c) orange and yellow atoms represent the terrace and surface atoms, respectively. And... 152

Figure 6.20. (a-b) The structure of Pt(017) and Pt(117) surface. Orange and yellow atoms represent the... 153

Figure 6.21. The atomic structures of vicinal Pt(001) surface, Pt(017) (left, a) and Pt(117) (right, b)... 154

초록보기

 Wolfgang Pauli once stated that 'God created the bulk, the surface was invented by the devil'. This quotation emphasizes the complexity and difficulty of studying material surfaces. For over a century, researchers have been fascinated by the properties of surface structures. Atoms on the surfaces and interfaces of materials experience a markedly different environment than bulk atoms. Surface atoms are bound to the bulk atom on one side and exposed or in contact with other substances on the other. Due to the sudden termination of the lattice at the surface, the outermost atoms at the surface form dangling bonds and the high surface energy. In order to eliminate dangling bonds and to reduce surface energy, there is reconstruction or surface passivation. Reconstruction and surface passivation affect many properties of materials such as catalysis, electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, mechanics, etc., as well as kinetic processes occurring at the surface interface, such as growth, fracture, catalytic processes, etc. This is why it is important to understand the precise atomic structure of the surface interface of a material. Several experimental methods are available to characterize the surface structure, such as LEED, STM, TEM, and AFM. However, characterizing the surface structure under real conditions remains challenging. The dynamic evolution of surface and interfacial structures during catalysis requires in situ characterization to fully comprehend the atomic-scale synthesis and catalytic mechanism of the material.

In addition to experimental characterization, theoretical modelling allows us to understand the effect of surfaces on the thermodynamic and kinetic behaviour of materials at the atomic scale. There are two commonly used simulation methods: density-functional theory (DFT) and molecular dynamics simulation (MD). DFT is very accurate but computationally complex, making it difficult to apply to systems with more than 1,000 atoms. MD is known for its excellent computational efficiency and can simulate the dynamics of hundreds of millions of atoms on nanosecond time scales. However, MD simplifies the interatomic interactions, resulting in less accurate simulations. As a result, traditional modelling methods are still difficult to accurately simulate large-scale surface systems.

With the rapid development of machine learning (ML) methods, the machine learning force field (MLFF) has been introduced in theoretical modelling. Due to their powerful fitting capabilities, MLFFs can learn the interatomic interactions from ab initio calculations for application in MD simulations with high accuracy. Moreover, the computational complexity of MLFF is (O(N)), and hundreds of millions of atoms can be simulated with high computational efficiency. In this thesis, MLFF is introduced to simulate the growth of diamond under high temperature and high pressure (HTHP) conditions, and the reconstruction of Pt(001) quasi hexagonal surface.

In Chapter 1, we provide an overview of the traditional theoretical modelling approaches to studying surface structure and properties, as well as the limitations inherent in these approaches. Additionally, we have outlined the advantages of MLFF. Chapter 2 introduces the application of MLFF to surface and interface studies, illustrating the advantages of MLFF in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. Chapter 3 introduces the methods used in this thesis, including DFT, MD and MLFF.

Chapter 4 provides a comprehensive comparison of commonly used force fields (empirical and MLFF fields) for carbon materials (graphene, graphite, diamond, carbon nanotube, and C₆₀). The results demonstrate that the MLFF well described the lattice constants, defect properties, and thermal stability of carbon materials. Additionally, the MLFF can simulate the fracture process and interface for graphene and carbon nanotubes, which is not possible with the empirical force field, unless modify the cutoff. However, the MLFF has limitations in describing the weak interactions such as van der Waals, which require further attention.

In Chapter 5, a Fe-C binary MLFF with ab initio accuracy was constructed to investigate the growth mechanism of HTHP diamond. Initially, MD simulations were conducted to analyse the diamond nucleation free energy, in conjunction with classical nucleation theory. This revealed a high nucleation barrier that impedes diamond nucleation. Subsequently, MD simulations were performed to grow a cuboctahedra diamond particle, and its morphology aligned well with the experimental observations. In order to gain insight into the morphological differences between HTHP diamond and natural diamond, the growth kinetics of several low-index diamond surfaces were examined. The findings indicate that the (111) surface exhibits a nucleation process, while the (100) and (110) surfaces undergo multilayer simultaneous growth processes.

Chapter 6 introduces the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of Pt(001) quasi-hexagonal surface reconstruction, using the adaptive learning MLFFs. The findings indicate that the surface energy, coordination number, and surface stress work together to drive the quasi-hexagonal reconstruction of Pt(001) rather than merely surface stress relaxation alone. Furthermore, large-scale molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated that the surface reconstruction of pristine Pt(001) leads to the formation of vacant surface area on the surface. The exposed subsurface is reconstructed as a hexagonal lattice, while the structure underneath the covered surface remains a square lattice, consistent with previous experimental research. Moreover, the deposition of Pt atoms and the formation of steps-induced surface reconstruction were studied. It has been demonstrated that surface reconstruction can occur in the presence of steps at 500 K. Furthermore, the post-annealing morphology of the vicinal Pt(001) surface was investigated, where the surface loses its sharp steps and becomes a shell-like structure.

In Chapter 7, we summarize the findings of this dissertation and discuss the potential applications of MLFF to complex systems. We believe that MLFF will help scientists elucidate the mysteries of complex surfaces and advance materials synthesis, catalyst design, and other key areas. This study shows that the long-term goal of fully understanding the atomic structure of material surfaces and interfaces is now within reach.