본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

고급검색

인명/단체명

저자정보 상세정보
인명/단체명을 입력하세요.

키워드

  • 대표어

  • 외국어

-

목차보기

Title Page 2

Contents 5

Abstract 10

Chapter 1. Introduction 12

1.1. Trend of Seafood Industries in Busan 12

1.2. Economic Contribution of Seafood Industries in Busan 16

1.3. Literature Reviews 20

Chapter 2. Methods 22

2.1. Busan SAM model 22

2.2. Hypothetical Extraction Method (HEM) 25

Chapter 3. Data 28

3.1. Multi-regional Input-output (MRIO) and Non-industry Values 28

3.2. Seafood Industries Separation 30

Chapter 4. Results 32

4.1. Regional Technical Coefficient of Seafood Industries in Busan 32

4.2. Import Coefficient of Seafood Industries in Busan 34

4.3. Total Economic Contributions of Seafood Industries in Busan 37

4.4. Comparison of SAM model to IO model 42

Chapter 5. Discussion 45

Chapter 6. Conclusion 51

References 54

Appendices 9

Appendix. A. Structure of Busan SAM (including values in million KRW) 63

Appendix. B. List of the final industry classification for Busan SAM 64

Appendix. C. List of industry and non-industry values data used for constructing Busan SAM model 65

Appendix. D. List of the seafood industry subsectors and the corresponding data source for disaggregation 66

List of Tables 8

Table 1. Industry classification for Busan SAM (BOK 33-sector and seafood-related 13-... 31

Table 2. The top ten backward-linked sectors by the size of the technical coefficients (TC)... 33

Table 3. The top ten backward-linked sectors by the size of the import coefficients (IC) of... 35

Table 4. Total economic contributions of seafood industries in Busan (million KRW except... 38

Table 5. Total contributions of seafood industries to industry output (Top 15 sectors) 40

Table 6. Total contributions to employment and value-added (labor and capital factor... 41

Table 7. Total contributions to output from SAM and IO models 43

List of Figures 7

Figure 1. Fish production from wild capture fishery and aquaculture in Busan from 1970... 14

Figure 2. The share of the seafood industries in total regional output and employment in... 15

초록보기

 Seafood industries of Busan in South Korea have currently suffered a notable decline in both regional output and value-added unlike the production growth in the past. In this situation, this study tries to evaluate the economic contribution of Busan's seafood industries using the hypothetical extraction method (HEM), a well-established technique that has rarely been applied in fisheries contexts. Also, this study is the first attempt to utilize the theoretically rigorous HEM to quantify the economic contribution of seafood industries within the SAM framework, addressing the limitation of IO models that do not consider distributional effects. The results showed, among others, that Wholesale Trade and Transportation Services are key industries for fishery managers and policymakers to target, as fostering their growth could significantly enhance the economic contribution of the seafood industries due to their high direct and total linkages. Interestingly, this study also discovered that several unexpected industries, such as Real Estate & Leasing and Health & Social Services, play a critical role in boosting the economic contribution of the seafood industries when the seafood industries are hypothetically extracted, since the considerable income allocated to household and regional government from industry activities are distributed to those sectors again.

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차

권호

기사명 원문보기 기사목차
닫기