본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

목차보기

목차

충격가치를 너머선 내면의 소통 : 곰리(Antony Gormley)와 화이트리드(Rachel Whiteread) / 전영백 1

I. 글을 열며 1

II. 침묵과 부재의 표상 3

공간의 주물 뜨기: 주물로 구체화되는 부재와 공간 5

III. 관객과의 충격적 소통 7

1. 인체와 공간의 파격적 관계 7

2. 조각 면과 신체의 흔적: '사진 같은 조각' 15

IV. 공공영역과 관람자 참여: 복수성과 '집단적 신체' 19

공간적 충격: 도시 공간으로의 개입 19

공동체의 몸: '집단적 신체(collective body)' 20

공간 오브제의 복수성 21

V. 맺으며 24

참고문헌 25

Abstract 27

초록보기

Although shock might be effect of avant-gardist’s works constituting art history, the ‘shock value’ is the new concept put forward to by ‘yBa’ in the 1990s mainly for the exhibition “Sensation” at RA in London in 1997. ‘Sensationalism’ in Gombrich’s term by which he criticizes the current artworks, especially referring to some of yBa, he turns to Antony Gormley’s work as significant and valuable for today’s art.

Gormley’s work pursues to materialize the space within the body, to be more precise, endowing volume to the sensation of that inner space of the body. He is said to be the first to use his own body from which he casts. In the process of casting, he experiences temporary ‘death’ by wrapping his own body and get it cast in plaster mould in the claustrophobic situation.

Difficult to communicate as it seem to be, it is to do with meditation which has been quite crucial to his work on the whole. The meditational method, called ‘vipassana,’ is the name given to the Buddhist meditation practice in which the artist was trained for two years in India. Such spiritual training on the making of his sculpture is influenced on his development of awareness of the body. In the process of his work, he told that he experiences temporal death.

Death can also be said to his particular concern of death mask, of which insight strongly influenced on his casting process. In his work, one can count on feeling the presence of being through the skin. In fact, his whole project is to make the work from the inside, for which he attempts to use of his own body. So his work traces and marks of his body is equated to photography. In Gormley’s words, it is a “three-dimensional photograph.”

Casting process is also important to Rachel Whiteread’s work which is well described as solidifying space or embodying nothingness. Her casts in plaster, rubber and resin have a strong material presence. Postminimal sculpture as it is categorized, Whiteread’s work emphasizes materiality and gravity coming from minimal forms. And what she concentrates on is the surfaces of casts. It is because she thinks of casting in terms of removing a surface from one thing and putting it on to another, or taking an image. She has compared the process to the making of a death mask. So her work has quite similar to Gormley’s in its fundamental concern and process.

‘Photographic sculpture’ is also descriptive of Whiteread’s work. It shows almost scientific interest in the trace left by a body and obsession with the specifics of place and community. That makes her sculpture similar to photography in its fundamental structure. ‘Indexicality,’ as is characteristic of the medium of photography, is what is common between Whiteread’s cast work and photography. Photography, like casting, combines that which is present with which is other, that is the residue of original which advances and retreats in the mind of viewer.

In Whiteread’s work, the surface of the sculpture is the point of contact between cast and original. The mass of plaster, as we see in her and , taken out of its real matrix, reconstructs in negative, all the elements of the interior surface of the domestic spaces. It is , a cast of Victorian terraced house situated in a typical East End neighbourhood that Whiteread’s work brought social debate on the meaning of an artwork in the community into a flame.

Both Whiteread and Gormley show fundamental reversion of conventional ways of both making and perceiving. In Gormley’s case, it is, above all, intimacy and privacy that his ‘body case’ reveals in contrast to monumentality a sculpture generally pursues in conventional terms. It is why so much of his work attempts to lay the verticality of the body down, thereby he tries to reverse and denigrate the sense of dominance and male confrontationality signified in verticality. Horizontality conjured up by his work implies vulnerability in contrast to a heroic stance of traditional sculpture. Here can one sense Gormley’s intention to abandon the institutional privilege of mainstream Western art history and open it up.

So it seems Whiteread’s work since it endows volume and form to what has been disregarded and denigrated. Or mainly empty space itself, that is nothingness and the invisible. The casting process of taking inside out is what makes her work both conceptual and integral. In this paper, I focused on conceptual shock, different to sensational shock, put forward by their cast works in terms of communicating intimacy and isolation. It was discussed especially by looking at Gormley’s recent exhibition (2007) and Whiteread’s (1993). In those works, people’s perception is something that they take into account for their own contents.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
그리스 조각에 재현된 외국인 :고전기와 헬레니즘시대(서기전 480년-31년)의 스키타이인, 페르시아인, 갈라티아인 도상 연구 김혜진 pp.9-33

보기
1920년대 『새터데이 이브닝 포스트』 표지 연구 :대중적인 시각이미지에 구현된 아메리카니즘 김일기 pp.35-54

보기
샌프란시스코의 록 포스터(Rock Posters, 1965-1971)에 표현된 '사이키델릭(Psychedelic)' 특징 연구 서금옥 pp.55-74

보기
13세기 프랑스 북부의 <성모와 아기 예수> 조각상 :설치 공간과 표현성의 문제 장록희 pp.75-98

보기
참회의 막달라 마리아 :중세 말 이탈리아의 막달레나 이미지와 신앙 이은기 pp.99-129

보기
에밀 놀데의 <그리스도의 생애> 연구 김경미 pp.131-159

보기
방문객의 시선 :로마 저택의 실제와 허상 조은정 pp.163-190

보기
가리키는 손, 가르치는 손 :'지시하는 손짓'과 관람자 전한호 pp.191-213

보기
1860-1870년대 프랑스 회화와 관람자 마순영 pp.215-239

보기
관람자에서 소비자로 :1923년 바우하우스 전시 이후 관람자의 역할 변화 진휘연 pp.241-264

보기
충격가치를 너머선 내면의 소통 :곰리(Antony Gormley)와 화이트리드(Rachel Whiteread) 전영백 pp.265-293

보기

참고문헌 (32건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 The Present Body, the Absent Body, and the Formless 네이버 미소장
2 Bradley, Fiona, “Introduction” in Rachel Whiteread: Shedding Life, New York: Themes and Hudson, 1996. 미소장
3 Button, Virginia, The Turner Prize, London: Tate Publishing, 2007. 미소장
4 Causey, Andrew, Sculpture Since 1945, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1998. 미소장
5 Cole, Ina, “The Relationship between Thought & Matter: A Conversation with Antony Gormley,” Sculpture (April 2003), pp. 43-49. 미소장
6 Corrin, Lisa G., Elliott, Patrick and Schlieker, Andrea, Rachel Whiteread, London: Serpentine Gallery, 2001. 미소장
7 Cousins, Mark, “Rachel Whiteread: Inside Outcast,” Tate: The Art Magazine 10 (Winter 1996), pp. 36-41. 미소장
8 The Present Body, the Absent Body, and the Formless 네이버 미소장
9 Deborah, Solomon, “Space Invader,” New York Times Magazine, New York: New York Times (Spring 2006), pp. 132-133. 미소장
10 Dibosa, David, “Witness This: Art, Memory, Democracy,” Parachute 111 (Je/Jl/Ag. 2003), pp. 89-99. 미소장
11 Exh. Cat. British Pavilion at the XLVII Venice Biennale, 15 June-9 (Nov. 1997). 미소장
12 Farley, Paul, “A World Turned Inside Out,” Art Review (2005), pp. 9-11. 미소장
13 Disembodied Spirits: Spirit Photography and Rachel Whiteread's "Ghost" 네이버 미소장
14 Hopkins, David, After Modern Art 1945-2000, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2000. 미소장
15 Hutchinson, John et al., Antony Gormley, London: Phaidon, 2000. 미소장
16 In the Blind Field: Hopper and the Uncanny 네이버 미소장
17 Jensen, Wilhelm, Gradiva: A Pompeiian Fancy, 190; Charlotte Mullins, Rachel Whiteread, London: Tate Publishing, 2004. 미소장
18 Krauss, Rosalind, “X Marks the Spot,” in Rachel Whiteread: Shedding Life, ed. Fiona Bradley, New York: Themes and Hudson, 1996. 미소장
19 Krauss, Rosalind, “Richard Serra Sculpture” in ed. Laura Rosenstock, Richard Serra, New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1986. 미소장
20 Lee, Pamela M., “As the Weather” in ed. Chris Townsend in The Art of Rachel Whiteread, London: Thames and Hudson, 2004. 미소장
21 Lingwood, James(ed.), Rachel Whiteread House, London: Phaidon, 1995. 미소장
22 Mack, Michael(ed.), Antony Gormley, Göttingen: Steidlmack, 2007. 미소장
23 Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Phenomenology of Perception (Paris, 1945), trans. Colin Smith, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962. 미소장
24 Mullins, Charlotte, Rachel Whiteread, London: Tate Publishing, 2004. 미소장
25 Rachel Whiteread in Conversation with Iwona Blazwick, in Rachel Whiteread, Eindhoven: Van Abbemuseum, 1992-3. 미소장
26 Rappolt, M., “Antony Gormley: Blind Light,” Art review, no.14 (Sep. 2007) p. 119. 미소장
27 Silverman, Kaja, The World Spectator, Standford: Standford University Press, 1999. 미소장
28 Stimson, Blake, “The Shimmer of Industrial Form” in ed. Chris Townsend, The Art of Rachel Whiteread, London: Thames and Hudson, 2004. 미소장
29 Mediating Generation: the mother–daughter plot 네이버 미소장
30 Townsend, Chris, “When We Collide: History and Aesthetics, Space and Signs in the Art of Rachel Whiteread,” in ed. Chris Townsend, The Art of Rachel Whiteread, London: Thames and Hudson, 2004. 미소장
31 The Present Body, the Absent Body, and the Formless 네이버 미소장
32 Wakefield, Neville, “Rachel Whiteread: Separation Anxiety and the Art of Release,” Parkett 42 (Dec. 1994), pp. 76-89. 미소장