본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

목차보기

Contents

The hot and cold market impacts on underpricing of certification, reputation and conflicts of interest in venture capital backed Korean IPOs / Lee, Jaeho 1

〈국문초록〉 1

〈Abstract〉 2

I. Introduction 3

II. Literature Review anzd Hypothesis Development 4

2.1. Underpricing : Information Asymmetry Perspective vs. Irrational Behaviour in Hot Market 4

2.2. VC Certification, Reputation and Conflicts of Interest Effects in the Hot and Cold Markets 5

III. Data and Variables 10

3.1. Data Sources 10

3.2. Model Specifications and Variables Measurements 11

IV. Empirical Results 13

4.1. IPO Firms : The Characteristics of VC and Non-VC backed IPOs 13

4.2. Underpricing by VC-backed and non-VC-backed IPOs : Bivariate Analysis 15

4.3. Multivariate Analysis Results 16

V. Conclusion 20

〈References〉 22

초록보기

This article analyses the impact of the participation of venture capital (VC) firms on underpricing in 372 Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) brought to Initial Public Offering (IPO) during the period 1999-2001 in KOSDAQ. This period shows a stark contrast in the stock price movements in a way that hot market is abruptly followed by cold market, thus providing a good testing ground for empirical analysis to compare VC impacts in both markets. In this article, it was hypothesised that VC-backing, the reputation of VCs and the institutional affiliation of VCs would have different impacts on IPO underpricing between hot and cold markets. The empirical findings are that the VC reputation and bank-affiliation of VCs reduced underpricing, but only in the period of cold market. On the contrary, it appears that the conventionally hypothesized relationship between VC effects and less underpricing, based on information asymmetry theories, was not found in the hot market. On the contrary, security-company-affiliation of VCs that were expected to cause conflict of interests led to less underpricing in the hot market. I argue that prospect theory proposed by Loughran and Ritter (2002) could be a better framework to account for this conflicting results found in the hot market. The empirical results for impacts of offer price revision on the underpricing clearly show that highly sought-after stocks experienced greater underpricing in the hot market.

본 논문은 1999년부터 2001년까지 KOSDAQ에 상장된 372개의 중소기업을 대상으로 상장전 벤처캐피탈의 지분참여가 주식의 공모가격평가에 미치는 영향에 대해 분석하였다. 이 논문의 주요 특징은 표본수집기간을 주가상승시장(hot market)과 주가침체시장(cold market)으로 구분하여, 각각의 시장에서 벤처캐피탈의 참여, 벤처캐피탈의 명성 및 벤처캐피탈에 대한 금융기관의 지분참여가 공모가격에 어떻게 상이한 영향을 미치는 지 분석하는 데 있다. 실증분석결과 주가침체시장에서 벤처캐피탈의 명성과 은행의 벤처캐피탈 참여가 공모가격 저평가 현상(즉, 높은 초기수익률)을 개선하는 것으로 나타났으나, 전통적인 정보불균형이론에 의해 수립된 이러한 벤처캐피탈의 공모가격 저평가 현상 개선효과는 주가상승시장에서는 발견되지 않았다. 오히려 이해상충의 문제로 인하여 공모가격 저평가 현상을 심화시킬 것으로 예상되었던 증권회사의 벤처캐피탈 참여는 주가상승시장에서 낮은 초기수익률로 저평가 현상을 완화하는 것으로 나타났다. 공모가격 저평가를 설명하는 주요 이론으로 제시되었던 전통적인 정보불균형이론보다 Loughran and Ritter(2002)에 의해 제시된 주가전망이론이 주가상승시장에서의 공모가격 결정 및 초기수익률 예측에 더 유용한 틀을 제공하는 것으로 보이며, 최초공모가격이 부분조정되어 최종공모가격이 상향된 주식일수록 더 높은 가치평가를 받아 높은 초기수익률을 보이는 것으로 분석되었다.

참고문헌 (47건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 Robust Financial Contracting and the Role of Venture Capitalists 네이버 미소장
2 Fads in the Initial Public Offering Market? 네이버 미소장
3 Signalling by underpricing in the IPO market 네이버 미소장
4 Corporate Governance Update 네이버 미소장
5 The role of venture capital in the creation of public companies: Evidence from the going-public process 네이버 미소장
6 (Working Paper) Korea's 1997 currency crisis 네이버 미소장
7 Beatty, R.(1989), “Auditor Reputation and the Pricing of IPOs,” Accounting Review, Vol.64, pp. 693-709. 미소장
8 How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues 네이버 미소장
9 Berkman, H. and J. B. T. Lee(2002), “The Effectiveness of Price Limits in an Emerging Market: Evidence From the Korean Stock Exchange,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol.10, pp. 517-530. 미소장
10 Partial Adjustment to Public Information and IPO Underpricing 네이버 미소장
11 Bessler, W. and A. Kurth(2003), “The Performance of Venture-Backed IPOs in Germany : Exit Strategies, Lock-Up Periods, and Bank Ownership,” European Financial Management Association 2004 Basel Meeting Paper. 미소장
12 Calomiris, C. W. and C. D. Ramirez(1996), “Financing the American Corporation : the Changing Menu of Financial Relationships,” NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research H0079. 미소장
13 Underwriter Reputation, Initial Returns, and the Long-Run Performance of IPO Stocks 네이버 미소장
14 A Theory of the Going-Public Decision 네이버 미소장
15 Cornelli, F. and O. Yosha(1997), “Stage Financing and the Role of Convertible Debt,” Discussion Paper, Centre For Economic Policy Research 1735. 미소장
16 Edwards, J. and K. Fischer(1994), Banks, Finance and Investment in Germany, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 미소장
17 Conflicts of interest and the performance of venture-capital-backed IPOs: A preliminary look at the UK 네이버 미소장
18 Conflict of Interest in the Issuance of Public Securities: Evidence from Venture Capital* 네이버 미소장
19 Optimal Investment, Monitoring, and the Staging of Venture Capital 네이버 미소장
20 Grandstanding in the venture capital industry 네이버 미소장
21 Signalling and the Pricing of New Issues 네이버 미소장
22 Hamao, Y., F. Packer, and J. R. Ritter(2000), “Institutional Affiliation and the Role of Venture Capital : Evidence From Initial Public offerings in Japan,” Pacific-Basin Financial Journal, Vol. 8, pp. 529-558. 미소장
23 Hellmann, T., L. Lindsey, and M. Puri(2003), “Building Relationships Early : Banks in Venture Capital,” Working Paper, Stanford University 미소장
24 The Interaction between Product Market and Financing Strategy: The Role of Venture Capital 네이버 미소장
25 Initial Public Offerings on the Unlisted Securities Market: The Impact of Professional Advisers 네이버 미소장
26 Does the Presence of Venture Capitalists Improve the Survival Profile of IPO Firms? 네이버 미소장
27 The aftermarket performance of initial public offerings in Korea 네이버 미소장
28 The Korean IPO Market: Initial Returns 네이버 미소장
29 KOSDAQ, Http://www.kosdaq.or.kr. 미소장
30 Korean Stock Exchange, www.kse.or.kr. 미소장
31 Kortum, S. and J. Lerner(1998), “Does Venture Capital Spur Innovation?,” NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research 6846. 미소장
32 The Syndication of Venture Capital Investments 네이버 미소장
33 Li, X. and R. W. Masulis(2003), “Venture Capital Investments by IPO Underwriters : Certification or Conflict of Interest?,” Working Paper, University of Miami and Vanderbilt University. 미소장
34 What Is Special about the Roles of Underwriter Reputation and Market Activities in Initial Public Offerings? 네이버 미소장
35 Why Don't Issuers Get Upset about Leaving Money on the Table in IPOs? 네이버 미소장
36 Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed over Time? 네이버 미소장
37 IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning? 네이버 미소장
38 Venture Capitalist Certification in Initial Public Offerings 네이버 미소장
39 Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy, Http://www.mocie.go.kr. 미소장
40 Analyst Following of Initial Public Offerings 네이버 미소장
41 Ritter(2005), Initial Public Offerings, Working Paper, University of Florida 미소장
42 Why new issues are underpriced 네이버 미소장
43 The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations 네이버 미소장
44 Pseudo Market Timing and the Long‐Run Underperformance of IPOs 네이버 미소장
45 Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures 네이버 미소장
46 Information quality and the valuation of new issues 네이버 미소장
47 Seasoned Offerings, Imitation Costs, and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings 네이버 미소장