권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Objective: Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) offers some of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. However, an additional skin incision is necessary in order to gain these advantages. The author recently performed a modified PPSF through a single skin incision and it yielded good results. Here, we report the single incision percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (SIPPSF).
Methods: The medical records of 51 patients who underwent single segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with pedicle screw fixation (PSF) between December 2009 and December 2011 were reviewed. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the PSF technique used; conventional group (Group C), SIPPSF (Group S) and PPSF through multiple skin incisions (Group M). Operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL) and pain intensity before and after the operation using a numeric rating scale (NRS) were evaluated.
Results: The number of patients in Group S, Group C and Group M was 25, 17 and 9, respectively. The NRS demonstrated a reduction in pain intensity in all the patients, and there were no differences in NRS scoring between the three groups. Group S showed a reduction in the EBL compared to Group C (p=0.001) and a reduction in the operation time compared to Group M(p=0.003).
Conclusion: The author supposes that the type of skin incision does not correlate significantly with the clinical results of TLIF with PPSF. However, it can be considered that SIPPSF offers the advantage of avoiding an additional paramedian skin incision.| 번호 | 참고문헌 | 국회도서관 소장유무 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ![]() |
미소장 |
| 2 | Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. ![]() |
미소장 |
| 3 | Fang LM, Zhang YJ, Zhang J, Huang N, Lin HG, Li B, et al: Treatment of lumbar disc herniation by modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a pedicle screw system. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 90:3339-3342, 2010 | 미소장 |
| 4 | Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. ![]() |
미소장 |
| 5 | Gaines RW, Jr.: The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A:1458-1476, 2000 | 미소장 |
| 6 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histologic Evidence of Postoperative Back Muscle Injury in Rats ![]() |
미소장 |
| 7 | Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Review of Techniques and Outcomes ![]() |
미소장 |
| 8 | Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery. ![]() |
미소장 |
| 9 | Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M, Sudo H, Abe Y, Minami A: Midterm clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 21:1171-1117, 2011 | 미소장 |
| 10 | Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). ![]() |
미소장 |
| 11 | Perioperative and postoperative complications of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly adults. ![]() |
미소장 |
| 12 | Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Adjacent Level Angle Change on Single-level Lumbar 4-5 Fusion Using Percutaneous Screw Fixation and Open Screw Fixation | 소장 |
| 13 | Lu C, Lu GH, Ma ZM: [Analysis of complication in the spinal pedicle screw internal fixation]. Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 25:51-52, 2000 | 미소장 |
| 14 | McGirt MJ, Parker SL, Lerner J, Engelhart L, Knight T, Wang MY: Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infe-ction after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5,170 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 14:771- 778, 2011 | 미소장 |
| 15 | Minimally invasive approach versus traditional open approach for one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. ![]() |
미소장 |
| 16 | Oppenheimer JH, DeCastro I, McDonnell DE: Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical review. Neurosurg Focus 27:E9, 2009 | 미소장 |
| 17 | Comparison of One-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Performed With a Minimally Invasive Approach or a Traditional Open Approach ![]() |
미소장 |
| 18 | Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of spondylolisthesis and degenerative segmental instability. | 소장 |
| 19 | Cost-Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Associated Low-Back and Leg Pain Over Two Years ![]() |
미소장 |
| 20 | [Minimally invasive osteosynthesis in septic conditions]. ![]() |
미소장 |
| 21 | The lumbar multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. ![]() |
미소장 |
| 22 | Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 18 Suppl:S1-6, 2005 | 미소장 |
| 23 | Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Review of Techniques and Outcomes ![]() |
미소장 |
| 24 | Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine. ![]() |
미소장 |
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: 정기간행물실(524호) / 서가번호: 국내17
2021년 이전 정기간행물은 온라인 신청(원문 구축 자료는 원문 이용)
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.