본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

고급검색

인명/단체명

저자정보 상세정보
인명/단체명을 입력하세요.

키워드

  • 대표어

  • 외국어

-

목차보기

목차

올리버 크롬웰 동상을 둘러싼 영국 의회의 논란, 1840-1900 / 박지향 1

[머리글] 1

I. 크롬웰에 대한 역사적 평가 3

II. 크롬웰 동상 건립을 둘러싼 1890년 이전의 논의 7

III. 1894-5년의 논의 : 보수당과 아일랜드 민족주의자의 동맹 15

IV. 1899년의 논란 : 잉글랜드 대 아일랜드 22

V. 나가며 28

〈Abstract〉 30

초록보기

Oliver Cromwell was harshly blamed from the Restoration till the late 18th century when he began to be seen as the protector of freedom and Protestantism. The 19th century witnessed the enthusiasm and even cult of Cromwell, ignited by Thomas Carlyle and other writers. The effort to erect the statue of Cromwell in Westminster Palace was initiated in the 1840’s following the advice of the reports of the Royal Commission on Fine Arts. The Parliamentary debates on Cromwell’s statue, 1840-1900, demonstrate interesting alliances and divisions between various sectors of British Politics. Before 1890, the focus was on whether Cromwell was a murderer/despot or a freedom seeker, and the division was made rather simply between Liberals and Tories. By the time the issue was raised again in 1894, British politics had become much more complicated because of the rise of the Irish Nationalist Party and the defection of the Liberal Unionists from the Liberal Party. Cromwell was most hated by the Irish due to the 1641 massacre. Irish representatives were most vigorously opposed to the statue. When the budget for the statue was frustrated by the allied attack from the Irish representatives and Tories, Lord Rosebery, the Liberal Prime Minister, offered to cover all expenses. The statue was finally unveiled in November 1899, the tercentenary year of Cromwell’s birth. However, criticism continued to be heard in the Parliament. This time critical voices were limited to the Irish while the Tories decided to acquiesce as they felt uncomfortable with being the ally of the Irish Nationalists. The controversy over Cromwell’s statue points to the interesting finding that ideology was overshadowed by national feelings in 19th century British politics.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
영국의 ANF(Atlantic Nuclear Force)구상과 서독, 1963-1965 김진호 pp.5-39

보기
올리버 크롬웰 동상을 둘러싼 영국 의회의 논란, 1840-1900 박지향 pp.40-70

보기
구리 도둑 : 금속 징발과 총력전쟁, 1914-1945 채드 댄튼 ; 김은철 역 pp.71-104

보기
'새로운' 사회운동 이론 : 진정으로 '새로운' 운동들인가? 박우룡 pp.105-137

보기
과거 속에서 현재를 보다 : 부르크하르트의『이탈리아 르네상스의 문화』 최성철 pp.138-167

보기
두보이즈의『흑인의 영혼』 : '두 개의 정체성'을 지닌 흑인이야기 황혜성 pp.168-197

보기
찰스 섬너와 노예제 문제 : 인종평등 정책에 나타나는 공화주의 담론을 중심으로, 1861-1874 하아랑 pp.198-230

보기

참고문헌 (23건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 Peter Gaunt, Oliver Cromwell (Oxford, 1996) 미소장
2 The Reputation of Oliver Cromwell in the 19th Century 네이버 미소장
3 Roger Howell Jr., “Images of Oliver Cromwell,” R. C. Richardson ed., Images of Oliver Cromwell: Essays for and by Roger Howell Jr. (Manchester and New York, 1993) 미소장
4 Roger Howell Jr., “Who needs another Cromwell,” R. C. Richardson ed., Images of Oliver Cromwell 미소장
5 Patrick Little ed., Oliver Cromwell, New Perspectives (New York, 2009) 미소장
6 Blair Worden, “The English Reputations of Oliver Cromwell 1660-1900,” William Lamont, ed., Historical Controversies and Historians (London, 1998) 미소장
7 Blair Worden, “The Victorians and Oliver Cromwell,” Stefan Collini, Richard Whatmore and Brian Young ed., History, Religion, and Culture: British Intellectual History 1750-1950 (Cambridge, 2000) 미소장
8 `J'y Suis, J'y Reste': The Parliamentary Statue of Oliver Cromwell by Hamo Thornycroft 네이버 미소장
9 J. F. Battick and N. C. Klimavicz, “Much Ado About Oliver: the Parliamentary dispute over Cromwell’s statue,” History Today, vol. 24, no. 6 (June 1974). 미소장
10 Thomas Carlyle, Oliver Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches, 4 vols. (Elibron Classics, 2005 Adamant Media Corporation) 미소장
11 John Morley, Recollections (1917) 미소장
12 Parliamentary Papers, 1842(412) XXV, First Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, Appendix 2. 미소장
13 Parliamentary Papers, 1842(412) XXV, First Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, p. 7. 미소장
14 Parliamentary Papers, 1844(585) XXXI, Third Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, Appendix no. 4. Robert Peel의 편지 (17th August 1843). 미소장
15 Parliamentary Papers 1845(671) XXVII, Fourth Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, Appendix no. 1. 미소장
16 Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates 미소장
17 Parliamentary Papers, 1861(2806) XXXII, Twelfth Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, Appendix no. 1. 미소장
18 Royal Gallery, The Queen’s Robing Room, the Vestibule, the Lower Landing Place 미소장
19 Graham Walker, “Archibald Philip Primrose, 5th Earl of Rosebery,” Robert Eccleshall and Graham Walker ed., Biographical Dictionary of British Prime Ministers (1998), p. 222 미소장
20 Battick and Klimavicz, “Much Ado About Oliver,” 미소장
21 Robert Rhodes James, Rosebery, A Biography of Archibald Philip, Fifth Earl of Rosebery (New York, 1963), p. 381. 미소장
22 The Times 미소장
23 Lord Rosebery, Cromwell A Speech Delivered at the Cromwell Tercentenary Celebration 1899 (1900) 미소장

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차

권호

기사명 원문보기 기사목차
닫기