본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

초록보기

This study aimed to measure the variation in the levels of risk perception associated with various health risk factors.

We analyzed the variables of psychological paradigms that may affect such risk perception levels. According to theperception survey results, the perception of the risk of medical malpractice appeared to be at the highest level comparedto other risk factors. According to the analysis of differences in psychological paradigms of health risk factors betweengenders, the known extent of hazard that medical malpractice, medicines side effects, vaccination accidents, acquiredimmune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), and food poisoning was much high in female than in male. According to theevaluation of the severity of the risk to future generations, it appeared that women believed that vaccination accidents,AIDS, chronic diseases such as diabetes and hypertension, smoking, and drinking would have a greater effect on therisk to future generations than did men. The significance of this study is that the psychological paradigm affecting theperception level of health risk factors and the risk perceptions themselves have been analyzed by a survey of adults fromthe general population of Korea.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
아토피피부염의 치료 김혜성, 조상현 pp.226-233

항고혈압 약물의 병합투여 박정배 pp.253-258

아토피피부염의 여러 진단기준 이승철 pp.212-217

아토피피부염의 병인 최응호, 윤나영 pp.218-225

비만 및 대사증후군의 발달학적 측면 최용성, 황일태 pp.234-240

우리나라 대도시에 거주하는 국민들의 공중보건 위험요인에 대한 인식 김경희, 김해준, 이은일, 김상후, 최재욱 pp.259-269

아토피피부염의 우리나라 현황 및 특징 김규한 pp.208-211

4대 중증질환 보장성 강화정책의 평가 김윤 pp.198-203

성인 편평족 김성재, 이봉근, 성일훈 pp.243-252

참고문헌 (29건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 Crouch EA, Zeise RW. The risks of drinking water. Water Resour Res 1983;19:1359-1375. 미소장
2 Kim KH. Consumer’s perceptions attributed to food-related risks and risk communication [dissertation]. Seoul: Korea University; 2012. 미소장
3 The Study of Health-Risk Perception: Implications for Health Services Research 소장
4 Park DG, Jeong UH. History, definitions and tasks of health communication. Health Commun Res 2009;1:33-48. 미소장
5 Perception of Risk 네이버 미소장
6 Starr G, Langley A, Taylor A. Environmental health risk perception in Australia [Internet]. [place unknown]: Centre for Population Studies in Epidemiology South Australian Depart-ment of Human Services; 2000 [cited 2014 Jan 3]. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-pubhlth-publicat-document-metadata-envrisk.htm. 미소장
7 Kim SJ, Cha H. The effect of public segmentation and mes-sage framing on the health risk communication: applying anger activism model. Korean J Journal Commun Stud 2009;53:231-253. 미소장
8 Development of Health Communication Strategies for Health Behavior Change: Application of Social Ecological Models to Smoking Cessation Intervention 소장
9 Gender-specific factors predicting substance abuse: in search of health communication strategies for high risk group 소장
10 Yoo SJ, Jeong HJ, Park HS. The analysis on factors affecting the intention for H1N1 virus vaccination and the impact of negative news reports: the comparison between HBM and TPB. Korean J Advert Public Relat 2010;12:283-319. 미소장
11 Hahm MI, Kwon HJ, Lee HY, Park HG, Lee SG. Differences of experts and non-experts in perceiving environmental and technological risks. J Environ Health Sci 2009;35:269-277. 미소장
12 Slovic P. The perception of risk. Sterling: Earthscan Publica-tions; 2000. 미소장
13 Risk Perception and Policy Implications for Risk Analysis: With Focus on the Lay People in the Capital Region 소장
14 Jung JB, Chae JH. The politicization of risk and an effective response strategy purpose and methodology. Seoul: Korea Institute of Public Administration; 2010. 미소장
15 Sandman PM. Responding to community outrage: strategies for effective risk communication [Internet]. New York: Risk Communication Website; 2012 [cited 2013 Oct 13]. Available from: http://www.psandman.com. 미소장
16 Lee KH. Study on the emprical analysis and the implications for the effective food risk communication. J Consum Policy Stud 2008;104-133. 미소장
17 Maharaj P. Reasons for condom use among young people in KwaZulu-Natal: prevention of HIV, pregnancy or both? Int Fam Plan Perspect 2006;32:28-34. 미소장
18 Knowledge, risk perception of AIDS and reported sexual behaviour among students in secondary schools and colleges in Tanzania 네이버 미소장
19 Shobo Y. Youth’s perceptions of HIV infection risk: a sex-specific test of two risk models. African J AIDS Res 2007;6:1-8. 미소장
20 Influenza Vaccine Coverage Rate and Related Factors on Pregnant Women 소장
21 Han JH. Effects of risk communication in vaccination [disser-tation]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2003. 미소장
22 Comparative studies of risk perception: a review of twenty years of research 네이버 미소장
23 Gender Differences in Risk Taking: A Meta-Analysis 네이버 미소장
24 Gender and regional differences in risk perception: results from implementing the Seveso II Directive in Sweden 네이버 미소장
25 Sociological Aspects of Attribution 네이버 미소장
26 Lee YJ. Attribution and behavioral responses in failed medical service encounters [dissertation]. Seoul: Kyunghee University; 2010. 미소장
27 Lee JE, Choi IS. The change in trust toward social commerce companies after failure of social commerce services: focusing on severity and main source of service failure, and brand equity of social commerce companies. Korean J Consum Advert Psychol 2011;12:799-824. 미소장
28 Kim KH, Song DJ, Choi JW. A Study on risk communication and perception of electromagnetic waves from cellular phones: focus on risk perception of women. J Korea Inst Electron Commun Sci 2013;8:1065-1074. 미소장
29 Risk Communication Study for Nanotechnology Using Risk Cognitive Map 소장