권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Myungdong Theater's reopening on June 5, 2009 as the first non-profit producing institution without having a permanent resident company marked, indeed, a beginning of a new era in contemporary Korean theatre. Its long-awaited restoration, both historically and symbolically significant occasion, from the past 34 years of its official closure as a theatre building has called to a national attention. The building which had originally been built as a film theatre during the Japanese colonial rule by a Japanese architectural firm in early part of the 1930s, was converted to a business office building since its purchase made by a financing corporation in 1975, It has taken for over 15 years since the first movement towards restoration for the Myungdong Theater. That movement was initiated, not by theatre people but rather unexpectedly by the Myungdong Merchants' Association for Prosperity as represented by its President Jang Hwan Kim. No one believed then that the Myungdong Theater could ever truly be returned to theatre people's hands. But that dream not only came true but its newly acquired state as the non-profit producing institution has noted an important change in the paradigm of theatre management in Korea.
In this paper, the author traces, with an intention to evaluate objectively its achievement and drawbacks, back the first about a year-long management of the Myungdong Theater from its official relaunching in June 2009. While the author's coverage in the main body of the paper ranges, suggesting a wide spectrum of interest and research has preceded, from the analyses of the theatre's new identity as a producing institution to its current programming, the main focus is given to the latter. And in order to provide readers for appropriate historical information the beginning chapter following the introduction, a detailed overview of the background of the Myungdong Theater is prepared.
With the Board of Trustees on its top in structural hierarchy, the President(Mr. Ja Heung Koo) is responsible for the actual running of the Theater whose internal organization consists of the three Departments, Performance Planning(planning, marketing, publicity, etc.), Administration (accounting & finance), and Backstage(set, lighting, sound, etc.). 'Mission-driven' as that is considered a standard management model for non-profit institution, the Myungdong Theater is also not an exception, and it has declared the "high quality art', "popularization", "globalization" of its production as the leading missions. Among a number of the Myungdong Theater's notable management policies, an extended week-long period for set-up and rehearsals for each production is the most promising. For it has been conceived, on the one hand, to offer more staging time for practitioners for final touches, and to revolutionize, on the other hand, the long-held, undesirable convention of the Korean theatre's backstage practice, in which only one or two days are allowed for set-up and rehearsals. Other policies such as the increased budget for each production, flexible performance time, ticket policy, and even plans for the promotion of patron's contribution towards enhancing the audience development, educational programs, and so forth, appear to have contributed to the positive results of the Theater's management.
Myungdong Theater's repertoires during its first 6 some months in 2009, which were selected to appeal, in particular, to those mid-to-elder generations who had long been away from theatre viewing practice, resulted in remarkably high attendance rate. But there have been criticisms regarding the Theater's conservative choice of classical repertoires. And with a change of direction towards the more recent plays of both Korean and international, made in the repertoires during the first half of 2010, has increased the students' attendance, while they happened to have dropped the preceding season's leading audience groups. Despite its slight ups and downs likewise, Myungdong Theater has proved its overall success, both in terms of quality productions and ticket sales, in its first year-long period of management since its reopening. On the bases of these achievements and other results as well as the current conditions of the Myungdong Theater, the author proposes finally the six interrelated suggestions, including an encouragement to the acquisition of the second space for smaller, experimental staging that would contrast to the main stage programs. And these suggestions, hopefully, for future references replace the conclusive remark.| 번호 | 참고문헌 | 국회도서관 소장유무 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 김성희, 「국ㆍ공립극장 재단법인화에 따른 정책 및 극장경영 개선방안 연구」, 한국연극학회 편, 예술경영과 희곡읽기 , (서울: 푸른 사상, 2000), 435~473쪽. | 미소장 |
| 2 | 나카가와 이쿠오, 「공공문화시설의 경영」, 이토오 야스오 외 지음, 이홍재 옮김, 예술과 문화정책 , (서울: 역사넷, 2000), 193~200쪽. | 미소장 |
| 3 | 문화체육관광부, 명동예술극장 , (서울: 건축세계(주), 2009). | 미소장 |
| 4 | 명동예술극장, 「명동예술극장 개관」 자료집. | 미소장 |
| 5 | 서연호, 「국립극단의 과거, 현재, 미래」, 국립극단 50년사 , (서울: 연극과 인간, 2000), 231~239쪽. | 미소장 |
| 6 | 신우식, 「환도 직후의 공연무대」, 국립극단 50년사 , (서울: 연극과 인간, 2000), 37~46쪽. | 미소장 |
| 7 | 에이기 기세이, 「세타가야 퍼블릭 씨어터」, 에이기 기세이 & 모토스키 쇼조 편저, 김의경 & 명진숙 공역, 살아 숨 쉬는 극장 , (서울: 연극과 인간, 2008), 139~149쪽. | 미소장 |
| 8 | 예술경영지원센터, 해외 공연장 운영사례 , 서울: 예술경영센터 지원컨설팅팀, 2008. | 미소장 |
| 9 | 유민영, 우리시대 演劇運動史 , (서울: 단국대학교 출판부, 1990). | 미소장 |
| 10 | 이상만, 「명동의 국립극장 시절」, 국립극장, 국립극장 이야기 , (서울: 국립극장, 2003), 52~53쪽. | 미소장 |
| 11 | 이세기, 「국립극단과 나」, 국립극단 50년사 , (서울: 연극과 인간, 2000), 193~200쪽. | 미소장 |
| 12 | 이승엽, 극장경영과 공연제작 , (서울: 역사넷), 2001. | 미소장 |
| 13 | 전정옥, 「따강까(Taganka), 그것은 장르-유리 류비모프의 정치연극」, <연극평론> 47(2007, 겨울), 81~95쪽. | 미소장 |
| 14 | Study on public theaters' cultural aspects and their patterns of change | 소장 |
| 15 | 공공극장의 기능과 과제 : 아르코예술극장과 예술의 전당 | 소장 |
| 16 | ______, 「공연역사를 만들어가는 해외제작극장들」, 명동예술극장 개관기념 학술행사 자료집, 2009년 5월 14일, 명동예술극장, 19~26쪽. | 미소장 |
| 17 | 편집부, 「특집-2009년 개관하는 중극장」, <한국연극> 390(2009, 1), 52~57쪽. | 미소장 |
| 18 | Knight, Judith, 「Performing Arts Management in the UK」, 예술경영지원센터, 2007 IETM 서울회의(IETM Satellite Meeting in Seoul 2007) , 2007, 40~48쪽. | 미소장 |
| 19 | Langley, Stephen, Theatre Management and Production in America , (New York, NY: Drama Book Publishers, 1990). | 미소장 |
| 20 | McCarthy, Kevin F., Arthur Brooks, et al., The Performing Arts in a New Era , (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2001). | 미소장 |
| 21 | 강종호, <명동예술극장 복원축하공연 ‘명인열전’>, 연합뉴스, 2010년 1월 25일. | 미소장 |
| 22 | 김준엽, <구자흥 명동ㆍ정동극장장 “신작ㆍ고전 안배…… 명동예술극장 더 젊어질 것”>, 국민일보, 2010년 2월 23일. | 미소장 |
| 23 | 박돈규, <명동예술극장 34년 만에 복원>, 조선일보, 2009년 4월 8일. | 미소장 |
| 24 | ______, <명동예술극장 재개관작 ‘맹진사댁 경사’>, 조선일보, 2009년 6월 11일. | 미소장 |
| 25 | 오미환, <명동 국립극장 복원 주역 김장환 씨>, 한국일보, 2009년 4월 3일. | 미소장 |
| 26 | 구자흥, 연구자와의 개인 인터뷰, 2010년 5월 16일. | 미소장 |
| 27 | 김윤철 외, 「특집좌담: 중극장 시대, 연극 변화의 방향을 모색한다」, <한국연극> 390 (2009.1), 62~69쪽. | 미소장 |
| 28 | 구자흥, 「착실한 성장을 시작하는 2010 시즌」,《유랑극단 쇼팔로비치》공연프로그램, 2010년 3월 5~28일, 명동예술극장, 4쪽. | 미소장 |
| 29 | 《추억을 그리고, 꿈을 그리고》공연프로그램명동, 예술극장, 2010년 6월 3일~7월 2일. | 미소장 |
| 30 | http://www.stheater.or.kr | 미소장 |
| 31 | http://www.ktheater.or.kr | 미소장 |
| 32 | http://www.kafte.or.kr | 미소장 |
| 33 | http://www.ytf.or.kr | 미소장 |
| 34 | http://www.mct.or.kr | 미소장 |
| 35 | yhlee@mdtheater.or.kr | 미소장 |
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: 정기간행물실(524호) / 서가번호: 국내08
2021년 이전 정기간행물은 온라인 신청(원문 구축 자료는 원문 이용)
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.