본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

초록보기

개발원조 NGO는 일반적으로 경제적인 어려움에 처한 사람들이 생존할 수 있도록 긴급구호를 제공하는 등의 인도주의 활동을 수행하는 역할을 해왔는데, 1980년대 후반부터 인권에 기반한 접근으로 알려진 새로운 개발 계획이 등장하면서 기존 개발원조 NGO의 역할에 대한 인식이 바뀌기 시작했다. 이 접근법은 개발원조 활동에 소외된 주민들의 시민적・정치적 권리를 증진하고자 하며, 개발원조 NGO들은 이 접근법을 통해 장기적이고 근본적인 원조 효과를 가져오기 위해 정치적 활동을 시작하게 되었다. 하지만 인권에 기반한 접근의 등장에도 불구하고 일부 개발원조 NGO는 인도주의 활동에 국한된 전통적인 활동을 유지하고 있다. 본고는 개발원조 NGO가 기반을 두고 있는 국가의 시민문화(civic culture)가 이와 같은 차이를 발생시키고 있으며, 민주적 시민문화에 기반을 둔 개발원조 NGO는 인권에 기반한 접근을 더욱 잘 받아들이는 반면 폐쇄된 시민문화 내의 개발원조 NGO는 전통적인 인도적 지원 활동을 유지하는 것을 확인하였다. 본고는 옥스팜 미국과 옥스팜 일본을 비교 연구하여 각 국가의 독특한 시민 문화가 인권에 기반한 접근 전략이 어떻게 영향을 주는지 논의한다.

International aid non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have generally been thought of as playing a humanitarian role, such as providing emergency relief to help people in dire conditions survive. Beginning in the late 1980s, this idea began to change when a new development scheme known as the human rights–based approach (HRBA) emerged; this approach promotes the civil and political rights of marginalized local people. Aid NGOs have begun to undertake political activities in the hope of producing long-term development effects. However, some NGOs have maintained a traditional mission limited to humanitarian relief. This study claims that the civic culture of an NGO’s home country makes a difference, and that NGOs embedded in democratic cultures are more receptive to the HRBA, while NGOs in closed cultures have maintained traditional relief missions. This comparative research examines two branches of Oxfam International, Oxfam America and Oxfam Japan, to investigate how the distinctive civic culture of their respective home countries conditioned each organization’s response to the rise of human rights–based models in aid strategies embraced by Oxfam International.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
쿼바디스(Quo Vadis) 아메리카 : Quo Vadis America : the decay of the U.S. and the advent of the Biden administration / 미국의 쇠퇴와 바이든의 등장 박원곤 p. 5-37
트럼프 행정부의 정체성 = Identity of the Trump administration 박용수 p. 39-71
미국 국가안보 제도의 기원 : The origin of U.S. national security institutions : politics among bureaucracies in the creation of the National Security Council / 국가안전보장회의(NSC) 창설 과정에서 관료 조직 간 정치 장성일 p. 73-105
코로나19 팬데믹 시대 한국 노동시장과 사회복지제도에 대한 대안으로 기본소득 검토 = An analysis on the universal basic income as an alternative for South Korea s dualistic labor market and social welfare programs in the era of COVID-19 송지연 p. 107-140
정치적 불평등 완화를 위한 기획, 민주주의 배당 = Democracy dividends designed to alleviate political inequality 최광은 p. 141-178
국제정치, 알제리, 그리고 <파피차> : International relations, Algeria, and <Papicha> : the aesthetic reconstruction of societal security / 영화와 표상을 통한 사회안보 재구성 윤성원 p. 179-210

무장 반군의 권위주의 체제 수립과 정권 안정성 = Autocratic regime formation by armed rebels and subsequent regime stability 송원준 p. 211-244
아시아 지역패권의 정치경제 : The political economy of regional hegemony in Asia : an empirical analysis of diplomatic foundations for China / 중국의 외교적 지지기반 분석 김치욱 p. 245-279

Aid NGOs and the human rights-based approach : 개발원조 NGO와 인권에 기반한 접근 : 옥스팜 미국과 옥스팜 일본의 사례 연구 / case studies of Oxfam America and Oxfam Japan Junhyup Kim, Young Soo Kim p. 281-315

참고문헌 (64건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 Adelman, Carol, Bryan Schwartz and Elias Riskin. 2017. The Index of Global Philanthropy and Remittances 2016. Washington D.C.: Hudson Institute. 미소장
2 Almond, Gabriel and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitude and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 미소장
3 Bob, Clifford. 2005. The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgent, Media, and International Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press. 미소장
4 Bob, Clifford. 2010. “The market for human rights.” Aseem Prakash and Mary Kay Gugerty eds. Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action, pp.133-154. New York: Cambridge University Press. 미소장
5 Büthe, Tim, Solomon Major and Andre de Mello e Souza. 2012. “The politics of private foreign aid: Humanitarian principles, economic development objectives, and organizational interests in NGO private aid allocation.” International Organization 66, No.4. pp. 571-607. 미소장
6 Cameron, John and Olivia Kwiecien. 2019. “Advocacy, charity and struggles for global justice in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 40 No.3. pp. 330-347. 미소장
7 Checkel, Jeffery T. 1999. “Norms, institutions, and national identity in contemporary Europe.” International Studies Quarterly 43, No.1. pp. 83-114. 미소장
8 Clark, Ann Marie. 2001. Diplomacy of Conscience. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 미소장
9 Cooley, Alexander and James Ron. 2002. “The NGO scramble: Organizational insecurity and the political economy of transnational action.” International Security 27, No.1. pp. 5-39. 미소장
10 Cornwall, Andrea and Celestine Nyamu-Musembi. 2004. “Putting the ‘rights-based approach’ to development into perspective.” Third World Quarterly 25, No.8. pp. 1415-1437. 미소장
11 Cortell, Andrew and James Davis. 1996. “How do international institutions matter? The domestic impact of international rules and norms.” International Studies Quarterly 40, pp. 451-478. 미소장
12 Davis, James H., John A Ruhe, Monle Lee and Ujvala Rajadhyaksha. 2007. “Mission possible: Do school mission statements work?” Journal of Business Ethics 70, No.1. pp. 99-110. 미소장
13 Donnelly, Jack. 2003. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 미소장
14 Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International norm dynamics and political change.” International Organization 52, No.4. pp. 887-917. 미소장
15 Fukuyama, Francis. 2001. “Social capital, civil society and development.” Third World Quarterly 22, No.1. pp. 7-20. 미소장
16 Gaenslen, Fritz. 1986. “Culture and decision making in China, Japan, Russia, and the United States.” World Politics 39, No.1. pp. 78-103. 미소장
17 Green, Duncan. 2016. How Change Happens. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 미소장
18 Hirata, Keiko. 2002. Civil Society in Japan: The Growing Role of NGOs in Tokyo’s Aid and Development Policy. New York: St. Martin’s Press. 미소장
19 Holcombe, Susan H. 2010. “Structuring a global NGO for a rights-based change agenda.” Laura Roper eds. Change not Charity: Essays on Oxfam America’s First 40 Years, 362-375. Boston: Oxfam America. 미소장
20 Htun, Mala and S. Laurel Weldon. 2012. “The civic origins of progressive policy change: Combating violence against women in global perspective, 1975-2005.” American Political Science Review 106, No.3. pp. 548-569. 미소장
21 Inglehart, Ronald and Wayne E. Baker. 2000. “Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values.” American Sociological Review 65, No.1. pp. 19-51. 미소장
22 Johnson, Erica and Aseem Prakash. 2007. “NGO research program: A collective action perspective.” Policy Science 40, No.3. pp. 221-240. 미소장
23 Keck, Margaret and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 미소장
24 Kim, Junhyup. 2018. “To Give or To Act? The Transition of NGOs from Aid Donors to Human Rights Advocates.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Purdue University. 미소장
25 Kindornay, Shannon, James Ron and Charli Carpenter. 2012. “Rights-based approaches to development: implications for NGOs.” Human Rights Quarterly 34, No.2. pp. 472-506. 미소장
26 Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agenda, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: Longman. 미소장
27 Korten, David C. 1987. “Third generation NGO strategies: A key to people-centered development.” World Development 15, No.1. pp. 145-159. 미소장
28 Lancaster, Carol. 2007. Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 미소장
29 Lang, Sabine. 2013. NGOs, Civil Society and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 미소장
30 Nelson, Paul J. and Ellen Dorsey. 2003. “At the nexus of human rights and development: New methods and strategies of global NGOs.” World Development 31, No.12. pp. 2013-2026. 미소장
31 Nelson, Paul J. and Ellen Dorsey. 2007. “New rights advocacy in a global public domain.” European Journal of International Relations 31, No.12. pp. 187-216. 미소장
32 Offenheiser, Raymond, Susan Holcombe and Nancy Hopkins. 1999. “Grappling with globalization, partnership, and learning: A look inside Oxfam America.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28, No.4. pp. 121-139. 미소장
33 Okada, Aya. 2008. “The Challenge of Development NGO Advocacy in Japan.” Master’s Thesis, University of Pittsburgh. 미소장
34 Oxfam GB. 2018. “My story.” https://www.oxfam.org.uk/what-we-do/content/my-story (검색일: 2018.4.29.). 미소장
35 Oxfam International. 2018a. “History of Oxfam International.” https://www.oxfam.org/en/countries/history-oxfam-international (검색일: 2018.04.29.). 미소장
36 Oxfam International. 2018b. International Financial Institutions. https://www.oxfam.org/en/international-financial-institutions (검색일: 2018.04.29.). 미소장
37 Oxfam Japan. 2016. Campaign Outreach [キャンペーン・アウトリーチ]. http://oxfam.jp/whatwedo/campaign/ (검색일: 2016.12.09.). 미소장
38 Prakash, Aseem and Mary Kay Gugerty. 2010. “Advocacy organizations and collective action: An Introduction.” Aseem Prakash and Mary Kay Gugerty eds, Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action. 1-28. New York: Cambridge University Press. 미소장
39 Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 미소장
40 Rice, Tom W. and Jan L. Feldman. 1997. “Civic culture and democracy from Europe to America.” The Journal of Politics 59, No.4. pp. 1143-1172. 미소장
41 Risse, Thomas. 2010. “Rethinking advocacy organizations? A critical comment.” Aseem Prakash and Mary Kay Gugerty eds, Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action. 283-294. New York: Cambridge University Press. 미소장
42 Saaler, Sven. 2006. “Pan-Asianism in modern Japanese history: overcoming the nation, creating a region, forging an empire.” J. Victor Koschmann and Sven Saaler eds. Pan-Asianism in Modern Japanese History: Colonialism, Regionalism and Borders. pp.1-18. New York: Routledge. 미소장
43 Salamon, Lester M. and Helmut K. Anheier. 1992. “In search of the non-profit Sector I: The question of definition.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 3, No.2, pp. 125-151. 미소장
44 Schmitz, Hans Peter. 2012. “A human rights-based approach (HRBA) in practice: Evaluating NGO development efforts.” Polity 44, No.4, pp. 523-541. 미소장
45 Schraeder, Peter, Steven W Hook and Bruce Taylor. 1998. “Clarifying the foreign aid puzzle: A comparison of American, Japanese, French, and Swedish aid flows.” World Politics 50, No.2. pp. 294-323. 미소장
46 Sell, Susan and Aseem Prakash. 2004. “Using ideas strategically: The contest between business and NGO networks in intellectual property rights.” International Studies Quarterly 48, No.1, pp. 143-175. 미소장
47 Sengupta, Arjun. 2001. “Right to development as a human right.” Economics and Political Weekly 36, No.27. pp. 2527-2536. 미소장
48 Short, Joe. 2010. “Acting strategically: Memories of Oxfam America, 1977-1984.” Laura Roper eds., Change not Charity: Essays on Oxfam America’s First 40 Years. pp.91-113. Boston: Oxfam America. 미소장
49 Simon, Laurence R. 2010. “The Origins of Advocacy at Oxfam America." Laura Roper eds., Change not Charity: Essays on Oxfam America’s First 40 Years. pp.114-139. Boston: Oxfam America. 미소장
50 Smith, Jackie and Dawn Wiest. 2005. “The uneven geography of global civil society: National and global influences on transnational association.” Social Forces 84, No.2. pp. 621-652. 미소장
51 Stewart, Frances. 1989. “Basic needs strategies, human rights, and the right to development.” Human Rights Quarterly 11, No.3. pp. 347-374. 미소장
52 Stroup, Sarah S. 2012. Borders among Activists: International NGOs in the United States, Britain, and France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 미소장
53 Stroup, Sarah S. and Amanda Murdie. 2012. “There’s no place like home: Explaining international NGO advocacy.” The Review of International Organizations 7, No.4. pp. 425-448. 미소장
54 Stroup, Sarah S, and Wendy H. Wong. 2013. “Come together? Different pathways to international NGO centralization.” International Studies Review 15, No.2. pp. 163-184 미소장
55 Thomas, John W. 2010. “The founding of Oxfam America.” Laura Roper eds., Change not Charity: Essays on Oxfam America’s First 40 Years. pp.23-27. Boston: Oxfam America. 미소장
56 Thomas-Slayter, Barbara. 2010. “Perspectives on Oxfam’s partnership model.” Laura Roper eds., Change not Charity: Essays on Oxfam America’s First 40 Years. pp.74-88. Boston: Oxfam America. 미소장
57 United Nations. 1948. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. G.A. Res. 217A(III) 미소장
58 United Nations Development Group (UNDG). 2003. The Human Rights-Based Approach to Development Cooperation towards a Common Understanding among UN Agencies. Available at: https://unsdg.un.org/resources/human-rights-based-approach-development-cooperation-towards-common-understanding-among-un(검색일: 2016.07.10.) 미소장
59 United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 2006. Applying a Human Rights-Based Approach to Development Cooperation and Programming: A UNDP Capacity Development Resource. UNDP Capacity Development Group. 미소장
60 Weiss, Janet A. and Sandy Kristin Piderit. 1999. “The value of mission statements in public NGOs.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9, No.2. pp. 193-223. 미소장
61 Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. Protest, Policy and the Problem of Violence Against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press. 미소장
62 Weldon, S. Laurel. 2011. When Protest Makes Policy: How Social Movements Represent Disadvantaged Groups. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 미소장
63 Williams, Linda Stallworth. 2008. “The mission statement: A corporate reporting tool with a past, present, and future.” Journal of Business Communication 45, No.2. pp. 94-119. 미소장
64 Yanacopulos, Helen. 2016. International NGO Engagement, Advocacy, Activism: The Faces and Spaces of Change. New York: Palgrave. 미소장

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차