본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

목차보기

Contents

Implementing a content and language integrated learning in a Korean college context / Youn-Kyoung Lee 1

[요약] 1

I. INTRODUCTION 1

II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 3

1. Content and Language Integrated Learning and Its Conceptualization 3

2. Relevant Research in CLIL 4

III. METHODOLOGY 6

1. Research Design and Procedures 6

2. Participants and Setting 6

3. Data Collection and Analysis 7

4. Data Analysis 8

IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 8

1. CLIL Class Contents 8

2. Students' Perception of the CLIL Class 11

V. CONCLUSION 15

REFERENCES 17

초록보기

The present study aimed at examining the implementation of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in a Korean college context, focusing on class contents and student perceptions. The study used the class syllabus, all class materials, and an online questionnaire survey. For the participants, 51 Korean college learners participated in the study. In terms of student perception of CLIL classes, the findings of the study revealed that the students’ overall perception was positive, indicating that more than 70 percent of the students considered CLIL worthy to be taken. However, vocabulary was deemed the most difficult in CLIL classes rather than understanding concepts and listening in English. While some students stated that they could understand the importance of vocabulary to effectively comprehend the English lecture, others complained that they had to learn content with unknown vocabulary. Thus, the students preferred CLIL classes, using familiar topics in that the lecture was conducted in English. In addition, some students preferred to use both Korean and English in future CLIL classes because of their low English proficiency. Finally, the study concluded with suggestions for the successful implementation of future CLIL classes in Korean tertiary contexts.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
Improving public speaking : an English speech contest case study Nahk Bohk Kim p. 1-22

보기
Gamification and EFL writing : effects on student motivation Dennis Laffey p. 23-42

보기
Implementing a content and language integrated learning in a Korean college context Youn-Kyoung Lee p. 43-61

보기
Metapragmatic approach to impoliteness in Korean and English Sujung Min p. 63-80

보기
영어 어휘 교수·학습에 관한 국내 연구동향분석 : Analysis of research trends on English vocabulary teaching and learning : focused on the KCI journals / KCI 학술지를 중심으로 권은영, 우경민 p. 81-105

보기
영어교육 관련 사회적 인식 변화에 대한 빅데이터 분석과 테크놀로지 활용 영어교육에 대한 인식 제고 방안 = Big data analysis of changes in social perception of English education and suggestions for raising awareness about technology-based English education 김지은 p. 107-121

보기
한국 영어 학습자들의 영어 학습 동기의 종단적 변화 : The longitudinal change of English learning motivation among English learners in South Korea : an analysis of critical reflective essay / 회고적 성찰 그래프 분석 김태영 p. 123-151

보기

참고문헌 (36건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 Aguilar, M., & Munoz, C. (2014). The effect of proficiency on CLIL benefits in Engineering students in Spain. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1-8. 미소장
2 Aguilar, M., & Rodriguez, R. (2012). Lecturer and student perceptions on CLIL at a Spanish university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(2), 183-197. 미소장
3 Aizawa, M., & Rose, H. (2019). An analysis of Japan’s English as a medium of instruction initiatives within higher education: The gap between meso-level policy and micro-level practice. Higher Education, 77, 1125-1142. 미소장
4 Anderson, W., & Krathwohl, R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman. 미소장
5 Barrios, E., & Acosta-Manzano, I. (2020). Primary students’ satisfaction with CLIL and perceived CLIL linguistic difficulty. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 2, 1-14. 미소장
6 Bennett, C. (2003). Comprehensive multicultural education: Theory and practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. 미소장
7 Bloom, S. (1994). Reflections on the development and use of the taxonomy. In L. W. Anderson & L. A. Sosniak (Eds.), Bloom’s taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective, (p. 93). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 미소장
8 Bradley, N., Cabell, C., Cole, R., Kennedy, H., & Poje, J. (2018). From which point do we begin? On combining the multilateral and multi-perspectival. STEM Journal, 19(2), 65-93. 미소장
9 Bruton, A. (2013). CLIL: Some of the reasons why…and why not. System, 41, 587-597. 미소장
10 Coyle, D. (1999). Theory and planning for effective classrooms: Supporting students in content and language integrating learning contexts. In J. Masih (Ed.), Learning through a foreign language: Models. methods and outcomes (pp. 32-74). London: CILT Publications. 미소장
11 Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543-562. 미소장
12 Coyle, D. (2015). Strengthening integrated learning: Towards a new era for pluriliteracies and intercultural learning. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 8(2), 84-103. 미소장
13 Dearden, J. (2014). English as a medium of instruction – a growing global phenomenon. Retrieved January 3, 2021, from the World Wide Web:http://www.britishcouncil. org/sites/ default/files/e484_emi__cover_open_3_final_web.pdf 미소장
14 Eriksson, A., & Carlsson, C. J. (2013). From apprenticeship genres to academic literacy: Problematizing students’ and teachers’ perceptions of communication activities in an ICL environment. Journal of Academic Writing, 3(1), 67-83. 미소장
15 Kang, h, Y., & Kang, H. Y. (2009). A study on the effect of a content-based instruction through integration of English and Arts. Elementary English Education, 15(1), 59-86. 미소장
16 Kim, E, G., Park, S, M., & Baldwin, M. (2021). Toward successful implementation of introductory integrated content and language classes for EFL Science and Engineering students. TESOL Quarterly, 55(1), 219-247. 미소장
17 Kim, H. J. (2015). An effect of content-centered class using movies in learning practical expressions. Cross-Cultural Studies, 39, 408-432. 미소장
18 Kim, M, H., & Rha, K, H. (2010). Analyzing the effectiveness of content-based interdisciplinary instruction in elementary English classes. Studies in Linguistics, 16, 27-45. 미소장
19 Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman. 미소장
20 Kwon, S, H., & Lee, J. E. (2012). A study on student improvement of English communication ability through differentiated content-based language teaching in an elementary school. Language Teaching, 24(3), 239-256. 미소장
21 Lappalainen, P. (2010). Integrated language education-a means of enhancing engineers’ social competencies. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 393-403. 미소장
22 Lee, H. K. (2017). A study on supporting second language children’s content learning in elementary school. The Journal of Education Studies, 3, 1-14. 미소장
23 Lee, H. R., & Sung, K. W. (2014). WTC in EMI: Correlational factors and college learners’ perceptions. Foreign Languages Education, 21(2), 75-106. 미소장
24 Lee, Y. J. J. (2021). Forming a speech community in the EFL classroom with reference to movie English. English Language & Literature Teaching 27(2), 115-136. 미소장
25 Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 미소장
26 O’Dwyer, F., & Boer, M. D. (2015). Approaches to assessment in CLIL classrooms: Two case studies. Language Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 397-421. 미소장
27 Macaco, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An., J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36-76. 미소장
28 Marsh, D. (2002). CIL/EMILE-The European dimension: Actions, trends, and foresight potential. Feenberg, A. (1999a). Distance learning: Promise or threat? Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789 47616. 미소장
29 Nation, I. S. P., & Webb, S. A. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle. 미소장
30 Paul, F., & Kim, N. B. (2020). Student anxiety and motivation of speaking English in conversation class: A case study. English Language & Literature Teaching, 26(4), 1-20. 미소장
31 Peterson, T. (2004). A guide to working with people from other cultures. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press, Inc. 미소장
32 Richards, J., & Rogers, T. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching: Third edition. London: Cambridge. 미소장
33 Tatzl, D. (2017). An intensive presentations course in English for aeronautical engineering students using cyclic video recordings. Language Learning in Higher Education, 7(2), 275-309. 미소장
34 Uemura, T. (2017). CLIL and its possible application to engineering education to enhance undergraduates’ academic and subject-specific English literacy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 161, 90-110. 미소장
35 Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England. 미소장
36 Yang, W., & Gosling, M. (2013). National appraisal and stakeholder perceptions of a tertiary CLIL program in Taiwan. International CLIL Research Journal, 2(1), 67-81. 미소장

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차