본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

초록보기

This paper revisits some interesting asymmetry observed between that-clause and ‘so’ in English. Despite the fact that that-clauses embedded within an array of verb phrases can be pro-formed by ‘so’, the ones embedded within morphologically related noun phrases cannot. Moulton (2015) attempted to offer an account of this asymmetrical phenomenon by proposing that, contra standard assumptions, that-clauses embedded within those verb phrases are predicates rather than arguments in a parallel fashion to those embedded within derivationally related nouns. In other words, he argues that, based on derivational relatedness, the semantico-syntactic function of that-clause within a noun phrase can be extended to a verb phrase as well. We explore this issue by re-examining the syntactic distribution of ‘so’ and the semantic function of that-clause embedded within two distinct syntactic categories, a noun phrase and a verb phrase. We then propose that ‘so’ is a TP-substituting propositional anaphor. In so doing, we argue that there exist two types of CPs (cross-linguistically) and that these distinctions account for different syntactic behaviors of ‘so’ as a propositional anaphor in a variety of constructions.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
Motivational principles underlying linguistic characteristics of second language writing Mijin Eom, Mostafa Papi p. 229-245

(An) experimental study of lexical encoding and grouping in L1 and L2 production of sentences describing motion events Ji-Hyun Kim, Mun-Hong Choe p. 246-264

‘So’ as a TP-substituting propositional anaphor Myung-Kwan Park, Wooseung Lee p. 265-278

북한 영어교육의 패러다임 전환 : The paradigm shift in English language teaching in North Korea : a corpus-assisted analysis / 코퍼스 기반 분석 이영희, 김태영 p. 279-299

영어 교사연구자의 발전 및 발전 요인 탐구 = Exploring English teacher-researchers’ professional development and its instigating factors 안경자 p. 300-319

짝 활동 유형에 따른 초등 영어 학습자의 어휘 성취도와 정의적 반응 비교 연구 = The effects of pair types on Korean elementary English learners’ vocabulary learning performance and affective factors 유미경, 이경랑 p. 320-335

2022학년도 수능영어의 체감 난이도 상승 요인에 관한 코퍼스 기반 분석 = A corpus-based analysis of the perceived difficulty increase in the 2022 CSAT English test 한지수, 이영희 p. 336-354

참고문헌 (31건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 Ahn, B. 2015. Out-Sourcing Internal Arguments. Presented at West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics 33. Simon Fraser University. 미소장
2 Alrenga, P. 2005. A sentential subject asymmetry in English and its implications for complement selection. Syntax 8, 175-207. 미소장
3 Bealer, G. 1998. Propositions. Mind 107, 1-32. 미소장
4 Bošković, Ž. and H. Lasnik. 2003. On the distribution of null complementizers. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 527-546. 미소장
5 Chung, S. and W. A. Ladusaw. 2004. Restriction and Saturation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 미소장
6 Cornish, F. 1992. ‘So’ be ‘It’: The discourse semantic roles of ‘so’ and ‘it’. Journal of Semantics 9(2), 163-178. 미소장
7 Davies, W. D. and S. Dubinsky. 2010. On the existence (and distribution) of sentential subjects. In D. B. Gerdts, J. C. Moore and M. Polinsky, eds., Hypothesis A/Hypothesis B: Linguistic Explorations in Honor of David M. Perlmutter, 211-228. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 미소장
8 Elliott P. D. 2020. Elements of Clausal Embedding. Doctoral dissertation, UCL 미소장
9 Elswyk, P. van. 2020. ‘That’-clauses and propositional anaphors. Philosophical Studies 177(10), 2861-2875. 미소장
10 Gast, V. and E. König. 2008. Sentence anaphora in English and German. Talk given at the First Meeting of the International Society for the Linguistics of English at the University of Freiburg. Freiburg, October. 미소장
11 Grimshaw, J. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 미소장
12 Hacquard, V. 2006. Aspects of Modality. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 미소장
13 Han, H. J. 2005. A nominal-shell for CPs: Beyond subject CPs. In R. L. Edwards, P. J. Midtlyng, C. L. Sprague and K. G. Stensrud, eds., Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 41. 1. The Main Session, 95-109. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 미소장
14 Hankamer, J. and L. Mikkelsen. 2021. CP complements to D. Linguistic Inquiry 52(3), 473-518. 미소장
15 Higgins, F. R. 1973. The Pseudocleft Construction in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. 미소장
16 Huddleston, R. and G. K. Pullum. 2001. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. 미소장
17 Kratzer, A. 2006. Decomposing Attitude Verbs. Available at http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/DcwY2JkM/attitude-verbs2006.pdf 미소장
18 Kratzer, A. 2013. Modality for the 21st Century. In S. R. Anderson, J. Moeschler and F. Reboul, eds., L'interface Langage-Cognition/The Language-Cognition Interface: Actes du 19e Congrès International des Linguistes Genève, 179-199. Librarie Droz. 미소장
19 Larson, R. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335-391. 미소장
20 Lohndal, T. 2014. Sentential subjects in English and Norwegian. Syntaxe et Semantique 1, 81-113. 미소장
21 Meijer, A. M. 2018. The pragmatics and semantics of embedded polar responses with English ‘so’. In W. G. Bennett et al., eds., Proceedings of the 35th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 269-279. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 미소장
22 Moulton, K. 2008. Small antecdents: Syntax or pragmatics? In E. Elfner and M. Walkow, eds., Proceedings of the Thirty-seventh Annual North East Linguistics Society, 1, 45-58. Amherst, MA: GLSA. 미소장
23 Moulton, K. 2009. Natural Selection and the Syntax of Clausal Complementation. Doctoral Dissertation, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. 미소장
24 Moulton, K. 2015. CPs: Copies and compositionality. Linguistic Inquiry 46(2), 305-342. 미소장
25 Moulton, K. 2019. (Non)-Complement Clauses and In-situ Saturation: Consequences for cross-clausal Adependencies. A handout at GLOW in Asia XII/SICOGG XXII, 2019, Dongguk University, Seoul. 미소장
26 Needham, S. M. 2012. Propositional Anaphora in English: The Relationship between ‘so’ and Discourse. Master’s thesis, Carleton University Ottawa. 미소장
27 Özyildiz, D. 2019. Embedded clauses in Turkish: Different paths to composition. Talk at RelNompComp, University of Toronto, 19 June. 미소장
28 Sailor, C. 2012. On embedded polar replies. Handout from the Workshop on the Syntax of Answers to Polar Questions, Newcastle University, UK. 미소장
29 Schier, S. 1972. Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 미소장
30 Takahashi, S. 2010. The hidden side of clausal complementation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28, 343-380. 미소장
31 Vendler, Z. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 56, 143-160. [Reprinted with minor changes in Linguistics in philosophy, by Zeno Vendler, 97-121. Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press, 1967.] 미소장

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차