본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

초록보기

Civic engagement is an umbrella term that includes various components and is rarely defined for low-income individuals in the context of developing countries. This paper investigates and establishes the construct validity of an instrument to measure civic engagement among this study population. The sample consists of 9,013 low-income individuals within 37 low-, lower-middle, and upper-middle income countries. The data is drawn from the World Values Survey Wave 6 (2010-2014). Several factor analysis models were estimated, including an individual-level exploratory factor analysis (EFA), an individual-level confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and a multi-level (individual- and country-level) confirmatory factor analysis (MCFA). Results supported a three-factor structure at both individual and country levels: 1) electoral behavior, 2) membership in civic organizations, and 3) cognitive engagement. Results indicated that the proposed factor structure fits the data well, at both the individual and country levels. The results of this study have both practical and conceptual implications. For researchers, this study provides initial evidence for the construct validity of the civic engagement for use with low-income individuals in developing countries. Practitioners also may use the findings to develop interventions and policies that would improve civic engagement among the study population.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
학업중단 청소년의 또래 애착이 스마트폰 중독에 미치는 영향 : The effect of peer attachment among adolescents who have drop out students on smartphone addiction : the serial mediating effect of self-esteem and depression / 자아존중감과 우울의 직렬매개효과 심연희, 김명숙, 전동일 p. 5-28
국내 죽음불안 연구 동향 : Research trend of death anxiety in Korea : focusing on its relationship with counseling / 상담과의 연관성을 중심으로 이우제, 조은이 p. 29-66
텍스트 마이닝을 이용한 가상자산 규제 관련 언론 보도의 잠재적 프레임 분석 = Potential frame analysis of media reports related to virtual asset regulation using text mining 송민호, 김은이 p. 67-101
노인의 삶의 만족도 변화와 우울 변화의 관계에 관한 연구 = A study on the relationship between changes in life satisfaction and changes in depression in the elderly 허만세 p. 102-130
의사결정나무분석을 활용한 4년제 대졸자의 중소제조기업 선택 결정요인 분석 = A study on determinantal of small and medium-sized manufacturers four-year college graduates choice base on decision tree analysis 지혜순, 이영민 p. 131-153
(A) multilevel measurement model of civic engagement among low-income populations in low-and middle-income countries = 개발도상국 저소득층의 시민사회참여 측정척도 개발 : 다층 탐색적·확인적 요인분석 결과 Chu, Yoosun p. 154-188
사회적 자본과 국가자긍심이 통일의 필요성 인식에 미치는 상관관계 분석, 2006-2018 = A study of the analysis on the impact of social capital and national pride on the perception of the necessity of unification of South and North Korea, 2006-2018 최두훈 p. 193-220

참고문헌 (48건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by civic engagement? Journal of Transformative Education, 3(3), 236–253. http://doi.org/10.1177/1541344605276792 미소장
2 Andolina, M., Keeter, S., Zukin, C., & Jenkins, K. (2003). A guide to the index of civic and political engagement. College Park, MD: The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. 미소장
3 American Psychological Association. (n.d.) Civic engagement. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/education/undergrad/civic-engagement.aspx 미소장
4 Barnes, S.H. & Kaase, M. (Eds.). (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. Beverley Hills and London: Sage Publications. 미소장
5 Bedolla, L. G. (2010). 21st century competencies and civic participation. Paper prepared for the NRC meeting on 21st Century Competencies: A Planning Process on Behalf of the Hewlett Foundation. 미소장
6 Benenson, J. R. (2015). Civic engagement as a pathway toward economic opportunity: a multimethod study of low-income individuals (Doctoral dissertation). Brandeis University, Waltham, MA. 미소장
7 Berger, B. (2009). Political theory, political science, and the end of civic engagement. Perspectives On Politics, 7(2), 335–350. http://doi.org/10.1017/S153759270909080X 미소장
8 Checkoway, B., & Aldana, A. (2013). Four forms of youth civic engagement for diverse democracy. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(11), 1894–1899. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.09.005 미소장
9 Delli Carpini, M. X. (2000). Increasing the civic engagement of young adults in the United States. Philadelphia, PA: The Pew Charitable Trusts. 미소장
10 Deutsch, F. (2009). Participation and democracy: Dynamics, causes and consequences of elite- challenging activities (Doctoral dissertation). Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany. 미소장
11 Dodman, D., Brown, D., Francis, K., Hardoy, J., Johnson, C., & Satterthwaite, D. (2013). Understanding the nature and scale of urban risk in low- and middle-income countries and its implications for humanitarian preparedness, planning and response. London, UK: Institutional Institute for Environment and Development. 미소장
12 Ehrlich, T. (2000). Civic responsibility and higher education. Westport, CT: American Council on Education. Oryx Press. 미소장
13 Ekman, J., & Amnå, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22, 283–300. http://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1 미소장
14 Finch, H., & Bolin, J. (2017). Multilevel modeling using Mplus. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 미소장
15 Finley, A. (2011). Civic Learning and Democratic Engagements: A Review of the Literature on Civic Engagement in Post-Secondary Education. Paper prepared for the US Department of Education as part of Contract: ED-OPE-10-C-0078 미소장
16 Flanagan, C. A., Syvertse, A. K., & Stout, M. D. (2007). Civic measurement models: tapping adolescents’ civic engagement. College Park, MD: The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. 미소장
17 Gaby, S. (2017). The Civic Engagement Gap(s): Youth Participation and Inequality From 1976 to 2009. Youth and Society, 49(7), 923–946. http://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X16678155 미소장
18 Hall, P. A. (1999). Social capital in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 29(3), 417–461. doi:10.1017/S0007123499000204 미소장
19 Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2015). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques: MLM and SEM approaches using Mplus (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. 미소장
20 Hylton, M. E. (2015). Civic engagement and civic literacy among social work students: Where do we stand? Journal of Policy Practice, 14(3-4), 292-307. http://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2015.1004396 미소장
21 Inglehart, R. (1977). Cognitive Mobilization and Political Participation Among Western Publics. In The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics (pp. 293-321). Princeton University Press. 미소장
22 Inglehart, R., C. Haerpfer, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, J. Diez-Medrano, M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin & B. Puranen et al. (eds.). 2014. World Values Survey: Round Six –Country-Pooled Datafile Version: www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. 미소장
23 Jacobs, G., & Šlaus, I. (2010). Indicators of economics progress: the power of measurement and human welfare. Cadmus, 1(1), 53-113. 미소장
24 Jacoby, B. (2009). Civic engagement in higher education: Concepts and practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 미소장
25 Kamran, S., & Uusitalo, O. (2016). Vulnerability of the unbanked: evidence from a developing country. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(4), 400–409. http://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12277 미소장
26 Keeter, S., Zukin, C., Andolina, M., & Jenkins, K. (2002a). The civic and political health of the nation: a generational portrait. College Park, MD: The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. 미소장
27 Keeter, S., Zukin, C., Andolina, M., & Jenkins, K. (2002b). Improving the Measurement of Political Participation. Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association Chicago, IL April 25-28, 2002. 미소장
28 Kelloway, E. K. (2017). Using Mplus for structural equation modeling: a researcher's guide (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd. 미소장
29 Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Self-reported measure. In Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (pp. 805-806). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n523 미소장
30 Lopez, M. H., Levine, P., Both, D., Kiesa, A., Kirby, E., Marcelo, K. (2006). The 2006 civic and political health of the nation: a detailed look at how youth participate in politics and communities. College Park, MD: The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. 미소장
31 Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2004). Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis. Statistica Neeraldica, 58(2), 127-137. 미소장
32 Malik, K., & Waglé, S. (2002). Civic engagement and development: Introducing the issues. Capacity for development: New solutions to old problems, 85-100. 미소장
33 McBride, A. M. (2003). Asset ownership among low-income and low-wealth individuals: Opportunity, asset ownership, and civic engagement (Doctoral dissertation, Washington University, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64, 3483. 미소장
34 McBride, A. M., Sherraden, M. S., & Pritzker, S. (2006). Civic engagement among low-income and low-wealth families: In their words. Family Relations, 55(2), 152–162. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00366.x 미소장
35 Medrano, J. D. (n.d.). Managing weights and population weights within the WVS. Retrieved from http://www.jdsurvey.net/jds/jdsurveyActualidad.jsp?Idioma=I&SeccionTexto=0405 미소장
36 Muthén, B. O. (2009). MLR fit indices. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/9/4555.html?1525391209 미소장
37 Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus uer’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author. 미소장
38 Nath, S. (2012) Civic engagement in low income and minority neighborhoods, and the role of public investment. Undergraduate Economic Review, 9(1), Article 8. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/uer/vol9/iss1/8 미소장
39 Norris, P. (2002). Civic engagement: Mexico in comparative perspective. Retrieved from https://sites.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/Acrobat/Mexican%20Civic%20Engagement%20N orris.pdf 미소장
40 Putnam, R. D. (1993). What makes democracy work? National Civic Review, 82(2), 101-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.4100820204 미소장
41 Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster. 미소장
42 Scharfer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 144-177. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147 미소장
43 Schmitt, T. A. (2011). Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 304–321. http://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406653 미소장
44 Schwartz, H., Bostic, R. W., Green, R. K., Reina, V. J., Davis, L. M., & Augustine, C. H. (2016). The preservation of affordable rental housing: An evaluation of the MacArthur Foundation’s window of opportunity initiative. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation. 미소장
45 United Nations [UN]. (2008). People Matter Civic Engagement in Public Governance. World Public Sector Report 2008. New York, NY: Author. 미소장
46 Uslaner, E. M. (2003). Civic Engagement in America: Why People Participate in Political and Social Life. Retrieved from http://www.politicipublice.ro/uploads/civic_engagement_in_america.pdf 미소장
47 Wirth, R. J., & Edwards, M. C. (2007). Item factor analysis: Current approaches and future directions. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 58–79. doi:10.1037/1082- 989X.12.1.58 미소장
48 Yuan, K-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing Data. Sociological Methodology, 30(1), 165- 200. https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00078 미소장