권호기사보기
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
대표형(전거형, Authority) | 생물정보 | 이형(異形, Variant) | 소속 | 직위 | 직업 | 활동분야 | 주기 | 서지 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
연구/단체명을 입력해주세요. |
|
|
|
|
|
* 주제를 선택하시면 검색 상세로 이동합니다.
Purpose: Although many studies have reported the use of dynamic hip screws (DHS) and cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) forbasicervical femoral neck fracture (BFNF), no clear treatment protocols have been recommended. The present study aimed tocompare the surgical outcomes associated with DHS and CMN to determine the appropriate fixation method for BFNF.
Materials and Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up toJanuary 9, 2021 that compared the treatment outcomes between CMN and DHS in BFNF. The primary outcomes of the presentmeta-analysis were fracture union time, postoperative cut-out rate, and reoperation rate.
Results: We included seven studies involving 353 cases of BFNF in our review. Of these, 206 patients were treated using CMN,and DHS were utilized in 147 patients. In a pooled analysis, the DHS group required a longer time to achieve fracture union com pared to the CMN group [mean difference (MD): -0.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.70, -0.12; p=0.006; I2=0%]. However, thecut-out and reoperation rates exhibited no statistically significant differences between the DHS and CMN groups [cut-out odds ra tio (OR): 0.54; 95% CI: 0.10, 2.82; p=0.47; I2=24%, reoperation rate OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.15, 2.86; p=0.57; I2=19%, respectively].
Conclusion: Stable fixation using DHS and CMN does not show a significant clinical or radiographical difference in BFNF, andthe implant can be selected based on the surgeon’s preference.번호 | 참고문헌 | 국회도서관 소장유무 |
---|---|---|
1 | Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd. Hip fractures in the elderly:a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 1992;2:285-9. | 미소장 |
2 | Sambrook P, Cooper C. Osteoporosis. Lancet 2006;367:2010-8. | 미소장 |
3 | Cullen MW, Gullerud RE, Larson DR, Melton LJ 3rd, Huddleston JM. Impact of heart failure on hip fracture outcomes: a population-based study. J Hosp Med 2011;6:507-12. | 미소장 |
4 | Antapur P, Mahomed N, Gandhi R. Fractures in the elderly: when is hip replacement a necessity? Clin Interv Aging 2011;6:1-7. | 미소장 |
5 | Su BW, Heyworth BE, Protopsaltis TS, Lipton CB, Sinicropi SM, Chapman CB, et al. Basicervical versus intertrochanteric fractures:an analysis of radiographic and functional outcomes. Orthopedics 2006;29:919-25. | 미소장 |
6 | Panteli M, Rodham P, Giannoudis PV. Biomechanical rationale for implant choices in femoral neck fracture fixation in the non-elderly. Injury 2015;46:445-52. | 미소장 |
7 | Sharma A, Sethi A, Sharma S. Comparative analysis of treatment of basicervical femur fractures in young adults with CCS, DHS, and PFN. Rev Bras Ortop 2018;53:783-7. | 미소장 |
8 | Kim JT, Ha YC, Park CH, Yoo JI, Kim TY. Single screw type of lag screw results higher reoperation rate in the osteosynthesis of basicervical hip fracture. J Orthop Sci 2020;25:152-5. | 미소장 |
9 | Yoo JI, Cha Y, Kwak J, Kim HY, Choy WS. Review on basicervical femoral neck fracture: definition, treatments, and failures. Hip Pelvis 2020;32:170-81. | 미소장 |
10 | Chen CY, Chiu FY, Chen CM, Huang CK, Chen WM, Chen TH. Surgical treatment of basicervical fractures of femur--a prospective evaluation of 269 patients. J Trauma 2008;64:427-9. | 미소장 |
11 | Mousapour A, Mardanpour K, Hojabrian A, Saeb M, Khabiri SS, Safari-Faramani R, et al. A comparison of bipolar hemiarthroplasty versus dynamic hip screw fixation of basicervical femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Spine Trauma 2019;5:25-8. | 미소장 |
12 | Kuokkanen HO. Treatment options for basicervical fractures of the femoral neck. A clinical follow-up. Acta Orthop Belg 1991;57:162-8. | 미소장 |
13 | Hu SJ, Yu GR, Zhang SM. Surgical treatment of basicervical intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with cephalomeduallary hip nails. Orthop Surg 2013;5:124-9. | 미소장 |
14 | Watson ST, Schaller TM, Tanner SL, Adams JD, Jeray KJ. Outcomes of low-energy basicervical proximal femoral fractures treated with cephalomedullary fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016;98:1097-102. | 미소장 |
15 | Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015;4:1. | 미소장 |
16 | Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:10. | 미소장 |
17 | Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 2003;73:712-6. | 미소장 |
18 | Schmidt FL, Oh IS, Hayes TL. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2009;62(Pt 1):97-128. | 미소장 |
19 | Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2019. | 미소장 |
20 | Eceviz E, Çevik HB, Bulut G. Comparison of intramedullary and extramedullary fixation of basicervical fractures of the femur in the elderly: a prospective randomized study. Med Bull Haseki 2020;58:169-75. | 미소장 |
21 | Jian Z, Lv T, Ao R, Jiang X, Zhou J, Yu B. Comparison of clinical outcomes between cephalomedullary nails and dynamic hip screws for basicervical proximal femoral fractures. Research Square [Preprint]. 2020 [accessed 2022 March 1]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-37367/v1. | 미소장 |
22 | Lee YK, Yoon BH, Hwang JS, Cha YH, Kim KC, Koo KH. Risk factors of fixation failure in basicervical femoral neck fracture: which device is optimal for fixation? Injury 2018;49:691-6. | 미소장 |
23 | Saarenpää I, Partanen J, Jalovaara P. Basicervical fracture--a rare type of hip fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002;122:69-72. | 미소장 |
24 | Zhang TC, Zhang ZS, Zhou F, Tian Y, Ji HQ, Guo Y, et al. Diagnosis and treatment for the basicervical fractures of the trochanteric region. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2017;49:246-51. | 미소장 |
25 | Kweon SH, Lee SH, Kook SH, Choi YC. Outcomes of cephalomedullary nailing in basicervical fracture. Hip Pelvis 2017;29:270-6. | 미소장 |
26 | Massoud EI. Fixation of basicervical and related fractures. Int Orthop 2010;34:577-82. | 미소장 |
27 | Guo J, Dong W, Jin L, Yin Y, Zhang R, Hou Z, et al. Treatment of basicervical femoral neck fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation. J Int Med Res 2019;47:4333-43. | 미소장 |
28 | Okano I, Sawada T, Kushima N, Tachibana T, Inagaki K. Treatment with helical blade cephalomedullary nail for two-part basicervical proximal femoral fracture in elderly patients: a retrospective observational study. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2017;8:244-51. | 미소장 |
29 | Huang SG, Chen B, Zhang Y, Nie FF, Ju L, Li M, et al. Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of PFNA, PFLCP, and DHS in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture. Am J Ther 2017; 24:e659-66. | 미소장 |
30 | Johnson J, Deren M, Chambers A, Cassidy D, Koruprolu S, Born C. Biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for basicervical femoral neck fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019;27:e41-8. | 미소장 |
31 | Xiong WF, Du SC, Chang SM. Choosing an optimal implant fixation for basicervical femoral neck fractures. Injury 2018;49:1238-9. | 미소장 |
32 | Warren JA, Sundaram K, Hampton R, McLaughlin J, Patterson B, Higuera CA, et al. Cephalomedullary nailing versus sliding hip screws for Intertrochanteric and basicervical hip fractures: a propensity-matched study of short-term outcomes in over 17,000 patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2020;30:243-50. | 미소장 |
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
*전화번호 | ※ '-' 없이 휴대폰번호를 입력하세요 |
---|
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
---|
도서위치안내: 정기간행물실(524호) / 서가번호: 대학01
2021년 이전 정기간행물은 온라인 신청(원문 구축 자료는 원문 이용)
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.