본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

초록보기

Purpose: To evaluate the level of agreement between ANTERION (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), OA-2000 (Tomey, Nagoya, Japan), and IOLMaster 500 (Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany).

Methods: Fifty-one eyes of 51 patients were included in the study. Flat keratometry (K) and steep K, vector component of astigmatism (Jackson cross-cylinder at 0° and 90° [J0] and Jackson cross-cylinder at 45° and 135° [J45]), anterior chamber depth, and axial length were compared using the three devices. Repeated measures analysis of variance was conducted to compare the mean values of the biometrics. Pearson correlation test was conducted to analyze the correlations of the measured values, and a Bland-Altman plot was used to assess the agreement between the three devices. The predicted intraocular lens power of each device was compared to the others using the SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, and Kane formulas.

Results: All K values measured using ANTERION were flatter than those of other instruments. However, good agreement was observed for flat K (ANTERION - OA-2000; 95% limits of agreement [LoA], 0.86 diopters [D]) and steep K (ANTERION - OA -2000; 95% LoA, 0.93 D) and OA-2000 - IOLMaster 500 (95% LoA, 0.93 D). J0 and J45 vector components of astigmatism were not statistically different; however, the agreements were poor between the devices (95% LoA ≥1.97 D). Anterior chamber depth values of ANTERION and OA-2000 were interchangeable (95% LoA, 0.15 mm). The axial length showed a high agreement (95% LoA ≤0.17 mm) among the three devices. The predicted intraocular lens powers of the three devices were not interchangeable regardless of formulas (95% LoA ≥1.04 D).

Conclusions: Significant differences in ocular biometrics were observed between ANTERION and the other two devices. This study demonstrated that only axial length showed good agreement among devices.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
Evaluation of the effect of uncomplicated cataract surgery on retina and optic disc : optical coherence tomography angiography study Burak Özkan, Emine Çiloğlu p. 287-295

Assessment for macular thickness after uncomplicated phacoemulsification using optical coherence tomography Byung-Jin Kim, Ye Jin Ahn, Hye-Young Oh, Soon Il Choi, Young-Sik Yoo, Woong-Joo Whang, Yong-Soo Byun, Mee-Yon Lee, Choun-Ki Joo p. 296-305

(The) repeatability, reproducibility, and correlation of the Schirmer test : a comparison of open versus closed eye Eren Ekici, Cagatay Caglar, Esra Ün Akgümüş p. 306-312

Reestablishing lacrimal drainage by canaliculorhinostomy after dacryocystectomy : a viable option in symptomatic patients Shruthi Tara, Neha Panickar, Derin Puthur p. 313-317

Impact of lacrimal gland extraction on the contralateral eye in an animal model for dry eye disease Minha Kim, So Young Kim, Ji Won Jeon, Hyung Keun Lee p. 318-325

Agreement between two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer Ji Young Moon, Soo Chang Cho, Hyun Jin Kim, Roo Min Jun, Kyung Eun Han p. 326-337

Comparison of anterior segment measurements with a new multifunctional unit and five other devices Bo Yi Kim, Ikhyun Jun p. 338-349

(The) association between level of control and exodeviation after the monocular occlusion test in pediatric patients with intermittent exotropia Sunggeun Son, Won Jae Kim p. 350-355

Rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis : etiopathology, clinical features, outcome, and the factors associated with outcome Amit Kumar Deb, Rakesh Singh, Subashini Kaliaperumal, Arun Alexander, Tanmay Gokhale, Sandip Sarkar p. 356-365

Assessment of perinatal clinical characteristics, perinatal risk factors, and microbial profile in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary care center : a descriptive study Kaviyapriya Natarajan, Nirupama Kasturi, Sujatha Sistla p. 366-373

(Correspondence) Choroidal detachment following micropulse laser cyclophotocoagulation in a trabeculectomized eye with chronic angle closure glaucoma : a case report Purumeh Nam, Chungkwon Yoo, Ji-Hye Park, Yong Yeon Kim p. 374-375

(Correspondence) Effectiveness of more than 2-year treatment with miniscleral contact lens in ocular surface diseases : four case reports Min Sung Oh, Min Seung Kang, Su Hwan Park, Ji Eun Lee p. 376-378

참고문헌 (35건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:472-85. 미소장
2 Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238:765-73. 미소장
3 Lam AK, Chan R, Pang PC. The repeatability and accuracy of axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements from the IOLMaster. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001;21:477-83. 미소장
4 Goebels S, Pattmoller M, Eppig T, et al. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41:2387-93. 미소장
5 Chan PP, Lai G, Chiu V, et al. Anterior chamber angle imaging with swept-source optical coherence tomography:comparison between CASIAII and ANTERION. Sci Rep 2020;10:18771. 미소장
6 Tana-Rivero P, Aguilar-Corcoles S, Tello-Elordi C, et al. Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021;47:488-95. 미소장
7 Schiano-Lomoriello D, Hoffer KJ, Abicca I, Savini G. Repeatability of automated measurements by a new anterior segment optical coherence tomographer and biometer and agreement with standard devices. Sci Rep 2021;11:983. 미소장
8 Oh R, Oh JY, Choi HJ, et al. Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices. BMC Ophthalmol 2021;21:62. 미소장
9 Fisus AD, Hirnschall ND, Findl O. Comparison of 2 sweptsource optical coherence tomography-based biometry devices. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021;47:87-92. 미소장
10 Hoffer KJ. Definition of ACD. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1484. 미소장
11 Goto S, Maeda N, Noda T, et al. Comparison of composite and segmental methods for acquiring optical axial length with swept-source optical coherence tomography. Sci Rep 2020;10:4474. 미소장
12 Kim KY, Choi GS, Kang MS, Kim US. Comparison study of the axial length measured using the new swept-source optical coherence tomography ANTERION and the partial coherence interferometry IOL master. PLoS One 2020;15:e0244590. 미소장
13 Hua Y, Qiu W, Xiao Q, Wu Q. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes. PLoS One 2018;13:e0193023. 미소장
14 Santodomingo-Rubido J, Mallen EA, Gilmartin B, Wolffsohn JS. A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:458-62. 미소장
15 Hashemi H, Heydarian S, Khabazkhoob M, et al. Keratometry in children: comparison between auto-refractokeratometer, rotating scheimpflug imaging, and biograph. J Optom 2019;12:99-110. 미소장
16 Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:367-75. 미소장
17 Hashemi H, Heydarian S, Ali Yekta A, et al. Agreement between Pentacam and handheld Auto-Refractor/Keratometer for keratometry measurement. J Optom 2019;12:232-9. 미소장
18 Beato JN, Esteves-Leandro J, Reis D, et al. Agreement between IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam HR for keratometry assessment in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Int J Ophthalmol 2020;13:920-6. 미소장
19 Liao X, Peng Y, Liu B, et al. Agreement of ocular biometric measurements in young healthy eyes between IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000. Sci Rep 2020;10:3134. 미소장
20 Elbaz U, Barkana Y, Gerber Y, et al. Comparison of different techniques of anterior chamber depth and keratometric measurements. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:48-53. 미소장
21 Shetty N, Kaweri L, Koshy A, et al. Repeatability of biometry measured by three devices and its impact on predicted intraocular lens power. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021;47:585-92. 미소장
22 Chan TC, Yu MC, Chiu V, et al. Comparison of two novel swept-source optical coherence tomography devices to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer. Sci Rep 2021;11:14853. 미소장
23 McAlinden C, Wang Q, Gao R, et al. Axial length measurement failure rates with biometers using swept-source optical coherence tomography compared to partial-coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence interferometry. Am J Ophthalmol 2017;173:64-9. 미소장
24 Jasvinder S, Khang TF, Sarinder KK, et al. Agreement analysis of LENSTAR with other techniques of biometry. Eye (Lond) 2011;25:717-24. 미소장
25 Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The lens opacities classification system III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:831-6. 미소장
26 Kongsap P. Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients. Eye Vis (Lond) 2016;3:27. 미소장
27 Ghaffari R, Mahmoudzadeh R, Mohammadi SS, et al. Assessing the validity of measurements of swept-source and partial coherence interferometry devices in cataract patients. Optom Vis Sci 2019;96:745-50. 미소장
28 Xiong S, Lv M, Zou H, et al. Comparison of refractive measures of three autorefractors in children and adolescents. Optom Vis Sci 2017;94:894-902. 미소장
29 Anderson DF, Dhariwal M, Bouchet C, Keith MS. Global prevalence and economic and humanistic burden of astigmatism in cataract patients: a systematic literature review. Clin Ophthalmol 2018;12:439-52. 미소장
30 Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:368-76. 미소장
31 McAlinden C, Wang Q, Pesudovs K, et al. Axial length measurement failure rates with the IOLMaster and Lenstar LS 900 in eyes with cataract. PLoS One 2015;10:e0128929. 미소장
32 Shetty R, Arora V, Jayadev C, et al. Repeatability and agreement of three Scheimpflug-based imaging systems for measuring anterior segment parameters in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:5263-8. 미소장
33 RetzlaffJA, Sanders DR, KraffMC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 1990;16:333-40. 미소장
34 Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology 2018;125:169-78. 미소장
35 Connell BJ, Kane JX. Comparison of the Kane formula with existing formulas for intraocular lens power selection. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 2019;4:e000251. 미소장

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차