본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

초록보기

This study investigated student engagement by conceptualizing learning engagement and examining the inner mechanism that operates in the university English learning context. This study administered a questionnaire to 376 college students, and data analysis was conducted with SPSS 26.0 and AMOS 24.0. The findings revealed that student engagement can be conceptualized into behavioral, cognitive, affective, and interactive engagement. The results confirmed that cognitive engagement positively affected behavioral engagement, whereas affective engagement did not. Affective engagement had positive effects on both cognitive engagement and interactive engagement. Interactive engagement positively affected cognitive engagement but did not affect behavioral engagement. Further, the results showed that cognitive engagement acted as a full mediator between affective engagement and behavioral engagement, as well as between interactional engagement and behavioral engagement. The findings of this study propose implications for optimizing English teaching to facilitate student engagement and ultimately enhancing their learning satisfaction along with improving academic outcomes.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
(The) development and validation of English communicative competence model for high school students in Korea Whyun Young Choi, Mun-Koo Kang p. 3-24

Unraveling the connections : english proficiency, motivational orientations, and online community engagement among ESP students Jeongyeon Kim, Victoria Kim p. 25-48

AFAIK, IDK that word : investigating learners’ receptive knowledge of online acronyms Dennis Laffey p. 49-67

(A) longitudinal study of English achievement of Korean EFL young adolescent students : focusing on initial English proficiency, English private tutoring, and urbanicity Jiseon Ryu, Byungmin Lee p. 69-92

Korean elementary English teachers’ professionalism development in using EdTech : a grounded theory study Jihye Sim, Seungcheon Ha, Kyuhee Jo p. 93-120

Exploring the factors influencing student engagement in university English classes Xiaohui Zhang, Hyun-Ju Kim p. 121-143

영어과 예비교사의 교육과정 개발 역량 강화를 위한 중등 교원양성기관 수업 모형 연구 = Developing a college course model for enhancing pre-service English teachers’ curriculum development competency via collaboration with inservice teachers : 현직교사와의 협업을 중심으로 이진화 p. 145-166

참고문헌 (62건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271. 미소장
2 Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school:Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386. 미소장
3 Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427-445. 미소장
4 Berger, J. B., & Milem, J. F. (1999). The role of student involvement and perceptions of integration in a causal model of student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 40(6), 641-664. 미소장
5 Brophy, J. (1987). Synthesis of research on strategies for motivating students to learn. Educational Leadership, 45(2), 40-48. 미소장
6 Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching (6th ed.). New York:Longman. 미소장
7 Burman, D. D., Bitan, T., & Booth, J. R. (2008). Sex differences in neural processing of language among children. Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 1349-1362. 미소장
8 Byram, M. (2012). Language awareness and (critical) cultural awareness–relationships, comparisons and contrasts. Language Awareness, 21(1-2), 5-13. 미소장
9 Christenson, S. L., & Anderson, A. R. (2002). Commentary: The centrality of the learning context for students’ academic enabler skills. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 378-393. 미소장
10 Christenson, S., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement (Vol. 840). New York: Springer. 미소장
11 Clore, G. L., & Huntsinger, J. R. (2009). How the object of affect guides its impact. Emotion Review, 1(1), 39-54. 미소장
12 Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self-processes and development (pp. 43-77). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 미소장
13 Constant, E. W. (1984). Communities and hierarchies: Structure in the practice of science and technology. In R. Laudan (Ed.), The nature of technological knowledge: Are models of scientific change relevant? (pp. 27-46). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. 미소장
14 Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104. 미소장
15 Diamantopoulos, A., Siguaw, J. A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. London: Sage. 미소장
16 Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1-13. 미소장
17 Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 275-300. 미소장
18 Ehrman, M. E. (1993). Ego boundaries revisited: Toward a model of personality and learning. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Strategic interaction and language acquisition: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 330-362). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 미소장
19 Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1990). Adult language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting. The Modern Language Journal, 74(3), 311-327. 미소장
20 Filak, V. F., & Sheldon, K. M. (2008). Teacher support, student motivation, student need satisfaction, and college teacher course evaluations: Testing a sequential path model. Educational Psychology, 28(6), 711-724. 미소장
21 Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117-142. 미소장
22 Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. 미소장
23 Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221-234. 미소장
24 Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97-131). Boston, MA: Springer. 미소장
25 Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. 미소장
26 Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21-43. 미소장
27 Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-192. 미소장
28 Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Evaluating model fit: A synthesis of the structural equation modelling literature. In A. Brown (Ed.), 7th European Conference on research methodology for business and management studies (pp. 195-200). London: Academic Publishing. 미소장
29 Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132. 미소장
30 Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5-20. 미소장
31 Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2007). Student behaviors, activities, and experiences associated with student success. In E. Ward &L. E. Wolf-Wendel (Eds.), Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions, and recommendations (pp. 43-67). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 미소장
32 Lam, S. F., Wong, B. P., Yang, H., & Liu, Y. (2012). Understanding student engagement with a contextual model. In S. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 403-419). Boston, MA: Springer. 미소장
33 Lane, E. S., & Harris, S. E. (2015). A new tool for measuring student behavioral engagement in large university classes. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(6), 83-91. 미소장
34 Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. 미소장
35 Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement. Sociology of Education, 68(4), 241-270. 미소장
36 MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. 미소장
37 MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2003). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 53(S1), 137-166. 미소장
38 Mekki, O. M., Ismail, A. M., & Hamdan, D. M. (2022). Student engagement in English language classes: An evaluative study. Sohag University International Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 15-52. 미소장
39 Miller, R. B., Greene, B. A., Montalvo, G. P., Ravindran, B., & Nichols, J. D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 388-422. 미소장
40 Nagao, A. (2018). Can the EFL classroom be considered a community of practice? IAFOR Journal of Language Learning, 4(1), 93-108. 미소장
41 Nasrollahi Shahri, M. N. (2018). Constructing a voice in English as a foreign language:Identity and engagement. TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), 85-109. 미소장
42 Newton, J. M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2020). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. New York: Routledge. 미소장
43 Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2014). Cognitive approaches to emotions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(3), 134-140. 미소장
44 Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 83-98. 미소장
45 Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50-72. 미소장
46 Quaye, S. J., Harper, S. R., & Pendakur, S. L. (Eds.). (2019). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations. New York: Routledge. 미소장
47 Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Boston, MA: Springer. 미소장
48 Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579-595. 미소장
49 Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness:Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3-19). Boston, MA: Springer. 미소장
50 Rong, T. S. (2010). AMOS and research method (2nd ed.). Chongqing, China: Chongqing University Press. 미소장
51 Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). “Should I ask for help?” The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents’ help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 329-341. 미소장
52 Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581. 미소장
53 Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21-44). Boston, MA: Springer. 미소장
54 Skinner, E. A., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765-781. 미소장
55 Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self‐efficacy and selfregulation:Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191-204. 미소장
56 Svalberg, A. M. L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18(3-4), 242-258. 미소장
57 Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson. 미소장
58 Taylor, L., & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving Student Engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1-32. 미소장
59 Wang, M. T., & Peck, S. C. (2013). Adolescent educational success and mental health vary across school engagement profiles. Developmental Psychology, 49(7), 1266-1276. 미소장
60 Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York:Cambridge University Press. 미소장
61 Xu, C. H. (2020). The influencing factor model and the intervention strategy in blended learning context based on MOOC. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Shanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China. 미소장
62 Zumbrunn, S., McKim, C., Buhs, E., & Hawley, L. R. (2014). Support, belonging, motivation, and engagement in the college classroom: A mixed method study. Instructional Science, 42(5), 661-684. 미소장

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차