본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
가상 인플루언서의 특성들이 구전의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 연구 = A study on the impact of virtual influencer's characteristics on word of mouth : focusing on the mediating effect of attachment and self-congruity : 구전 소통의 과정을 중심으로 고영, 강재원 p. 5-48
버추얼 쇼호스트의 특성이 라이브커머스 지속이용의도에 미치는 영향 = The impact of virtual show host attributes on continued intention to use in live commerce 송유진, 최세정 p. 49-85
메타버스 아바타의 설정 자유가 반시민적 댓글 공유의도에 미치는 영향 = Metaverse avatar types and uncivil behavioral intention : the mediating role of self-image concerns and the moderating effect of bystander presence : 자아 이미지 걱정의 매개효과와 주변인의 조절된 매개효과 임인재, 박윤정, 이세영, 금희조 p. 87-142

의인화의 심리적 기제와 인공지능 의인화의 문제 = Anthropomorphism and artificial intelligence : psychology and criticisms 진보래 p. 143-188
20대의 성별갈등 이슈에 대한 선택적 노출이 태도극화에 미치는 영향 = The impact of selective exposure on attitude polarization in the issue of gender conflict among 20-somethings : focusing on the moderating effects of online communication : 온라인커뮤니케이션의 조절효과를 중심으로 호규현, 이윤종, 김정현 p. 189-234

참고문헌 (121건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 김민지·최선우·문선영·박해인·황희경·김민경·석정호 (2020). 가상현실기법을활용한 정신건강 교육 및 기술훈련 프로그램의 우울증상 회복 및 자살위험성 감소 효과. 『Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association』, 59권 1호,51-60. 미소장
2 김연미·송미영·양정숙·나현미 (2022). AI 로봇 통합관리프로그램이 재가노인의 인지기능, 일상생활활동, 우울에 미치는 효과. 『Journal of Digital Convergence』,20권 2호, 511-523. 미소장
3 박남기·김윤경·장은채·이주연·최어진 (2021). 사회성 능력이 인공지능 챗봇의사회적 사용과 자기노출에 미치는 영향: 사용자의 외로움 정도와 챗봇에 대한 지각된 인간다움의 매개효과. 『한국언론학보』, 65권 5호, 367-401. 미소장
4 박수아·최세정 (2018). 인공지능 스피커 만족도와 지속적 이용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인: 기능적, 정서적 요인을 중심으로. 『정보사회와 미디어』, 19권 3호,159-182. 미소장
5 송문선 (2022). 독거노인의 반려 AI 로봇 (효돌) 과의 동거 중에 경험하는 의인화에대한 질적연구. 『사회복지연구』, 53권 1호, 119-159. 미소장
6 심혜린·최준호 (2022). 학습용 에이전트 의인화 설계 요인: 인간성과 역할을 중심으로. 『한국콘텐츠학회논문지』, 22권 2호, 358-369. 미소장
7 윤상석·김혁수·최종석·박성기 (2015). 자폐 범주성 장애 아동의 눈맞춤과 얼굴표정읽기 기능향상을 위한 행동 중재용 로봇시스템. 『로봇학회 논문지』, 10권2호, 90-98. 미소장
8 현은자 (2010). 유아교육에서의 R-learning. 『로봇과 인간』, 7권 3호, 9-15. 미소장
9 홍은지·조광수·최준호 (2017). 스마트홈 대화형 인터페이스의 의인화 효과. 『한국 HCI학회 논문지』, 12권 1호, 15-23. 미소장
10 Airenti, G. (2015). The cognitive bases of anthropomorphism: From relatedness to empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7, 117-127. 미소장
11 Airenti, G. (2018). The development of anthropomorphism in interaction: Intersubjectivity, imagination, and theory of mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2136. 미소장
12 Asselborn, T., Johal, W., & Dillenbourg, P. (2017, August). Keep on moving! Exploring anthropomorphic effects of motion during idle moments. In 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (pp. 897-902). IEEE. 미소장
13 Bartneck, C., & Hu, J. (2008). Exploring the abuse of robots. Interaction Studies, 9(3), 415-433. 미소장
14 Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2(3), 412-414. 미소장
15 Bateson, M., Callow, L., Holmes, J. R., Redmond Roche, M. L., & Nettle, D. (2013). Do images of ‘watching eyes’ induce behaviour that is more pro-social or more normative? A field experiment on littering. PLOS ONE, 8(12), e82055. 미소장
16 Bayne, S. (2015). Teacherbot: Interventions in automated teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(4), 455-467. 미소장
17 Bethel, C. L., Stevenson, M. R., & Scassellati, B. (2011, October). Secret-sharing: Interactions between a child, robot, and adult. In 2011 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (pp. 2489-2494). IEEE. 미소장
18 Blut, M., Wang, C., Wünderlich, N. V., & Brock, C. (2021). Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: A meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,49, 632-658. 미소장
19 Bryson, J. J. (2010). Robots should be slaves. In Y. Wilks (Ed.), Close engagements with artificial companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues (pp. 63-74). John Benjamins. 미소장
20 Bryson, J. J., & Theodorou, A. (2019). How society can maintain human-centric artificial intelligence. In M. Toivonen & E. Saari (Eds.), Human-centered digitalization and services (pp. 305-323). Springer. 미소장
21 Burch, J. & Oumawatari, K. (2018, May 25). In Japan, a Buddhist funeral service for robot dogs. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/ travel/article/in-japan—a-buddhist-funeral-service-for-robot-dogs 미소장
22 Burnham, T. C., & Hare, B. (2007). Engineering human cooperation: Does involuntary neural activation increase public goods contributions? Human Nature, 18, 88-108. 미소장
23 Calo, R. (2012). Robots and privacy. In P. Lin, K. Abney & G. A. Bekey (Eds), Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics (pp. 187-201). The MIT Press. 미소장
24 Chen, R. P., Wan, E. W., & Levy, E. (2017). The effect of social exclusion on consumer preference for anthropomorphized brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 23-34. 미소장
25 Chiou, E. K., Schroeder, N. L., & Craig, S. D. (2020). How we trust, perceive, and learn from virtual humans: The influence of voice quality. Computers & Education, 146, 103756. 미소장
26 Christoforakos, L., & Diefenbach, S. (2023). Technology as a social companion? An exploration of individual and product-related factors of anthropomorphism. Social Science Computer Review, 41(3), 1039-1062. 미소장
27 Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. The Mit Press. 미소장
28 Conty, L., George, N., & Hietanen, J. K. (2016). Watching Eyes effects: When others meet the self. Consciousness and Cognition, 45, 184-197. 미소장
29 Damiano, L., & Dumouchel, P. (2018). Anthropomorphism in human-robot co-evolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 468. 미소장
30 Darling, K. (2016). Extending legal protection to social robots: The effects of anthropomophism, empathy, and violent behavior toward robotic objects. In R. Calo, A. M. Froomkin & I. Kerr (Eds.), Robot law (pp. 213-231). Edward Elgar. 미소장
31 Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. The MIT Press. 미소장
32 Deshmukh, A., Craenen, B., Vinciarelli, A., & Foster, M. E. (2018, December). Shaping robot gestures to shape users’ perception: The effect of amplitude and speed on godspeed ratings. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human-agent interaction (pp. 293-300). ACM. 미소장
33 Duffy, B. R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3-4), 177-190. 미소장
34 Durden, E., Pirner, M. C., Rapoport, S. J., Williams, A., Robinson, A., & Forman-Hoffman, V. L. (2023). Changes in stress, burnout, and resilience associated with an 8-week intervention with relational agent “Woebot”. Internet Interventions, 33, 100637. 미소장
35 Epley, N. (2018). A mind like mine: The exceptionally ordinary underpinnings of anthropomorphism. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 3(4), 591-598. 미소장
36 Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886. 미소장
37 Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds. Psychological Science, 19(2), 114-120. 미소장
38 Eyssel, F., & Reich, N. (2013, March). Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots)—On the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 121-122). ACM. 미소장
39 Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D., & Bobinger, S. (2011, March). Effects of anticipated human-robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 61-68). ACM. 미소장
40 Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017). Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot). JMIR Mental Health, 4(2), e19. 미소장
41 Fogg, B. J. (2002). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann. 미소장
42 Fogg, B. J., & Nass, C. (1997). Silicon sycophants: The effects of computers that flatter. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46(5), 551-561. 미소장
43 Garber, M. (2013, September 20). Funerals for fallen robots. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/09/funerals-for-fallenrobots/ 279861/ 미소장
44 Gams, M., Gu, I. Y. H., Härmä, A., Muñoz, A., & Tam, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence and ambient intelligence. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 11(1), 71-86. 미소장
45 Gobbini, M. I., Gentili, C., Ricciardi, E., Bellucci, C., Salvini, P., Laschi, C., ... & Pietrini, P. (2011). Distinct neural systems involved in agency and animacy detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(8), 1911-1920. 미소장
46 Goel, A. K., & Polepeddi, L. (2018). Jill Watson: A virtual teaching assistant for online education. In C. Dede, J. Richards & B. Saxberg (Eds.), Learning engineering for online education: Theoretical contexts and design-based examples (pp. 120-143). Routledge. 미소장
47 Guellai, B. & Streri, A. (2011). Cues for early social skills: Direct gaze modulates newborns’ recognition of talking faces. PLOS ONE, 6(4), e18610. 미소장
48 Gunkel, D. J. (2018). The other question: Can and should robots have rights? Ethics and Information Technology, 20, 87-99. 미소장
49 Hartzog, W. (2015). Unfair and deceptive robots. Maryland Law Review, 74(4), 785-829. 미소장
50 Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399-423. 미소장
51 Hayes, P., & Ford, K. (1995). Turing test considered harmful. In Proceedings of the 14 international joint conference on artificial intelligence (Vol. 1., pp. 972-977). ACM. 미소장
52 Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. John Wiley & Sons. 미소장
53 Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243-259. 미소장
54 Henley, J. (2022, July 24). Chess robot grabs and breaks finger of seven-year-old opponent. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/jul/24/chessrobot- grabs-and-breaks-finger-of-seven-year-old-opponent-moscow 미소장
55 Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernández-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science, 317(5843), 1360-1366. 미소장
56 Ho, A., Hancock, J., & Miner, A. S. (2018). Psychological, relational, and emotional effects of self-disclosure after conversations with a chatbot. Journal of Communication, 68(4), 712-733. 미소장
57 Kang, H., & Kim, K. J. (2020). Feeling connected to smart objects? A moderated mediation model of locus of agency, anthropomorphism, and sense of connectedness. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 133, 45-55. 미소장
58 Kahneman, D. (2013). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 미소장
59 Keijsers, M., & Bartneck, C. (2018, February). Mindless robots get bullied. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 205-214). ACM. 미소장
60 Kiilavuori, H., Sariola, V., Peltola, M. J., & Hietanen, J. K. (2021). Making eye contact with a robot: Psychophysiological responses to eye contact with a human and with a humanoid robot. Biological Psychology, 158, 107989. 미소장
61 Konok, V., Korcsok, B., Miklósi, Á., & Gácsi, M. (2018). Should we love robots? The most liked qualities of companion dogs and how they can be implemented in social robots. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 132-142. 미소장
62 Kühne, K., Fischer, M. H., & Zhou, Y. (2020). The human takes it all: Humanlike synthesized voices are perceived as less eerie and more likable. evidence from a subjective ratings study. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 14, 593732. 미소장
63 Lee, K. M., Moon, Y., Park, I., & Lee, J. G. (2023). Voice orientation of conversational interfaces in vehicles. Behaviour & Information Technology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2023.2166870 미소장
64 Lemoine, B. (2022, June 11). Is LamDA Sentient?―an Interview. Medium. https:// medium.com/@cajundiscordian/is-lamda-sentient-an-interview-ea64d916d917 미소장
65 Ligthart, M. E., Neerincx, M. A., & Hindriks, K. V. (2022). Getting acquainted: First steps for child-robot relationship formation. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9, 853665. 미소장
66 Lin, P., Abney, K., & Jenkins, R. (2017). Robot ethics 2.0: From autonomous cars to artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press. 미소장
67 Luo, X., Tong, S., Fang, Z., & Qu, Z. (2019). Frontiers: Machines vs. humans: The impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases. Marketing Science, 38(6), 937-947. 미소장
68 McAleer, P., Todorov, A., & Belin, P. (2014). How do you say ‘hello’? Personality impressions from brief novel voices. PLOS ONE, 9(3), e90779. 미소장
69 McDermott, D. (1976). Artificial intelligence meets natural stupidity. ACM SIGART Bulletin, 57, 4-9. 미소장
70 Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371-378. 미소장
71 Mondloch, C. J., Lewis, T. L., Budreau, D. R., Maurer, D., Dannemiller, J. L., Stephens, B. R., & Kleiner-Gathercoal, K. A. (1999). Face perception during early infancy. Psychological Science, 10(5), 419-422. 미소장
72 Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 323-339. 미소장
73 Moon, Y., & Nass, C. (1996). How “real” are computer personalities? Psychological responses to personality types in human-computer interaction. Communication Research, 23(6), 651-674. 미소장
74 Morewedge, C. K., Preston, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 1-11. 미소장
75 Mourey, J. A., Olson, J. G., & Yoon, C. (2017). Products as pals: Engaging with anthropomorphic products mitigates the effects of social exclusion. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2), 414-431. 미소장
76 Nass, C., & Brave, S. (2005). Wired for speech: How voice activates and advances the human-computer relationship. MIT Press. 미소장
77 Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Carney, P. (1999). Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer‐based interviewing systems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 1093-1109. 미소장
78 Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997). Are machines gender neutral? Gender-stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(10), 864-876. 미소장
79 Nass, C., Steuer, J., & Tauber, E. R. (1994, April). Computers are social actors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 72-78). ACM. 미소장
80 Nomura, T., Uratani, T., Kanda, T., Matsumoto, K., Kidokoro, H., Suehiro, Y., & Yamada, S. (2015, March). Why do children abuse robots?. In Proceedings of the 10th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction extended abstracts (pp. 63-64). ACM. 미소장
81 Parke, P. (2015, February, 13). Is it cruel to kick a robot dog? CNN. https://www. cnn.com/2015/02/13/tech/spot-robot-dog-google/index.html 미소장
82 Pizzirani, B., & Karantzas, G. C. (2019). The association between dehumanization and intimate partner abuse. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(5), 1527-1541. 미소장
83 Pollack, J. B. (2006). Mindless intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(3), 50-56. 미소장
84 Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664-683. 미소장
85 Rankin, C. H., Abrams, T., Barry, R. J., Bhatnagar, S., Clayton, D. F., Colombo, J., ... & Thompson, R. F. (2009). Habituation revisited: An updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 92(2), 135-138. 미소장
86 Riether, N., Hegel, F., Wrede, B., & Horstmann, G. (2012, March). Social facilitation with social robots? In Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 41-48), ACM. 미소장
87 Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people. Cambridge University Press. 미소장
88 Rigdon, M., Ishii, K., Watabe, M., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Minimal social cues in the dictator game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 358-367. 미소장
89 Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., Koren, Y., & Gordon, G. (2020). Robot-supported collaborative learning (RSCL): Social robots as teaching assistants for higher education small group facilitation. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 6, 148. 미소장
90 Ross, L. A., & Olson, I. R. (2010). Social cognition and the anterior temporal lobes. Neuroimage, 49(4), 3452-3462. 미소장
91 Salvini, P., Ciaravella, G., Yu, W., Ferri, G., Manzi, A., Mazzolai, B., ... & Dario, P. (2010, September). How safe are service robots in urban environments? Bullying a robot. In 19th international symposium in robot and human interactive communication (pp. 1-7). IEEE. 미소장
92 Salles, A., Evers, K., & Farisco, M. (2020). Anthropomorphism in AI. AJOB Neuroscience, 11(2), 88-95. 미소장
93 Schroeder, J., & Epley, N. (2015). The sound of intellect: Speech reveals a thoughtful mind, increasing a job candidate’s appeal. Psychological Science, 26(6), 877-891. 미소장
94 Shamsuddin, S., Yussof, H., Ismail, L., Hanapiah, F. A., Mohamed, S., Piah, H. A., & Zahari, N. I. (2012, March). Initial response of autistic children in human-robot interaction therapy with humanoid robot NAO. In IEEE 8th international colloquium on signal processing and its applications (pp. 188-193). IEEE. 미소장
95 Shneiderman, B. (2021). Human-centered AI. Issues in Science and Technology, 37(2), 56-61. 미소장
96 Simon, J. C., & Gutsell, J. N. (2021). Recognizing humanity: Dehumanization predicts neural mirroring and empathic accuracy in face-to-face interactions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(5), 463-473. 미소장
97 Sorell, T., & Draper, H. (2014). Robot carers, ethics, and older people. Ethics and Information Technology, 16, 183-195. 미소장
98 Sparrow, R. (2016). Robots in aged care: A dystopian future? AI & Society, 31, 445-454. 미소장
99 Sparrow, R., & Sparrow, L. (2006). In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds and Machines, 16, 141-161. 미소장
100 Stern, S. E., Mullennix, J. W., Dyson, C. L., & Wilson, S. J. (1999). The persuasiveness of synthetic speech versus human speech. Human Factors, 41(4), 588-595. 미소장
101 Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin. 미소장
102 Thelot, R. (2023). Searching for sentience. AI & Society. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s00146-023-01740-y 미소장
103 Thompson, C. (2018, November 14). May AI help you. New York Times. https:// www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/14/magazine/tech-design-ai-chatbot.html 미소장
104 Tiku, N. (2022, July 22). Google fired engineer who said its AI was sentient. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/22/ google-ai-lamda-blake-lemoine-fired 미소장
105 Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Moscovitch, M., Weinrib, O., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Response properties of the human fusiform face area. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(1-3), 257-280. 미소장
106 Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. The MIT Press. 미소장
107 Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. Simon and Schuster. 미소장
108 Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books. 미소장
109 Van Camp, J. (2019, Mar 8). My Jibo is dying and it’s breaking my heart. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/jibo-is-dying-eulogy/ 미소장
110 Waytz, A., Epley, N., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Social cognition unbound: Insights into anthropomorphism and dehumanization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 58-62. 미소장
111 Waytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113-117. 미소장
112 Waytz, A., Morewedge, C. K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J.-H., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 410-435. 미소장
113 Watson, D. (2019). The rhetoric and reality fo anthropomorphism in artificial intelligence. Minds and Machines, 29(3): 417-440. 미소장
114 Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA–A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9, 36-45. 미소장
115 Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. W. H. Freeman & Co. 미소장
116 Westerman, D., Edwards, A. P., Edwards, C., Luo, Z., & Spence, P. R. (2020). I-it, I-thou, I-robot: The perceived humanness of AI in human-machine communication. Communication Studies, 71(3), 393-408. 미소장
117 White, R. W. (1959). Motivation Reconsidered: The Concept of Competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297-331. 미소장
118 Williams, R., Machado, C. V., Druga, S., Breazeal, C., & Maes, P. (2018, June). “My doll says it’s ok”: A study of children’s conformity to a talking doll. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on interaction design and children (pp. 625-631). ACM. 미소장
119 Xiang, C. (2023, March, 31). ‘He would still be here’: Man dies by suicide after talking with AI chatbot, Widow says. Vice. https://www.vice.com/en/ article/pkadgm/man-dies-by-suicide-after-talking-with-ai-chatbot-widow-says 미소장
120 Young, A. W., Fruhholz, S., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2020). Face and voice perception: Understanding commonalities and differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 398-410. 미소장
121 Złotowski, J., Proudfoot, D., Yogeeswaran, K., & Bartneck, C. (2015). Anthropomorphism: opportunities and challenges in human–robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7, 347-360. 미소장

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차