권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the reporting quality of case reports published in the Journal of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research (2019-2024) using the CAse REport (CARE) guidelines, and to compare the results with a previous evaluation of re ports from 2013 to 2018.
Methods: Case reports were identified through database and manual searches. Each re port was evaluated using the 2017 CARE checklist, which consists of 28 subitems across 13 domains. Reporting was assessed as either “reporting” (1 point) or “not reporting” (0 points). The results were analyzed based on the maximum, minimum, and median re porting rates, and then compared with those of the previous study.
Results: Seven case reports were included. Compared to the previous study, the overall quality of reporting improved. The maximum and median reporting rates increased, while the minimum and median “not reporting” rates decreased. Six items reached 100% re porting, notably “intervention adherence and tolerability” and “adverse and unanticipated events.” In contrast, three items—“diagnostic challenges,” “diagnostic reasoning,” and “informed consent”—remained unreported. The decreased reporting in five items was largely attributed to the stricter evaluation criteria applied in this study.
Conclusions: The overall quality of recent case reports has improved. However, the per sistence of underreported items highlights the need for continued efforts to enhance the completeness and transparency of case reporting in Korean medicine*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: 정기간행물실(524호) / 서가번호: 국내14
2021년 이전 정기간행물은 온라인 신청(원문 구축 자료는 원문 이용)
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.