권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Population ageing has heightened the need to understand how public spaces within residential communities support older adults’ everyday outdoor activities. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on spatial design strategies for age-friendly public spaces in residential communities. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus and Web of Science to identify relevant empirical studies, which were subsequently analyzed using a thematic synthesis approach. The review consolidates recurrent intervention types into a six-dimensional framework informed by environmental gerontology and international age-friendly principles, encompassing pathway design and connectivity, resting and sitting facilities, greenery and shade provision, lighting and safety features, wayfinding and signage, and interaction and activity spaces. The findings show a strong emphasis on pathway design and resting facilities, shaped by their role as foundational environmental supports in dense residential environments and by region-specific policy and climatic conditions. Evidence gaps include limited standardization, insufficient cost-effectiveness information, and under representation of low-density or climatically distinct settings. The review clarifies how age-friendly spatial design functions within residential community public spaces and provides a structured basis for future research and community-level micro-renewal practice.
Population ageing has heightened the need to understand how public spaces within residential communities support older adults’ everyday outdoor activities. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on spatial design strategies for age-friendly public spaces in residential communities. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus and Web of Science to identify relevant empirical studies, which were subsequently analyzed using a thematic synthesis approach. The review consolidates recurrent intervention types into a six-dimensional framework informed by environmental gerontology and international age-friendly principles, encompassing pathway design and connectivity, resting and sitting facilities, greenery and shade provision, lighting and safety features, wayfinding and signage, and interaction and activity spaces. The findings show a strong emphasis on pathway design and resting facilities, shaped by their role as foundational environmental supports in dense residential environments and by region-specific policy and climatic conditions. Evidence gaps include limited standardization, insufficient cost-effectiveness information, and under representation of low-density or climatically distinct settings. The review clarifies how age-friendly spatial design functions within residential community public spaces and provides a structured basis for future research and community-level micro-renewal practice.*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: 정기간행물실(524호) / 서가번호: 국내13
2021년 이전 정기간행물은 온라인 신청(원문 구축 자료는 원문 이용)
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.