본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

초록보기

This study explores raters’ perceptions of successful interaction in paired discussion tasks within a second language (L2) context, aiming to operationalize interactional competence (IC) in assessment. A qualitative analysis of raters’ notes collected during the evaluation process identified three key categories of successful interaction in paired discussion tasks: interactional management, interactive listening, and co-constructive interaction. Raters highlighted the importance of clear and well-reasoned opinion expression, eliciting partners’ responses, and providing appropriate and genuine responses to previous utterances as important strategies for managing interaction in paired discussion tasks. Interactive listening reflects the importance of the listener’s role in interaction, focusing on how attentively participants listen to each other’s utterances. This category encompasses behaviors such as non-verbal cues (e.g., eye contact, nodding) and backchanneling (e.g., “okay”, “mm”). Co-constructive interaction was recognized as essential, with raters valuing supportive behaviors such as assisting a struggling partner. While collaborative patterns were generally preferred, dominance was viewed positively when it compensated for a passive partner’s lack of engagement. However, dominance driven by excessive self-expression was viewed negatively, highlighting the value of mutual engagement. These findings provide insights into developing rating criteria that capture the interplay of these features, enabling a more comprehensive assessment of IC in paired discussion tasks.