본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

고급검색

인명/단체명

저자정보 상세정보
인명/단체명을 입력하세요.

키워드

  • 대표어

  • 외국어

-

초록보기

The deep integration of digital technology and healthcare services has generated vast amounts of medical data, whose scenario-based applications have become the core driving force behind healthcare innovation. However, no consensus has yet been reached on the regulatory framework for allocating medical data rights. Patients, healthcare institutions, and regulatory authorities form the core three-dimensional framework, where significant tensions exist between patients’ assertions of control over their medical data, healthcare institutions’ demands for data utilization rights, and the public governance responsibilities of regulatory bodies. Value conflicts among these diverse stakeholders are increasingly coming to the fore. Compared to other data types, healthcare data possesses distinctive characteristics in terms of its personal nature, public attributes, and sensitivity. The interplay of these three attributes not only exacerbates the ambiguity in defining rights holders and the boundaries of rights but also imposes higher academic and practical demands on the refined and differentiated construction of rights allocation rules. The existing legal framework lacks clear definitions for the nature of rights in medical data and provides insufficient guidance on ownership allocation, further exacerbating the imbalance between data utilization and rights protection in practice. Data rights theory, interest balancing theory, and the principle of consistency between rights and responsibilities provide core legal foundations for allocating rights over medical data. Through introspective examination of the inherent conflicts in data, combined with the varying control capacities of multiple stakeholders and the logic of corresponding rights and responsibilities, there is an urgent need to establish a tiered and categorized rights allocation mechanism. Based on their formation patterns, healthcare data can be categorized into primary and derived types. The personal rights embedded in source medical data should be vested in patients to safeguard their health interests. The limited property rights inherent in derived medical data should belong to healthcare institutions, providing material support for their data utilization. The responsibility for full-cycle oversight of medical data should be entrusted to a designated regulatory authority. By clearly defining regulatory boundaries and establishing detailed standards for end-to-end supervision, this approach ensures the compliant and orderly utilization of medical data, achieving the organic synergy between its public value and market value.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
영미법상 착오제도에 대한 비교법적 연구 = Comparative research on mistake in common law 정성헌 p. 209-230
기후위기 시대 무인도서 관리에 대한 법정책적 연구 = A legal policy study on the management of uninhabited islands in the period of climate crisis 김은환 p. 25-56
해고예고와 해고서면통지의 관계와 입법론적 제언 = The relationship between the advance notice of dismissal and the written notice of grounds for dismissal and legislative suggestions 신동윤 p. 149-180
중국내 한국교민 법률서비스 수준 제고를 위한 법·제도 개선연구 = A study on legal and institutional improvements to enhance legal services for Korean expatriates in China 문상석, 황은진, 황경수 p. 85-117
독일 민법에서 친권의 귀속과 행사에 관한 검토 = A study on the allocation and exercise of parental custody under the German Civil Code : implications of German law and proposals for introducing joint parental custody : 독일 민법의 시사점 및 공동친권 도입을 위한 제언 조은희 p. 231-270
인격적 이익의 침해와 위법성 판단 = Infringement of personal interests and judgment of unlawfulness 박규용 p. 119-148
북한 민법상 소유권 규정의 개정과 한계 = Amendments and limitations of ownership regulation under North Korean civil law : focusing on general provisions, joint ownership and good faith acquisition : 일반규정, 공동소유와 선의취득 등을 중심으로 김성욱 p. 1-24
(A) study on the categorization and tiered allocation of medical data rights in a three-dimensional framework = 3차원 차원에서의 의료 데이터 권리 분류 및 계층적 구성 연구 Zhang, Cai-Hua, Li, Yang p. 271-305
사이버안보 업무에 관한 헌법학적 연구 = A constitutional study on cybersecurity services : issues regarding the duties of Korea’s national intelligence service : 국가정보기관 직무로서의 문제를 중심으로 안요환, 최은석 p. 181-208
On the framework, logic, and approach of judicial intelligent review in Chinese arbitration = 중국 중재에서 사법적 지능심사의 구조·논리·접근 방식에 관한 연구 Zhu, Fu-Yong, You, Mei-Qi p. 307-355
증언불능 증인의 법정 외 진술과 형사소송법 제314조 해석론 = Out-of-court statements by unavailable witnesses and the interpretation of Article 314 of the Korean Criminal Procedure Act : with reference to the forfeiture-by-wrongdoing doctrine and the case law of the European court of human rights : 부당행위에 의한 권리박탈 이론과 유럽인권법원 판례와 관련하여 김종구 p. 57-84

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차

권호

기사명 원문보기 기사목차
닫기