권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
목차
표제지=0,1,1
제출문=1,2,1
요약문=2,3,6
SUMMARY(영문요약문)=8,9,5
CONTENTS=13,14,2
목차=15,16,2
LIST OF TABLES=17,18,2
LIST OF FIGURES=19,20,4
제1장 서론=23,24,1
제1절 연구개발의 필요성 및 목적=23,24,2
제2절 연구사=24,25,7
제3절 이론 분석=30,31,13
제4절 중부지방 로타리 경운작업 실태=43,44,6
제2장 기존 트랙터 로타리날의 분석=49,50,1
제1절 서언=49,50,1
제2절 재료 및 방법=49,50,1
1. 공시재료=49,50,1
2. 로타리날의 형태분석=49,50,1
3. 로타리날의 운동분석=50,51,5
제3절 결과 및 고찰=54,55,1
1. 시스템 성능시험 결과=54,55,1
2. 로타리날의 형태분석 결과=55,56,2
3. 로타리날의 운동분석 결과=56,57,5
제4절 요약 및 결론=60,61,1
제3장 자동 토양경도 측정 시스템=61,62,1
제1절 서언=61,62,1
제2절 재료 및 방법=61,62,1
1. 공시재료=61,62,1
2. 하드웨어 설계=62,63,4
3. 소프트웨어 설계=66,67,1
4. 성능시험=66,67,2
제3절 결과 및 고찰=68,69,1
1. 토양경도 측정부 캘리브레이션 결과=68,69,1
2. 성능시험 결과=68,69,8
제4절 요약 및 결론=75,76,2
제4장 기존 로타리날의 경운부하 측정 및 로타리날의 요인시험=77,78,1
제1절 서언=77,78,1
제2절 재료 및 방법=77,78,1
1. 공시재료=77,78,1
2. 하드웨어 설계=77,78,6
3. 소프트웨어 설계=82,83,4
제3절 결과 및 고찰=86,87,1
1. 측정대차 캘리브레이션 결과=86,87,1
2. 기존 로타리날 경운부하 측정결과=87,88,2
3. 로타리날 요인시험 결과=89,90,7
제4절 요약 및 결론=95,96,1
제5장 이물질 감김 방지장치 및 흙부착 방지장치=96,97,1
제1절 서언=96,97,1
제2절 재료 및 방법=97,98,1
1. 공시재료=97,98,1
2. 로타리 소요동력 측정장치=98,99,3
3. 이물질 감김 방지장치=101,102,3
4. 흙부착 방지장치=103,104,4
5. 성능시험=107,108,3
제3절 결과 및 고찰=110,111,1
1. 로타리 소요동력 측정장치의 캘리브레이션 결과=110,111,1
2. 이물질 감김 방지장치 성능시험 결과=111,112,11
3. 흙부착 방지장치 성능시험 결과=122,123,19
제4절 요약 및 결론=141,142,1
제6장 에너지 절감형 트랙터 로타리날=142,143,1
제1절 서언=142,143,1
제2절 재료 및 방법=142,143,1
1. 로타리날 최적 배열설계=142,143,3
2. 로타리날 최적설계=145,146,1
3. 성능시험=145,146,3
제3절 결과 및 고찰=147,148,1
1. 로타리날 최적 배열설계 결과=147,148,6
2. 로타리날 최적설계 결과=152,153,3
3. 성능시험 결과=154,155,8
제4절 요약 및 결론=162,163,1
제7장 종합결론 및 요약=163,164,2
참고문헌=165,166,6
영문목차
[title page etc.]=0,1,13
CONTENTS=13,14,4
List of Tables=17,18,2
List of Figures=19,20,4
Chapter 1 Introduction=23,24,1
Para. 1 Necessity and objectives Study & Development=23,24,2
Para. 2 History of Study=24,25,7
Para. 3 Theoretical Analysis=30,31,13
Para. 4 Realities of Rotary Tilling Operations in Central Region=43,44,6
Chapter 2 Analysis of Conventional Rotary Blades=49,50,1
Para. 1 Introduction=49,50,1
Para. 2 Materials and Method=49,50,1
1. Material Used=49,50,1
2. Shaped Analysis of Rotary Blade=49,50,1
3. Kinematical Analysis of Rotary Blades=50,51,5
Para. 3 Results and Discussion=54,55,1
1. Results of System Performance Test=54,55,1
2. Results of Structural Analysis of Rotary Blade=55,56,2
3. Results of Mechanical Analysis of Rotary Blade=56,57,5
Para. 4 Summary and Conclusion=60,61,1
Chapter 3 Automated Soil Hardness Measuring System=61,62,1
Para. 1 Introduction=61,62,1
Para. 2 Materials and Method=61,62,1
1. Material Used=61,62,1
2. Hardware Design=62,63,4
3. Software Design=66,67,1
4. Performance Test=66,67,2
Para. 3 Results and Discussion=68,69,1
1. Results of Calibration of Soil Hardness measuring system=68,69,1
2. Results of Performance Test=68,69,8
Para. 4 Summary and Conclusion=75,76,2
Chapter 4 Measurement of Power Requirement Conventional Rotary Blades & Factor Test of Rotary Blade=77,78,1
Para. 1 Introduction=77,78,1
Para. 2 Material and Method=77,78,1
1. Material Used=77,78,1
2. Hardware Design=77,78,6
3. Perfoiniance Test=82,83,4
Para. 3 Results and Discussion=86,87,1
1. Results of Calibration of Torque Meter=86,87,1
2. Results of Measurement of Power Requirement Conventional of Existing Rotary Blades=87,88,2
3. Results of Factor Test of Rotary Blade=89,90,7
Para. 4 Summary and Conclusion=95,96,1
Chapter 5 Alien substance Winding Prevention Device & Soil Adherence Prevention Device=96,97,1
Para. 1 Introduction=96,97,1
Para. 2 Material and Method=97,98,1
1. Material Used=97,98,1
2. Torque Meter=98,99,3
3. Alien Substance Winding Prevention Device=101,102,3
4. Soil Adherence Prevention Device=103,104,4
5. Performance Test=107,108,3
Para. 3 Results and Discussion=110,111,1
1. Results of Calibration of Torque Meter=110,111,1
2. Results of Perfoiliiance Test of Alien Substance Winding Prevention Device=111,112,11
3. Results of Performance Test of Soil Adherence Prevention Device=122,123,19
Para. 4 Summary and Conclusion=141,142,1
Chapter 6 Energy-Saving Rotary Blade for Farm Tractor=142,143,1
Para. 1 Introduction=142,143,1
Para. 2 Materials and Method=142,143,1
1. Design of Optimum Arrangement of Rotary Blades=142,143,3
2. Design of Optimum Rotary Blade=145,146,1
3. Performance Test=145,146,3
Para. 3 Results and Discussion=147,148,1
1. Results of Design of Optimum Arrangement of Rotary Blades=147,148,6
2. Results of Design of Optimum Rotary Blade=152,153,3
3. Results of Performance Test=154,155,8
Para. 4 Summary and Conclusion=162,163,1
Chapter 7 Conclusion and Summary=163,164,2
References=165,166,6
Fig. 1.1 The rotary blade of Meyenburg type=24,25,1
Fig. 1.2 Meyenburg's garden rotary cultivator=25,26,1
Fig. 1.3 Typical rotary tiller in japan=26,27,1
Fig. 1.4 Two kinds of rotary blades=26,27,1
Fig. 1.5 The graph of the path of a point forward-turning rotary tillage.=30,31,1
Fig. 1.6 The names of every part and angle factors of rotary blade.=32,33,1
Fig. 1.7 Cutting operation of sectional shapes along lengthwise blades.=34,35,1
Fig. 1.8 The section form of bending part.=35,36,1
Fig. 1.9 The contrast photo shapes of rotary blade.=35,36,1
Fig. 1.10 The measuring schematic diagram of shape factors of rotary blade (I).=37,38,1
Fig. 1.11 The measuring schematic diagram of shape factors of rotary blade (II).=38,39,1
Fig. 1.12 The contrast diagram of scoop angle between rotary blade which the bending part is plane and curved surface of bending part when they cut in soil.=39,40,1
Fig. 1.13 The enlarged figure of part I.=39,40,1
Fig. 1.14 The enlarged figure of part II.=40,41,1
Fig. 1.15 The figureof θ made by the end surfaces of rotary blade.=41,42,1
Fig. 2.1 Schematic diagram of system for analizing revolution motion characteristics of rotary blade=50,51,1
Fig. 2.2 Photo of system for analysis of motion characteristics of rotary blade=51,52,1
Fig. 2.3 Photo of actuator used by tractor forward direction axis=52,53,1
Fig. 2.4 Photo of revolution motion part of rotary blades=52,53,1
Fig. 2.5 The main window of control program of system for analyzing revolution motion characteristics of rotary blade=53,54,1
Fig. 2.6 Photo of testing for analysis of motion characteristics=54,55,1
Fig. 2.7 Schematic diagram of design parameter of rotary blade=55,56,1
Fig. 2.8 The graph of edged-curve of rotary blade in each type=56,57,1
Fig. 2.9 3D simulation of revolution of rotary blade=57,58,1
Fig. 2.10 Analysis of rotary blade coordinates according to revolution angle=57,58,1
Fig. 2.11 The result of rotary blade coordinates according to revolution angle=58,59,1
Fig. 2.12 Schematic diagram of C type rotary blade=58,59,1
Fig. 3.1 Schematic diagram of a tractor-attached automatic soil hardness measuring system=62,63,1
Fig. 3.2 A view of sensor part for measuring soil hardness=64,65,1
Fig. 3.3 A view of driving part of the measuring system=64,65,1
Fig. 3.4 A view of Photo of attaching part of the measuring system=65,66,1
Fig. 3.5 The flow-chart of the control system for soil hardness measurement=65,66,1
Fig. 3.6 Perfoiniance test bed=67,68,1
Fig. 3.7 A view of perfoniiance test of the measuring system=67,68,1
Fig. 3.8 Calibration chart for the load cell=68,69,1
Fig. 3.9 The example of measuring soil hardness by penetration depth with automatic device=70,71,1
Fig. 3.10 The result of measuring soil hardness with manual-type device(kPa)=73,74,1
Fig. 3.12 The result of soil hardness measurement with automatic device(KPa)=74,75,1
Fig. 4.1 The section figureof man-made soil bin=78,79,1
Fig. 4.2 The measurement car=79,80,1
Fig. 4.3 The construction of measuring system=79,80,1
Fig. 4.4 The photo of experimental rotary=80,81,1
Fig. 4.5 The schematic diagram of dynamic transmission of rotary=80,81,1
Fig. 4.6 The schematic diagram of adhesive position of strain gauge=81,82,1
Fig. 4.7 The photo of rotary shaft after processing=81,82,1
Fig. 4.8 The photo of fixed rotary shaft=82,83,1
Fig. 4.9 The method of soil hardness control=83,84,1
Fig. 4.10 Test section of soil bin=84,85,1
Fig. 4.12 The Photo of device in the experiment=84,85,1
Fig. 4.13 Test section of soil bin=84,85,1
Fig. 4.13 The calibration results of torque meter=86,87,1
Fig. 4.14 The results of measuring tillage power in each type=88,89,1
Fig. 4.15 The results of measuring tillage power in each condition=91,92,1
Fig. 4.16 The result of average power=94,95,1
Fig. 4.17 The result of specific torque=94,95,1
Fig. 5.1 The photo of rotary power requirement measuring device=99,100,1
Fig. 5.2 The photo of device in the experiment=100,101,1
Fig. 5.3 Block diagram of the data acquisition and analysis system=100,101,1
Fig. 5.4 The drawing of developed rotary tiller for preventing an alien substance being rolled=101,102,1
Fig. 5.5 The photo of developed rotary tiller for preventing an alien substance being rolled=102,103,2
Fig. 5.6 The drawing of rotary tiller for preventing soil adherence=104,105,1
Fig. 5.7 The device for preventing soil adherence=105,106,1
Fig. 5.8 The photo of rotary tiller for preventing soil adherence=106,107,1
Fig. 5.9 The photo of system calibration=107,108,1
Fig. 5.10 The photo of rotary for preventing an alien substance to be wound in performance test=108,109,1
Fig. 5.11 The photo of rotary for preventing soil adherence in performance test=109,110,1
Fig. 5.12 Calibration curve of torque meter=110,111,1
Fig. 5.13 The signal from torque meter and proximity sensor with general rotary in performance test=114,115,1
Fig. 5.14 The state of an alien substance wound with general rotary in performance test=114,115,1
Fig. 5.15 The signal from torque meter and proximity sensor with rotary preventing an alien substance to be wound in performance test=118,119,1
Fig. 5.16 The state of an alien substance wound with rotary preventing an alien substance to be wound in performance test=118,119,1
Fig. 5.17 The result of performance test in each material=120,121,1
Fig. 5.18 The signal from torque meter and proximity sensor with no material preventing soil adherence=125,126,1
Fig. 5.19 The state of soil adherence with no material preventing soil adherence=125,126,1
Fig. 5.20 The signal from torque meter and proximity sensor with stainless steel material preventing soil adherence=129,130,1
Fig. 5.21 The state of soil adherence with stainless steel material preventing soil adherence=129,130,1
Fig. 5.22 The signal from torque meter and proximity sensor with rubber material preventing soil adherence=133,134,1
Fig. 5.23 The state of soil adherence with rubber material preventing soil adherence=133,134,1
Fig. 5.24 The signal from torque meter and proximity sensor with PE material preventing soil adherence=137,138,1
Fig. 5.25 The state of soil adherence with PE material preventing soil adherence=137,138,1
Fig. 5.26 The result of performance test in each material=139,140,1
Fig. 6.1 The program for designing rotary blades arrangement=143,144,1
Fig. 6.2 The schematic diagram of overlap of rotary=144,145,1
Fig. 6.3 The photo of rotary tilling in performance test=146,147,1
Fig. 6.4 The photo of lattice frame for analysis of breaking performance=147,148,1
Fig. 6.5 The pattern and order of rotary blades of cutting soil-surface=148,149,1
Fig. 6.6 Torque and revolution signal from torque-meter and proximity sensor=148,149,1
Fig. 6.7 Torque curve from the torque-meter and the FFT graph=149,150,1
Fig. 6.8 The result of overlap experiment=150,151,1
Fig. 6.9 Drawing of the developed rotary blade=153,154,1
Fig. 6.10 The photo of energy saving rotary blade developed=154,155,1
Fig. 6.11 The results of performance test for measuring power requirement=155,156,1
Fig. 6.12 The results of breaking performance of the developed and the conventional blades=160,161,1
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.