Fig. 2.1.1. Surface Weather Charts And Satellite Images (a)0000UTC, (b)0600UTC, And (c)1200UTC 21 January 2005=8,30,1

Fig. 2.1.2. Time Series Of Temperature, Wind Speed, Wind Direction, Precipitation, Relative Humidity, And Pressure At Haenam AWS Site 21 January 2005=9,31,1

Fig. 2.1.3. Surface Weather Charts From 31 January To 3 February 2005=9,31,1

Fig. 2.1.4. 500hPa Weather Charts From 31 January To 3 February 2005=10,32,1

Fig. 2.1.5. Snowfall From 31 January To 3 February 2005=11,33,1

Fig. 2.1.6. Maximum Altitude Of Autosonde Observation Of Each Time From 0400UTC 21 To 1900UTC 3 February 2005=12,34,1

Fig. 2.1.7. Maximum Altitude Of Autosonde Observation Of Each Time From 0500UTC 31 January To 0200UTC January 2005=13,35,1

Fig. 2.2.1. Surface Weather Charts From 2 May 2005 To 3 May 2005=14,36,1

Fig. 2.2.2. Maximum Altitude Of Autosonde Observation Of Each Time From 0500UTC 31 January To 0200UTC January 2005=15,37,1

Fig. 2.3.1. Keop-2005 Observational Network=16,38,1

Fig. 2.3.2. Surface (Left), 500hPa (Middle), And 200hPa(Right) Weather Charts At The Beginning Time Of Changma (From 1200UTC 24 Jun 2005 To 0000UTC 26 June 2005)=17,39,1

Fig. 2.3.3. Surface Weather Charts And Satellite Images (a)0000UTC 28 June, (b) 0000UTC 1 July, And (c) 0900UTC 28 July 2005=18,40,1

Fig. 2.3.4. Radar Imageries(Left Panels) And Precipitation Per Day(Right Panels) At (a)0000UTC 28 June, (b) 0000UTC 1 July, And (c) 0900UTC 28 July 2005=19,41,1

Fig. 2.3.5. Surface(Upper Panels), 500hPa(Middle Panels), And 200hPa(Lower Panels) At The Ending Time Of Changma(From 17 July 2005 To 28 July 2005)=20,42,1

Fig. 2.3.6. Maximum Altitude Of Each Observation Site Of Each Time From 19 June To 18 July 2005=22,44,1

Fig. 2.3.7. The Vertical Distribution Of (a) Equivalent Potential Temperature, (b)U- Component Of Wind, And (c)V-Component Of Wind. Vertical bars(d) Represents Precipitation During Summertime In 2005=24,46,1

Fig. 2.3.8. Time Series Of (a)Net Radiation, (b)Sensible Heat Flux, (c)Latent Heat Flux, And (d) Soil Water Contents During Summertime In 2005=25,47,1

Fig. 3.2.1. Domain For The Hovmoller Calculation (Thick Line: 20°~40°N, 105°~135°E)(이미지 참조)=29,51,1

Fig. 3.2.2. A Schematic Illustration Of The Negative Cosine-Rectangular Weighting Function That Was Rotated Until The Autocorrelation Coefficient Was Maximized=30,52,1

Fig. 3.2.3. The Convective Index Derived From GOES-9 Brightness Temperature (Upper Pane) And The Total Amount Of Precipitation Rate (mm/h) At 11 Sites Located In The Southwest Of Korea (Lower Panel)=32,54,1

Fig. 3.2.4. Hovmoller Diagram Of Convective Index (CI) Derived From GOES-9 Brightness Temperature For (a) Winter, (b) Spring, (c) Summer And (d) Fall, Where The Period Of Winter Is Represented Two Months(이미지 참조)=33,55,1

Fig. 3.2.5. Hovmoller(Left) And Streak(Right) Diagram For Changma Period (2004.6.24 - 2004. 7. 17)(이미지 참조)=34,56,1

Fig. 3.2.6. The Scatter Plot Of Span And Duration Of All Identified Cloud Streaks For The Period Of (a) Changma And (b) Summer=36,58,1

Fig. 3.2.7. The Scatter Plot Of Span(Left Two Panels) And Duration(Right Tow Panels) That Compared With Propagation For The Period Of Changma(Upper Two Panels) And Sumrner(Under Two Panels)=37,59,1

Fig. 3.3.1. Hovmoller (Longitude-Time : Time In UTC) Diagram Of Convective Index Which Is Defined As A Difference Of Water Vapor Channel (IR3) Brightness Temperature And Infrared Channel (IR1) For The Period Of 25 June And 12 July 2005(이미지참조)=40,62,1

Fig. 3.3.2. Latitude-Time Plots (Time In UTC) Of Convective Index For The Periods Of 25 June-12 July 2005=41,63,2

Fig. 3.3.3. (a) Hovmoller Diagram Of Rianfall From WRF Model For The Period Of 25 June And 12 July 2005.(이미지 참조)=42,64,1

Fig. 3.3.4. Same Fig. 3. 1. 9, But For WRF Rainfall Forecast. Daily Rainfall Is Composed With 7-12- Hour Forecasts=44,66,1

Fig. 3.3.5. Power Spectrum Of The Convective Index Averaged Over 5 Longitudinal Bands At (a) 105-110°E, (b) 110-115°E, (c) 115-120°E, (d) 120-125°E, (E) 125-130°E, (F) 130-135°E For 25 June-12 July 2005=45,67,1

Fig. 3.3.6. Same As Fig. 3.3.5, But For WRF Rainfall Forecasts=46,68,1

Fig. 3.3.7. (a) Time-Longitude Convective Index Diagram For 25 June-12 July 2005=48,70,1

Fig. 3.3.8. (a) Time-Latitude Convective Index Diagram For 25 June-12 July 2005=49,71,1

Fig. 4.1.1. Stacked Doppler Spectra From Manus Island 915-MHS Wind Profiler For 0058:50 UTC 29 July 1992=52,74,1

Fig. 4.1.2. Logical Flow Diagram Of Rain Classification Algorithm (From Williams et al., 1995)=54,76,1

Fig. 4.1.3. Frequency Distribution Of Doppler Spectral Moments For Precipitating Clouds Classified As Stratiform Clouds During The Summertime(June-August)=57,79,1

Fig. 4.1.4. Same As Fig. 4.1.3 Except For Precipitating Clouds Classified As Mixed Stratiform/Convective Clouds=57,79,1

Fig. 4.1.5. Same As Fig. 4.1.3 Except For Precipitating Clouds Classified As Deep Convective Clouds=58,80,1

Fig. 4.1.6. Same As Fig. 4.1.3 Except For Precipitating Clouds Classified As Shallow Convective Clouds=58,80,1

Fig. 4.1.7. Occurrence Frequency Of Each Rain Type In Precipitating Cloud System Observed During Summer Season In (a)2003, (b)2004, And (c)2005 At Haenam Site=60,82,1

Fig. 4.1.8. Percentage Of Precipitation Categories During Changma Period=61,83,1

Fig. 4.1.9. Horizontal Distribution Of Total Amount Precipitation(mm) During Changma Period In 2003 (a) And 2004 (b) Using GPCP 1° X 1 ° Daily Data=62,84,1

Fig. 4.1.10. Horizontal Distribution Of 850hPa Vorticity And Moisture Flux Averaged During Changma Period In 2003 (a), 2004 (b), And 2005 (c)=64,86,1

Fig. 4.1.11. Vertical Cross Section Of Averaged Equivalent Potential Temperature And Streamline During Changma Period Along 127°E In 2003(a), 128°E In 2004 (b), And 128°E In 2005 Between 20°N And 55°N=65,87,1

Fig. 4.2.1. The Schematic Diagram Of (a) WRF/KLAPS 6-hr Assimilation Cycle And (b) Cold Start System=70,92,1

Fig. 4.2.2. The Domain For Numerical Experiments And KEOP-2005 Observational Sites(이미지 참조)=71,93,1

Fig. 4.2.3. The Surface Weather Charts(Left). MTSAT Enhanced IR Imageries (Middle), And Radar Imageries (Right) At 1800UTC 8 July 2004 And In 12 Hours(CASE I)=73,95,1

Fig. 4.2.4. Same As Fig. 4.2.2 Except For 1800UTC 10 July 2004(Case II)=73,95,1

Fig. 4.2.5. Same As Fig. 4.2.2 Except For 1800UTC 11 July 2004(Case III)=74,96,1

Fig. 4.2.6. Horizontal Difference Map Of 850hPa Temperature ((a),(b)), 700hPa Water Vapor Mixing Ratio ((c),(d)), And Geopotential Height ((e),(f)) With Wind Of SND II From CNT For 1800UTC 8 July 2005=76,98,1

Fig. 4.2.7. Same As Fig. 4.2.6 Except For 1800UTC 11 July 2005=77,99,1

Fig. 4.2.8. Horizontal Difference Map Of 850hPa Temperature ((a),(b)), 700hPa Water Vapor Mixing Ratio ((c),(d)), And Geopotential Height (e),(f)) With Wind Of SND I From CNT For 1800UTC 10 July 2005=78,100,1

Fig. 4.2.9. Simulated((a)CNT, (b)SND II), Difference Of Snd II From CNT(c), And Observed(d) 12-Hours Accumulated Rainfall Amount At 1800UTC 8 July 2005=80,102,1

Fig. 4.2.10. Same As Fig. 4.2.9 Except Fot 1800UTC 11 July 2005=80,102,1

Fig. 4.2.11. Simulated((a)CNT, (b)SND I ), Difference Of SND I From CNT(c), And Observed(d) 12-Hours Accumulated Rainfall Amount At 1800UTC 8 July 2005=81,103,1

Fig. 4.2.12. Threat Score Of Cnt(Opened Circle), SND I (Filled Circle), And SND II (Filled Triangle) Relative To Cooperative AWS Stations For Various Thresholds Of 12-hourly Accumulated Precipitation (Inch) At 1800UTC 10 July 2005=83,105,1

Fig. 4.2.13. Terrain With Radiosonde Sites. Dashed Circles Are Representing Verification Areas=84,106,1

Fig. 4.2.14. RMSE In CNT(Dark Gray) And SND I(Black) : 8500hPa Temperature(Upper), 500hPa V-Component Wind Speed(Middle), MSLP(Bottom). X-Axis Of Chart Is Representing Forecast Time=85,107,1

Fig. 4.2.15. Same As Fig. 4.2.14 Except For 850hPa Temperature=86,108,1

Fig. 5.2.1. Surface Charts And IR Images Of GOES 9 From 0000UTC To 1800UTC On July 1, 2005=91,113,1

Fig. 5.2.2. The Panels In Column (a) Include Equivalent Potential Temperature(EPT) On 850hPa Surface With Wind Vectors Of The Same Pressure Level=94,116,2

Fig. 5.2.3. Comparison Of The Analyzed Field At 0000UTC On July 1,2005 And The 1 Hour Forecasted Field From This Time=97,119,1

Fig. 5.2.4. The Evolution Of The Changma Front From 0000UTC To 1800UTC On July 1, 2005. The Explanation Of The Figure Is The Same As That Of The Fig.5.2.3=98,120,2

Fig. 5.3.1. The Domain And Topography Of The Analysis Area. The Filled Circle Indicates The Center Of The Domain As Well As The Gunsan NEXRAD Site=101,123,1

Fig. 5.3.2. The Remapped Reflectivity Factor On 925hPa Level From 1400UTC To 1800UTC On July 1,2005 In 30 Minutes Interval=102,124,2

Fig. 5.3.3. The AWS Time Series Of Jangsu Observatory From 0000KST To 1200KST On July 2, 2005=104,126,1

Fig. 5.3.4. The Wind Profiler Observation From Gunsan Site. The Period Is From 0000KST To 0800KST On July 2, 2005=105,127,1

Fig. 5.4.1. The 12 Minutes Forecast From The Initial Time At 1700UTC On July 1, 2005. In (a), The 925hPa Radar Reflectivity Factor And Circulation Wind Vectors Are Displayed=107,129,1

Fig. 5.4.2. Three Dimensional Display Of The Convective Cell At The Same Time Of The (e) Of The Fig. 5.4.1, But The View Point Is The North-East Side Of The Convective Cell While That Of The (e) Of The Fig. 5.4.1 Is South=108,130,1

Fig. 5.4.3. The One Minute Forecast From 1700UTC On July 1, 2005=109,131,1

Fig. 5.4.4. Storm Relative Helicity At The One Minutes Forecast From 1700UTC=110,132,2

Fig. 5.4.5. The 40 Minutes Forecast From 1700UTC On July 1, 2005. Others Are The Same As Those Of The Fig. 5.4.3=111,133,1