본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

목차보기

목차

[표제지]=0,1,1

머리말=0,2,1

목차=i,3,3

List of Tables=iv,6,3

List of Figures=vii,9,2

연구요약=1,11,6

제1장 서론=7,17,2

제1절 연구배경과 목적=9,19,2

제2절 연구 범위와 방법=11,21,2

제3절 국내ㆍ외의 기존 연구=13,23,2

제4절 대기오염물질의 배출량 산정방법=15,25,8

제2장 WATER 9 Model의 구조와 입력자료=23,33,2

제1절 Water 9 Model의 개요와 구조=25,35,1

1. WATER 9 Model의 개요=25,35,19

2. Water 9 Model의 구조=44,54,2

제2절 WATER 9 Model의 입력자료=46,56,1

1. 하수처리시설의 설계 자료와 운전자료=46,56,3

2. 연구대상 화합물 특성자료=49,59,3

3. 기상 자료와 수중 오염물질 분석자료=52,62,1

제3절 WATER 9 Model에 의한 대기오염물질 배출량 산정절차=53,63,1

1. 하수처리 공정의 해석=54,64,2

2. 모델 공정도 작성=56,66,1

3. 자료입력과 기본값 수정=57,67,3

4. Model의 적용=60,70,1

제3장 하수처리장의 대기오염물질 배출량 산정=61,71,2

제1절 조사대상 하수처리장의 개요=63,73,1

1. 하수처리공정=64,74,1

2. 공정별 특징=65,75,2

제2절 하수처리장에서 대기오염물질의 배출 특성=67,77,1

1. 황화합물의 배출 특성=67,77,6

2. 휘발성 유기화합물(VOCs) 배출특성=73,83,4

제3절 하수 중의 오염물질 분석방법과 결과=77,87,1

1. 하수 중 황화합물의 농도 측정=77,87,5

2. 하수 중 VOCs의 농도 측정=82,92,4

3. 하수 중 황화합물과 VOCs의 분석결과=86,96,1

제4절 WATER 9 Model에 의한 배출량 산정 결과=87,97,1

1. 하수처리장의 총 배출량=87,97,2

2. 오염물질별 배출량=89,99,5

3. 처리공정별 배출량=94,104,3

제4장 하수처리장의 대기오염물질 배출특성 평가=97,107,2

제1절 하수처리장의 대기오염물질 배출특성=99,109,1

1. 오염물질별 배출특성=99,109,1

2. 오염물질의 처리공정별 배출특성=100,110,3

제2절 실제측정과 WATER 9 Model에 의한 배출량 비교평가=103,113,1

1. Flux Chamber의 제작과 시료채취=103,113,4

2. Flux 산정과 배출량 비교=107,117,6

제3절 유입수 농도에 의한 대기오염배출량 추정=113,123,6

제5장 결론=119,129,6

참고문헌=125,135,13

[판권지]=138,148,1

List of Tables

Table2.1. Characteristics Of Emission Estimation Models In U.S. EPA EIIP=45,55,1

Table2.2. Input Data Of Influent Sewage For WATER 9 Model=46,56,1

Table2.3. Input Data Of Grit Chamber Sewage For WATER 9 Model=47,57,1

Table2.4. Input Data Of First Sedimentation Tank Sewage For WATER 9 Model=47,57,1

Table2.5. Input Data Of Biological Degradation Tank Sewage For WATER 9 Model=48,58,1

Table2.6. Input Data Of Second Sedimentation Tank Sewage For WATER 9 Model=48,58,1

Table2.7. The Following Compound Properties Are Estimated=50,60,1

Table2.8. Detailed Calculation At Unit 4 1st Sedimentation Tank=51,61,1

Table3.1. General Status Of The Sewage Treatment Plant=63,73,1

Table3.2. Malodorous Sulfur Compound In Sewage=68,78,1

Table3.3. Physical And Chemical Characteristics Of Often Detected VOCs In Sewage And Wastewater=74,84,1

Table3.4. Henry's Constant And Molecular Weight Of Sulfur Compounds=79,89,1

Table3.5. Operating Condition Of UNITY And GC-PFPD=80,90,1

Table3.6. Analytical Condition Of Purge-Trap=84,94,1

Table3.7. Analytical Results Of Sulfur Compound And VOCs In Sewage=86,96,1

Table3.8. Material Balance Of Air Pollutants Overall Loading To System=88,98,1

Table3.9. Emission Rate Of Air Pollutants From The Sewage Treatment Plant=88,98,1

Table3.10. Emission Rate Of Air Pollutants From The Sewage Treatment Plant=88,98,1

Table3.11. Material Balance Of Hydrogen Sulfide At The Sewage Treatment Plant=90,100,1

Table3.12. Material Balance Of Methyl Mercaptan At The Sewage Treatment Plant=90,100,1

Table3.13. Material Balance Of Dimethyl Sulfide At The Sewage Treatment Plant=91,101,1

Table3.14. Material Balance Of Benzene At The Sewage Treatment Plant=91,101,1

Table3.15. Material Balance Of Toluene At The Sewage Treatment Plant=92,102,1

Table3.16. Material Balance Of Ethyl Benzene At The Sewage Treatment Plant=92,102,1

Table3.17. Material Balance Of Xylene At The Sewage Treatment Plant=93,103,1

Table3.18. Emission Rate Of Grit Chamber On Overall Loading=94,104,1

Table3.19. Emission Rate Of First Sedimentation Tank On Overall Loading=95,105,1

Table3.20. Emission Rate Of Bio-Treatment Tank On Overall Loading=95,105,1

Table3.21. Emission Rate Of Diffused Aerator On Overall Loading=96,106,1

Table3.22. Emission Rate Of Second Sedimentation Tank On Overall Loading=96,106,1

Table4.1. Atmospheric Result Of The Sewage Treatment Plant=105,115,1

Table4.2. Comparison Of Fluxes Measured By Closed Flux Chamber=109,119,1

Table4.3. Comparison Of Emission Measured By WATER 9 And CFC.=110,120,1

Table4.4. Comparison Of Emission Factor By WATER 9, CFC And Other Study=112,122,1

Table4.5. Atmospheric Factors, Influent Conc., And Emission Amount Of H₂S On A Survey Date=113,123,1

Table4.6. Atmospheric Factors, Influent Conc., And Emission Amount Of Toluene On A Survey Date=114,124,1

Table4.7. Relationship Of Air Emission And Influent Conc.=115,125,1

List of Figures

Fig.1.1. Flow Chart In This Study=12,22,1

Fig.2.1. Estimation Procedure Of Emission By WATER 9 Model=53,63,1

Fig.2.2. Diagram Of Sewage Treatment Plant=54,64,1

Fig.2.3. Sewage Treatment Flow Sheet=56,66,1

Fig.2.4. Example Of Unit Description=57,67,1

Fig.2.5. Inputted Pollutant From Analysis Result=58,68,1

Fig,2.6. Selected Compound From Data Base=59,69,1

Fig.2.7. Compound Properties Edited From Data Base=59,69,1

Fig.3.1. Sewage Treatment Flow Sheet=64,74,1

Fig.3.2. Influenced pH On The Equilibrium Of Hydrogen Sulfide=69,79,1

Fig.3.3. Rate Of Hydrogen Sulfide And HS ̄(이미지참조) In Dissolved Sulfides=69,79,1

Fig.3.4. Variations Of H₂S Conc. In Water And Air By The Temp. Changes=71,81,1

Fig.3.5. Analysis System Of Sulfur Compound=80,90,1

Fig.3.6. Calibration Curve Of Sulfur Compound=81,91,1

Fig.3.7. Pre-treatment System For VOCs Analysis=84,94,1

Fig.3.8. Calibration Curve Of VOCs=85,95,1

Fig.4.1. Material Conversion Of Pollutants Introduced To Sewage Treatment Plant=99,109,1

Fig.4.2. Mass Transfer Rate Of Hydrogen Sulfide=100,110,1

Fig.4.3. Mass Transfer Rate Of Methyl Mercaptan=101,111,1

Fig.4.4. Mass Transfer Rate Of Dimethyl Sulfide=101,111,1

Fig.4.5. Mass Transfer Rate Of Benzene=101,111,1

Fig.4.6. Mass Transfer Rate Of Toluene=102,112,1

Fig.4.7. Mass Transfer Rate Of Ethyl Benzene=102,112,1

Fig.4.8. Mass Transfer Rate Of Xylene=102,112,1

Fig.4.9. Floating Closed Flux Chamber And Sampling=103,113,1

Fig.4.10. Measurement Equipment Of Atmospheric Date And Closed Flux Chamber Sealing=104,114,1

Fig.4.11. Equipment Of Gas Sampling=106,116,1

Fig.4.12. Conc. Change Per Hour Of Pollutants In The CFC At First Sedimentation Tank=108,118,1

Fig.4.13. Linear Regression Equations Of Pollutants In The CFC At First Sedimentation Tank=108,118,1

Fig.4.14. Comparison Of Emissions Estimated By WATER 9 Model And Measured By Closed Flux Chamber=111,121,1

Fig.4.15. Relationship Of Air Emission And Influent Conc.=114,124,1