본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
로그인 회원가입 English 국회부산도서관

전체메뉴

HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

고급검색

인명/단체명

저자정보 상세정보
인명/단체명을 입력하세요.

키워드

  • 대표어

  • 외국어

-

목차보기

목차

[표제지]=0,1,1

제출문=i,2,1

요약문=ii,3,5

Summary=vii,8,5

Contents=xii,13,3

목차=xv,16,4

List Of Tables=xix,20,4

List Of Figures=xxiii,24,6

제1장 서론=xxix,30,1

제1절 연구개발의 목적 및 필요성=1,31,1

1. 연구개발의 필요성=1,31,2

2. 연구개발의 목적=3,33,4

제2절 연구개발의 내용 및 범위=7,37,1

제3절 연구추진체계=8,38,1

제2장 국내외 기술개발 현황=8-1,39,1

제1절 국내 기술개발 현황=9,40,1

1. 국내의 주요 환경정책 추진현황=9,40,3

2. 국외의 주요 환경정책 추진현황=12,43,6

제2절 국내외 연구동향=17,48,1

1. 국내 비점오염원의 연구동향=17,48,3

2. 국외 비점오염원의 연구동향=19,50,6

제3장 이론적 고찰=24-1,56,1

제1절 비점오염원의 정의=25,57,1

1. 비점오염원의 특성=25,57,3

2. 비점오염원에 의한 수질영향=27,59,6

제2절 지역별 비점오염원의 배출 유형=32,64,1

1. 도시(공업)지역=33,65,1

2. 농업지역=33,65,2

3. 산림지역=34,66,2

4. 도로지역=35,67,2

5. 하천지역=36,68,1

6. 기타지역=37,69,1

제3절 도시지역 비점오염 유출특성=38,70,1

1. 도시지역 비점오염 유출특성=38,70,4

2. 비점오염원 구성 물질=42,74,13

제4절 비점오염원 관리기술 및 시설=55,87,1

1. 비점오염원 관리기술=55,87,1

2. 비점오염원 관리기술의 효과=55,87,3

3. 비점오염원 저감시설=57,89,21

제4장 연구개발수행 내용 및 결과=77-1,110,1

제1절 연구수행 방법=78,111,1

1. 개요=78,111,2

2. 연구지역의 선정=79,112,3

3. 실험방법=82,115,15

제2절 연구결과=97,130,1

1. 도로배수의 수질특성=97,130,6

2. 도로배수의 유출특성 평가=103,136,1

3. 설계 강우강도 선정 평가=104,137,5

4. 여재의 처리특성 분석=109,142,8

5. 처리장치의 수리계산=116,149,2

6. 강우강도별 처리장치(1/4규모)의 제거율=117,150,8

7. 노면 배수 처리장치(1/4 축소) 성능 실험=124,157,10

8. 실규모 장치를 이용한 실험=134,167,4

9. 현장 적용실험=138,171,37

10. 현장 적용 평가=175,208,2

제3절 도로노면 초기우수 무동력 처리장치 개발(EcoTank)=177,210,1

1. EcoTank의 특징=177,210,3

2. EcoTank에 의한 도로노면 초기빗물 처리 개념도=180,213,2

3. EcoTank의 설계처리량 및 집수구역=182,215,1

4. EcoTank 제원=183,216,1

5. EcoTank 설계=184,217,13

6. EcoTank 시작품=197,230,2

제4절 유지관리 지침서=199,232,1

1. 유지관리 계획=199,232,2

2. 유지관리 절차=200,233,2

3. EcoTank의 유지관리=201,234,3

4. EcoTank 장치관리=204,237,1

5. 퇴적물 관리=204,237,1

6. 여재 교체 시기=204,237,1

7. 사용 여재 처리=205,238,1

8. 유지관리자의 임무=205,238,1

9. EcoTank 유지관리 지침표=206,239,1

제5장 결론=206-1,240,6

제6장 연구개발목표 달성도 및 대외기여도=211-1,246,1

제1절 연구개발목표 달성도=212,247,2

1. 1차년도 연구개발목표 달성도=213,248,2

2. 2차년도 연구개발목표 달성도=214,249,2

제2절 대외기여도=215,250,2

1. 환경ㆍ기술적 측면=216,251,1

2. 사회ㆍ경제적 측면=216,251,2

제7장 연구개발결과의 활용계획=217-1,253,3

제8장 참고문헌=219-1,256,7

List Of Tables

Table 1.1. Yearly Main Subject And Scope Of Project=7,37,1

Table 2.1. Objects To Regulate Rainfall Runoff Under NPDES Permission=14,45,1

Table 2.2. Characteristics Of Separated And Combined Sewage Overflow=22,53,1

Table 3.1. Characteristics Of Point Source And Non-Point Source=26,58,1

Table 3.2. Pollution Loading Rate Of Point Source And Non-Point Source=27,59,1

Table 3.3. Case Study On CSOs And Stromwater Runoff In Urban area=33,65,1

Table 3.4. Livestock Pollution Loading By Stormwater And Effluent Criteria Of Livestock Wastewater=34,66,1

Table 3.5. Comparison Of Pollutant Generated From Rain Between Road And Urban Area=36,68,1

Table 3.6. Comparison Of 0.4Ha Parking Lots And 0.4Ha Pasture=40,72,1

Table 3.7. Characteristics Of Water Balance In Forest And Urban Area=41,73,1

Table 3.8. Mean Concentration Of Non-Point Source Pollutants By Land-Use Characteristics In Urban Area=41,73,1

Table 3.9. Non-Point Poiiutants Sources From Urban Road=42,74,1

Table 3.10. Estimation Of Carcinogenic Level For Animals And Human Body Tasted By IARC=44,76,2

Table 3.11. PHAs Contents Of Commercial Gasoline=46,78,1

Table 3.12. PHAs Analysis Of Diesel Fuel=47,79,1

Table 3.13. PAHs Emission Of Gasoline Cars=48,80,1

Table 3.14. Total PAHs Generated By Diesel Fuel Car=49,81,1

Table 3.15. Appliances Concerned With Endocrine Disrupt=51,83,1

Table 3.16. Examples Of Endocrine Disrupter And Mechanism Of Endocrine Disrupter=52,84,1

Table 3.17. International Organization On Chemicals=54,86,1

Table 3.18. Kinds Of Non-Point Source Control Technology=55,87,1

Table 3.19. Effects Of Installation On Non-Point Source Treatment Plant=57,89,1

Table 3.20. Confidence On Design Technology Of Non-Point Source Treatment=61,93,1

Table 4.1. The Vehicle Volume Of Traffic Investigation=79,112,1

Table 4.2. Analysis Item And Method=82,115,1

Table 4.3. Characteristics Of Polypropylene(J-P)=84,117,1

Table 4.4. Rain Conditions For Sampling Runoff=97,130,1

Table 4.5. Water Quality Of First Flush On Road=98,131,1

Table 4.6. Daily SS Conc. When It Rains=99,132,1

Table 4.7. Heavy Metals Conc. Of Initial Rain=100,133,1

Table 4.8. PAHs Conc. In Stormwater Runoff=102,135,1

Table 4.9. Effluent SS Conc. Percentage At Rain Intensity=107,140,1

Table 4.10. SS Removal Rate Using J-P=109,142,1

Table 4.11. Heavy Metal Removal Rate Using J-P=109,142,1

Table 4.12. PAHs Removal Rate Using J-P=110,143,1

Table 4.13. SS Removal Rate Using B-P=111,144,1

Table 4.14. Heavy Metal Removal Rate Using B-P=111,144,1

Table 4.15. PAHs Removal Rate Using B-P=112,145,1

Table 4.16. SS Removal Rate Using P-F=113,146,1

Table 4.17. Heavy Metal Removal Rate Using P-F=113,146,1

Table 4.18. PAHs Removal Rate Using P-F=114,147,1

Table 4.19. Removal Rate At Media=115,148,1

Table 4.20. Calculation On Hydro Profile Of Installation=116,149,1

Table 4.21. SS Removal Efficiency Of Media Respectively At Rain Intensity=118,151,1

Table 4.22. Removal Rate Of Heavy Metal Using J-P(20㎜/hr)=121,154,1

Table 4.23. PAHs Removal Rate Using Media Respectively(10㎜/hr)=124,157,1

Table 4.24. Variation Of Hydro Profile During Continuous Operation=125,158,1

Table 4.25. Comparison On Removal Efficiency Of Heavy Metal As Continuous operation=126,159,1

Table 4.26. Variation Of PAHs Conc. During Continuous Operation(J-P)=130,163,1

Table 4.27. Variation Of PAHs Conc. During Continuous Operation(P-F)=131,164,1

Table 4.28. Variation Of PAHs Conc. During Continuous Operation(B-P)=132,165,1

Table 4.29. Variation Of PAHs Conc. During 24hrs Operation=133,166,1

Table 4.30. Characteristics Of Influent At Rain Intensity=138,171,1

Table 4.31. SS Removal Efficiency Of Ecotank® At Rain Intensity=138,171,1

Table 4.32. T-P Removal Efficiency Of EcoTank® At Rain Intensity=139,172,1

Table 4.33. CODcr Removal Rate At Rain Intensity=140,173,1

Table 4.34. Heavy Metal Removal Rate At Rain Intensity=141,174,1

Table 4.35. Characteristics Of Sewage=142,175,1

Table 4.36. Removal Of SS Conc. In EcoTank® On Sewage=142,175,1

Table 4.37. Removal Of CODcr In EcoTank® On Sewage=143,176,1

Table 4.38. Removal Of DOC In Ecotank® On Sewage=144,177,1

Table 4.39. Conditions Of Rainwater As Sampling=145,178,1

Table 4.40. Characteristics Of EcoTank® On Runoff(04/11/01)=146,179,1

Table 4.41. Characteristics Of EcoTank® On Runoff(04/11/05)=148,181,1

Table 4.42. Characteristics Of EcoTank® On Runoff(04/11/10)=150,183,1

Table 4.43. Characteristics Of EcoTank® On Runoff(04/11/18)=152,185,1

Table 4.44. Removal Of SS In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/04/06)=154,187,1

Table 4.45. Removal Of CODcr In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/04/06)=155,188,1

Table 4.46. Removal Of T-P In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/04/06)=156,189,1

Table 4.47. Removal Of T-N In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/04/06)=156,189,1

Table 4.48. Removal Of Heavy Metal In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/04/06)=157,190,1

Table 4.49. Removal Of SS In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/05/05)=159,192,1

Table 4.50. Removal Of CODcr In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/05/05)=160,193,1

Table 4.51. Removal Of T-P In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/05/05)=161,194,1

Table 4.52. Removal Of T-N In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/05/05)=162,195,1

Table 4.53. Removal Of Heavy Metal In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/05/05)=163,196,1

Table 4.54. Removal Of SS In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/05/11)=165,198,1

Table 4.55. Removal Of CODcr In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/05/11)=166,199,1

Table 4.56. Removal Of T-N And T-N In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/05/11)=167,200,1

Table 4.57. Removal Of Heavy Metal In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/05/11)=168,201,1

Table 4.58. Removal Of TOC And DOC In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/05/11)=169,202,1

Table 4.59. Removal Of SS In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/05/17)=170,203,1

Table 4.60. Removal Of CODcr In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/05/17)=171,204,1

Table 4.61. Removal Of T-N And T-N In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/05/17)=172,205,1

Table 4.62. Removal Of Heavy Metal In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/05/17)=173,206,1

Table 4.63. Removal Of TOC And DOC In EcoTank® On Runoff(05/05/17)=174,207,1

Table 4.64. Drainage VS EcoTank=178,211,1

Table 4.65. EcoTank Specificity=183,216,1

Table 4.66. Maintenance Check List=203,236,1

Table 4.67. EcoTank Maintenance Guideline=206,239,1

List Of Figures

Fig. 1.1. Diagram Of Water Quality Pollution Loading Rate And Non-Point Source Management=2,32,1

Fig. 1.2. Non-Power Driven Treatment Apparatus For Surface Drainage; Ecotank®=3,33,1

Fig. 1.3. Treatment Apparatus Of Pollutant From Impervious Cover With Drainage=4,34,1

Fig. 1.4. Schematic Diagram Of Ecotank®=5,35,1

Fig. 1.5. Schematic Diagram Of Ecotank®(Under Designate Rain Intensity)=5,35,1

Fig. 1.6. Schematic Diagram Of Ecotank®(Over Designate Rain Intensity)=6,36,1

Fig. 3.1. Variation Of Runoff Volume At Runoff Time=28,60,1

Fig. 3.2. Generation Type Of Non-Point Source=32,64,1

Fig. 3.3. Soil Washing(a) And Concrete Draingae(b) In Sloppy Field=34,66,1

Fig. 3.4. Erosion Slope=35,67,1

Fig. 3.5. Non-Point Source On Road(a) And Inflow Of Initial Rain Collected At Bridge To River(b)=35,67,1

Fig. 3.6. Straighten Stream(a)And Parking Zone Of Terrace Land On The River=36,68,1

Fig. 3.7. Construction Field(a) And Abonded Mine(b)=37,69,1

Fig. 3.8. Emission Characteristics Of Impervious Cover=40,72,1

Fig. 3.9. Wet Expanded Detention Pond=65,97,1

Fig. 3.10. Wet Pond=65,97,1

Fig. 3.11. Wetland=66,98,1

Fig. 3.12. Infiltration=67,99,1

Fig. 3.13. Infiltration Trench=67,99,1

Fig. 3.14. Schematic Diagram Of Stormtreat=70,102,1

Fig. 3.15. Schematic Diagram Of Stormfilter=71,103,1

Fig. 3.16. Linear Type Stormfilter(a), Precast Type Stormfilter(b)=72,104,1

Fig. 3.17. Gravity Oil/Water Separator=73,105,1

Fig. 3.18. CPI Separator=73,105,1

Fig. 3.19. Schematic Diagram Stormceptor=74,106,1

Fig. 3.20. Type Of Stormceptor=76,108,1

Fig. 4.1. Variation Of Vehicles=80,113,1

Fig. 4.2. Main Road In Korea Institution Of Construction Technology=81,114,1

Fig. 4.3. Parking Lot In Korea Institution Of Construction Technology=81,114,1

Fig. 4.4. A Model Road For Rain Intensity Experiment=83,116,1

Fig. 4.5. An Asphalt Road Surface Manufactured For Experiment=83,116,1

Fig. 4.6. Expanded Polypropylene(J-P)=84,117,1

Fig. 4.7. Porous Sponge(B-P)=85,118,1

Fig. 4.8. Polypropylene Fiber(P-F)=85,118,1

Fig. 4.9. Up-Flow Filtering Tower=86,119,1

Fig. 4.10. Ecotank®(1/4 Scale Down)=87,120,1

Fig. 4.11. Schematic Diagram Of Ecotank®(Patent Registration 0431862)=88,121,1

Fig. 4.12. Media Column Of Ecotank®=88,121,1

Fig. 4.13. Field Scale Treatment Installation=89,122,1

Fig. 4.14. Photogaraph Of Detail Parts In Ecotank®=90,123,1

Fig. 4.15. Efficiency Test For Field Scale Treatment Installation=91,124,1

Fig. 4.16. Retention Basin For First Flush=92,125,1

Fig. 4.17. EcoTank®(For Concrete)=93,126,1

Fig. 4.18. EcoTank®(Inside)=93,126,1

Fig. 4.19. Mold Usde For Manufacture=94,127,1

Fig. 4.20.(A) Photograph Of EcoTank® Construction Work=94,127,1

Fig. 4.20.(B) Photograph Of EcoTank® Construction Work=95,128,1

Fig. 4.21. Photograph Of EcoTank®=96,129,1

Fig. 4.22. Daily Rain Volume=98,131,1

Fig. 4.23. Average SS Conc. Of Initial Rain=99,132,1

Fig. 4.24. Heavy Metals Conc. Of Initial Rain=101,134,1

Fig. 4.25. Relationship Between SS Conc. And Heavy Metals In Stormwater Runoff=103,136,1

Fig. 4.26. Pollutant Emission At Increase Of Water Quality=106,139,1

Fig. 4.27. 30x30 Model Road; Before Experiment(a), On Experiment(b)=106,139,1

Fig. 4.28. Characteristics Of SS Effluent At Rain Intensity=108,141,1

Fig. 4.29. PAHs Removal Rate Using J-P=110,143,1

Fig. 4.30. PAHs Removal Rate Using B-P=112,145,1

Fig. 4.31. PAHs Removal Rate Using P-F=114,147,1

Fig. 4.32. Schematic Diagram Of Treatment Reactor=117,150,1

Fig. 4.33. Variation Of SS Removals Of Media Respectively At Rain Intensity=119,152,1

Fig. 4.34.(A) Variation Of Heavy Metal Removals Of Media Respectively At Rain Intensity=119,152,1

Fig. 4.34.(B) Variation Of Heavy Metal Removals Of Media Respectively At Rain Intensity=120,153,1

Fig. 4.35. Variation Of Heavy Metal At Rain Intensity(J-P)=120,153,1

Fig. 4.36. Variation Of Heavy Metal At Rain Intensity(P-F, B-P)=121,154,1

Fig. 4.37. Variation Of PAHs Conc. At Rain Intensity(J-P)=122,155,1

Fig. 4.38. Variation Of PAHs Conc. At Rain Intensity(P-F)=123,156,1

Fig. 4.39. Variation Of PAHs Conc. At Rain Intensity(B-P)=123,156,1

Fig. 4.40. SS Removal Efficiency Using Media Respectively=125,158,1

Fig. 4.41. Removal Efficiencies Of Pb And Zn During 24hrs Operation(J-P)=127,160,1

Fig. 4.42. Removal Efficiencies Of Cr, Cd And Cu During 24hrs Operation(J-P)=127,160,1

Fig. 4.43. Removal Efficiencies Of Pb And Zn During 24hrs Operation(P-F)=127,160,1

Fig. 4.44. Removal Efficiencies Of Cr, Cd And Cu During 24hrs Operation(P-F)=128,161,1

Fig. 4.45. Removal Efficiencies Of Pb And Zn During 24hrs Operation(B-P)=128,161,1

Fig. 4.46. Removal Efficiencies Of Cr, Cd And Cu During 24hrs Operation(B-P)=128,161,1

Fig. 4.47. Comparison On Adsorption Capacity Of Media After 24hrs Operation=129,162,1

Fig. 4.48. Variation Of PAHs Conc. During Continuous Operation(J-P)=131,164,1

Fig. 4.49. Variation Of PAHs Conc. During Continuous Operation(P-F)=132,165,1

Fig. 4.50. Variation Of PAHs Conc. During 24hrs Operation(B-P)=133,166,1

Fig. 4.51. SS Removal Rate Of J-P And P-F At Rain Intensity=134,167,1

Fig. 4.52. Heavy Metal Removal Rate Of J-P And P-F=135,168,1

Fig. 4.53. Removal Rate Of Heavy Metal Using Expanded Polypropylene At Field Scale Installation=136,169,1

Fig. 4.54. Variation Of PAHs At Rain Intensity Using Field Scale Installation(J-P)=136,169,1

Fig. 4.55. Variation Of PAHs At Rain Intensity Using Field Scale Installation(P-F)=137,170,1

Fig. 4.56. SS Removal Rate At Rain Intensity=139,172,1

Fig. 4.57. T-P Removal Rate At Rain Intensity=139,172,1

Fig. 4.58. CODcr Removal Rate At Rain Intensity=140,173,1

Fig. 4.59. Heavy Metal Removal Rate At Rain Intensity=141,174,1

Fig. 4.60. Removal Of SS Conc. In EcoTank® On Sewage=143,176,1

Fig. 4.61. Removal Of CODcr In EcoTank® On Sewage=144,177,1

Fig. 4.62. Removal Of DOC In EcoTank® On Sewage=144,177,1

Fig. 4.63. Characteristics Of EcoTank® On Runoff(T-P, SS, COD)(2004/11/01)=147,180,1

Fig. 4.64. Characteristics Of EcoTank® On Runoff(Heavy Metal)(2004/11/01)=147,180,1

Fig. 4.65. Characteristics Of EcoTank® On Runoff(T-P, SS, COD)(2004/11/05)=149,182,1

Fig. 4.66. Characteristics Of EcoTank® On Runoff(Heavy Metal)(2004/11/05)=149,182,1

Fig. 4.67. Characteristics Of EcoTank® On Runoff(T-P, SS, COD)(2004/11/10)=151,184,1

Fig. 4.68. Characteristics Of EcoTank® On Runoff(Heavy Metal)(2004/11/10)=151,184,1

Fig. 4.69. Characteristics Of EcoTank® On Runoff(T-P, SS, COD)(2004/11/18)=153,186,1

Fig. 4.70. Characteristics Of EcoTank® On Runoff(Heavy Metal)(2004/11/18)=153,186,1

Fig. 4.71. Removal Of SS In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/04/06)=154,187,1

Fig. 4.72. Removal Of CODcr In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/04/06)=155,188,1

Fig. 4.73. Removal Of T-P In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/04/06)=156,189,1

Fig. 4.74. Removal Of T-N In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/04/06)=157,190,1

Fig. 4.75. Removal Of Heavy Metal In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/04/06)=158,191,1

Fig. 4.76. Removal Of SS In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/05)=159,192,1

Fig. 4.77. Removal Of CODcr In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/05)=160,193,1

Fig. 4.78. Removal Of T-P In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/05)=161,194,1

Fig. 4.79. Removal Of T-N In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/05)=162,195,1

Fig. 4.80. Removal Of Heavy Metal In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/05)=163,196,1

Fig. 4.81. Removal Of TOC In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/05)=164,197,1

Fig. 4.82. Removal Of DOC In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/05)=164,197,1

Fig. 4.83. Removal Of SS In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/11)=165,198,1

Fig. 4.84. Removal Of CODcr In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/11)=166,199,1

Fig. 4.85. Removal Of T-P and T-N In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/11)=167,200,1

Fig. 4.86. Removal Of Heavy Metal In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/11)=168,201,1

Fig. 4.87. Removal Of TOC And DOC In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/11)=169,202,1

Fig. 4.88. Removal Of SS In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/17)=170,203,1

Fig. 4.89. Removal Of CODc In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/17)=171,204,1

Fig. 4.90. Removal Of T-N and T-N In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/17)=172,205,1

Fig. 4.91. Removal Of Heavy Metal In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/17)=173,206,1

Fig. 4.92. Removal Of TOC And DOC In EcoTank® On Runoff(2005/05/17)=174,207,1

Fig. 4.93. Non-Power Driven Treatment Apparatus For Surface Drainage(Patent Registration 3357071)=178,211,1

Fig. 4.94. EcoTank®(Patent Registration 3357071)=179,212,1

Fig. 4.95. A Schematic Diagram Of Treatment From Road Runoff By EcoTank=180,213,1

Fig. 4.96. A Schematic Diagram Of Treatment For First Flush From Road Runoff=181,214,1

Fig. 4.97. Maintenance Procedure=201,234,1

Fig. 4.98. Maintenance Of EcoTank=202,235,1

영문목차

[title page etc.]=0,1,7

Summary=vii,8,5

Contents=xii,13,17

Chapter 1. Introduction=xxix,30,1

Paragraph 1. Purposes And Necessities=1,31,1

1. Necessities=1,31,2

2. Purposes=3,33,4

Paragraph 2. Tasks And Scopes=7,37,1

Paragraph 3. Study System=8,38,1

Chapter 2. Status Of Current Technologies=8-1,39,1

Paragraph 1. Technical And Political Development=9,40,1

1. Change Of Policy In Korea=9,40,3

2. Change Of Policy In Other Country=12,43,6

Paragraph 2. Previous Study=17,48,1

1. Change Of Study In Korea=17,48,3

2. Change Of Study In Other Country=19,50,6

Chapter 3. Theoretical Study=24-1,56,1

Paragraph 1. Definition Of Non-Point Source=25,57,1

1. Characteristics Of Non-Point Source=25,57,3

2. Influence On Water Quality By Non-Point Source=27,59,6

Paragraph 2. Emission Type Of Non-Point Source=32,64,1

1. Urban(Industrial) Area=33,65,1

2. Agricultural Area=33,65,2

3. Forest=34,66,2

4. Road=35,67,2

5. River=36,68,1

6. Other Areas=37,69,1

Paragraph 3. Characteristics Of Non-Point Source In Urban Area=38,70,1

1. Characteristics Of Non-Point Source In Urban Area=38,70,4

2. Compositions Of Non-Point Source=42,74,13

Paragraph 4. Non-Point Source Management Technology And Plant=55,87,1

1. Non-Point Source Management Technology=55,87,1

2. Effect On Non-Point Source Management Technology=55,87,3

3. Non Point Source Treatment Pilot=57,89,21

Chapter 4. Methods And Results=77-1,110,1

Paragraph 1. Methods Of Research=78,111,1

1. Introduction=78,111,2

2. Selection Of Study Area=79,112,3

3. Methods=82,115,15

Paragraph 2. Results=97,130,1

1. Characteristics Of Stormwater Runoff Quality=97,130,6

2. Evaluation Of Stormwater Runoff Characteristics=103,136,1

3. Evaluation Of Design Rain Intensity Selection=104,137,5

4. Evaluation Of Media Performance=109,142,8

5. Examination Of Hydro Profile At Installation=116,149,2

6. Removal Rate Of Ecotank® At Rain Intensity=117,150,8

7. Performance Of Ecotank®(1/4 down size)=124,157,10

8. Performance Of Field Scale Ecotank®=134,167,4

9. Application Test On Field=138,171,37

10. Assessment Of Application To Field=175,208,2

Paragraph 3. Development Of Non-Power Driven Treatment(Ecotank)=177,210,1

1. Characteristics Of EcoTank®=177,210,3

2. Schematic Diagram Of EcoTank® For Treatment On Runoff=180,213,2

3. Treatment Wolume And Runoff Collecting Area For Design Of Ecotank®=182,215,1

4. Specification Of EcoTank®=183,216,1

5. Design Of EcoTank®=184,217,13

6. Installation Of EcoTank®=197,230,2

Paragraph 4. Guidline Of Maintenance=199,232,1

1. Maintenance Plan=199,232,2

2. Maintenance Procedure=200,233,2

3. Maintenance Of EcoTank=201,234,3

4. Management Of EcoTank=204,237,1

5. Sediment Management=204,237,1

6. Media Using Period=204,237,1

7. The Disposal Of Used Media=205,238,1

8. The Mission Of Manager=205,238,1

9. EcoTank Maintenance Guideline=206,239,1

Chapter 5. Conclusion=206-1,240,6

Chapter 6. Degree Of Achievement And Contribution=211-1,246,7

Chapter 7. Application Plan Of Research Results=217-1,253,3

Chapter 8. Reference=219-1,256,7

칼라목차

jpg

Fig. 3.9. Wet Expanded Detention Pond=65,97,1

Fig. 3.10. Wet Pond=65,97,1

Fig. 3.11. Wetland=66,98,1

Fig. 3.12. Infiltration=67,99,1

Fig. 3.13. Infiltration Trench=67,99,1

Fig. 4.47. Comparison On Adsorption Capacity Of Media After 24hrs Operation=129,162,1

Fig. 4.48. Variation Of PAHs Conc. During Continuous Operation(J-P)=131,164,1

Fig. 4.49. Variation Of PAHs Conc. During Continuous Operation(P-F)=132,165,1

Fig. 4.50. Variation Of PAHs Conc. During 24hrs Operation(B-P)=133,166,1

8-1,39,1

24-1,56,1

77-1,110,1

206-1,240,1

211-1,246,1

217-1,253,1

219-1,256,1

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차

권호

기사명 원문보기 기사목차
닫기