본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

전체메뉴

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

목차보기

영문목차

[title page]=0,1,1

Contents=i,2,4

Index Of Tables & Figures=v,6,2

Summary=1,8,10

Abstract=11,18,4

Part 1 : Economic And Business Environment=15,22,2

1.1. Forces Of Change=17,24,3

1.2. Trade And Investment=19,26,3

1.3. Economic Conditions=21,28,3

1.4. Competitiveness=23,30,4

Part 2. Forf(a)s(이미지 참조)=27,34,2

2.1. Role And Functions=29,36,1

2.1.1. Background And Purpose of Establishment=29,36,7

2.1.2. Statutory Responsibilities=35,42,3

2.1.3. Mission Statement And Objectives=37,44,2

2.1.4. Institutional Reporting Mechanisms=38,45,2

2.1.5. Organisation Structure=39,46,2

2.1.6. Staff Resources=40,47,2

2.1.7 Consultants=41,48,2

2.1.8. Budget=42,49,1

2.2. Policy Advisory Process=43,50,1

2.2.1. Working Arrangements=43,50,3

2.2.2. Irish Council For Science Technology And Innovation=45,52,2

2.2.3. National Competitiveness Council=46,53,2

2.2.4. Expert Group On Future Skills Needs=47,54,2

2.2.5. Policy Advisory Activities=48,55,9

2.3. Co-Ordination Of Development Agencies=57,64,1

2.3.1. Overview=57,64,3

2.3.2. IDA-Ireland=59,66,2

2.3.3. Enterprise Ireland=60,67,3

2.3.4. F(a)s(이미지참조)=62,69,1

2.4. Monitoring Enterprise Performance=62,69,4

2.5. Executive Activities=65,72,1

2.5.1. Background=65,72,1

2.5.2. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)=65,72,2

2.5.3. National Accreditation Board (NAB)=67,74,1

2.5.4. Awareness Campaigns=67,74,1

2.6. Forf(a)s Performance(이미지 참조)=67,74,1

2.6.1. Client Surveys=67,74,2

2.6.2. Expenditure Review=68,75,3

2.6.3. Implementation of Forf(a)s Recommendations(이미지 참조)=70,77,1

2.6.4. Performance Measurement=71,78,4

2.7. Future Direction=74,81,1

2.7.1. Overview=74,81,1

2.7.2. Co-Ordination Of Policy Development=74,81,2

2.7.3. Facilitation Of Implementation=76,83,1

2.7.4. Evaluation Of Performance=76,83,1

Part 3 : High Technology Industry In Ireland=77,84,2

3.1. Evolution Of The Irish Economy=79,86,1

3.1.1. Ireland: Some Basic Facts=79,86,1

3.1.2. Overview of Performance in 2002=79,86,2

3.1.3. Era Of Protectionism 1922-1955=81,88,4

3.1.4. Outward Orientation: 1955 to Date=84,91,12

3.1.5. Diversification=95,102,2

3.2. Reasons For Success=96,103,1

3.2.1. Overview=96,103,1

3.2.2. EU Membership=97,104,2

3.2.3. Social Partnership Agreements=98,105,3

3.2.4. Taxation=100,107,1

3.2.5. Skills, Education And Labour Supply=100,107,5

3.2.6. Public Finances=104,111,2

3.2.7. Public Administration=105,112,2

3.2.8. Enterprise Policy=107,114,3

3.3. Science, Technology And Innovation=109,116,1

3.3.1. National System Of Innovation=109,116,5

3.3.2 Third Level Research=113,120,3

3.3.3. Business Research=115,122,3

3.3.4. Technology Transfer=118,125,1

3.3.5. Venture Capital=119,126,2

3.3.6. Career In Science And Technology=120,127,2

3.3.7. European Union=121,128,2

3.3.8. Building The Science And Technology Infrastructure=122,129,2

3.4. Foreign Direct Investment=123,130,1

3.4.1. Rationale=123,130,3

3.4.2. Sectoral Strategy=125,132,7

3.4.3. Market Share=131,138,4

3.4.4. Economic Impact=134,141,3

3.4.5. Research By Foreign Owned Companies=136,143,5

3.4.6. Spillover Effects=140,147,3

3.4.7 Durability=142,149,3

3.4.8/5. Corporation Tax Payments=144,151,2

3.5. Future Direction=145,152,1

3.5.1. Promotional Strategy=145,152,3

3.5.2. Agency Strategies=147,154,4

3.5.3. Key Issues=150,157,9

Part 4 : Some Implications For Korea=159,166,2

4.1. Comparisons Of Korea And Ireland=161,168,2

4.2. Attracting Foreign High Technology Companies to Korea=162,169,3

4.3. Increasing R&D By Foreign High Technology Companies In Korea=164,171,2

4.4. Increasing The Spillover Effects From Foreign Owned Companies ln Korea=165,172,2

Reference=167,174,2

Appendix=169,176,1

1. Glossary=169,176,1

2. Colm Regan : Biographical Note=170,177,1

보고서 판매 안내=171,178,8

[Copyright]=179,186,1

Index Of Tables

Table 1. Population and Labour Force Change 1926-1961=84,91,1

Table 2. Export Change By Sector Of Origin And Market Destination 1929-1960=84,91,1

Table 3. Macroeconomic Performance=94,101,1

Table 4. Employment Growth (% Change)=94,101,1

Table 5. Sectoral Shares (%) In GDP=95,102,1

Table 6. Industry Related Science And Technology Expenditure 1989-2006=112,119,1

Table 7. Gross Expenditure On R&D (GERD) As A Percentage Of GDP 1991-1999=113,120,1

Table 8. Changes In The Contribution Of BERD To GNP And GDP, 1993-2001=116,123,1

Table 9. Analysis Of BERD In 2001 Classified According To Ownership Of Company=117,124,1

Table 10. Employment In Foreign Owned Enteprise By Sector 1980-2000=126,133,1

Table 11. Composition Of Manufacturing Employment 1999-2000=128,135,1

Table 12. Shares Of US FDI Outflows 1999=132,139,1

Table 13. Leading Computer And Pharmaceutical Companies=133,140,1

Table 14. Employment in Foreign, Irish Owned And Manufacturing And International Services=135,142,1

Table 15. Total Employment By Sector=136,143,1

Table 16. Economic Impact Of IDA Import Companies=142,149,1

Table 17. Survival Rates Of Cohorts Of Foreign Owned And Irish Manufacturing And Internationally Traded Services Firms 1980-1994=143,150,1

Table 18. Rate Of Job Loss In Foreign And Irish-Owned Firms Manufacturing And Internationally Traded Services Firms 1981-2000=144,151,1

Table 19. World Competitiveness Scoreboard 2003=161,168,1

Table 20. Extent To Which Basic, Technological, Scientifie And Human Resources Meet The Needs Of Business=162,169,1

Index Of Figures

Figure 1. Growth Rates In Real GDP - Ireland And EU15 - 1991 To 2003=93,100,1

Figure 2. Real GDP Growth - 1997 To 2002=93,100,1

Figure 3. Irish Merchandise Trade By Region, 1990-2001=96,103,1

Figure 4. Percentage Of Population Under 25 Years Of Age Inl Year 2000=101,108,1

Figure 5. Percentage Of Population That Has Attained At Least Tertiary Education For Persons 25-34. 2001=102,109,1

Figure 6. The Degree To Which The Education System Meets The Needs Of A Competitive Economy 2003=103,110,1

Figure 7. Diagram Of The National System Of Innovation=110,117,1

Figure 8. High Tech Investment As A Proportion Of Total Investment Inl 2001=120,127,1

Figure 9. Percentage Of R&D Active Companies Which Engaged In Collaborative Research With Other Institutions, 2001=139,146,1