권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
영문목차
[title page]=0,1,1
Contents=i,2,4
Index Of Tables & Figures=v,6,2
Summary=1,8,10
Abstract=11,18,4
Part 1 : Economic And Business Environment=15,22,2
1.1. Forces Of Change=17,24,3
1.2. Trade And Investment=19,26,3
1.3. Economic Conditions=21,28,3
1.4. Competitiveness=23,30,4
Part 2. Forf(a)s(이미지 참조)=27,34,2
2.1. Role And Functions=29,36,1
2.1.1. Background And Purpose of Establishment=29,36,7
2.1.2. Statutory Responsibilities=35,42,3
2.1.3. Mission Statement And Objectives=37,44,2
2.1.4. Institutional Reporting Mechanisms=38,45,2
2.1.5. Organisation Structure=39,46,2
2.1.6. Staff Resources=40,47,2
2.1.7 Consultants=41,48,2
2.1.8. Budget=42,49,1
2.2. Policy Advisory Process=43,50,1
2.2.1. Working Arrangements=43,50,3
2.2.2. Irish Council For Science Technology And Innovation=45,52,2
2.2.3. National Competitiveness Council=46,53,2
2.2.4. Expert Group On Future Skills Needs=47,54,2
2.2.5. Policy Advisory Activities=48,55,9
2.3. Co-Ordination Of Development Agencies=57,64,1
2.3.1. Overview=57,64,3
2.3.2. IDA-Ireland=59,66,2
2.3.3. Enterprise Ireland=60,67,3
2.3.4. F(a)s(이미지참조)=62,69,1
2.4. Monitoring Enterprise Performance=62,69,4
2.5. Executive Activities=65,72,1
2.5.1. Background=65,72,1
2.5.2. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)=65,72,2
2.5.3. National Accreditation Board (NAB)=67,74,1
2.5.4. Awareness Campaigns=67,74,1
2.6. Forf(a)s Performance(이미지 참조)=67,74,1
2.6.1. Client Surveys=67,74,2
2.6.2. Expenditure Review=68,75,3
2.6.3. Implementation of Forf(a)s Recommendations(이미지 참조)=70,77,1
2.6.4. Performance Measurement=71,78,4
2.7. Future Direction=74,81,1
2.7.1. Overview=74,81,1
2.7.2. Co-Ordination Of Policy Development=74,81,2
2.7.3. Facilitation Of Implementation=76,83,1
2.7.4. Evaluation Of Performance=76,83,1
Part 3 : High Technology Industry In Ireland=77,84,2
3.1. Evolution Of The Irish Economy=79,86,1
3.1.1. Ireland: Some Basic Facts=79,86,1
3.1.2. Overview of Performance in 2002=79,86,2
3.1.3. Era Of Protectionism 1922-1955=81,88,4
3.1.4. Outward Orientation: 1955 to Date=84,91,12
3.1.5. Diversification=95,102,2
3.2. Reasons For Success=96,103,1
3.2.1. Overview=96,103,1
3.2.2. EU Membership=97,104,2
3.2.3. Social Partnership Agreements=98,105,3
3.2.4. Taxation=100,107,1
3.2.5. Skills, Education And Labour Supply=100,107,5
3.2.6. Public Finances=104,111,2
3.2.7. Public Administration=105,112,2
3.2.8. Enterprise Policy=107,114,3
3.3. Science, Technology And Innovation=109,116,1
3.3.1. National System Of Innovation=109,116,5
3.3.2 Third Level Research=113,120,3
3.3.3. Business Research=115,122,3
3.3.4. Technology Transfer=118,125,1
3.3.5. Venture Capital=119,126,2
3.3.6. Career In Science And Technology=120,127,2
3.3.7. European Union=121,128,2
3.3.8. Building The Science And Technology Infrastructure=122,129,2
3.4. Foreign Direct Investment=123,130,1
3.4.1. Rationale=123,130,3
3.4.2. Sectoral Strategy=125,132,7
3.4.3. Market Share=131,138,4
3.4.4. Economic Impact=134,141,3
3.4.5. Research By Foreign Owned Companies=136,143,5
3.4.6. Spillover Effects=140,147,3
3.4.7 Durability=142,149,3
3.4.8/5. Corporation Tax Payments=144,151,2
3.5. Future Direction=145,152,1
3.5.1. Promotional Strategy=145,152,3
3.5.2. Agency Strategies=147,154,4
3.5.3. Key Issues=150,157,9
Part 4 : Some Implications For Korea=159,166,2
4.1. Comparisons Of Korea And Ireland=161,168,2
4.2. Attracting Foreign High Technology Companies to Korea=162,169,3
4.3. Increasing R&D By Foreign High Technology Companies In Korea=164,171,2
4.4. Increasing The Spillover Effects From Foreign Owned Companies ln Korea=165,172,2
Reference=167,174,2
Appendix=169,176,1
1. Glossary=169,176,1
2. Colm Regan : Biographical Note=170,177,1
보고서 판매 안내=171,178,8
[Copyright]=179,186,1
Figure 1. Growth Rates In Real GDP - Ireland And EU15 - 1991 To 2003=93,100,1
Figure 2. Real GDP Growth - 1997 To 2002=93,100,1
Figure 3. Irish Merchandise Trade By Region, 1990-2001=96,103,1
Figure 4. Percentage Of Population Under 25 Years Of Age Inl Year 2000=101,108,1
Figure 5. Percentage Of Population That Has Attained At Least Tertiary Education For Persons 25-34. 2001=102,109,1
Figure 6. The Degree To Which The Education System Meets The Needs Of A Competitive Economy 2003=103,110,1
Figure 7. Diagram Of The National System Of Innovation=110,117,1
Figure 8. High Tech Investment As A Proportion Of Total Investment Inl 2001=120,127,1
Figure 9. Percentage Of R&D Active Companies Which Engaged In Collaborative Research With Other Institutions, 2001=139,146,1
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.