본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

전체메뉴

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

목차보기

영문목차

- Foreword. Acknowledgements. Authors.

- Part I: Developing the Framework.

1: Understanding `Success'.

2: Review of Past Efforts to Define and Evaluate Success; with C.J.A. Beck.

3: Comparative Case Analysis: Developing and Applying Methods.

- Part II: Sample Cases.

4: The Mono Lake Case; K. Mazaika.

5: The Pyramid Lake Case; E. McCandless.

6: The Pecos River Case; A. Hanada, L. Hancock.

7: The Snowmass Creek Case; K. Crandall.

- Part III: Comparing the Cases; Testing the Framework.

8: Patterns in Environmental Conflict Resolution: Comparisons Across Cases.

9: Evaluating Criteria for Success.

10: Reflections on Resolving Water Conflicts.

- Appendix A: GUIDEBOOK for Analyzing Success in Conflict Resolution Cases.

- Appendix B: Federal Policies Affecting Environmental Conflict Resolution; K. Mazaika.

- Appendix C: Applying the Economic and Financial Criteria.

- References. Index.

이용현황보기

Braving the currents : evaluating environmental conflict resolution in the river basins of the American West 이용현황 표 - 등록번호, 청구기호, 권별정보, 자료실, 이용여부로 구성 되어있습니다.
등록번호 청구기호 권별정보 자료실 이용여부
0001138394 333.73 D477b 서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대) 이용가능

출판사 책소개

알라딘제공

This thoughtful reference identifies, applies, and evaluates criteria to define success in complex multi-party natural resource disputes. The authors examine 28 "success" criteria from many angles, present a method for systematically considering all the elements necessary for successful environmental CR, and then apply this analytic framework to eight specific western U.S. water conflicts.



Braving the Currents systematically identifies, applies, and evaluates criteria to define success in complex multi-party natural resource disputes. The authors elucidate the full range of criteria for defining success that researchers, stakeholders, and practitioners have relied on as they have participated in, and reflected upon, environmental conflict resolution (CR) efforts. They examine 28 "success" criteria from many angles, present a method for systematically considering all the elements necessary for successful environmental CR, and then apply this analytic framework to eight specific western U.S. water conflicts. The criteria are assessed in terms of their accessibility, reliability, validity, and overall usefulness in evaluating specific conflict cases and different resolution methods.

The book concludes with observations about successfully resolved disputes, a summary of what the authors have learned through their extensive evaluations, and a discussion of how public policies can contribute to dispute prevention and management. While the cases focus on water conflicts, their processes and assessments are applicable to a wide body of cases.

At the suggestion of academic reviewers, the authors have included "Appendix A: A Guidebook", which enhances the book's text applicability by providing detailed instructions for case documentation and analysis.

This book will be of particular interest to students and instructors of conflict resolution, environmental studies, public policy, negotiation, and resource management; public and private sector managers, researchers, practitioners, and attorneys; and conflict resolution professionals.