권호기사보기
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
대표형(전거형, Authority) | 생물정보 | 이형(異形, Variant) | 소속 | 직위 | 직업 | 활동분야 | 주기 | 서지 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
연구/단체명을 입력해주세요. |
|
|
|
|
|
* 주제를 선택하시면 검색 상세로 이동합니다.
목차
Preface v
Introduction: Labels and Alignments in American Politics xvii
PART 1 DEMOCRACY AND THE AMERICAN POLITICAL PROCESS 1
Issue 1. Should Americans Believe in a Unique American "Mission"? 2
YES: Wilfred M. McClay, from "The Founding of Nations," First Things (March 2006) 4
NO: Howard Zinn, from "The Power and the Glory: Myths of American Exceptionalism," Boston Review (Summer 2005) 13
Humanities professor Wilfred M. McClay argues that America's "myth," its founding narrative, helps to sustain and hold together a diverse people
Historian Howard Zinn is convinced that America's myth of "exceptionalism" has served as a justification for lawlessness, brutality, and imperialism
Issue 2. Is Democracy the Answer to Global Terrorism? 22
YES: George W. Bush, from Speech at National Defense University (March 8, 2005) 24
NO: F. Gregory Gause III, from "Can Democracy Stop Terrorism?" Foreign Affairs (September/October 2005) 29
President George W. Bush argues that the best antidote to terrorism is the tolerance and hope generated by democracy. Political scientist Gregory Gause contends that there is no relationship between terrorism emanating from a country and the extent to which democracy is enjoyed by its citizens
Issue 3. Should the Electoral College Be Abolished? 38
YES: George C. Edwards III, from Why the Electoral college Is Bad for America (Yale University Press, 2004) 40
NO: Gary L. Gregg, from "The Electoral College Is Good for America," National Review Online (October 25-27, 2004) 45
University Professor George C. Edwards Ill believes that the Electoral College method of election violates the democratic principle of majority election and has resulted in the election of candidates with fewer votes than their leading opponent
Leadership Institute Director Gary L. Gregg maintains that the Electoral College system has succeeded in moderating and stabilizing American politics, and its abolition would risk the creation of radical parties and the election of minority presidents
Issue 4. Do the Media Have a Liberal Bias? 51
YES: Bernard Goldberg, from Arrogance: Rescuing America from the Media Elite (Warner Books, 2003) 53
NO: Robert F. Kennedy Jr., from Crimes Against Nature (Harper Collins, 2005) 62
Former CBS reporter Bernard Goldberg argues that liberal bias is pervasive in news reporting, the result not of a conspiracy but of a mind-set among media elites acquired from the homogeneous social circles in which they live and work
Environmentalist and political activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. believes that conservative bias, fostered by conservative foundations, media owners, and talk radio commentators, has stifled investigative reporting and misinformed millions of Americans
Issue 5. Should America Adopt Public Financing of Political Campaigns? 73
YES: Mark Green, from Selling Out: How Big Corporate Money Buys Elections, Rams Through Legislation, and Betrays Our Democracy (Regan Books, 2002) 75
NO: John Samples, from "Taxpayer Financing of Campaigns," in John Samples, ed., Welfare for Politicians? Taxpayer Financing of Campaigns (CATO Institute, 2005) 81
Political activist and author Mark Green sums up his thesis in the subtitle of his book, a work that urges adoption of public financing of election campaigns in order to make politics more honest and to reduce the dependency of elected officials on selfish interests
Cato Institute director and political scientist John Samples opposes public financing of candidates for public office because it does not achieve any of the goals of its advocates and it forces voters to underwrite the financing of candidates they do not support
PART 2 THE INSTITUTIONS OF GOVERNMENT 89
Issue 6. Is Congress Barred from Regulating Commerce Within a State? 90
YES: William H. Rehnquist, from Majority Opinion, United States v. Lopez, U.S. Supreme Court (April 26, 1995) 92
NO: Stephen G. Breyer, from Dissenting Opinion, United States v. Lopez, U.S. Supreme Court (April 26, 1995) 99
Supreme Court Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist argues that Congress cannot regulate activities within a state that are not economic and do not substantially affect commerce among the states
Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer upholds the right of Congress to regulate activities within a state if Congress has a rational basis for believing that it affects the exercise of congressional power
Issue 7. Should the Courts Seek the "Original Meaning" of the Constitution? 106
YES: Antonin Scalia, from Remarks at Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (March 14, 2005) 108
NO: Stephen Breyer, from Active liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution (Knopf, 2005) 115
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia rejects the notion of a "living Constitution," arguing that the judges must try to understand what the framers meant at the time
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer contends that in finding the meaning of the Constitution, judges cannot neglect to consider the probable consequences of different interpretations
Issue 8. May the President Wiretap Without a Warrant to Protect National Security? 122
YES: Andrew C. McCarthy, from "How to 'Connect the Dots'," National Review (January 30, 2006) 124
NO: Al Gore, from "Restoring the Rule of Law," From a Speech Presented to The American Constitution Society for Law and Policy and The Liberty Coalition (January 15, 2006) 130
Former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy supports the National Security Agency program of surveillance without a warrant as an effective means of protecting national security that employs the inherent power of the president to protect the country against subversion
Former vice president Al Gore views the warrantless wiretapping of American citizens as a brazen violation of the Constitution and of specific acts of Congress that have spelled out the circumstances under which a president may receive judicial permission to wiretap or otherwise invade the privacy of citizens
PART 3 SOCIAL CHANGE AND PUBLIC POLICY 139(158)
Issue 9. Is Capital Punishment Justified? 140
YES: Robert W. Lee, from "Deserving to Die," The New American (August 13, 1990) 142
NO: Eric M. Freedman, from "The Case Against the Death Penalty," USA Today Magazine (March 1997) 150
Essayist Robert W. Lee argues that capital punishment is the only fair way for society to respond to certain heinous crimes
Law professor Eric M. Freedman contends that the death penalty does not reduce crime but does reduce public safety and carries the risk of innocent people being executed
Issue 10. Does Affirmative Action Advance Racial Equality? 158
YES: Glenn C. Loury, from The Anatomy of Racial Inequality (Harvard University Press, 2002) 160
NO: Walter E. Williams, from "Affirmative Action Can't Be Mended," in David Boaz, ed., Toward Liberty: The Idea That Is Changing the World (CATO Institute, 2002) 165
Political scientist Glenn Loury argues that the prudent use of "race-sighted" policies is essential to reducing the deleterious effects of race stigmatization, especially the sense of "racial otherness," which still remain in America
Economist Walter Williams argues that the use of racial preferences sets up a zero-sum game that reverses the gains of the civil rights movement, penalizes innocent people, and ends up harming those they are intended to help
Issue 11. Is "Middle Eastern" Profiling Ever Justified? 174
YES: Daniel Pipes, from "Fighting Militant Islam, Without Bias," City Journal (November 2001) 176
NO: David A. Harris, from 'Flying While Arab,' Immigration Issues, and Lessons from the Racial Profiling Controversy," Testimony before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (October 12, 2001) 183
Daniel Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum, argues that "heightened scrutiny" of Muslims and Middle Eastern?ooking people is justified because, while not all Muslims are Islamic extremists, all Islamic extremists are Muslims
Law professor David A. Harris opposes profiling people of Middle Eastern appearance because, like racial profiling, it compromises civil liberties and actually damages our intelligence efforts
Issue 12. Should Abortion Be Restricted? 190
YES: Robert P. George, from The Clash of Orthodoxies: Law, Religion, and Morality in Crisis (ISI Books, 2001) 192
NO: Mary Gordon, from "A Moral Choice," The Atlantic Monthly (March 1990) 198
Legal philosopher Robert P. George asserts that, since each of us was a human being from conception, abortion is a form of homicide and should be banned
Writer Mary Gordon maintains that having an abortion is a moral choice that women are capable of making for themselves, that aborting a fetus is not killing a person, and that antiabortionists fail to understand female sexuality
Issue 13. Are Tax Cuts Good for America? 206
YES: Amity Shlaes, from The Greedy Hand: How Taxes Drive Americans Crazy and What to Do About It (Random House, 1999) 208
NO: Paul Krugman, from "The Tax-Cut Con," The New York Times Magazine (September 14, 2003) 215
Wall Street Journal editorial writer Amity Shlaes maintains that the federal income tax is too high, too complex, and biased against high-income earners who invest in economic growth
Economist Paul Krugman believes that the Bush tax cuts increase economic inequality, contribute to a huge budget deficit, and endanger the future of Medicare and Social Security
Issue 14. Is America Becoming More Unequal? 230
YES: Jeff Madrick, from "Inequality and Democracy," in George Packer, ed., The Fight Is for Democracy (Perennial, 2003) 232
NO: Christopher C. DeMuth, from "The New Wealth of Nations," Commentary (October 1997) 241
Editor and author Jeff Madrick maintains that the striking recent increase in income and wealth inequality reflects increasing inequality of opportunity and threatens the civil and political rights of less wealthy Americans
American Enterprise Institute president Christopher C. DeMuth asserts that Americans have achieved an impressive level of wealth and equality and that a changing economy ensures even more opportunities
Issue 15. Does the Patriot Act Abridge Essential Freedom? 250
YES: Nat Hentoff, from The War on the Bill of Rights and the Gathering Resistance (Seven Stories Press, 2003) 252
NO: Heather Mac Donald, from "Straight Talk on Homeland Security," City Journal (Summer 2003) 262
Village Voice columnist Nat Hentoff opposes the Patriot Act as an unjustified invasion of private belief and behavior, in the conviction that the sacrifice of liberty for security will result in the loss of both
Manhattan Institute fellow Heather Mac Donald believes that, since the new terrorism poses an unprecedented threat to America's survival, the Patriot Act is an appropriate response and contains adequate protection of fundamental liberties
Issue 16. Stopping Illegal Immigration: Should Border Security Come First? 274
YES: Mark Krikorian, from "Comprehensive Immigration Reform II," Testimony Before Senate Committee on the Judiciary (October 18, 2005) 276
NO: Frank Sharry, from "Comprehensive Immigration Reform II," Testimony Before Senate Committee on the Judiciary (October 18, 2005) 286
Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, argues that we have not seriously tried to enforce the laws against illegal aliens, and recommends shrinking the illegal population through consistent and equitable law enforcement
Frank Sharry, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, contends that the "enforcement only" approach ignores the fact that the United States has an increasingly integrated labor market with Latin America, and recommends a comprehensive approach combining border control with expanded legal channels
PART 4 AMERICA AND THE WORLD 297
Issue 17. Is Free Trade Fair Trade? 298
YES: Douglas A. Irwin, from Free Trade Under Fire (Princeton University Press, 2002) 300
NO: David Morris, from "Free Trade: The Great Destroyer," in Jerry Mander and Edward Goldsmith, eds., The Case Against the Global Economy: And for a Return to the Local (Sierra Club Books, 1996) 308
Professor of economics Douglas A. Irwin asserts that all countries benefit from free trade because it promotes efficiency, spurs production, and forces the least productive companies to reduce their output or shut down, resulting in better goods at lower prices
David Morris, vice president of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, argues that free trade is unnecessary because gains in efficiency do not require large-scale multinational enterprises and that it is undesirable because it widens the standard-of-living gap between rich and poor nations
Issue 18. Does the War in Iraq Help the War Against Terrorism? 318
YES: J.R. Dunn, from "Prospects of Terror," The American Thinker (March 21, 2006) 320
NO: Robert Jervis, from "Why the Bush Doctrine Cannot Be Sustained," Political Science Quarterly (Fall 2005) 331
J.R. Dunn, a military editor and author, believes that the radical Islamists are losing the support of the Iraqi people, that Iraq is moving toward democracy, and that the war against terror is being won
In the same fashion, America and its allies will thwart Iran's quest for nuclear weapons
Robert Jervis, a professor of international relations, maintains that the war in Iraq distracted the United States from the war against terrorism, that preventive war risks grave errors of judgment, and that victory in Iraq will not necessarily result in more democracy or less terrorism
Issue 19. Is the Use of Torture Against Terrorist Suspects Ever Justified? 342
YES: Charles Krauthammer, from "The Truth About Torture," The Weekly Standard (December 5, 2005) 344
NO: Andrew Sullivan, from "The Abolition of Torture," New Republic (December 19, 2005) 352
Charles Krauthammer argues that the legal protections for prisoners of war and civilians do not apply to terrorist suspects captured abroad, and in certain extreme cases torture may be used to extract information from them
Andrew Sullivan contends that any nation that uses torture infects itself with the virus of totalitarianism, belies its claim of moral superiority to the terrorists, and damages its chances of persuading the Arab world to adopt Western-style democracy
Issue 20. Does the United Nations Promote World Peace and Security? 363
YES: Madeleine K. Albright, from "Think Again: The United Nations," Foreign Policy (September/October 2003) 365
NO: Joshua Muravchik, from "The Case Against the UN," Commentary (November 2004) 371
Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright believes that the United Nations continues to perform peacekeeping and humanitarian tasks no nation or other group of nations can perform
International relations scholar Joshua Muravchik concludes that the United Nations has failed to either keep the peace or intervene to defend weaker victims from aggressive enemies
Issue 21. Must America Exercise World Leadership? 381
YES: Robert J. Lieber, from The American Era: Power and Strategy for the 21st Century (Cambridge University Press, 2005) 383
NO: Niall Ferguson, from "An Empire in Denial," Harvard International Review (Fall 2003) 390
International relations professor Robert J. Lieber believes that the United States, as the world's sole superpower, is uniquely capable of providing leadership against the threats of terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, as well as extending the rule of law and democracy
Author Niall Ferguson maintains that, despite America's military and economic dominance, it lacks both the long-term will and the capital and human investment that would be necessary to sustain its dominance
Contributors 400
Index 405
등록번호 | 청구기호 | 권별정보 | 자료실 | 이용여부 |
---|---|---|---|---|
0001202082 | 320.973 M155t15 | 서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대) | 이용가능 |
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
*전화번호 | ※ '-' 없이 휴대폰번호를 입력하세요 |
---|
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.