대표어
권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
영문목차
Contents
About the Author ix
Preface xi
Acknowledgments xv
Chapter 1 Introduction: A Climate of Threat and Vulnerability 1
Chapter 2 Context: The Promise of 72 Virgins 16
Chapter 3 Value Conflict: Civil Liberties Versus National Security 31
Chapter 4 Explaining the Support for Civil Liberties 59
Chapter 5 Acceptable Consequences 87
Chapter 6 Civil Liberties in an Evolving Context 113
Chapter 7 Spiral of Silence: Partisan Orientations in a Climate of Threat 138
Chapter 8 Racial Reactions 164
Chapter 9 Social Group Affect, Intolerance, and Threat 192
Chapter 10 Conclusion 218
Appendix A Terror Event Timeline 225
Appendix B Data and Research Design 228
Appendix C Survey Questions 231
Notes 245
References 253
Index 267
| 등록번호 | 청구기호 | 권별정보 | 자료실 | 이용여부 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001419224 | 323.0973 -A9-3 | 서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대) | 이용가능 |
Drawing on a unique series of original public opinion surveys conducted in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 and over the subsequent three years, Negative Liberty documents the rapid shifts in Americans' opinions regarding the tradeoff between liberty and security, at a time when the threat of terrorism made the conflict between these values particularly stark. Theories on the psychology of threat predicted that people would cope with threats by focusing on survival and reaffirming their loyalty to their communities, and indeed, Davis found that Americans were initially supportive of government efforts to prevent terrorist attacks by rolling back certain civil liberties. Democrats and independents under a heightened sense of threat became more conservative after 9/11, and trust in government reached its highest level since the Kennedy administration. But while ideological divisions were initially muted, this silence did not represent capitulation on the part of civil libertarians. Subsequent surveys in the years after the attacks revealed that, while citizens' perceptions of threat remained acute, trust in the government declined dramatically in response to the perceived failures of the administration's foreign and domestic security policies. Indeed, those Americans who reported the greatest anxiety about terrorism were the most likely to lose confidence in the government in the years after 2001. As a result, ideological unity proved short lived, and support for civil liberties revived among the public. Negative Liberty demonstrates that, in the absence of faith in government, even extreme threats to national security are not enough to persuade Americans to concede their civil liberties permanently.
The September 11 attacks created an unprecedented conflict between liberty and security, testing Americans' devotion to democratic norms. Through lucid analysis of concrete survey data, Negative Liberty sheds light on how citizens of a democracy balance these competing values in a time of crisis.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.
