대표어
권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Contents
List of contributors
Foreword / Michael Cox
Series editor's preface
Acknowledgement
1. Introduction / Brian Schmidt
2. The Myth of the ‘First Great Debate’ / Peter Wilson
3. Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory / Andreas Osiander
4. Didthe Realist-Idealist Great Debate Really Happen? / Luke Ashworth
5. C.A.W. Manning and the First Great Debate / David Long
6. The American National Interest Great Debate / Brian Schmidt
7. Myth, Half-Truth, Reality or Strategy? / Cameron Thies
8. Where are we now in the Debate about the First Great Debate? / Peter Wilson
Bibliography
Index| 등록번호 | 청구기호 | 권별정보 | 자료실 | 이용여부 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001722782 | 327.101 -A12-11 | 서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대) | 이용가능 |
This book provides an authoritative account of the controversy about the first great debate in the field of International Relations. Of all the self-images of International Relations, none is as pervasive and enduring as the notion that a great debate pitting idealists against realists took place in the 1940s.
The story of the first great debate continues to structure the contemporary identity of International Relations, yet in recent years revisionist historians have challenged the conventional wisdom that the field experienced such a debate. Drawing on expert contributors working in Canada, Europe, the United Kingdom, and the United States, this book includes key participants in the historiographical controversy. The book assembles the existing scholarship and provides a thorough analysis of the status of the first great debate in the history of International Relations. It is an invaluable examination of the causes and future direction of idealist and realist arguments.
International Relations and the First Great Debate will be of interest to students and scholars concerned with the foundations of International Relations.
This book provides an authoritative account of the controversy about the first great debate in the field of International Relations. Of all the self-images of International Relations, none is as pervasive and enduring as the notion that a great debate pitting idealists against realists took place in the 1940s.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.
