본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

목차보기

영문목차

Preface=xxvii

Acknowledgments=xxix

Special Notice on Citations=xxxi

1. Due Process of Law=1

A. Notice and the Opportunity to Be Heard=1

Problem Case : The Due Process Game=1

1. The Process Due : Of Context and Subtext=2

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld=2

Note : Reading Procedure Cases=15

Note : The Liberty Interests of Citizens and Non-Citizens=16

Note : Due Process as Notice and a Chance to Be Heard=18

Note : Private Actors and Due Process=20

Note : The Mathews Test=21

2. Notice : The Constitutional Dimension=23

Problem Case : The Elusive Defendant=23

Greene v. Lindsey=24

Notes and Questions=29

Note : Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Co.=29

Note : Jones v. Flowers=30

3. Notice : Constitutional Requirements Ritualized : Rule 4=32

National Development Co. v. Triad Holding Corp. & Adnan Khashoggi=36

Note : Serving and Being Served=39

Note : Serving Process Abroad=40

Mid-Continent Wood Products v. Harris=41

Notes and Questions=47

4. Improper Conduct to Effect Service=49

Wyman v. Newhouse=49

Note : Impropriety and Immunity from Service of Process=51

B. What Kind of Hearing Does Due Process Require?=52

Problem Case : The Well-Meaning Legislator=52

Adversarial Legalism : The American Way of Law / Robert Kagan=54

Notes and Questions=60

Note : The Common Understanding of Due Process=61

Why People Obey the Law / Tom R. Tyler=61

Notes and Questions=63

Note : Global Rules of Civil Procedure=63

Lassiter v. Department of Social Services=65

Note : Adding Lawyers : A Functional Approach=74

Note : Lawyers and Due Process=75

1. Access to Lawyers : The Price of Advice=76

a. The Contingent Fee=78

b. Other Methods for Providing Legal Services=78

i. Government-Provided Legal Services=78

ii. Group Legal Services=80

iii. The Prepayment Movement=81

iv. Private Agreements=81

v. Pro Bono Legal Services=81

vi. Lay Competition=83

c. Access to Justice as a Fundamental Right=84

Walters v. National Association of Radiation Survivors=85

Note : The Second Act―Legislation=92

Note : Further Radiation Survivors Proceedings in the Lower Courts=92

Turner v. Rogers=94

Notes and Questions=105

Note : Tennessee v. Lane=106

C. Due Process and Jurisdiction : The Limits of State Power over Persons and Property=107

Problem Case : An Unhappy Wanderer=107

1. Introduction : State Boundaries and Jurisdiction=107

2. Pennoyer v. Neff : The Human Drama=108

Sin, Scandal, and Substantive Due Process : Personal Jurisdiction and Pennoyer Reconsidered / Wendy Perdue=108

3. Pennoyer v. Neff : The Legal Story=111

4. Minimum Contacts and Substantial Justice=114

Problem Case : Contact Without Commerce=114

International Shoe Co. v. Washington=115

Note : The World After Shoe=119

Note : Litigating Personal Jurisdiction=121

Note : General and Specific Jurisdiction=123

5. Minimum Contacts and Foreseeability=124

Problem Case : Contacts in the Stream of Commerce=124

World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson (Oklahoma Supreme Court)=124

Notes and Questions=127

World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson=128

Notes and Questions=134

Note : The Robinson Saga=135

Note : Why Does the Forum Matter?=136

Note : Choice of Law=137

6. Directing a "Product" Toward a Forum State : Minimum Contacts and Fair Play in a Post-Modern Age=138

Problem Case : A Troubled Young Man=138

Note : Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.=139

Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court=140

Note : Foreign Corporations, Private and State Owned=146

Note : Criticism of Asahi=147

J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro=148

Notes and Questions=161

7. Contacts and Contracts=163

Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz=163

Notes and Questions=172

8. Persons or Property Within the State=174

Problem Case : Just Passing Through=174

Shaffer v. Heitner=176

Note : Post-Shaffer Legislation=184

Burnham v. Superior Court=184

Notes and Questions=193

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown=195

Notes and Questions=199

9. Persons and Property in Cyberspace=202

Problem Case : The Ubiquitous Defendant=202

Introduction : Personal Jurisdiction and Cyberspace=203

Zippo Mfg. Co. v. Zippo Dot Com=203

Note : Traditional Concepts=212

Note : Substance and Procedure=214

Note : Enforceability=215

Note : Purposeful Availment and Dot-Com Litigation Overseas=215

10. Waiving Due Process Objections by Agreement : Autonomy or Adhesion?=217

Problem Case : A Hidden Forum Selection Clause?=217

Carnival Cruise Lines v. Shute=220

Notes and Questions=225

Note : Applying the Case Law=229

D. Due Process and the Dual Court System : A First Look at Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Venue=231

Problem Case : The Due Process Game (Part Two)=231

1. A Dual Court System=231

a. Legislative Authority―Federal Versus State=231

b. Federal Judicial Authority=232

2. Federal Diversity Jurisdiction=233

Problem Case : Down with Diversity! Viva Diversity!=233

a. Determining Diversity of Citizenship=233

Problems=234

Mas v. Perry=235

Note : The Domicile of Married Women=237

Tanzymore v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.=237

Note : The Citizenship of Corporations=242

Hertz Corp. v. Friend=242

Notes and Questions=250

b. Historical Backdrop and Current Controversies=258

c. Joinder and the Amount in Controversy=261

Note : Litigating Subject Matter Jurisdiction=262

3. Federal Question Jurisdiction : Statutory Requirements=263

Problem Case : Making a Federal Case=263

Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust=265

a. Some Easy Cases=266

b. The Well-Pleaded Complaint Requirement=266

Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co. v. Mottley=266

Note : The Aftermath of Mottley=268

c. Hard Cases : What Kinds of "Mixed" Claims Arise Under Federal Law?=269

Problem Case : More Than a Hidden Forum Selection Clause...=269

Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Mfg.=272

Note : Reconciling Grable and Merrell Dow=278

4. Tribal Courts=283

Williams v. Lee=284

American Indian Law / William C. Canby Jr.=286

5. Venue=290

Applying the Basic Federal Venue Statutes=291

Review Problem : Choosing Systems in Retrospect=292

2. Constructing a Civil Lawsuit=293

Problem Case : The Due Process Game (Part Three)=293

A. A Brief History of Civil Procedure=294

1. Common Law Procedure=295

a. The Pleading Process=295

b. The Writ System=297

c. Methods of Proof=301

d. Equity=303

2. Code Procedure=305

3. Modern Procedure in Federal Courts=308

B. The Allegations : Pleading And Responding Under The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure=311

1. The Complaint=311

Problem Case : The Aggrieved Nurses=311

a. The Basic Standard : Rule 8=312

Conley v. Gibson=312

Notes and Questions=314

American Nurses' Ass'n v. Illinois=315

Notes and Questions=321

Note : Pleading and Substantive Law=324

Problem Case : What You Don't Know Can Hurt You=325

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly=327

Notes and Questions=348

Ashcroft v. Iqbal=350

Notes and Questions=363

Note : Plausibility Versus Probability=369

Note : Public Debate and Empirics=370

Note : Trans-substantivity and Information Asymmetry=375

b. Special Pleading Requirements : Statutory and Rule-Imposed Burdens=376

Note : Rule 9(b)―The Securities Fraud Litigation Example=378

Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.=379

Note : Tellabs Back in the Seventh Circuit=389

Note : Drawing Inferences, Plausible and Otherwise=390

c. Pleading in the Alternative : How Consistent Must the Plaintiff Be?=391

McCormick v. Kopmann=391

2. Responding to the Complaint=396

Problem Case : A Woman Partner=396

a. The Rules and Forms=397

b. The Pre-Answer Motion=398

c. The Answer=400

Fuentes v. Tucker=400

Zielinski v. Philadelphia Piers, Inc.=402

Notes and Questions=405

d. Affirmative Defenses=406

Problem Case : A Woman Partner (Part Two)=406

Gomez v. Toledo=406

Ingraham v. United States=410

Notes and Questions=413

e. Amending the Pleadings=414

Problem Case : A Woman Partner (Part Three)=414

Note : Liberal Pleading and Liberal Amendments=415

Krupski v. Costa Crociere S.p.A.=417

Notes and Questions=423

Barcume v. City of Flint=425

Notes and Questions=430

Note : Waiting Too Long to Amend=433

C. Policing the Pleadings : Ethical Constraints, Frivolous Cases, and Creative Advocacy=435

Problem Case : The Worker with the "Bad" Accent=435

The History and Importance of Rule 11=436

1. "An Inquiry Reasonable Under the Circumstances"=442

Kraemer v. Grant County=443

Note : The Effect of Rule 11 on Lawyers' Work=447

Christian v. Mattel, Inc.=449

Note : No-Holds-Barred Advocacy=458

Note : "Later Advocating" Written Submissions=459

Note : The Standard of Review on Appeal=461

2. "Improper Purpose," Frivolous Claims, and Arguments for Legal Change=462

Saltany v. Reagan=462

Saltany v. Bush=465

Note : Lawyers for Causes=467

Note : Post-Pleading Improper Purposes=469

3. "Warranted by Existing Law..."=470

Frantz v. U.S. Powerlifting Federation=470

Note : Nonfrivolous Arguments for Extension of the Law=474

4. "Factual Contentions Have Evidentiary Support"=474

Young v. City of Providence ex rel. Napolitano=474

Note : Tension Between Zealous and Accurate Advocacy?=481

Note : Factual Contentions Versus Inferences=482

Note : De-emphasizing Monetary Sanctions―Turning Down the Heat=483

5. The Inherent Power to Sanction=484

Note : The Contempt Power=489

Note : Contracting for Sanctions?=490

3. Discovery of the Adversary's Case=491

Problem Case : The Elusive Defendant (Part Two)=491

A. An Overview of the Discovery Tools and Their Deployment=491

Deposition Strategy in the Framework of an Overall Discovery Plan / Lawrence J. Zweifach=492

B. Discovery Reform Redux : How The Solution Became the Problem=497

Problem Case : The Secret Memo=500

Chalick v. Cooper Hospital/Univ. Med. Ctr.=501

Notes and Questions=507

C. The Scope of Discovery=511

1. "Relevant to Any Party's Claim or Defense"=511

Blank v. Sullivan & Cromwell=511

Note : Relevance : Three Takes on Scope Under Rule 26=513

Note : Unduly Burdensome or Expensive=516

2. "Any Matter Not Privileged"=517

Problem Case : A Literary Law Student=517

Note : Privileges in Civil Litigation=518

Hickman v. Taylor=519

Note : The Necessities of Adversary Litigation=527

Note : The Scope of Work Product and Anticipating Litigation=528

Upjohn Co. v. United States=531

Note : The Lifetime of the Privilege : Swidler & Berlin v. United States=536

Note : Waiving the Privilege=538

Note : Privilege in a Corporate Context=540

Note : "Upjohn Warnings"=541

Note : The Role of Privileges in Assuring Accurate Outcomes=543

Note : Administering a Claim of Privilege=544

Note : The Privilege as Applied to Government Attorneys=547

Note : Opinion Work Product=549

Note : Spoliation and the Duty to Preserve Evidence=552

3. Digital Data and the Problem of Electronic Discovery=554

Qualcomm Inc. v. Broadcom Corp.=555

Note : A Problem of Divided Responsibility?=570

Note : E-Discovery Amendments to Rule 26=575

Note : The Discovery of "Metadata"=576

Note : Privilege Logs and Inadvertent Disclosure in E-Discovery=578

Note : Social Networking Sites, Discovery, and Privacy=580

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Simply Storage Management, Inc.=580

Note : Discovery Abuse in Sexual Harassment Cases=587

4. The Adversary's Experts=587

Problem Case : XRT and the SafeTeeTot=587

Note : Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 (2d Cir. 1979)=588

The Long Road Back for a Disgraced Patrician / David Margolik=590

Note : The Temptations of Expert Witnesses=592

Cordy v. The Sherwin-Williams Co.=593

Coates v. AC & S, Inc.=595

Notes and Questions=597

D. Interrogatories and the Adversarial Advocate=602

Problem Case : Rozier v. Ford Motor Co.=602

Rozier v. Ford Motor Co.=603

Note : Discovery Against Complex Organizations=610

E. Depositions and the Adversarial Advocate=613

Problem Case : The Secret Memo (Part Two)=613

Paramount Communications Inc v. QVC Network Inc.=614

Notes and Questions=620

Note : The Appealability of Discovery Orders=622

F. Discovery in International Litigation=624

4. Dispositions and Adjudications=629

A. Ending Litigation Without Judgment : Settlements, Pretrial Conferences, and other Maneuvers=633

Problem Case : Pressured to Settle=633

1. Settlement=634

Marek v. Chesny=635

Note : Evans v. Jeff D., 475 U.S. 717 (1986)=644

Notes and Questions=647

2. The Pretrial Conference―Helpful Judicial Oversight or Unwelcome Coercion?=653

Settlement Strategies for Trial Judges / Robert Zampano=655

In re Atlantic Pipe Corp.=657

Note : Special Procedures to Encourage Settlement=665

Note : "Litigotiation"=667

Note : Motions in Limine=668

B. Summary Judgment=669

Problem Case : A Literary Law Student (Part Two)=669

1. The Development of Modern Summary Judgment Doctrine=669

a. Piercing the Pleadings : Historical Perspectives=669

Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co.=670

b. The Supreme Court Trilogy=676

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett=676

Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Louis H. Catrett, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.=684

Note : Burdens of Proof, Pleading, and Production=687

Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp.=689

Note : Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986)=699

Notes and Questions=701

c. A New Standard for Summary Judgment?=703

Scott v. Harris=705

Notes and Questions=716

2. Summary Judgment Problems=720

Exercise : A Literary Law Student=721

C. An Overview of a Trial=723

Problem Case : Hailing a Cab=723

Note : The Problem of Proof=723

D. The Stages of a Trial=724

1. Opening Arguments=724

2. Presentation of Evidence=725

3. Motions Testing the Sufficiency of the Evidence=725

4. Closing Arguments and Jury Instructions=726

5. Jury Deliberations and Verdicts=726

6. Post-Verdict Motions=726

5. Decision Makers and Decision Models=729

Introduction=729

A. The Judge=729

Problem Case : Judicial Positioning=729

1. Judicial Selection : Appointment and Election=730

a. Selection of Federal Judges=730

b. Federal Magistrates and Special Masters=730

c. Selection of State Judges=733

Selection of Judges―An Historical Introduction / Glenn Winters=734

2. Judicial Qualifications=736

3. Disqualification of Judges in Individual Cases=739

Problem Case : The Prejudiced Judge=739

Statutes and Precedents=740

Note : Liteky v. United States, 510 US. 540 (1994)=743

Note : Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868 (2009)=745

Problem Case : The Prejudiced Judge, Revisited=748

B. The Judge's Powers=748

1. Injunctions and Contempt=748

Walker v. City of Birmingham=749

Notes and Questions=765

C. The Jury : The Seventh Amendment Right=766

Problem Case : The Harassed Student=766

1. The Jury Trial Advantage=767

2. Incidents of Jury Trial : Size and Unanimity=769

3. Interpreting the Seventh Amendment : The Historical Test=770

Curtis v. Loether=771

Note : Other Applications of the Historical Test=775

Note : Jury Trials and Civil Rights=777

4. Preserving the Right : The Order of Trial=777

Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. Westover=778

Note : What Facts a Judge May Decide=782

5. The Jury's Competence : A Functional Analysis=783

Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc.=784

Notes and Questions=787

D. Choosing a Jury=791

Problem Case : The Harassed Student (Part Two)=791

1. The Law of Jury Selection=791

Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.=793

Note : Reversal as the Remedy for Improper Jury Selection=796

Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.=796

Note : The Right of the Individual Potential Juror=800

A Place in the Palladium : Women's Rights and Jury Service / Barbara Allen Babcock=801

E. Managing the Jury=804

Problem Case : The Bereaved Widow=804

1. Guiding Jury Deliberations : Instructions and the Form of the Verdict=806

Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co.=806

Notes and Questions=812

2. Taking the Case Away : Judgment as a Matter of Law=815

Galloway v. United States=815

Notes and Questions=824

Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.=827

Notes and Questions=836

3. Starting Over : The New Trial Motion=838

Sanders-El v. Wencewicz=838

Notes and Questions=841

4. Appellate Review of Jury Verdicts=844

Weisgram v. Marley Co.=844

Notes and Questions=851

5. Excessive Verdicts=854

a. Prejudice, Passion, and Punitive Damages=854

Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts=854

b. Additur and Remittitur=858

c. The Role of the Appellate Court in Administering Remittitur=858

Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co.=858

d. Excessive Verdicts and Due Process=860

6. Anticipating Jury Verdicts=867

7. Trials in the Courtroom of the Future=868

F. Alternative Decision Makers=870

Problem Case : An Injured Quarterback=870

1. Arbitration=871

Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.=871

Note : Arbitration Procedure=878

Note : Post-Gilmer Developments for Employees and Unions=879

Note : Who Decides Whether a Dispute Is Subject to Arbitration?=880

Note : Paying for Private Justice=882

Note : Justifying Private Justice=885

Note : The Appealability of Arbitration Awards=888

Note : Court-Annexed ADR=889

Note : The Rise of International Arbitration=891

2. Mediation=892

Problem Case : An Injured Quarterback (Part Two)=892

Woods v. Holy Cross Hospital=893

Notes and Questions=898

3. Other Forms of ADR=898

4. Critical Perspectives on ADR=900

6. More Complex Litigation=903

A. Subject Matter Jurisdiction in a Dual Court System : A Second Look=903

1. The Governing Law in a Diversity Case=903

Problem Case : Having It Whose Way?=903

a. From Erie to Hanna=903

Litigation and Inequality : Federal Diversity Jurisdiction in Industrial America, 1870-1958 / Edward A. Purcell Jr.=904

Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins=909

Note : The Personal and Political Aspects of Erie=914

b. Substance and Procedure―Illustrative Cases=914

i. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949)=915

ii. Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co., 337 U.S. 530 (1949)=915

iii. Woods v. Interstate Realty Co., 337 U.S. 535 (1949)=916

iv. Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Coop., Inc., 356 U.S. 525 (1958)=917

c. The Hanna Presumption=918

Hanna v. Plumer=918

Notes and Questions=924

d. Separating Substance from Procedure, Balancing State and Federal Interests, and Other Nagging Questions of Erie-Hanna Jurisprudence=927

Shady Grove Orthopedic Assoc. P.A. v. Allstate Ins. Co.=929

Notes and Questions=944

2. Supplemental Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts=945

Problem Case : Suing the HMO=945

a. Background to the Statute (28 U.S.C. §1367)=946

i. The Gibbs Test=946

ii. Post-Gibbs Developments=947

b. The Modern Approach=948

c. Solving the Problem Case=949

d. Operation of §1367 in the Class Action Context=951

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.=951

Note : Efficiency and Institutional Competence=965

Note : The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005=965

Note : The Multiparty, Multiforum Trial Jurisdiction Act of 2002=968

e. Declining to Exercise Supplemental Jurisdiction=969

f. Tolling of Statutes of Limitation and Supplemental Jurisdiction=970

Note : Pendent Personal Jurisdiction=971

3. Federal Removal Jurisdiction=972

a. Introduction=972

b. Remand=972

Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis=973

Notes and Questions=981

4. Venue Transfers Within the Federal Court System=989

5. Sua Sponte Transfer=991

Republic of Bolivia v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.=991

6. Forum Non Conveniens=993

Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno=993

Note : Placing Conditions on Dismissal=999

Note : The Degree of Deference to Plaintiff's Choice=999

Note : Venue Transfers for Reasons Other Than Inconvenience=1000

Review Problem : Choosing Systems in a More Complex World=1001

B. Extending the Lawsuit : More on Joinder=1002

1. Joinder of Multiple Parties=1002

Problem Case : A Woman Partner (Once Again)=1002

a. Real Party in Interest=1003

b. Capacity to Sue or Be Sued=1004

c. Constitutional Limitations―Standing=1004

d. Fictitious Names=1004

e. Anonymous Parties=1004

2. The Rules of Party Joinder=1005

a. Permissive Joinder (Rule 20)=1005

Mosley v. General Motors Corp.=1005

Note : Fraudulent Joinder=1009

Note : Common Questions After Wal-Mart v. Dukes=1009

b. Compulsory Joinder (Rule 19)=1010

Temple v. Synthes Corp.=1010

Helzberg's Diamond Shops, Inc. v. Valley West Des Moines Shopping Center, Inc.=1012

Notes and Questions=1015

c. Impleader (Rule 14)=1016

Toberman v. Copas=1016

United States v. Joe Grasso & Son, Inc.=1019

d. Interpleader (Rule 22) and Statutory Interpleader : The Stakeholder's Remedy=1022

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Tashire=1022

Note : Transfer for Consolidation=1027

e. Intervention (Rule 24)=1028

American Lung Ass'n v. Reilly=1028

Notes and Questions=1031

C. Class Actions―An Introduction (Rule 23)=1035

1. Introduction=1035

In re Zurn Pex Plumbing Products Liability Litigation=1038

Notes and Questions=1051

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes=1056

Notes and Questions=1071

Note : The Right to Jury Trial=1073

Note : Tobacco-Related Class Actions and Their Progeny=1073

2. Appeal of Class Certification=1074

Blair v. Equifax Check Services, Inc.=1074

Notes and Questions=1081

3. Who Is Bound?―Of Civil Rights and Class Actions=1083

Hansberry v. Lee=1083

Note : Hansberry and the Concept of Persons Whose Interests Are Affected by Litigation=1087

Note : Defendant Classes=1088

Martin v. Wilks=1088

Notes and Questions=1094

4. Notice and the Opportunity to Be Heard=1096

Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin=1096

Notes and Questions=1102

5. Choice of Forum and Mode of Trial Issues : Personal Jurisdiction=1107

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts=1107

Note : Venue in Class Actions=1114

Note : Federal Jurisdiction in Class Actions=1114

6. Settlement=1117

Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor=1117

Notes and Questions=1128

The Plaintiffs' Attorney's Role in Class Action and Derivative Litigation : Economic Analysis and Recommendations for Reform / Jonathan R. Macey ; Geoffrey Miller=1134

Example : A Lawyer's Fairy Tale=1136

Note : Rule 68, Class Actions, and Mootness=1137

Note : The Aggregation Alternative=1138

7. Aggregation of Claims in Arbitration=1140

AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion=1140

Notes and Questions=1154

7. Repose : Ending Disputes=1157

A. Direct Attacks on Judgments=1157

Problem Case : A Time to Reconsider=1157

1. Judgments of Courts Lacking Jurisdiction=1158

Durfee v. Duke=1158

Note : Failure to Challenge Jurisdiction in the First Litigation=1162

2. Judgments Obtained by Fraud or Mistake=1163

Kupferman v. Consolidated Research & Mfg. Co.=1163

Note : Rozier v. Ford Motor Co., 573 F.2d 1332 (5th Cir. 1978)=1166

Note : Extrinsic Fraud=1166

3. Judgments Contrary to Law=1167

Pierce v. Cook & Co.=1167

Notes and Questions=1171

B. Collateral Effects of Judgments―Claim and Issue Preclusion=1173

Note : Planned Parenthood v. Casey=1175

1. Claim Preclusion=1176

a. In General=1176

b. Conditions of Claim Preclusion=1177

Problem Case : A Woman Partner (Yet Again)=1177

McConnell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.=1178

Consumers Union of United States v. Consumer Product Safety Commission=1180

Note : GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers Union=1186

Federated Department Stores v. Moitie=1187

Note : Pleading and Preclusion=1191

Note : Are Defects in Subject Matter Jurisdiction Ever Res Judicata?=1192

Note : Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Remedies=1193

c. Counterclaims and Cross-Claims=1194

Problem Case : A Woman Partner (One More Time)=1195

Martino v. McDonald's System, Inc.=1195

d. Sources of Preclusion Law=1200

Restatement (Second) of Judgments=1201

Notes and Questions=1206

2. Issue Preclusion=1208

Problem Case : Using a Friendly Decision=1208

a. In General=1209

Examples=1209

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sunnen=1209

Allen v. McCurry=1212

b. Mutuality of Estoppel=1217

Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore=1217

Notes and Questions=1225

Montana v. United States=1227

Notes and Questions=1231

Taylor v. Sturgell=1232

Notes and Questions=1245

3. Preclusion in a Federal System=1247

a. State Court Judgments in Federal Courts=1247

Kremer v. Chemical Corp.=1247

Note : England v. Louisiana State Bd. of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411 (1964)=1256

Note : Matsushita Electrical Indus. Co. v. Epstein, 516 U.S. 367 (1996)=1256

Note : Effect of Res Judicata on Amount in Controversy=1257

Brown v. Felsen=1257

Baker v. General Motors Corporation=1261

ExxonMobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp.=1271

b. Federal Court Judgments in State Courts=1277

Watkins v. Resorts International Hotel and Casino, Inc.=1277

Notes and Questions=1286

Table of Cases=1289

Table of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure=1307

Table of Judicial Code Citations―U.C.C.=1311

Index=1313

이용현황보기

Civil procedure : cases and problems 이용현황 표 - 등록번호, 청구기호, 권별정보, 자료실, 이용여부로 구성 되어있습니다.
등록번호 청구기호 권별정보 자료실 이용여부
0001866510 LM 347.735 -A13-13 서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대) 이용가능

출판사 책소개

알라딘제공
Contemporary due process cases lead off Civil Procedure: Cases and Problems , creating a conceptual framework for understanding jurisdiction and procedural rules. Coverage of the social and economic issues underlying procedural reform focuses on women, minorities, and the financial constraints on access to the adversary system. The book's constitutional context sets the groundwork for advanced courses on Procedure and Federal Courts. Lightly edited classic cases promote analysis and preserve the language and subtlety of procedural jurisprudence. Major Supreme Court precedents are followed and complemented by up-to-date lower court decisions. Hypothetical problems open each chapter and may be used in a variety of ways, including as class simulations or practice exams in review sessions. Concise and focused notes echo the Socratic method and prompt deep consideration of important themes.

The completely updated Fifth Edition provides detailed coverage of the Supreme Court's transformation of pleading practice in Bell Atlantic and Iqbal, with analysis of its effect on lower courts and summaries of scholarly criticism. New rulings by the Supreme Court included cover personal jurisdiction, diversity jurisdiction, Erie doctrine, class actions, and arbitration. The Fifth Edition also provides extended coverage of new developments in scholarship: e-discovery, complex litigation, and alternative dispute resolution. References to important empirical studies on class actions, the new pleading standard, and access to counsel refresh the text.

Features:

  • contemporary due process cases lead off
    • create a conceptual framework for understanding jurisdiction
    • highlight competing values that shape other procedural rules
  • shows social and economic context underlying procedural reform
    • focuses on women and minorities
    • shows general financial constraints on access to the adversary system
  • offers constitutional context
    • sets the groundwork for advanced courses on Procedure and Federal Courts
  • classic cases lightly edited
    • promote case analysis
    • preserve the language and subtlety of procedural jurisprudence
  • major Supreme Court precedents presented
    • plausibility pleading
    • class actions
    • personal jurisdiction
    • arbitration
    • complemented by up to date lower court decisions
  • hypothetical problems open each chapter
    • use as class simulations in class
    • rehearse as practice exams in review
  • concise and focused notes echo the Socratic method

Thoroughly updated, the revised Fifth Edition presents:

  • detailed coverage of the Supreme Court's transformation of pleading practice in Bell Atlantic and Iqbal, including analysis of the effects on lower courts and summaries of scholarly criticism
  • coverage of other newSupreme Court's decisions
    • personal jurisdiction
    • diversity jurisdiction
    • Erie doctrine
    • class actions
    • arbitration
  • new developments in scholarship
    • e-discovery
    • complex litigation
    • alternative dispute resolution
  • new material
    • important empirical studies on class actions
    • the new pleading standard
    • access to counsel