권호기사보기
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
대표형(전거형, Authority) | 생물정보 | 이형(異形, Variant) | 소속 | 직위 | 직업 | 활동분야 | 주기 | 서지 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
연구/단체명을 입력해주세요. |
|
|
|
|
|
* 주제를 선택하시면 검색 상세로 이동합니다.
영문목차
Preface=xxvii
Acknowledgments=xxix
Special Notice on Citations=xxxi
1. Due Process of Law=1
A. Notice and the Opportunity to Be Heard=1
Problem Case : The Due Process Game=1
1. The Process Due : Of Context and Subtext=2
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld=2
Note : Reading Procedure Cases=15
Note : The Liberty Interests of Citizens and Non-Citizens=16
Note : Due Process as Notice and a Chance to Be Heard=18
Note : Private Actors and Due Process=20
Note : The Mathews Test=21
2. Notice : The Constitutional Dimension=23
Problem Case : The Elusive Defendant=23
Greene v. Lindsey=24
Notes and Questions=29
Note : Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Co.=29
Note : Jones v. Flowers=30
3. Notice : Constitutional Requirements Ritualized : Rule 4=32
National Development Co. v. Triad Holding Corp. & Adnan Khashoggi=36
Note : Serving and Being Served=39
Note : Serving Process Abroad=40
Mid-Continent Wood Products v. Harris=41
Notes and Questions=47
4. Improper Conduct to Effect Service=49
Wyman v. Newhouse=49
Note : Impropriety and Immunity from Service of Process=51
B. What Kind of Hearing Does Due Process Require?=52
Problem Case : The Well-Meaning Legislator=52
Adversarial Legalism : The American Way of Law / Robert Kagan=54
Notes and Questions=60
Note : The Common Understanding of Due Process=61
Why People Obey the Law / Tom R. Tyler=61
Notes and Questions=63
Note : Global Rules of Civil Procedure=63
Lassiter v. Department of Social Services=65
Note : Adding Lawyers : A Functional Approach=74
Note : Lawyers and Due Process=75
1. Access to Lawyers : The Price of Advice=76
a. The Contingent Fee=78
b. Other Methods for Providing Legal Services=78
i. Government-Provided Legal Services=78
ii. Group Legal Services=80
iii. The Prepayment Movement=81
iv. Private Agreements=81
v. Pro Bono Legal Services=81
vi. Lay Competition=83
c. Access to Justice as a Fundamental Right=84
Walters v. National Association of Radiation Survivors=85
Note : The Second Act―Legislation=92
Note : Further Radiation Survivors Proceedings in the Lower Courts=92
Turner v. Rogers=94
Notes and Questions=105
Note : Tennessee v. Lane=106
C. Due Process and Jurisdiction : The Limits of State Power over Persons and Property=107
Problem Case : An Unhappy Wanderer=107
1. Introduction : State Boundaries and Jurisdiction=107
2. Pennoyer v. Neff : The Human Drama=108
Sin, Scandal, and Substantive Due Process : Personal Jurisdiction and Pennoyer Reconsidered / Wendy Perdue=108
3. Pennoyer v. Neff : The Legal Story=111
4. Minimum Contacts and Substantial Justice=114
Problem Case : Contact Without Commerce=114
International Shoe Co. v. Washington=115
Note : The World After Shoe=119
Note : Litigating Personal Jurisdiction=121
Note : General and Specific Jurisdiction=123
5. Minimum Contacts and Foreseeability=124
Problem Case : Contacts in the Stream of Commerce=124
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson (Oklahoma Supreme Court)=124
Notes and Questions=127
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson=128
Notes and Questions=134
Note : The Robinson Saga=135
Note : Why Does the Forum Matter?=136
Note : Choice of Law=137
6. Directing a "Product" Toward a Forum State : Minimum Contacts and Fair Play in a Post-Modern Age=138
Problem Case : A Troubled Young Man=138
Note : Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.=139
Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court=140
Note : Foreign Corporations, Private and State Owned=146
Note : Criticism of Asahi=147
J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro=148
Notes and Questions=161
7. Contacts and Contracts=163
Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz=163
Notes and Questions=172
8. Persons or Property Within the State=174
Problem Case : Just Passing Through=174
Shaffer v. Heitner=176
Note : Post-Shaffer Legislation=184
Burnham v. Superior Court=184
Notes and Questions=193
Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown=195
Notes and Questions=199
9. Persons and Property in Cyberspace=202
Problem Case : The Ubiquitous Defendant=202
Introduction : Personal Jurisdiction and Cyberspace=203
Zippo Mfg. Co. v. Zippo Dot Com=203
Note : Traditional Concepts=212
Note : Substance and Procedure=214
Note : Enforceability=215
Note : Purposeful Availment and Dot-Com Litigation Overseas=215
10. Waiving Due Process Objections by Agreement : Autonomy or Adhesion?=217
Problem Case : A Hidden Forum Selection Clause?=217
Carnival Cruise Lines v. Shute=220
Notes and Questions=225
Note : Applying the Case Law=229
D. Due Process and the Dual Court System : A First Look at Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Venue=231
Problem Case : The Due Process Game (Part Two)=231
1. A Dual Court System=231
a. Legislative Authority―Federal Versus State=231
b. Federal Judicial Authority=232
2. Federal Diversity Jurisdiction=233
Problem Case : Down with Diversity! Viva Diversity!=233
a. Determining Diversity of Citizenship=233
Problems=234
Mas v. Perry=235
Note : The Domicile of Married Women=237
Tanzymore v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.=237
Note : The Citizenship of Corporations=242
Hertz Corp. v. Friend=242
Notes and Questions=250
b. Historical Backdrop and Current Controversies=258
c. Joinder and the Amount in Controversy=261
Note : Litigating Subject Matter Jurisdiction=262
3. Federal Question Jurisdiction : Statutory Requirements=263
Problem Case : Making a Federal Case=263
Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust=265
a. Some Easy Cases=266
b. The Well-Pleaded Complaint Requirement=266
Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co. v. Mottley=266
Note : The Aftermath of Mottley=268
c. Hard Cases : What Kinds of "Mixed" Claims Arise Under Federal Law?=269
Problem Case : More Than a Hidden Forum Selection Clause...=269
Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Mfg.=272
Note : Reconciling Grable and Merrell Dow=278
4. Tribal Courts=283
Williams v. Lee=284
American Indian Law / William C. Canby Jr.=286
5. Venue=290
Applying the Basic Federal Venue Statutes=291
Review Problem : Choosing Systems in Retrospect=292
2. Constructing a Civil Lawsuit=293
Problem Case : The Due Process Game (Part Three)=293
A. A Brief History of Civil Procedure=294
1. Common Law Procedure=295
a. The Pleading Process=295
b. The Writ System=297
c. Methods of Proof=301
d. Equity=303
2. Code Procedure=305
3. Modern Procedure in Federal Courts=308
B. The Allegations : Pleading And Responding Under The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure=311
1. The Complaint=311
Problem Case : The Aggrieved Nurses=311
a. The Basic Standard : Rule 8=312
Conley v. Gibson=312
Notes and Questions=314
American Nurses' Ass'n v. Illinois=315
Notes and Questions=321
Note : Pleading and Substantive Law=324
Problem Case : What You Don't Know Can Hurt You=325
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly=327
Notes and Questions=348
Ashcroft v. Iqbal=350
Notes and Questions=363
Note : Plausibility Versus Probability=369
Note : Public Debate and Empirics=370
Note : Trans-substantivity and Information Asymmetry=375
b. Special Pleading Requirements : Statutory and Rule-Imposed Burdens=376
Note : Rule 9(b)―The Securities Fraud Litigation Example=378
Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.=379
Note : Tellabs Back in the Seventh Circuit=389
Note : Drawing Inferences, Plausible and Otherwise=390
c. Pleading in the Alternative : How Consistent Must the Plaintiff Be?=391
McCormick v. Kopmann=391
2. Responding to the Complaint=396
Problem Case : A Woman Partner=396
a. The Rules and Forms=397
b. The Pre-Answer Motion=398
c. The Answer=400
Fuentes v. Tucker=400
Zielinski v. Philadelphia Piers, Inc.=402
Notes and Questions=405
d. Affirmative Defenses=406
Problem Case : A Woman Partner (Part Two)=406
Gomez v. Toledo=406
Ingraham v. United States=410
Notes and Questions=413
e. Amending the Pleadings=414
Problem Case : A Woman Partner (Part Three)=414
Note : Liberal Pleading and Liberal Amendments=415
Krupski v. Costa Crociere S.p.A.=417
Notes and Questions=423
Barcume v. City of Flint=425
Notes and Questions=430
Note : Waiting Too Long to Amend=433
C. Policing the Pleadings : Ethical Constraints, Frivolous Cases, and Creative Advocacy=435
Problem Case : The Worker with the "Bad" Accent=435
The History and Importance of Rule 11=436
1. "An Inquiry Reasonable Under the Circumstances"=442
Kraemer v. Grant County=443
Note : The Effect of Rule 11 on Lawyers' Work=447
Christian v. Mattel, Inc.=449
Note : No-Holds-Barred Advocacy=458
Note : "Later Advocating" Written Submissions=459
Note : The Standard of Review on Appeal=461
2. "Improper Purpose," Frivolous Claims, and Arguments for Legal Change=462
Saltany v. Reagan=462
Saltany v. Bush=465
Note : Lawyers for Causes=467
Note : Post-Pleading Improper Purposes=469
3. "Warranted by Existing Law..."=470
Frantz v. U.S. Powerlifting Federation=470
Note : Nonfrivolous Arguments for Extension of the Law=474
4. "Factual Contentions Have Evidentiary Support"=474
Young v. City of Providence ex rel. Napolitano=474
Note : Tension Between Zealous and Accurate Advocacy?=481
Note : Factual Contentions Versus Inferences=482
Note : De-emphasizing Monetary Sanctions―Turning Down the Heat=483
5. The Inherent Power to Sanction=484
Note : The Contempt Power=489
Note : Contracting for Sanctions?=490
3. Discovery of the Adversary's Case=491
Problem Case : The Elusive Defendant (Part Two)=491
A. An Overview of the Discovery Tools and Their Deployment=491
Deposition Strategy in the Framework of an Overall Discovery Plan / Lawrence J. Zweifach=492
B. Discovery Reform Redux : How The Solution Became the Problem=497
Problem Case : The Secret Memo=500
Chalick v. Cooper Hospital/Univ. Med. Ctr.=501
Notes and Questions=507
C. The Scope of Discovery=511
1. "Relevant to Any Party's Claim or Defense"=511
Blank v. Sullivan & Cromwell=511
Note : Relevance : Three Takes on Scope Under Rule 26=513
Note : Unduly Burdensome or Expensive=516
2. "Any Matter Not Privileged"=517
Problem Case : A Literary Law Student=517
Note : Privileges in Civil Litigation=518
Hickman v. Taylor=519
Note : The Necessities of Adversary Litigation=527
Note : The Scope of Work Product and Anticipating Litigation=528
Upjohn Co. v. United States=531
Note : The Lifetime of the Privilege : Swidler & Berlin v. United States=536
Note : Waiving the Privilege=538
Note : Privilege in a Corporate Context=540
Note : "Upjohn Warnings"=541
Note : The Role of Privileges in Assuring Accurate Outcomes=543
Note : Administering a Claim of Privilege=544
Note : The Privilege as Applied to Government Attorneys=547
Note : Opinion Work Product=549
Note : Spoliation and the Duty to Preserve Evidence=552
3. Digital Data and the Problem of Electronic Discovery=554
Qualcomm Inc. v. Broadcom Corp.=555
Note : A Problem of Divided Responsibility?=570
Note : E-Discovery Amendments to Rule 26=575
Note : The Discovery of "Metadata"=576
Note : Privilege Logs and Inadvertent Disclosure in E-Discovery=578
Note : Social Networking Sites, Discovery, and Privacy=580
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Simply Storage Management, Inc.=580
Note : Discovery Abuse in Sexual Harassment Cases=587
4. The Adversary's Experts=587
Problem Case : XRT and the SafeTeeTot=587
Note : Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 (2d Cir. 1979)=588
The Long Road Back for a Disgraced Patrician / David Margolik=590
Note : The Temptations of Expert Witnesses=592
Cordy v. The Sherwin-Williams Co.=593
Coates v. AC & S, Inc.=595
Notes and Questions=597
D. Interrogatories and the Adversarial Advocate=602
Problem Case : Rozier v. Ford Motor Co.=602
Rozier v. Ford Motor Co.=603
Note : Discovery Against Complex Organizations=610
E. Depositions and the Adversarial Advocate=613
Problem Case : The Secret Memo (Part Two)=613
Paramount Communications Inc v. QVC Network Inc.=614
Notes and Questions=620
Note : The Appealability of Discovery Orders=622
F. Discovery in International Litigation=624
4. Dispositions and Adjudications=629
A. Ending Litigation Without Judgment : Settlements, Pretrial Conferences, and other Maneuvers=633
Problem Case : Pressured to Settle=633
1. Settlement=634
Marek v. Chesny=635
Note : Evans v. Jeff D., 475 U.S. 717 (1986)=644
Notes and Questions=647
2. The Pretrial Conference―Helpful Judicial Oversight or Unwelcome Coercion?=653
Settlement Strategies for Trial Judges / Robert Zampano=655
In re Atlantic Pipe Corp.=657
Note : Special Procedures to Encourage Settlement=665
Note : "Litigotiation"=667
Note : Motions in Limine=668
B. Summary Judgment=669
Problem Case : A Literary Law Student (Part Two)=669
1. The Development of Modern Summary Judgment Doctrine=669
a. Piercing the Pleadings : Historical Perspectives=669
Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co.=670
b. The Supreme Court Trilogy=676
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett=676
Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Louis H. Catrett, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.=684
Note : Burdens of Proof, Pleading, and Production=687
Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp.=689
Note : Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986)=699
Notes and Questions=701
c. A New Standard for Summary Judgment?=703
Scott v. Harris=705
Notes and Questions=716
2. Summary Judgment Problems=720
Exercise : A Literary Law Student=721
C. An Overview of a Trial=723
Problem Case : Hailing a Cab=723
Note : The Problem of Proof=723
D. The Stages of a Trial=724
1. Opening Arguments=724
2. Presentation of Evidence=725
3. Motions Testing the Sufficiency of the Evidence=725
4. Closing Arguments and Jury Instructions=726
5. Jury Deliberations and Verdicts=726
6. Post-Verdict Motions=726
5. Decision Makers and Decision Models=729
Introduction=729
A. The Judge=729
Problem Case : Judicial Positioning=729
1. Judicial Selection : Appointment and Election=730
a. Selection of Federal Judges=730
b. Federal Magistrates and Special Masters=730
c. Selection of State Judges=733
Selection of Judges―An Historical Introduction / Glenn Winters=734
2. Judicial Qualifications=736
3. Disqualification of Judges in Individual Cases=739
Problem Case : The Prejudiced Judge=739
Statutes and Precedents=740
Note : Liteky v. United States, 510 US. 540 (1994)=743
Note : Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868 (2009)=745
Problem Case : The Prejudiced Judge, Revisited=748
B. The Judge's Powers=748
1. Injunctions and Contempt=748
Walker v. City of Birmingham=749
Notes and Questions=765
C. The Jury : The Seventh Amendment Right=766
Problem Case : The Harassed Student=766
1. The Jury Trial Advantage=767
2. Incidents of Jury Trial : Size and Unanimity=769
3. Interpreting the Seventh Amendment : The Historical Test=770
Curtis v. Loether=771
Note : Other Applications of the Historical Test=775
Note : Jury Trials and Civil Rights=777
4. Preserving the Right : The Order of Trial=777
Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. Westover=778
Note : What Facts a Judge May Decide=782
5. The Jury's Competence : A Functional Analysis=783
Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc.=784
Notes and Questions=787
D. Choosing a Jury=791
Problem Case : The Harassed Student (Part Two)=791
1. The Law of Jury Selection=791
Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.=793
Note : Reversal as the Remedy for Improper Jury Selection=796
Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.=796
Note : The Right of the Individual Potential Juror=800
A Place in the Palladium : Women's Rights and Jury Service / Barbara Allen Babcock=801
E. Managing the Jury=804
Problem Case : The Bereaved Widow=804
1. Guiding Jury Deliberations : Instructions and the Form of the Verdict=806
Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co.=806
Notes and Questions=812
2. Taking the Case Away : Judgment as a Matter of Law=815
Galloway v. United States=815
Notes and Questions=824
Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.=827
Notes and Questions=836
3. Starting Over : The New Trial Motion=838
Sanders-El v. Wencewicz=838
Notes and Questions=841
4. Appellate Review of Jury Verdicts=844
Weisgram v. Marley Co.=844
Notes and Questions=851
5. Excessive Verdicts=854
a. Prejudice, Passion, and Punitive Damages=854
Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts=854
b. Additur and Remittitur=858
c. The Role of the Appellate Court in Administering Remittitur=858
Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co.=858
d. Excessive Verdicts and Due Process=860
6. Anticipating Jury Verdicts=867
7. Trials in the Courtroom of the Future=868
F. Alternative Decision Makers=870
Problem Case : An Injured Quarterback=870
1. Arbitration=871
Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.=871
Note : Arbitration Procedure=878
Note : Post-Gilmer Developments for Employees and Unions=879
Note : Who Decides Whether a Dispute Is Subject to Arbitration?=880
Note : Paying for Private Justice=882
Note : Justifying Private Justice=885
Note : The Appealability of Arbitration Awards=888
Note : Court-Annexed ADR=889
Note : The Rise of International Arbitration=891
2. Mediation=892
Problem Case : An Injured Quarterback (Part Two)=892
Woods v. Holy Cross Hospital=893
Notes and Questions=898
3. Other Forms of ADR=898
4. Critical Perspectives on ADR=900
6. More Complex Litigation=903
A. Subject Matter Jurisdiction in a Dual Court System : A Second Look=903
1. The Governing Law in a Diversity Case=903
Problem Case : Having It Whose Way?=903
a. From Erie to Hanna=903
Litigation and Inequality : Federal Diversity Jurisdiction in Industrial America, 1870-1958 / Edward A. Purcell Jr.=904
Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins=909
Note : The Personal and Political Aspects of Erie=914
b. Substance and Procedure―Illustrative Cases=914
i. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949)=915
ii. Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co., 337 U.S. 530 (1949)=915
iii. Woods v. Interstate Realty Co., 337 U.S. 535 (1949)=916
iv. Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Coop., Inc., 356 U.S. 525 (1958)=917
c. The Hanna Presumption=918
Hanna v. Plumer=918
Notes and Questions=924
d. Separating Substance from Procedure, Balancing State and Federal Interests, and Other Nagging Questions of Erie-Hanna Jurisprudence=927
Shady Grove Orthopedic Assoc. P.A. v. Allstate Ins. Co.=929
Notes and Questions=944
2. Supplemental Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts=945
Problem Case : Suing the HMO=945
a. Background to the Statute (28 U.S.C. §1367)=946
i. The Gibbs Test=946
ii. Post-Gibbs Developments=947
b. The Modern Approach=948
c. Solving the Problem Case=949
d. Operation of §1367 in the Class Action Context=951
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.=951
Note : Efficiency and Institutional Competence=965
Note : The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005=965
Note : The Multiparty, Multiforum Trial Jurisdiction Act of 2002=968
e. Declining to Exercise Supplemental Jurisdiction=969
f. Tolling of Statutes of Limitation and Supplemental Jurisdiction=970
Note : Pendent Personal Jurisdiction=971
3. Federal Removal Jurisdiction=972
a. Introduction=972
b. Remand=972
Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis=973
Notes and Questions=981
4. Venue Transfers Within the Federal Court System=989
5. Sua Sponte Transfer=991
Republic of Bolivia v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.=991
6. Forum Non Conveniens=993
Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno=993
Note : Placing Conditions on Dismissal=999
Note : The Degree of Deference to Plaintiff's Choice=999
Note : Venue Transfers for Reasons Other Than Inconvenience=1000
Review Problem : Choosing Systems in a More Complex World=1001
B. Extending the Lawsuit : More on Joinder=1002
1. Joinder of Multiple Parties=1002
Problem Case : A Woman Partner (Once Again)=1002
a. Real Party in Interest=1003
b. Capacity to Sue or Be Sued=1004
c. Constitutional Limitations―Standing=1004
d. Fictitious Names=1004
e. Anonymous Parties=1004
2. The Rules of Party Joinder=1005
a. Permissive Joinder (Rule 20)=1005
Mosley v. General Motors Corp.=1005
Note : Fraudulent Joinder=1009
Note : Common Questions After Wal-Mart v. Dukes=1009
b. Compulsory Joinder (Rule 19)=1010
Temple v. Synthes Corp.=1010
Helzberg's Diamond Shops, Inc. v. Valley West Des Moines Shopping Center, Inc.=1012
Notes and Questions=1015
c. Impleader (Rule 14)=1016
Toberman v. Copas=1016
United States v. Joe Grasso & Son, Inc.=1019
d. Interpleader (Rule 22) and Statutory Interpleader : The Stakeholder's Remedy=1022
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Tashire=1022
Note : Transfer for Consolidation=1027
e. Intervention (Rule 24)=1028
American Lung Ass'n v. Reilly=1028
Notes and Questions=1031
C. Class Actions―An Introduction (Rule 23)=1035
1. Introduction=1035
In re Zurn Pex Plumbing Products Liability Litigation=1038
Notes and Questions=1051
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes=1056
Notes and Questions=1071
Note : The Right to Jury Trial=1073
Note : Tobacco-Related Class Actions and Their Progeny=1073
2. Appeal of Class Certification=1074
Blair v. Equifax Check Services, Inc.=1074
Notes and Questions=1081
3. Who Is Bound?―Of Civil Rights and Class Actions=1083
Hansberry v. Lee=1083
Note : Hansberry and the Concept of Persons Whose Interests Are Affected by Litigation=1087
Note : Defendant Classes=1088
Martin v. Wilks=1088
Notes and Questions=1094
4. Notice and the Opportunity to Be Heard=1096
Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin=1096
Notes and Questions=1102
5. Choice of Forum and Mode of Trial Issues : Personal Jurisdiction=1107
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts=1107
Note : Venue in Class Actions=1114
Note : Federal Jurisdiction in Class Actions=1114
6. Settlement=1117
Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor=1117
Notes and Questions=1128
The Plaintiffs' Attorney's Role in Class Action and Derivative Litigation : Economic Analysis and Recommendations for Reform / Jonathan R. Macey ; Geoffrey Miller=1134
Example : A Lawyer's Fairy Tale=1136
Note : Rule 68, Class Actions, and Mootness=1137
Note : The Aggregation Alternative=1138
7. Aggregation of Claims in Arbitration=1140
AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion=1140
Notes and Questions=1154
7. Repose : Ending Disputes=1157
A. Direct Attacks on Judgments=1157
Problem Case : A Time to Reconsider=1157
1. Judgments of Courts Lacking Jurisdiction=1158
Durfee v. Duke=1158
Note : Failure to Challenge Jurisdiction in the First Litigation=1162
2. Judgments Obtained by Fraud or Mistake=1163
Kupferman v. Consolidated Research & Mfg. Co.=1163
Note : Rozier v. Ford Motor Co., 573 F.2d 1332 (5th Cir. 1978)=1166
Note : Extrinsic Fraud=1166
3. Judgments Contrary to Law=1167
Pierce v. Cook & Co.=1167
Notes and Questions=1171
B. Collateral Effects of Judgments―Claim and Issue Preclusion=1173
Note : Planned Parenthood v. Casey=1175
1. Claim Preclusion=1176
a. In General=1176
b. Conditions of Claim Preclusion=1177
Problem Case : A Woman Partner (Yet Again)=1177
McConnell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.=1178
Consumers Union of United States v. Consumer Product Safety Commission=1180
Note : GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers Union=1186
Federated Department Stores v. Moitie=1187
Note : Pleading and Preclusion=1191
Note : Are Defects in Subject Matter Jurisdiction Ever Res Judicata?=1192
Note : Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Remedies=1193
c. Counterclaims and Cross-Claims=1194
Problem Case : A Woman Partner (One More Time)=1195
Martino v. McDonald's System, Inc.=1195
d. Sources of Preclusion Law=1200
Restatement (Second) of Judgments=1201
Notes and Questions=1206
2. Issue Preclusion=1208
Problem Case : Using a Friendly Decision=1208
a. In General=1209
Examples=1209
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sunnen=1209
Allen v. McCurry=1212
b. Mutuality of Estoppel=1217
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore=1217
Notes and Questions=1225
Montana v. United States=1227
Notes and Questions=1231
Taylor v. Sturgell=1232
Notes and Questions=1245
3. Preclusion in a Federal System=1247
a. State Court Judgments in Federal Courts=1247
Kremer v. Chemical Corp.=1247
Note : England v. Louisiana State Bd. of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411 (1964)=1256
Note : Matsushita Electrical Indus. Co. v. Epstein, 516 U.S. 367 (1996)=1256
Note : Effect of Res Judicata on Amount in Controversy=1257
Brown v. Felsen=1257
Baker v. General Motors Corporation=1261
ExxonMobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp.=1271
b. Federal Court Judgments in State Courts=1277
Watkins v. Resorts International Hotel and Casino, Inc.=1277
Notes and Questions=1286
Table of Cases=1289
Table of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure=1307
Table of Judicial Code Citations―U.C.C.=1311
Index=1313
등록번호 | 청구기호 | 권별정보 | 자료실 | 이용여부 |
---|---|---|---|---|
0001866510 | LM 347.735 -A13-13 | 서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대) | 이용가능 |
The completely updated Fifth Edition provides detailed coverage of the Supreme Court's transformation of pleading practice in Bell Atlantic and Iqbal, with analysis of its effect on lower courts and summaries of scholarly criticism. New rulings by the Supreme Court included cover personal jurisdiction, diversity jurisdiction, Erie doctrine, class actions, and arbitration. The Fifth Edition also provides extended coverage of new developments in scholarship: e-discovery, complex litigation, and alternative dispute resolution. References to important empirical studies on class actions, the new pleading standard, and access to counsel refresh the text.
Features:
Thoroughly updated, the revised Fifth Edition presents:
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
*전화번호 | ※ '-' 없이 휴대폰번호를 입력하세요 |
---|
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.