본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

고급검색

인명/단체명

저자정보 상세정보
인명/단체명을 입력하세요.

키워드

  • 대표어

  • 외국어

-

목차보기


Deterrence theory in the contemporary operating environment
Chapter 1. Introduction
Chapter 2. Literature review
Chapter 3. Research methodology
Chapter 4. Case studies
Chapter 5. Conclusions and recommendations
2017 U.S. intelligence community worldwide threat assessement

이용현황보기

Deterrence theory in the contemporary operating environment : case studies of U.S. and North Korea, India and Pakistan standoff and kargil war, libyan bombing, Iraq, and Bin Laden embassy bombings 이용현황 표 - 등록번호, 청구기호, 권별정보, 자료실, 이용여부로 구성 되어있습니다.
등록번호 청구기호 권별정보 자료실 이용여부
0002456763 355.033 -A18-13 서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대) 이용가능

출판사 책소개

알라딘제공
The events of 11 September 2001 and the ensuing global war on terrorism have demonstrated the importance of developing deterrence strategies that can be successful in confronting not only traditional, but also non-traditional threats to national security. While the events of 11 September 2001 challenge the traditional notions of deterrence, so too have the events of the past 70 years. Throughout the Cold War and even today, there have been numerous acts of aggression by both state and non-state actors that should have been deterred under traditional notions of deterrence. The fact that these acts were not deterred have caused many to question whether the deterrence-based theories behind the U.S. National Security Strategy are adequate to address the current and future strategic environment. Given the inability of the international system and specifically the United States to deter these acts of aggression there needs to be a serious reevaluation of the theories of deterrence that form the foundation of the U.S. strategy of deterrence. Looking at four case studies, this study finds that while the existing theories do not account for some acts of aggression and limited deterrence failures, deterrence theory in general is still applicable to the current and future strategic environment. While deterrence theory is applicable, it is not static and must continually be improved. The rise of non-state actors require additional refinement in order for deterrence theory to gain further applicability in the future. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION * The Purpose of the Study * The Issues * The Problem * Primary Research Question * Assumptions * Definition of Terms * Other Terms * Limitations * Scope * Delimitations * Significance of Study * CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW * CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY * Identification and Explanation of Research Questions * Purpose of Research * Selection of Cases and Explanation of Data Gathering and Analysis Techniques * CHAPTER 4 CASE STUDIES * Case Study 1: U.S. Direct-General Deterrence * U.S. Response to the 1986 Libyan Bombing of a West German Discotheque * U.S. Response to the 1993 Iraqi Attempt to Assassinate Former President Bush in Kuwait * U.S. Response to the Two U.S. Embassy Bombings in East Africa by Bin Laden Operatives * Analysis of Case Study 1 * Implications for Deterrence Theory: Findings from Case Study 1 * Case Study 2: U.S.-Korea: Extended-General Deterrence * Analysis of Case Study 2 * Implications for Deterrence Theory: Findings from Case Study 2 * Case Study 3: India-Pakistan Standoff 1999 Kargil War: Direct-Immediate Deterrence * Analysis of Case Study 3 * Implications for Deterrence Theory: Findings from Case Study 3 * Case Study 4: U.S.-Philippines: Extended-Immediate Deterrence * Analysis of Case Study 4 * Implications for Deterrence Theory: Findings from Case Study 4 * CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS * Conclusion * Recommendations

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차

권호

기사명 원문보기 기사목차
닫기