본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

목차보기


Introduction: three theoretical arguments, four 'great men' of history, multiple methods, and disciplines
1. The psychology of rationality: cognitive style in international relations
2. The three 'r's of international relations: realism, romanticism and rationality
3. Little Bismarcks: a laboratory experiment on variation in rational thinking and rational behavior
4. The 'prince' among men: Bismarck's realpolitik in Prussian politics
5. Cold blood and iron: Bismarck, the struggle with Austria and German unification. 6. Blind faith: Richelieu, the devoted, and France in counter-reformation Europe
7. 'Blood, toil, tears and sweat': Churchill, romanticism and the rational appeasement debate
8. 'In defeat, defiance': Churchill in words (1935?39) and in deeds (1940)
9. 'Beginning the world all over again': resolving the paradox of Ronald Reagan
10. Winning one as the Gipper? Reagan's administration and American engagement with the Soviet Union
Conclusion: the irrationality of rational choice: saving a paradigm from itself
References
Index

이용현황보기

Reasoning of state : realists, romantics and rationality in international relations 이용현황 표 - 등록번호, 청구기호, 권별정보, 자료실, 이용여부로 구성 되어있습니다.
등록번호 청구기호 권별정보 자료실 이용여부
0002537569 327.1019 -A19-1 서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대) 이용가능

출판사 책소개

알라딘제공
Scholars and citizens tend to assume that rationality guides the decision-making of our leaders. Brian C. Rathbun suggests, however, that if we understand rationality to be a cognitive style premised on a commitment to objectivity and active deliberation, rational leaders are in fact the exception not the norm. Using a unique combination of methods including laboratory bargaining experiments, archival-based case studies, quantitative textual analysis and high-level interviews, Rathbun questions some of the basic assumptions about rationality and leadership, with profound implications for the field of international relations. Case studies of Bismarck and Richelieu show that the rationality of realists makes them rare. An examination of Churchill and Reagan, romantics in international politics who sought to overcome obstacles in their path through force of will and personal agency, show what less rationality looks like in foreign policy making.

Challenges the assumption of the rationality of foreign policy makers in international relations, showing how leaders systematically vary in the rationality of their thinking.

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차