본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

목차보기


Preface

PART 1 KEYNESIANISM
1 Keynes Resurrected?
2 What Is Keynesianism?
3 The Tragedy of Poverty

PART 2 BEFORE KEYNES
4 Poverty, Honor, and Revolution
5 Freedom After Revolution
6 Necessity and the Rabble
7 The State and the Masses
8 A Theory of Political Economy

PART 3 KEYNES
9 How to Read The General Theory I
10 How to Read The General Theory II
11 How to Read The General Theory III

PART 4 AFTER KEYNES
12 Keynesian Political Economy and the Problem of Full Employment
13 The (New) Keynesian Economics of Equilibrium Unemployment
14 From Unemployment to Inequality in the Twenty-First Century
15 Revolution After Revolution?

Index

이용현황보기

In the long run we are all dead : Keynesianism, political economy, and revolution 이용현황 표 - 등록번호, 청구기호, 권별정보, 자료실, 이용여부로 구성 되어있습니다.
등록번호 청구기호 권별정보 자료실 이용여부
0002582185 330.156 -A19-5 서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대) 이용가능
B000017451 330.156 -A19-5 부산관 서고(열람신청 후 2층 주제자료실) 이용가능

출판사 책소개

알라딘제공
A groundbreaking debunking of moderate attempts to resolve financial crises

In the ruins of the 2007–2008 financial crisis, self-proclaimed progressives the world over clamored to resurrect the economic theory of John Maynard Keynes. The crisis seemed to expose the disaster of small-state, free-market liberalization and deregulation. Keynesian political economy, in contrast, could put the state back at the heart of the economy and arm it with the knowledge needed to rescue us. But what it was supposed to rescue us from was not so clear. Was it the end of capitalism or the end of the world? For Keynesianism, the answer is both. Keynesians are not and never have been out to save capitalism, but rather to save civilization from itself. It is political economy, they promise, for the world in which we actually live: a world in which prices are “sticky,” information is “asymmetrical,” and uncertainty inescapable. In this world, things will definitely not take care of themselves in the long run. Poverty is ineradicable, markets fail, and revolutions lead to tyranny. Keynesianism is thus modern liberalism’s most persuasive internal critique, meeting two centuries of crisis with a proposal for capital without capitalism and revolution without revolutionaries.

If our current crises have renewed Keynesianism for so many, it is less because the present is worth saving, than because the future seems out of control. In that situation, Keynesianism is a perfect fit: a faith for the faithless.