일반도서
Law on the rocks : international law and China's maritime disputes - exhaustive analysis of claims to Senkaku and Paracel Islands, scarborough shoal, chinese legal warfare, Japan, Vietnam, Philippines
저자사항
U.S. Government, U.S. Military, Department of Defense (DoD), Jason Nakata.
Law on the rocks I. Introduction II. Effective control in maritime disputes III. Examing China's maritime disputes IV: Chinese legal warfare V. Conclusion 2019 U.S. intelligence community worldwide threat assessment
이용현황보기
Law on the rocks : international law and China's maritime disputes - exhaustive analysis of claims to Senkaku and Paracel Islands, scarborough shoal, chinese legal warfare, Japan, Vietnam, Philippines 이용현황 표 - 등록번호, 청구기호, 권별정보, 자료실, 이용여부로 구성 되어있습니다.
등록번호
청구기호
권별정보
자료실
이용여부
0002596446
LM 343.096 -A20-1
서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대)
이용가능
출판사 책소개
Maritime disputes in the Western Pacific have increased tensions among East Asian states. This thesis uses three case studies to investigate two questions: first, whether China's maritime claims and behavior align with international legal principles governing maritime disputes, and second, which IR framework best describes China's behavior related to its maritime disputes. The first case study examined ten legal rulings on maritime sovereignty and concludes that courts view effective control as a determinative factor in settling maritime disputes. The second case study examined effective control in three of China's maritime disputes. The analysis revealed Japan's claim to the Senkaku Islands and China's claim to the Paracel Islands are strong due to continued demonstrations of effective control. However, the Philippine claim to the Scarborough Shoal using effective control is valid but weak. The final case study showed how China attempts to effective control on its maritime claims using legal warfare. Based on the analysis of Chinese legal warfare, evidence shows two IR frameworks best describe China's behavior related to its maritime claims. Legal warfare provides a facade for offensive realist behavior; whereas the English School of realism expects China to use legal warfare to conform to some norms while revising other norms.This compilation includes a reproduction of the 2019 Worldwide Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community.I. Introduction: China's Maritime Claims and International Law * A. Major Research Question * B. Significance Of The Research Question * C. Literature Review * 1. International Law and International Relations Theory * 2. China's Rise in International Relations Theory * 3. Realism * a. Defensive Realism * b. Offensive Realism * 4. English School of Realism * 5. Liberalism * 6. Conclusion * D. Potential Explanations And Hypotheses * E. Research Design * 1. Indicators of Successful or Unsuccessful Hypothesis * F. Thesis Overview And Draft Chapter Outline * II. Effective Control in Maritime Disputes * A. Introduction * 1. Methodology * 2. Definitions * a. Treaty Law * b. Uti Possidetis * c. Effective Control (or Effectivites) * d. Acquiescence (or Abandonment) * e. Territorial Sea * f. Contiguous Zone * g. Exclusive Economic Zone * h. Islands * i. Rocks * j. Low-Tide Elevation * k. High Seas * B. Case Analysis of Maritime Disputes in the PCA, PCIJ, and ICJ * 1. United States v. Netherlands (Island of Palmas, 1928) * 2. Norway v. Denmark (Legal Status of Eastern Greenland, 1933) * 3. France v. United Kingdom (Minquiers and Ecrehos, 1953) * 4. El Salvador v. Honduras (Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute, 1992) * a. El Tigre Island * b. Meanguera Island and Meanguerita Island * 5. Eritrea v. Yemen (Red Sea Islands, 1998) * a. The Mohabbakahs * b. The Haycocks * c. The Zuqar-Hanish Group * d. Jabal al-Tayr and the Zubayr Group of Islands * 6. Qatar v. Bahrain (Case Concerning Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain, 2001) * a. The Hawar Islands * b. Janan Island * c. Fasht al Azm * d. Qit'at Jaradah
대표어
