본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

목차보기


1. Introduction
2. The Origins of the “Southern Problem”
3. ‘Apartheid’ Sudan: Rebel Narratives of the “Southern Problem”
4. ‘[A] Nation Is Not Physically of One “Blood”’: Portraying Sudan as Non-racial
5. The Political Afterlives of Rebel Narratives
6. Discourse, Diplomacy and Disintegration at the Round Table Conference
7. SANU’s Discursive Legacies
8. ‘We Have No Harlem in Sudan’: Sudan’s Deflective Diplomacy
9. ‘The Cuba of Africa’: Sudan’s Socialist Networks and Narratives
10. Narrative Jiu-Jitsu
11. Conclusion
12. Epilogue: Narrative-as-Lived—The Meaning of the “New Sudan” to SPLM Soldiers
Bibliography
Index

이용현황보기

Sudan's "southern problem" : race, rhetoric and international relations, 1961-1991 이용현황 표 - 등록번호, 청구기호, 권별정보, 자료실, 이용여부로 구성 되어있습니다.
등록번호 청구기호 권별정보 자료실 이용여부
0002613408 962.404 -A20-1 서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대) 이용가능

출판사 책소개

알라딘제공
This book explores the international battle for legitimacy between the Sudanese state and the Southern rebels during the two civil wars. In particular, it examines how racial thought and rhetoric were used in international debates about the political destiny of the South. Offering a discursive and diplomatic history of the wars, the book argues that Sudan’s ‘‘colour line’’ shaped its foreign relations. By placing the state and rebels within the same frame, the book uncovers the competition for Sudan’s reputation in the context of decolonisation and the liberation struggles in southern Africa. It, thus, provides insight into Africa’s international relations during the Cold War. During a period that enabled a broad set of political modalities of signalling credibility and respectability, Sudan’s rebels and governments alike deployed a range of discursive practices in order to influence world opinion. In sum, the book demonstrates that the war of words waged abroad represents a strategic, but often overlooked aspect of Sudan’s civil wars.  

New feature

This book explores the international battle for legitimacy between the Sudanese state and the Southern rebels during the two civil wars. In particular, it examines how racial thought and rhetoric were used in international debates about the political destiny of the South. Offering a discursive and diplomatic history of the wars, the book argues that Sudan’s ‘‘colour line’’ shaped its foreign relations. By placing the state and rebels within the same frame, the book uncovers the competition for Sudan’s reputation in the context of decolonisation and the liberation struggles in southern Africa. It, thus, provides insight into Africa’s international relations during the Cold War. During a period that enabled a broad set of political modalities of signalling credibility and respectability, Sudan’s rebels and governments alike deployed a range of discursive practices in order to influence world opinion. In sum, the book demonstrates that the war of words waged abroad represents a strategic, but often overlooked aspect of Sudan’s civil wars.