본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

고급검색

인명/단체명

저자정보 상세정보
인명/단체명을 입력하세요.

키워드

  • 대표어

  • 외국어

-

목차보기


Acknowledgments

1 Introduction: Speech, Privacy, and Dignity in France and the United States
1.1 Enlightenment Values in the Balance
1.2 The Role of the Government and Human Dignity
1.3 Hermeneutics and the Imaginary

2 Antiquity, Modernity, and Historical Imaginaries on the Role of the Government
2.1 The Role of the Government: Negative and Positive Liberties
2.2 Antiquity, Modernity, Natural Law, and Liberty
2.3 Historical Imaginaries
2.4 Declarations and Their Spirit

3 The Underlying Ex Ante Understanding of Liberty
3.1 Metaphysical Universalism versus Pragmatic Proclamation
3.2 Reconceptualization of the Role of the Government versus Definition of the Limits of the Role of the Government

4 The Moralizing Rational Republic versus the State Arbitrator of the Free Play of Interests
4.1 Rousseau's Conceptualization of the Moralizing Republic
4.2 The French Revolutionaries' Attempt to Realize the Rational Republic
4.3 Locke, Smith, Paine, and the State Arbitrator of the Free Play of Interests
4.4 The American Founders and Liberal Individual Reason

5 Foundation of the Rights of Man on the Rights of the Citizen versus Foundation of the Rights of the Citizen on the Rights of Man

6 Conclusion

Bibliography
Index

이용현황보기

Freedom of expression : the revolutionary roots of American and French legal thought 이용현황 표 - 등록번호, 청구기호, 권별정보, 자료실, 이용여부로 구성 되어있습니다.
등록번호 청구기호 권별정보 자료실 이용여부
0002933057 LM 342.44085 -A22-5 서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대) 이용가능

출판사 책소개

알라딘제공
Two legal systems founded on similar Enlightenment philosophical and political values use state coercion differently to regulate a liberty at the core of the Enlightenment: freedom of expression. This comparative study of France and the United States proposes a novel theory of how the limits of freedom of expression are informed by different revolutionary experiences and constitutional and political arrangements. Ioanna Tourkochoriti argues that the different ways freedom of expression is balanced against other values in France and the United States can be understood in reference to the role of the government and the understanding of republicanism and liberty. This understanding affects how jurists define the content and the limits of a liberty and strike a balance between liberties in conflict. Exploring both the legal traditions of the two countries, this study sheds new light on the broader historical, social and philosophical contexts in which jurists operate.

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차

권호

기사명 원문보기 기사목차
닫기