본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

목차보기


List of figures
List of tables
List of abbreviations
1. Introduction: Contestation and the dynamics of norm robustness
2. International torture prohibition: A contested norm endures
3. Responsibility to protect: A robust but changing norm?
4. Contesting the international moratorium on commercial whaling: A norm weakens at the international level
5. Losing Africa? Contestation and the decline in the International Criminal Court’s regional robustness
6. Bad pirates, good privateers? Surprising robustness of privateering norms
7. Atlantic slave trade: Stabilization through contestation
8. International norm disputes: Comparative insights for theory and practice
Appendix: Coding schemes for applicatory and validity contestation
Index

이용현황보기

International norm disputes : the link between contestation and norm robustness 이용현황 표 - 등록번호, 청구기호, 권별정보, 자료실, 이용여부로 구성 되어있습니다.
등록번호 청구기호 권별정보 자료실 이용여부
0003064367 LM 341.1 -A24-1 서울관 법률정보센터(206호) 이용가능

출판사 책소개

알라딘제공
This volume offers a study of when and why contested international norms decline. It includes four contemporary case studies (the torture prohibition, the responsibility to protect, the duty to prosecute institutionalized in the ICC, and commercial whaling) and two historical case studies (privateering and the transatlantic slave trade).

International Norm Disputes: The Link between Contestation and Norm Robustness offers a rich, comparative study of when and why contested international norms decline. It presents central findings on the link between contestation and norm robustness based on four detailed, contemporary case studies - the torture prohibition, the responsibility to protect, the duty to prosecute institutionalized in the International Criminal Court, and the moratorium oncommercial whaling. It also includes two historical case studies - privateering and the transatlantic slave trade. This scholarly volume provides in-depth knowledge on contestation and robustness dynamics of central international norms. Having meticulously collected relevant data and conducted extensive qualitative coding, the authors clearly demonstrate that norms are likely to weaken when challengers contest the validity of a norm's core claims but remain robust when they contest a norm's application and contestation does not become permanent. These important findings, comparatively presented here for the first time, are crucial for understanding the much-discussed problems of the contemporary liberal international order. The insights provided establish how different types of challenges will affect global governance mechanisms and which conditions are most likely to create fundamental change.