일반도서
The concertation impulse in world politics : contestation over fundamental institutions and the constrictions of institutionalist international relations
1 Unravelling the centrality of the contest over international institutions The disparity in institutionalist IR: Institutional choice without concertation Institutionalist IR as scholarly conceptual foil for this book Shifts in motivation—and contestation—of the concertation impulse Operational tests of concertation between stigmatization and reproduction 2 Concertation as a foundational/fundamental institution Reclaiming Bull's privileging of concertation Reassessing the debate about foundational/fundamental institutions Expanding the ambit of concertation in context and content Modifying the solidarist/pluralist models of concertation Stretching the concertation impulse beyond incumbent ownership Building on and beyond Bull's insights 3 Crises as potential animators of institutional transformation Crises as the master gap in institutionalist IR Stretching the boundaries of analysis: Bull to Ikenberry's liberal internationalism and Cox's critic Internal debates in IPE about the GFC and institutional performance Crisis-centrism and the GFC in IPE The crisis deficiency as the master gap in institutionalist IR redux 4 Raising the stakes of the institutional contest over the normative dimension Bifurcation of the normative dimension Stratified management versus arbitrary practices The extension of arbitrary practices in ascendant informality Repositioning the conceptual argumentation from North to de Certeau Tilting the institutional contest in an imbalanced fashion Institutional legitimacy for whom and for what purpose? 5 Hierarchical privileges of institutional convenience Common (inclusionary) assumptions with differentiated treatment in institutionalist IR Hierarchy underpinning institutional design Accenting stratification at the core of the system The strains of (expedient) US leadership Hierarchically driven informal designs prior to the GFC Commitment in an expansionary system, reorientated to convenience amid segmentation 6 Between aspirations and anxiety: The ambivalent hold of formal institutions by non-incumbents from The risks/reward equation of an innovative institutional design Rational institutionalism's discomfort with design ambivalence Reconsidering the distinctive motivations and modalities of the Global South Distorting the solidarity ethos within the Global South Reconfiguring dichotomous assumptions about the hold of formality The hold of formality, but not an absolute hold 7 Inserting designers into institutional design: Institutional entrepreneurship and the evolution of Connecting crises to individual and collective human agency Bringing in institutional entrepreneurs to the animation of plurilateral summitry Enlarging the culture of inclusivity Omission-recaptured engagement with core summit dynamics An institutional design concept anticipating the Covid-19 crisis Continuing to struggle between design and designers 8 Recalibrated but still contested: The G20 as a twenty-first-century institutional concert format Institutionalist IR in continual catch-up mode Not a classic concert in design but an institution with concert-like features Differentiating analyses of informality under the influence of rationalist institutionalism Moving the locus of concern from contestation over order to arbitrary tactics Non-incumbents engaging without (equal) ownership Turning towards a global focal point Institutional traction amid the organizational limitations 9 The (Trump) challenge of personalist-populist institutional disruption at the core of the system Institutions not personalism as the cause of stress in the system Trump and the debate over the (anti-)institutional challenge The search for rationality in the Trump challenge Concerts as sites of (arbitrary) personalistic practice Fitting the Trump challenge (awkwardly) into twenty-first-century concertation Trump and the reconfiguration of concertation as personalist focal points The control–competence conundrum as an addendum Beyond the bias towards rationality and US-centrism 10 Aspirations of a BRICS solidarity concert/hanging together as a pluralist club Russia's ambitious BRICS promotion Russian exceptionalism under Bull's shadow Stylized interpretations of rising powers and institutions A return to omission–catch-up engagement The curtailment of solidarity dreams/unanticipated plural sustainability Cushioning Russia, without concertation Conclusions: The recurrent impulse towards concertation Bull's privileging of concertation and reclaiming fundamental status The disconnect between institutionalist IR and core debates over institutional design This time it is different? The long-expected death or modification of concertation as a focal point The embedded paradox of the concertation impulse References Index
이용현황보기
The concertation impulse in world politics : contestation over fundamental institutions and the constrictions of institutionalist international relations 이용현황 표 - 등록번호, 청구기호, 권별정보, 자료실, 이용여부로 구성 되어있습니다.
등록번호
청구기호
권별정보
자료실
이용여부
0003128816
LM 341.2 -A24-6
서울관 법률정보센터(206호)
이용가능
출판사 책소개
This book unravels the centrality of contestation over international institutions under the shadow of crisis. Andrew Cooper makes a compelling case that concertation represents a fundamental institution as a peer competitor to multilateralism.
This book unravels the centrality of contestation over international institutions under the shadow of crisis. Breaking with the widely accepted image in the mainstream, US-centric literature of an advance of global governance supported by pillars of institutionalized formality, Andrew Cooper points to the retention of a habitual impulse towards concertation related to informal institutionalism. Rather than endorsing the view that world politics is moving inexorablytowards a multilateral, rules-based order, he places the onus on the resilience of a hierarchical self-selected concert model that subordinates normative attraction for efficiency-driven instrumentality. Relying for conceptual guidance on the recovery of a valuable component in the intellectual contribution of Hedley Bull, a compelling case is made that concertation represents a fundamental institution as a peer competitor to multilateralism. In effect, the debate over institutional design is recast away from an emphasis on utilitarian maximization towards a wider set of cardinal - and highly contested - questions: the nature of rules at the global level, the salience of institutional clubs,and the meaning and impact of (in)equality and cooperation/coordination among states across the incumbent West/non-incumbent Global South divide.