본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

목차보기


1 Unravelling the centrality of the contest over international institutions
The disparity in institutionalist IR: Institutional choice without concertation
Institutionalist IR as scholarly conceptual foil for this book
Shifts in motivation—and contestation—of the concertation impulse
Operational tests of concertation between stigmatization and reproduction
2 Concertation as a foundational/fundamental institution
Reclaiming Bull's privileging of concertation
Reassessing the debate about foundational/fundamental institutions
Expanding the ambit of concertation in context and content
Modifying the solidarist/pluralist models of concertation
Stretching the concertation impulse beyond incumbent ownership
Building on and beyond Bull's insights
3 Crises as potential animators of institutional transformation
Crises as the master gap in institutionalist IR
Stretching the boundaries of analysis: Bull to Ikenberry's liberal internationalism and Cox's critic
Internal debates in IPE about the GFC and institutional performance
Crisis-centrism and the GFC in IPE
The crisis deficiency as the master gap in institutionalist IR redux
4 Raising the stakes of the institutional contest over the normative dimension
Bifurcation of the normative dimension
Stratified management versus arbitrary practices
The extension of arbitrary practices in ascendant informality
Repositioning the conceptual argumentation from North to de Certeau
Tilting the institutional contest in an imbalanced fashion
Institutional legitimacy for whom and for what purpose?
5 Hierarchical privileges of institutional convenience
Common (inclusionary) assumptions with differentiated treatment in institutionalist IR
Hierarchy underpinning institutional design
Accenting stratification at the core of the system
The strains of (expedient) US leadership
Hierarchically driven informal designs prior to the GFC
Commitment in an expansionary system, reorientated to convenience amid segmentation
6 Between aspirations and anxiety: The ambivalent hold of formal institutions by non-incumbents from
The risks/reward equation of an innovative institutional design
Rational institutionalism's discomfort with design ambivalence
Reconsidering the distinctive motivations and modalities of the Global South
Distorting the solidarity ethos within the Global South
Reconfiguring dichotomous assumptions about the hold of formality
The hold of formality, but not an absolute hold
7 Inserting designers into institutional design: Institutional entrepreneurship and the evolution of
Connecting crises to individual and collective human agency
Bringing in institutional entrepreneurs to the animation of plurilateral summitry
Enlarging the culture of inclusivity
Omission-recaptured engagement with core summit dynamics
An institutional design concept anticipating the Covid-19 crisis
Continuing to struggle between design and designers
8 Recalibrated but still contested: The G20 as a twenty-first-century institutional concert format
Institutionalist IR in continual catch-up mode
Not a classic concert in design but an institution with concert-like features
Differentiating analyses of informality under the influence of rationalist institutionalism
Moving the locus of concern from contestation over order to arbitrary tactics
Non-incumbents engaging without (equal) ownership
Turning towards a global focal point
Institutional traction amid the organizational limitations
9 The (Trump) challenge of personalist-populist institutional disruption at the core of the system
Institutions not personalism as the cause of stress in the system
Trump and the debate over the (anti-)institutional challenge
The search for rationality in the Trump challenge
Concerts as sites of (arbitrary) personalistic practice
Fitting the Trump challenge (awkwardly) into twenty-first-century concertation
Trump and the reconfiguration of concertation as personalist focal points
The control–competence conundrum as an addendum
Beyond the bias towards rationality and US-centrism
10 Aspirations of a BRICS solidarity concert/hanging together as a pluralist club
Russia's ambitious BRICS promotion
Russian exceptionalism under Bull's shadow
Stylized interpretations of rising powers and institutions
A return to omission–catch-up engagement
The curtailment of solidarity dreams/unanticipated plural sustainability
Cushioning Russia, without concertation
Conclusions: The recurrent impulse towards concertation
Bull's privileging of concertation and reclaiming fundamental status
The disconnect between institutionalist IR and core debates over institutional design
This time it is different?
The long-expected death or modification of concertation as a focal point
The embedded paradox of the concertation impulse
References
Index

이용현황보기

The concertation impulse in world politics : contestation over fundamental institutions and the constrictions of institutionalist international relations 이용현황 표 - 등록번호, 청구기호, 권별정보, 자료실, 이용여부로 구성 되어있습니다.
등록번호 청구기호 권별정보 자료실 이용여부
0003128816 LM 341.2 -A24-6 서울관 법률정보센터(206호) 이용가능

출판사 책소개

알라딘제공
This book unravels the centrality of contestation over international institutions under the shadow of crisis. Andrew Cooper makes a compelling case that concertation represents a fundamental institution as a peer competitor to multilateralism.

This book unravels the centrality of contestation over international institutions under the shadow of crisis. Breaking with the widely accepted image in the mainstream, US-centric literature of an advance of global governance supported by pillars of institutionalized formality, Andrew Cooper points to the retention of a habitual impulse towards concertation related to informal institutionalism. Rather than endorsing the view that world politics is moving inexorablytowards a multilateral, rules-based order, he places the onus on the resilience of a hierarchical self-selected concert model that subordinates normative attraction for efficiency-driven instrumentality. Relying for conceptual guidance on the recovery of a valuable component in the intellectual contribution of Hedley Bull, a compelling case is made that concertation represents a fundamental institution as a peer competitor to multilateralism. In effect, the debate over institutional design is recast away from an emphasis on utilitarian maximization towards a wider set of cardinal - and highly contested - questions: the nature of rules at the global level, the salience of institutional clubs,and the meaning and impact of (in)equality and cooperation/coordination among states across the incumbent West/non-incumbent Global South divide.

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차