본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

고급검색

인명/단체명

저자정보 상세정보
인명/단체명을 입력하세요.

키워드

  • 대표어

  • 외국어

-

목차보기

Title page 1

Contents 6

Foreword 10

Acknowledgments 12

Executive Summary 14

Abbreviations 21

CHAPTER 1. The EQOSOGI data set and global findings: An introduction 22

What does EQOSOGI measure and why? 22

Data collection and analysis 25

Construction of the EQOSOGI data set and scores 28

Strengths and limitations of the methodology 29

Global findings 30

Notes 40

References 41

CHAPTER 2. A deep dive into the EQOSOGI findings 42

Decriminalization 42

Access to education 49

Access to labor markets 55

Access to services and social protection 59

Civil and political inclusion 72

Protection from hate crimes 79

Notes 83

References 83

CHAPTER 3. Why do SOGIESC-inclusive laws and policies matter for economic development? 89

SOGIESC inclusion and development 89

Three pathways connecting SOGIESC inclusion and development outcomes 94

Empirical findings on EQOSOGI and development outcomes 97

Notes 99

References 100

CHAPTER 4. Conclusions and the way forward 103

Lack of inclusive legal frameworks across all regions and groups 103

Efforts toward greater SOGIESC inclusion 105

Areas for policy engagement to advance SOGIESC inclusion 108

What's next? 109

Note 110

References 110

Glossary 112

References 115

Appendix A. Questions and coding methodology 118

Appendix B. Scoring methodology 139

Appendix C. Countries and local experts who contributed to the 2024 EQOSOGI 146

Tables 8

TABLE ES.1. EQOSOGI 2024 coverage, by region 15

TABLE 1.1. EQOSOGI 2024 coverage, by region 26

TABLE 1.2. EQOSOGI scores by country, overall and by indicator set 32

TABLE 1.3. EQOSOGI scores by country, overall and by SOGIESC group 35

TABLE 2.1. Examples of good legal practices on inclusive curricula and sexuality education, EQOSOGI 2024 countries 52

TABLE 2.2. Examples of good legal practices on SOGIESC inclusion in labor markets, EQOSOGI 2024 countries 57

TABLE 2.3. Recognition of SOGIESC-based persecution as grounds for asylum, EQOSOGI 2024 countries 78

TABLE 3.1. Correlation analysis between EQOSOGI scores and selected covariates 98

Figures 7

FIGURE ES.1. Distribution of EQOSOGI 2024 scores, by indicator set and region 19

FIGURE 1.1. Distribution of EQOSOGI 2024 scores, overall and by indicator set 31

FIGURE 1.2. Distribution of EQOSOGI 2024 scores, overall and by SOGIESC group 35

FIGURE 1.3. Distribution of EQOSOGI 2024 scores, overall and by SOGIESC group and region 38

FIGURE 1.4. Distribution of EQOSOGI 2024 scores, by indicator set and region 39

FIGURE 1.5. Distribution of EQOSOGI 2024 scores, by indicator set and country income group 40

FIGURE 2.1. Of the 64 countries analyzed, 20 prohibit discrimination in educational settings on the basis of one or more elements of SOGIESC;... 50

FIGURE 2.2. Of the 64 countries analyzed, 28 explicitly prohibit discrimination in employment on one or more SOGIESC grounds 56

FIGURE 2.3. Of the 64 countries analyzed, 18 have enacted legislation explicitly prohibiting discrimination in health care on one or more SOGIESC grounds 60

FIGURE 2.4. Of the 64 countries analyzed, 14 have enacted legislation explicitly prohibiting discrimination in housing on one or more SOGIESC grounds 61

FIGURE 2.5. Of the 64 countries analyzed, 17 have enacted legislation explicitly prohibiting discrimination in social protection and other services on one or more SOGIESC grounds 61

FIGURE 2.6. Of the 49 countries permitting SOGIESC-related organizations, 10 impose legal limitations on their operations 65

FIGURE 2.7. Of the 64 countries analyzed, 16 have public institutions such as national human rights institutions with an explicit mandate to advance the inclusion... 66

FIGURE 2.8. Of the 64 countries analyzed, 18 have institutions that handle charges of SOGIESC-based discrimination in public services 67

FIGURE 2.9. Of the 27 countries that allow updating sex/gender in official documents, 14 do so on a self-identification basis 68

FIGURE 2.10. Of the 64 countries analyzed, 11 offer more than two gender options in ID cards or passports 70

FIGURE 2.11. Of the 64 countries analyzed, 19 have members of parliament, cabinets, or the highest courts who openly identify as sexual or gender minorities 73

FIGURE 2.12. Few countries recognize domestic and foreign same-sex civil partnerships or marriages 74

FIGURE 2.13. About 30 percent of countries explicitly criminalize hate crimes based on one or more SOGIESC grounds 81

FIGURE 3.1. Pathways linking SOGIESC inclusion with economic development and social sustainability 94

Boxes 7

BOX 1.1. How does the World Bank integrate SOGIESC inclusion in its work? 24

BOX 2.1. Criminalization of behavior related to sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and sex characteristics: A remnant of the colonial past 45

BOX 2.2. Recent legal advances in decriminalizing behavior related to sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and sex characteristics-and the backlash 46

BOX 2.3. Addressing transgender-based discrimination: Thailand's gender equality act and the role of the WorLorPor committee 53

BOX 2.4. Advances in legal recognition of the rights of intersex persons 62

BOX 2.5. Advances in recognizing the rights of transgender persons in Pakistan 69

BOX 2.6. Advances in the legalization of same-sex marriages and registered civil partnerships in Latin America and the Caribbean 75

BOX 2.7. Argentina: Support services to the victims of hate crimes based on sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and sex characteristics 82

BOX 3.1. World Bank research on the economic cost of SOGIESC-based exclusion 91

BOX 4.1. Legal reforms related to inclusion of sexual and gender minorities in Canada, India, Japan, Kosovo, and Mexico since the first edition of EQOSOGI 105

BOX 4.2. The World Bank's efforts to mainstream SOGIESC inclusion 107

Maps 8

MAP 1.1. EQOSOGI 2024 coverage, pilot and expansion countries 26

MAP 2.1. Of the 64 countries analyzed, 23 criminalize people based on their sexual orientation and/or gender expression, and 7 rely on vagrancy, public morals,... 44

Box Figures 8

FIGURE B3.1.1. Total economic and fiscal cost of LGBTI exclusion in North Macedonia and Serbia, 2021 92

Appendix Tables 9

TABLE B.1. Selected questions to be used in the computation of the EQOSOGI score, by SOGIESC group 144

TABLE B.2. Number of questions in the EQOSOGI report, by indicator set, 2021 and 2024 144

Appendix Figures 8

FIGURE B.1. Steps involved in the computation of the EQOSOGI score 141

FIGURE B.2. EQOSOGI score construction for a hypothetical country 142

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차

권호

기사명 원문보기 기사목차
닫기