본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

고급검색

인명/단체명

저자정보 상세정보
인명/단체명을 입력하세요.

키워드

  • 대표어

  • 외국어

-

목차보기


Preface
Acknowledgements
Introduction: Bears and bees, juridical species
The study of animals in juridical literature
What is a juridical species?
Why bears? Why bees?
The animal in the mind of a lawyer
Creatures of jurisprudence
PART 1 Bears
1  Bears as subjects of law
The mark of a bear
‘Bears with lawyers’
Chucho
Judgment SU016 of 2020 Habeas corpus petition
The decision of Judge Ortiz Delgado
Where the bear tracks stop
2  Bears as actions of law
Francis v State of Utah
Besozzi v Harris
In the doctrinal shadows of scienter and negligence
Shaw v McCreary
3  Bears as articles of law
Bachofen’s Der Bær in den Religionen des Alterthums
‘The animal in its full independence’
Jurisdictions of the bear
To be liable for a bear ‘as if she were sole and unmarried’
4  Bears as institutions of law
‘If a bear breaks loose …’ Digest 9.1.1.10
Classical or interpolated?
‘Against nature’ and ‘according to nature’
‘If I kill the bear, the body is mine’
5  Bears as evidence of laws
Delgamuukw v British Columbia
The bear problem
The historical and the legal shape of facts
Direct evidence and the image of the bear
‘… and imagining a white bear …’
The Decision in the Supreme Court of Canada
PART 2 Bees
6  The juridical thought of bees
The entrance to the beehive
‘Attractive little problems’
Exigere: the thought of the swarm
7  The juridical nature of bees
Almond Alliance of California et al. v Fish and Game Commission et al
‘Neither tame nor wild’
The juridical hive: isolating and dividing bees
8  The juridical existence of bees
Kearry v Pattinson
Against a swarm of bees
Bienenrecht
‘The faculty which is competent in law with regard to them’
Bee-jurisdictions: Bechbretha, Zeidelweide
9  The juridical invention of bees
‘If when my bees fly to yours you burn them up …’ Digest 9.2.27.12
From doves to bees: the rule of animus revertendi
The ‘Case of the Poor Man’s Bees’
Burned or poisoned bees?
Burnt bees: a procedural estimation of value
The problem of dominium in the lex Aquilia
‘This: what human ingenuity could not have devised’
Conclusion
Bibliography
Index

이용현황보기

Creatures of jurisprudence : bears and bees as juridical species 이용현황 표 - 등록번호, 청구기호, 권별정보, 자료실, 이용여부로 구성 되어있습니다.
등록번호 청구기호 권별정보 자료실 이용여부
0003187805 LM 346.046954 -A25-1 서울관 법률정보센터(206호) 이용가능

출판사 책소개

알라딘제공

To what extent can an animal constitute a ‘juridical species’?? This highly original book considers how animals have been integral to law and to legal thinking.

Going beyond the traditional approaches to animal rights and the question of whether non-human animals may be considered legal ‘subjects’, this book follows two types of animal ? bears and bees ? and asks what existence these species have maintained in juridical thought.? Uncovering surprising roles that the animals play in the imagination of and solution to jurisprudential problems, the book offers a counter-argument to the view that juridical thought reduces one’s appreciation for the singularity and independence of their lives.? It shows, rather, that the animals exert a remarkable influence on the creative dimensions of law, offering a liveliness to it that is worthy of close attention.

Contributing to new directions at the intersection of jurisprudence and human-animal studies, this book will appeal to those with interests in either of these areas.



To what extent can an animal constitute a ‘juridical species’?? This highly original book considers how animals have been integral to law and to legal thinking.



추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차

권호

기사명 원문보기 기사목차
닫기