권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Title page 1
Contents 6
Foreword 4
Acknowledgements 5
Executive summary 10
Overview 13
References 16
Note 17
1. Trends and drivers of trust in Latin America and the Caribbean 18
1.1. Context matters: Latin Americans' concerns 20
1.2. A pressing global challenge: Levels of trust in government are generally low 23
1.2.1. The civil service is less trusted than the national government in LAC 25
1.2.2. The armed forces, police, civil society and media elicit more trust than the judiciary, civil service and political institutions 26
1.3. What drives trust in public institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean? 28
1.3.1. Governments in Latin America and the Caribbean could further invest in improving people's everyday experiences with public institutions (Chapter 3) 28
1.3.2. How can governments improve trust through improved day-to-day interactions with the public? 30
1.3.3. Whilst Latin Americans are relatively positive about their governments' ability to handle complex policy challenges, governments should look... 31
1.3.4. How can governments improve trust in their decision making on complex policy issues? 33
References 35
Annex 1.A. The OECD Framework on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions 37
Notes 38
2. Socio-economic conditions, political agency and trust 40
2.1. Personal backgrounds shape individuals' trust in government 42
2.1.1. People's sense of political agency and partisanship have a greater influence on trust than socio-economic or demographic characteristics 42
2.1.2. Trust in public institutions is lower among those concerned about finances, crime and discrimination 45
2.1.3. Women and younger people place less trust in government 48
2.1.4. Recent adverse experiences were found to have little impact on trust, even though results vary by country 50
References 51
Notes 52
3. Trust and perceptions of day-to-day interactions with public institutions 53
3.1. Education outperforms healthcare in satisfaction ratings, with notable socioeconomic gaps 55
3.1.1. Half of recent users express satisfaction with the education system in the LAC region 56
3.1.2. Satisfaction with the healthcare system in LAC falls significantly below the OECD average 58
3.1.3. Satisfaction with services varies across groups 60
3.2. Higher levels of satisfaction with administrative services are marred by fairness and integrity concerns 62
3.2.1. Just over half of Latin Americans are satisfied with administrative services 63
3.2.2. Many are sceptical of the fairness and integrity of public employees, reflecting a strained relationship with the civil service 66
3.3. In day-to-day interactions, people in LAC are more optimistic about government responsiveness to their needs 69
3.3.1. LAC respondents feel governments are more responsive to complaints and innovative ideas than their OECD peers 70
3.3.2. A large share of the population is concerned over data protection in a context of digital transformation of the public sector 71
References 73
Notes 75
4. Trust in government on complex policy issues 76
4.1. Governments are perceived as capable in addressing complex challenges, but less prepared to respond to emergencies 78
4.1.1. Many Latin Americans express concerns about the reliability of public institutions in responding to emergencies or adapting to new technologies 79
4.1.2. Yet half of Latin Americans are optimistic about their government's ability to tackle long-term challenges with intergenerational trade-offs 81
4.2. Concerns about political voice and accountability are common in LAC 83
4.2.1. Many people believe powerful groups are steering public policies away from the public interest 84
4.2.2. People feel able to and participate in politics, but they do not feel their voices are heard 86
4.2.3. Pessimism about checks and balances suggests that institutional accountability may be at risk 93
References 97
Notes 98
5. Trust and information integrity in Latin America and the Caribbean 99
5.1. Trust in the news media, trust in government, and media consumption patterns in LAC 101
5.2. Challenges to information integrity have consequences on trust 107
5.3. Trustworthy, accessible and inclusive public communication could enhance trust in public institutions 109
References 114
Notes 115
Annex A. The public governance drivers and personal characteristics shaping trust in public institutions 116
Understanding how public governance aspects affect trust 116
References 125
Notes 126
Annex B. Overview of the OECD Trust Survey in LAC Methodology 127
Note 129
Figures 7
Figure 1.1. A majority of people in the region see crime as a major threat to their country 21
Figure 1.2. Households in the region are frequently affected by job losses 22
Figure 1.3. About one-third report high or moderately high trust in their national government across LAC countries 23
Figure 1.4. Interpersonal trust is positively associated with institutional trust 24
Figure 1.5. Trust in the civil service is lower than trust in local or national government 25
Figure 1.6. The armed forces are the most trusted institution in LAC 27
Figure 1.7. Day-to-day dealings with public institutions require urgent improvements to boost trust 29
Figure 1.8. Main areas of focus for greater impact on trust across institutions in LAC 31
Figure 1.9. People are generally confident in their governments' ability to address intergenerational and complex challenges, but are more sceptical... 32
Figure 1.10. Main areas of focus for greater impact on trust across institutions in LAC 34
Figure 2.1. Political agency and partisanship play a more significant role in people's trust in the national government than their socio-economic status or demographic characteristics 42
Figure 2.2. People who feel they have a say in what government does or who are confident to participate in politics generally express higher trust in the national government 43
Figure 2.3. People who did not vote for a party in government trust public institutions less 44
Figure 2.4. Feelings of economic insecurity and fewer economic prospects correspond to lower trust in the national government 46
Figure 2.5. People who worry about becoming a victim of crime show lower trust in the government 47
Figure 2.6. Trust in the national government is lower among those who feel discriminated against 48
Figure 2.7. In most countries men trust the national government more 49
Figure 2.8. Trust in government and confidence in balancing intergenerational interests vary significantly across younger and older generations 50
Figure 3.1. Half of recent users are satisfied with the education system in their country 56
Figure 3.2. Students in countries with higher per-student expenditures on average perform better in a maths test 57
Figure 3.3. Four in ten people in surveyed LAC countries are satisfied with the healthcare system in their country 58
Figure 3.4. Per capita health spending in LAC countries is just over one-fourth of the OECD average 60
Figure 3.5. Individuals with financial concerns, people from discriminated groups, and those worried about crime report slightly lower satisfaction across education and health 61
Figure 3.6. A majority of people in surveyed LAC countries are satisfied with administrative services in their country 63
Figure 3.7. Enhancing information clarity and service speed could increase satisfaction with administrative services 64
Figure 3.8. Individuals with financial concerns and those worried about crime express lower levels of satisfaction with administrative services 66
Figure 3.9. A minority of people in the LAC region feel they would be treated fairly and equally by public servants 68
Figure 3.10. One in three people in surveyed LAC countries feel a public employee would refuse a petty bribe 69
Figure 3.11. Public services are perceived as more responsive in the LAC region than in the OECD more broadly 70
Figure 3.12. 2023 OECD/IDB Digital Government Index LAC, composite results by country 71
Figure 3.13. In a context of digital transformation, a minority of people in LAC feel confident that government will only use their data for legitimate purposes only 72
Figure 4.1. Latin Americans are nearly evenly split in perceptions of whether their government would be prepared to protect lives in the event of an emergency 80
Figure 4.2. Around a third doubt their government will regulate new technologies appropriately and help businesses and people use tech responsibly 81
Figure 4.3. Many Latin Americans are confident about their governments' ability to handle complex policy challenges 82
Figure 4.4. A slight majority express confidence in their government's ability to collaborate with other national stakeholders and handle complex challenges 83
Figure 4.5. One-third of Latin Americans believe that their national governments would reject a harmful policy promoted by a corporation, slightly above the OECD average 85
Figure 4.6. Nearly half of people in LAC feel high-level political officials would not reject private sector incentives in exchange for political favours 86
Figure 4.7. A small majority of people in Latin America and the Caribbean feel able to participate in politics 87
Figure 4.8. Political activities are more widespread in LAC 88
Figure 4.9. Greater confidence in having a say is associated with higher trust in government 89
Figure 4.10. Many people hesitate about governments changing unpopular policies 90
Figure 4.11. Many are sceptical about governments providing opportunities to voice opinions, as well as adopting opinions gathered in a public consultation 91
Figure 4.12. Distrusting respondents are politically engaged 93
Figure 4.13. A third find it likely that the national legislature holds the government accountable 94
Figure 4.14. Only three in ten people believe that courts decide independently from political interference 95
Figure 4.15. Trust in the judiciary tends to be higher where judicial independence is perceived to be stronger 96
Figure 5.1. More people trust the media in LAC countries than across the OECD 102
Figure 5.2. Social media is the most frequently cited source of political information across LAC 103
Figure 5.3. People in LAC countries estimate they obtain over half of their political and current affairs information from social media 104
Figure 5.4. In LAC countries, generational differences in using social media for political information are significantly smaller 105
Figure 5.5. Trust gaps by information sources are narrower in LAC countries than in the OECD 106
Figure 5.6. People who prefer not getting any information about politics tend to have more negative views of public governance in both OECD and LAC countries 107
Figure 5.7. Social factors play a more prominent role in news assessment across LAC regions compared to OECD countries 108
Figure 5.8. A minority of people in the LAC region feel the government uses the best available evidence when making decisions 110
Figure 5.9. Government statistics are largely perceived as inaccessible 111
Figure 5.10. Latin Americans are largely satisfied with the clarity of information about administrative services, but less with the clarity of communication around policy reforms 112
Figure 5.11. Those financially disadvantaged and who feel disconnected from political processes are less confident that the government would explain... 113
Boxes 9
Box 1. The OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean 14
Box 2. Selected country initiatives using data and results of the OECD Trust Survey 15
Box 1.1. Low levels of interpersonal trust correspond with lower trust in public institutions 24
Box 1.2. National civil services enjoy relatively solid levels of trust in OECD countries 26
Box 3.1. OECD Recommendation on Human-Centred Public Administrative Services 65
Box 4.1. Distrusting but not disengaged 92
Annex Tables 9
Table 1.A.1. OECD Framework on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions and survey questions 37
Table A A.1. The effects of different governance drivers on trust into institutions 124
Table A B.1. Overview on hard and soft sampling quotas 128
Table A B.2. Data collection overview 128
Table A B.3. Additional questions in the 2025 OECD Trust Survey in LAC 128
Annex Figures 8
Figure A A.1. People who perceive governments to use the best available evidence and balance intergenerational interests are more likely to have high... 118
Figure A A.2. Satisfaction with administrative services is the strongest driver of trust in the national civil service 119
Figure A A.3. Confidence in legislatures' ability to balance different interests in society is the strongest driver of trust in the legislative 120
Figure A A.4. Ensuring people can voice their opinions on decisions affecting their community has the highest potential for increasing trust in local government 122
Annex Boxes 9
Box A A.1. Logit regression assessing the significance of different factors related to trust 123
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.