본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

목차보기

Title page 1

Contents 6

Foreword 4

Acknowledgements 5

Executive summary 9

1. Introduction 12

2. Trade facilitation frameworks in ASEAN 13

3. Key trends in trade facilitation in ASEAN through the lens of the OECD TFIs 15

3.1. There is steady progress in trade facilitation across all AMS 15

3.2. Heterogeneity of performance remains significant 18

3.3. ASEAN TFIs performance in perspective 19

4. A closer look at the implementation of trade facilitation measures 21

4.1. Transparency and predictability 21

4.2. Automating and streamlining trade documents and procedures 29

4.3. Border agency co-operation mechanisms 36

4.4. Governance and impartiality 40

5. Further trade facilitation reforms are critical to promote competitiveness and resilience in AMS 42

5.1. Trade facilitation reforms have contributed to trade cost reductions, but more can be achieved 42

5.2. Trade facilitation reforms also increasingly matter for resilience 43

5.3. Closing the gap between trade facilitation commitments and their implementation in practice would deliver further trade benefits 44

6. Trade facilitation reforms for new challenges and opportunities in ASEAN 46

References 48

Notes 49

Annex A. About the OECD Trade Facilitation Indicators 50

Annex B. ASEAN average performance by area 57

Annex C. Trade facilitation performance by AMS 59

Figures 7

Figure 3.1. ASEAN's trade facilitation developments: Uneven but rising progress by policy area 16

Figure 3.2. ASEAN performance: From early gains in transparency to a post-2022 surge in border co-operation 17

Figure 3.3. All AMS are improving their trade facilitation policy environment, albeit at different speeds 18

Figure 3.4. Performance amongst AMS diverges most in streamlining of trade-related documents, automation and advance rulings systems 19

Figure 3.5. Performance in ASEAN compared with other regions 20

Figure 4.1. More systematic efforts are required to improve the depth and comprehensiveness of trade-related information 22

Figure 4.2. Implementation on guidelines and institutional mechanisms for public consultations remains uneven and limited in scope 23

Figure 4.3. Challenges continue to limit the effectiveness of advance ruling systems 24

Figure 4.4. Greater clarity, accessibility, and impartiality would strengthen appeal procedures systems 26

Figure 4.5. Efforts are required to enhance transparency and predictability of fees and charges 27

Figure 4.6. Trade-related documents can be further simplified and harmonised in the region 29

Figure 4.7. Bridging the gap between domestic reforms and regional interoperability can help reduce uneven performance in automation 31

Figure 4.8. Recent reforms in streamlining procedures are reflected in the generally strong average performance of measures within this area 33

Figure 4.9. The domestic regulatory environment is becoming increasingly supportive for electronic transactions, but barriers are increasing... 35

Figure 4.10. Increasing barriers on e-payments and connectivity highlight divergent levels of digital readiness for going paperless among AMS, 2024 35

Figure 4.11. The steady progress in domestic mechanisms for border agency co-operation is reflected in the relatively strong average... 37

Figure 4.12. External border agency co-operation builds on the progress in domestic mechanisms 39

Figure 4.13. Governance and impartiality is one of the areas of best average performance 41

Figure 5.1. Trade costs reductions associated to trade facilitation reforms a decade after the conclusion of the WTO TFA (2012-22): Achievements... 43

Figure 5.2. Trade facilitation reforms can help maintain supply in case of shocks and enable new trade relationships 44

Figure 5.3. The trade flow response to improving operational practices is stronger than that for the implementation of regulatory frameworks 45

Boxes 25

Box 4.1. ASEAN-Wide Self-Certification (AWSC) Scheme 25

Box 4.2. Transparency and predictability: Potential areas for action 28

Box 4.3. Going paperless in ASEAN: The wider environment for the digitalisation of trade-related documents and processes in AMS 34

Box 4.4. Automating and streamlining of trade-related documents and procedures 36

Box 4.5. Transit trade facilitation in ASEAN: Progress and challenges 38

Box 4.6. Border agency co-operation: Potential areas for action 40

Box 4.7. Governance and impartiality: Potential areas for action 41

Annex Tables 8

Table A A.1. Information availability: Measures 50

Table A A.2. Involvement of the trade community: Measures 51

Table A A.3. Advance rulings: Measures 51

Table A A.4. Appeal procedures: Measures 52

Table A A.5. Fees and charges: Measures 52

Table A A.6. Documents: Measures 53

Table A A.7. Automation: Measures 53

Table A A.8. Streamlining of procedures: Measures 53

Table A A.9. Internal border agency co-operation: Measures 55

Table A A.10. External border agency co-operation: Measures 55

Table A A.11. Governance and impartiality: Measures 56

Annex Figures 7

Figure A B.1. ASEAN average performance by area, 2012-24 57

Figure A B.2. ASEAN Members: Improvements by area, 2022-24 58

Figure A C.1. Brunei Darussalam: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012-24 59

Figure A C.2. Cambodia: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012-24 60

Figure A C.3. Indonesia: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012-24 60

Figure A C.4. Lao PDR: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012-24 61

Figure A C.5. Malaysia: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012-24 61

Figure A C.6. Myanmar: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012-24 62

Figure A C.7. Philippines: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012-24 62

Figure A C.8. Singapore: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012-24 63

Figure A C.9. Thailand: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012-24 63

Figure A C.10. Viet Nam: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012-24 64