권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Title page 1
Contents 6
Foreword 4
Acknowledgements 5
Executive summary 9
1. Pay transparency in progress 11
1.1. Progress in closing the gender pay gap remains painfully slow 12
1.2. The principle of equal pay for work of equal value is a cornerstone of gender equality in the labour market 15
1.3. Pay transparency tools are increasingly popular, with approaches evolving rapidly 16
1.3.1. Public support for pay gap reporting 16
1.4. Pay transparency systems are in transition 19
1.4.1. Looking back: Recent trends in pay gap reporting 20
1.4.2. Looking ahead: Planned developments in pay transparency across the OECD 23
1.5. Well-designed pay transparency measures can narrow pay gaps 26
1.5.1. Evidence on the effectiveness of pay gap reporting 27
1.5.2. Evidence on equal pay audits reveals potential but also highlights implementation challenges 29
1.5.3. New evidence on other pay transparency measures 30
1.5.4. Implementation features have implications for the effectiveness of pay transparency measures 31
1.6. Key findings and policy recommendations for governments 32
References 33
Notes 36
2. Gender-neutral job evaluation and classification 38
2.1. What are gender-neutral job evaluation and classification systems? 39
2.2. Job evaluation systems help assess and compare the value of diverse work 42
2.2.1. Institutional mechanisms: How to embed requirements for gender sensitivity in job evaluations? 43
2.2.2. Which gender-neutral criteria are used to assess the value of work? 45
2.2.3. Some countries have assessed job evaluation systems 50
2.3. Gender-neutral job classifications are not (yet) the norm 53
2.3.1. Transparency requirements make pay determination criteria visible to workers 56
2.4. Countries are supporting employers in conducting job evaluations and classifications 59
2.4.1. Analytical tools and toolkits can streamline job evaluation 61
2.4.2. Governments provide methodological guidance for job evaluations 64
2.4.3. Countries deliver capacity-building through training, support and sectoral engagement 65
2.4.4. Specific initiatives combat systematic undervaluation of female-dominated work 66
2.4.5. Countries are developing new job evaluation frameworks and adjusting existing ones 67
2.5. The EU Pay Transparency Directive drives convergence on job evaluation and classifications 68
References 71
Notes 73
3. Pay transparency in the OECD: An overview 74
3.1. Pay gap reporting is set to become the norm across OECD countries 76
3.2. Coverage: Who reports, and when? 80
3.2.1. Firm size thresholds 80
3.2.2. Worker inclusion rules 80
3.2.3. Other criteria for determining eligibility 81
3.2.4. Reporting frequency 81
3.2.5. Coverage gaps persist 81
3.3. Content: What do companies need to report? 83
3.3.1. What are employers required to report? 83
3.3.2. Some countries are expanding the breadth of reporting 85
3.4. Pay auditing: Must companies analyse or address pay inequalities? 85
3.4.1. When do companies need to conduct a pay audit? 86
3.4.2. What are companies required to do as part of the pay audit? 87
3.5. Communicating requirements and results: How to drive impact? 87
3.5.1. Proactive outreach can improve employer awareness 87
3.5.2. Direct worker communication can facilitate action on pay inequities 88
3.5.3. Public disclosure can drive accountability and help reduce pay gaps 89
3.6. Oversight: How do countries ensure compliance? 91
3.6.1. Compliance monitoring is common across countries, but intensity varies 91
3.6.2. The focus of compliance monitoring - what is monitored - varies across countries 96
3.7. Driving efficiency: How are countries leveraging digital tools and data? 97
3.7.1. How are digital tools and data used to support reporting? 97
3.7.2. Administrative data holds untapped potential to reduce administrative burden for employers 98
3.8. Pre-employment salary transparency 99
3.8.1. Salary transparency in job advertisements - theory and evidence 99
3.8.2. A handful of countries mandate salary transparency in job ads 102
3.8.3. Monitoring compliance with salary transparency requirements 106
3.8.4. Public sector and sub-national salary transparency requirements 107
3.8.5. Can employers request or consider information on a candidate's salary history during recruitment? 108
3.8.6. Few OECD countries explicitly mandate gender-neutral language in job advertisements 109
3.8.7. What other steps are being taken to promote salary transparency prior to employment? 110
References 110
Notes 114
4. Pay transparency in practice: OECD case studies 117
4.1. Introduction and overview of the case studies 119
4.2. Pay transparency in Belgium 122
4.2.1. Comparing the value of work: Gender-neutral job evaluation and classification 122
4.2.2. Gender pay gap reporting 126
4.2.3. Salary transparency prior to employment 130
4.3. Pay transparency in France 130
4.3.1. Comparing the value of work in the private sector: Gender-neutral job evaluation and classification 130
4.3.2. Gender pay gap reporting 134
4.4. Pay transparency in Portugal 139
4.4.1. Comparing the value of work: Gender-neutral job evaluation and classification 139
4.4.2. Gender pay gap reporting 142
4.5. Pay transparency in Spain 147
4.5.1. Comparing the value of work: Gender-neutral job evaluation and classification 147
4.5.2. Gender pay gap reporting 151
4.5.3. Salary transparency prior to employment 155
References 155
Notes 157
Annex A. Overview of measures to help employers or social partners implement gender-neutral job evaluation and classification schemes 160
Annex B. Key actors involved in the definition and implementation of changes related to the EU Pay Transparency Directive 177
Annex C. Information about pay reporting measures in the public and private sectors 180
Annex D. Required content in private sector pay reporting 186
Annex E. Job classification systems required or suggested to be used in private sector gender pay reporting 191
Figure 1.1. Across the OECD, full-time working women earn 10% less than full-time working men 13
Figure 1.2. Progress in closing the gender pay gap has been slow 14
Figure 1.3. Providing information on the gender wage gap increases public support for pay transparency measures 17
Figure 1.4. Around two-thirds of OECD countries report forthcoming changes to pay transparency measures 20
Figure 2.1. Close to 40% of OECD countries require private sector employers to conduct gender-neutral job evaluations 43
Figure 2.2. Responsibility, effort, working conditions and skills are the most commonly cited criteria for gender-neutral job evaluation 46
Figure 2.3. At least ten OECD countries mandate or recommend gender-neutral job classification systems in the private sector 56
Figure 2.4. Illustration of Spain's gender-neutral job evaluation tool 62
Figure 2.5. Illustration of Logib tools: Equal pay analysis and Pay systems 63
Figure 3.1. In 2025, 55% of OECD countries required private sector companies to conduct gender pay gap reporting 77
Figure 3.2. By end 2026, it is expected that 84% of OECD countries will mandate gender pay gap reporting in the private sector 79
Figure 3.3. Estimated share of workers covered by pay gap reporting in the private sector 82
Figure 3.4. Affected private sector companies are commonly required to report non-pay statistics 84
Figure 3.5. Australia's public data portal enables detailed exploration of employer-level gender equality data 90
Figure 4.1. Illustration of the checklist 125
Figure 4.2. Sectoral-level gender pay information is made available to the general public 145
Boxes 18
Box 1.1. The 2025 OECD Pay Transparency Questionnaire 18
Box 1.2. Implementation of the EU Pay Transparency Directive 23
Box 1.3. Pay transparency in institutional settings: Evidence from universities 28
Box 2.1. EU Pay Transparency Directive: Job evaluation and classification requirements 41
Box 2.2. Lessons from Sweden's gender-neutral job evaluations as part of its pay audit process 52
Box 2.3. EU-wide guidelines on gender-neutral job evaluation and classification: Step-by-step toolkit 60
Box 2.4. Switzerland's Logib: A pioneering gender pay gap analysis tool 63
Box 2.5. BE-MAGIC project: Supporting the EU Pay Transparency Directive implementation 66
Box 3.1. Evidence on salary transparency: Experience from Austria and beyond 101
Box 3.2. Will the EU Pay Transparency Directive drive greater transparency in job advertisements? 103
Box 3.3. Disclosure of non-pay information in job advertisements could help to promote gender equality 105
Box 4.1. A 12-criteria control instrument to assess gender neutrality 123
Box 4.2. The Belgian "Checklist Gender neutrality in job evaluation and classification" 124
Box 4.3. France's "Guide for Taking Gender Equality between Women and Men into Account in Job Classification Systems" 132
Box 4.4. Portugal's Guide for Job Evaluation, based on objective criteria common to men and women 141
Box 4.5. Spain's gender-neutral job evaluation tool 149
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.