권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Title page 1
Contents 6
Foreword 4
Acknowledgements 5
Executive summary 9
1. Investing in NCD prevention is investing in social and economic prosperity 12
In Brief 13
NCDs reduce quality of life, productivity and economic growth 19
Identifying policy priorities allows resources to be directed effectively for maximum impact 22
Successful NCD strategies are based on three interconnected pillars 29
References 35
Notes 37
2. The growing NCD burden will escalate unless decisive action is taken 38
In Brief 39
Decades of effort have not yet turned the tide on NCDs 40
While some risk factors have improved, the health benefits are undermined by rising obesity levels 41
Improvements in care mean people live longer with chronic conditions, increasing the burden on the health system 46
Population ageing will continue to increase the NCD burden and associated healthcare cost 49
References 52
Annex 2.A. EU results 53
Annex 2.B. G20 results 55
3. NCDs reduce quality of life, productivity and economic growth 56
In Brief 57
NCDs reduce quality of life, cause depression and early death 58
NCDs increase health spending, reduce workforce productivity, and weaken economic growth 60
References 64
4. Focusing on key priorities maximises impact on health and the economy 65
In Brief 66
Addressing NCD risk factors can yield notable health and economic gains 68
Tackling obesity offers the greatest opportunity to reduce the NCD burden in the OECD and EU 70
Prevention delivers larger health and economic benefits than cure 72
All countries can achieve big results by focussing on one or two key priorities 76
Societal co-benefits further strengthen the case for action on NCD risk factors 78
References 80
Annex 4.A. EU results 81
Annex 4.B. G20 results 83
Annex 4.C. Country-level results 85
5. Effective NCD action requires an integrated approach across individuals, environments, and health systems 90
In Brief 91
Empowering individuals through information and education 93
Creating environments that support healthier choices 95
Building responsive health systems 99
References 106
Annex A. Comparing OECD and WHO data on risk factors 109
References 111
Annex B. The OECD SPHeP NCDs model 112
References 114
Figure 1.1. In the OECD, progress on air pollution, smoking, harmful alcohol use and physical inactivity is outweighed by rising obesity prevalence 15
Figure 1.2. Improvements in care have reduced the fatality of heart attacks and stroke 17
Figure 1.3. People with multiple NCDs are much more likely to take five or more medications 18
Figure 1.4. Population ageing is expected to increase the number of new NCDs in the OECD, EU and G20 by more than 30% over the next 25 years 19
Figure 1.5. The four NCDs covered in the analyses will account for around 4 in 10 premature deaths over the next 25 years 20
Figure 1.6. The annual GDP of OECD, EU and G20 countries will be nearly 4% lower due to NCDs, on average over 2026-2050 22
Figure 1.7. Schematic overview of the Top Quartile scenario 23
Figure 1.8. Tackling obesity accounts for more than half of the potential impact of actions on risk factors 24
Figure 1.9. The potential health and economic gains from lower risk factor prevalence are greater than from improved survival 25
Figure 1.10. Tackling the top three priorities in terms of reducing risk factors or improving NCDs survival rates for each country delivers... 27
Figure 1.11. Three core policy considerations for NCD strategies 29
Figure 1.12. Health information, motivation and behavioural skills can be delivered across different channels 30
Figure 1.13. Information and environmental policies for healthier lifestyles are an excellent investment 31
Figure 1.14. There is considerable scope to increase lifestyle counselling in primary care 33
Figure 1.15. There is still some way to go in creating people-centred health systems for NCDs 34
Figure 2.1. The prevalence of NCDs has continued to grow over the past three decades 41
Figure 2.2. In the OECD, progress on air pollution, smoking, harmful alcohol consumption and physical activity is outweighed by rising obesity levels 44
Figure 2.3. Rising obesity prevalence is driving up the number of NCDs in the majority of countries 45
Figure 2.4. Improvements in care have reduced the fatality of heart attacks and stroke 46
Figure 2.5. People with multiple NCDs are much more likely to take five or more medications 48
Figure 2.6. People with multiple NCDs are less confident in their ability to manage their health and well-being 49
Figure 2.7. Population ageing is expected to increase the number of new NCDs in the OECD by more than 30% over the next 25 years 50
Figure 2.8. Healthcare expenditure on NCDs is predicted to increase by more than 50% in the OECD due to population ageing 51
Figure 3.1. The four NCDs covered in the analyses will account for more than 4 in 10 premature deaths in the OECD over the next 25 years 58
Figure 3.2. Men in the OECD are nearly 80% more likely to die prematurely from NCDs than women 59
Figure 3.3. If there were no NCDs, health expenditure would be 41% lower in the OECD 61
Figure 3.4. NCDs reduced the workforce output, primarily by decreasing the number of people in employment 62
Figure 3.5. The average annual GDP of OECD and EU countries will be nearly 4% lower due to NCDs 63
Figure 4.1. Schematic overview of the Top Quartile scenario 68
Figure 4.2. Achieving the Top Quartile risk factor levels would decrease premature mortality by 11.4%, healthcare expenditure by 6.2% and raise... 69
Figure 4.3. Tackling obesity accounts for more than half the potential impact of action on risk factors 70
Figure 4.4. Action on obesity also has the greatest economic impact 71
Figure 4.5. The potential health and economic gains from lower risk factor prevalence are greater than from improved survival 73
Figure 4.6. Tackling the top three priorities in terms of reducing risk factors or improving NCDs survival rates for each country delivers... 77
Figure 4.7. Action on harmful alcohol use could reduce premature mortality from road traffic accidents and interpersonal violence by around 5% 79
Figure 5.1. Three core policy considerations for NCD strategies 92
Figure 5.2. Health information, motivation and behavioural skills can be delivered across different channels 94
Figure 5.3. Information and environmental policies for healthier lifestyles are an excellent investment 98
Figure 5.4. There is considerable scope to increase lifestyle counselling in primary care 100
Figure 5.5. Cancer screening rates vary substantially across countries, showing room for improvement 102
Figure 5.6. There is still some way to go in creating people-centred health systems for NCDs 104
Boxes 14
Box 1.1. What are NCDs? 14
Box 1.2. The OECD model for Strategic Public Health Planning for Non-Communicable Diseases (SPHeP-NCDs) 16
Box 1.3. The challenge of managing multimorbidity 17
Box 1.4. NCDs and depression 21
Box 1.5. Identifying NCD priorities using the Top Quartile scenario 23
Box 1.6. Societal co-benefits further strengthen the case for action on NCDs 28
Box 2.1. What are NCDs? 40
Box 2.2. A note on OECD Health Statistics and the data used in the OECD SPHeP NCDs model 43
Box 2.3. The challenge of managing multimorbidity 48
Box 3.1. Men bear a disproportionately heavy burden of NCDs 59
Box 4.1. Identifying NCD priorities using the Top Quartile scenario 68
Box 5.1. A comprehensive plan to reduce the burden of cardiovascular diseases in the EU 93
Box 5.2. Mois sans tabac in France 95
Box 5.3. Equity and integration: Transforming lives and livelihoods through leadership and action on noncommunicable diseases and the... 96
Box 5.4. The OECD Best Practices in Public Health initiative 96
Box 5.5. Cross-sectoral action to improve air quality 97
Box 5.6. Screening for NCDs in high-risk populations 101
Box 5.7. Medication safety 105
Annex Figure 2.A.1. In the EU, progress on air pollution, smoking, harmful alcohol use and physical inactivity is undermined by rising obesity prevalence 53
Annex Figure 2.A.2. Improvements in care have reduced the fatality of heart attacks and stroke in the EU 54
Annex Figure 2.B.1. In the G20, progress on air pollution, smoking and harmful alcohol consumption is outweighed by rising obesity levels 55
Annex Figure 4.A.1. Tackling obesity accounts for more than half the potential impact of action on risk factors in the EU 81
Annex Figure 4.A.2. The potential economic gains from preventing disease are greater than from improving survival in the EU 82
Annex Figure 4.B.1. Tackling air pollution offers the greatest potential impact of action on risk factors in the G20 83
Annex Figure 4.B.2. The potential economic gains from preventing disease are greater than from improving survival in the G20 84
Annex Figure 4.C.1. Impact of achieving the Top Quartile rates by country 85
Figure A A.1. Data on tobacco smoking prevalence 109
Figure A A.2. Data on alcohol consumption 110
Figure A A.3. Data on obesity 111
Figure A B.1. Schematic overview of the OECD SPHeP-NCDs model 112
Figure A B.2. Schematic overview of scenarios looking at risk factor progress since 2010 113
Figure A B.3. Schematic overview of the Top Quartile scenarios 114
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.