권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Title page 1
Contents 5
Foreword 4
Basic statistics of Korea, 2024 8
Executive summary 9
1. Future-proofing macroeconomic policies 18
1.1. After decades of strong performance, structural challenges remain 19
1.2. The energy price shock is clouding the economic outlook 20
1.2.1. Inflation pressures were weak before the energy crisis 22
1.2.2. Fiscal policy is supportive 24
1.2.3. The labour market holds up, but with some weak spots 24
1.2.4. Growth is projected to strengthen 25
1.3. Structural policies could improve macroeconomic outcomes 27
1.3.1. Complement macroprudential tools to lift housing supply responsiveness 29
1.3.2. Ageing pressures call for structural reforms and a prudent fiscal framework 33
1.3.3. Steps are taken to safeguard trade and attract foreign investment 37
Annex 1.A. Economic and political developments in North Korea 44
References 49
2. Tax reform for growth and revenue 52
2.1. Tax reform is central to achieving future growth and fiscal sustainability 53
2.2. Converging corporate income tax rates would improve efficiency 55
2.3. A large share of workers does not pay personal income tax 56
2.4. Consumption taxes constitute a low share of overall revenue 58
2.5. Environmental taxes and emissions trading can be further developed 61
2.6. Recurrent property taxes should play a more prominent role 64
References 68
3. Smarting up education and life-long learning 71
3.1. Adult skills decline fast by age in Korea 72
3.2. Initial education could lay stronger foundations for adult learning 75
3.2.1. High-stake exams lead to intensive tutoring 75
3.2.2. An increasing supply of tertiary degrees is not matched by increased quality 78
3.2.3. High-stakes tests to enter employment come with drawbacks 80
3.3. Reform could support investments in updating and maintaining workers' skills 81
3.3.1. Labour market institutions hold back private incentives to invest in skills 83
3.3.2. Realising social returns of investments in skills require coordination 85
References 88
4. Reshaping the geography of opportunity 91
4.1. Demographic decline and regional divergence reinforce each other 92
4.2. Improving framework conditions in remote areas 100
4.2.1. Ensuring equitable access to services 100
4.2.2. Harnessing digitalisation and regulatory flexibility 104
4.2.3. Aligning fiscal frameworks with local development needs 109
4.3. Revitalising regional hubs 112
4.3.1. Consolidating place-based development support 113
4.3.2. Integrating universities into regional ecosystems 115
4.3.3. Leveraging zone-based policies 118
4.4. Adapting spatial planning and housing policies 122
4.4.1. Decentralising planning authority 122
4.4.2. Using land value capture to rebalance development incentives across regions 123
4.4.3. Making housing markets more efficient 125
References 128
Figure 1. Rapid ageing puts public finances under pressure 10
Figure 2. Reducing tax expenditures and raising indirect taxes can boost revenue 13
Figure 3. The tertiary education earnings premium is falling 14
Figure 4. Internal migration aggravates regional divergences 15
Figure 1.1. Income levels and work-life balance have improved 19
Figure 1.2. Consumption is supported by accommodative fiscal policy 21
Figure 1.3. Inflation is on target and expectations appear anchored 23
Figure 1.4. Employment growth is driven by women 25
Figure 1.5. Housing affordability is primarily an issue in Seoul 29
Figure 1.6. Transaction-based prices outpace total housing stock prices 30
Figure 1.7. Housing starts have been declining since 2018, notably in the SMA 30
Figure 1.8. The fiscal position weakens as fiscal pressure from ageing is rising 33
Figure 1.9. Fiscal pressures require a prudent fiscal framework and structural reforms 37
Figure 1.10. Exports are concentrated 38
Figure 1.11. Korean equities outperformed other main markets the past year 41
Figure 1.12. Control of corruption is improving 41
Figure 1.13. Public Integrity and Accountability 42
Figure 2.1. Tax structures with a low share of revenue from Goods and Services 54
Figure 2.2. The share of tax-exempt wage earners is declining but remains substantial 56
Figure 2.3. Top statutory PIT rates 57
Figure 2.4. Value-added taxes as a share of GDP are lower than the OECD average 59
Figure 2.5. Cigarettes are relatively affordable in Korea 60
Figure 2.6. Average effective carbon rates are low compared to other countries 61
Figure 2.7. Emissions need to fall faster to reach target 62
Figure 2.8. Korea's property taxation is skewed towards transaction taxes 64
Figure 2.9. Korea has the highest share of inheritance, estate, and gift taxes in total revenue 66
Figure 3.1. Adult skills are below the OECD average 73
Figure 3.2. Skills are declining by age 73
Figure 3.3. Artificial intelligence may already be changing the Korean labour market 74
Figure 3.4. Almost half of Koreans work in a different field from their highest qualification 76
Figure 3.5. Education funding is skewed towards primary and secondary school 77
Figure 3.6. Upper secondary education quality has increased while tertiary stagnated 78
Figure 3.7. The tertiary education earnings premium is falling in Korea 79
Figure 3.8. Learning-by-doing and adult training boost skills 81
Figure 3.9. Learning by doing and adult training are less frequent than in the OECD average 83
Figure 4.1. The capital region offers economic opportunity at the cost of expensive housing 92
Figure 4.2. Stark regional differences in per capita production and income 93
Figure 4.3. High wages in the Seoul Metropolitan Area attract young cohorts 93
Figure 4.4. Internal migration undermines balanced regional development 94
Figure 4.5. Net migration flows of 15-29 year-olds, 2010-2024 95
Figure 4.6. Old-age dependency ratio will rise substantially more outside SMA 95
Figure 4.7. Many struggle to find affordable homes in the Seoul Metropolitan Area 97
Figure 4.8. Fertility is particularly low in the capital area 98
Figure 4.9. Widening gap between urban centres and rural regions in access to health services 101
Figure 4.10. Childcare centre density is declining across regions 102
Figure 4.11. Easing regulations in professional services could yield high benefits 108
Figure 4.12. Taxing power and spending responsibilities of local governments are misaligned 110
Figure 4.13. The spending autonomy of local governments is limited 111
Figure 4.14. Upward mobility is increasingly determined by moving to and studying in the SMA 115
Boxes 7
Box 1.1. Economic policy directions 2026 27
Box 1.2. Composition effects drive transaction-based housing price increases in Seoul 29
Box 1.3. Government roadmap to expand housing supply in the Seoul Metropolitan Area 31
Box 1.4. Korea's framework to support supply chain resilience 39
Box 2.1. Korea's implementation of the Global Anti-Base Erosion Tax 56
Box 2.2. Greenhouse gas emissions and policy framework in Korea 61
Box 3.1. The OECD Survey of Adult Skills 72
Box 3.2. Key policy initiatives to promote adult vocational skills 82
Box 4.1. Intergenerational earnings mobility and the role of internal migration 96
Box 4.2. Regional development policy agenda in Korea 99
Box 4.3. Examples of spatial transition initiatives in OECD countries 103
Box 4.4. Levers of AI-enabled regional development in other OECD countries 106
Box 4.5. Unlocking the potential of intermediary cities 114
Box 4.6. The digital learning ecosystem in Korea 116
Box 4.7. Crisis Response Zones in Korea 120
Box 4.8. Examples of attempts to decentralise planning authority 123
Annex Figure 1.A.1. Industry structure comparison between North and South Korea 44
Annex Figure 1.A.2. Exports are concentrated on a small number of niche products 45
Annex Figure 1.A.3. The North Korean Won depreciated massively 46
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.