권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Title page 1
Contents 6
Foreword 4
Acknowledgements 5
Executive summary 8
Key findings 9
1. Introduction: Citizen participation in Cohesion Policy 11
Setting the scene: Cohesion Policy is the main investment policy in the European Union 12
Citizen participation in Cohesion Policy 13
Cohesion Policy and the OECD-DG REGIO collaboration 15
References 18
2. The experience of 11 pilots across seven EU countries 19
Selection of participating territories 20
The 11 OECD-DG REGIO pilots 20
Beyond individual pilots: Citizen participation as a versatile toolbox to improve Cohesion Policy at the subnational level 30
References 37
3. Lessons learned: Well-designed participation improves policies while strengthening trust and legitimacy 39
Designing and implementing meaningful participatory processes 41
Achieving policy impact: participation can increase policy effectiveness 48
Building democratic skills and increasing public trust 50
Challenges identified through the OECD-DG REGIO pilots 52
References 55
4. Beyond experimentation: Transforming local governance to embed meaningful participation in Cohesion Policy 57
Strengthening the preconditions that enable meaningful participation 58
Conclusion 64
Next steps: Key actions for Cohesion Policy to increase the value and impact of participation 65
References 68
Glossary 70
Key terms on EU Cohesion Policy 70
Key terms on participation 71
References 73
Figure 1.1. Pilot territories participating in the project "Innovative Implementation of the Partnership Principle in Cohesion Policy" 17
Boxes 7
Box 1.1. European Union's Cohesion Policy 12
Box 1.2. OECD and European Commission work on Citizen Participation and Deliberation 14
Box 2.1. Multilevel coordination and support to increase impact of participatory processes in Romania 32
Box 2.2. Multi-staged processes can involve citizens at different stages of the policy cycle 34
Box 3.1. OECD's Guiding Principles for Citizen Participation Processes 42
Box 3.2. Involving people with disabilities in Poland 43
Box 3.3. Closing the feedback loop: good practices 45
Box 3.4. Using different media supports to increase the reach and impact of participation in Romania 47
Box 3.5. Banská Bystrica digital democracy platform 52
Box 4.1. A sound environment for participatory processes in Catalonia 59
Box 4.2. Banská Bystrica digital democracy platform 61
Box 4.3. Local resolutions to enable deliberative democracy in Romania 63
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.