본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

목차보기

Title page 1

Contents 6

Foreword 4

Acknowledgements 5

Executive summary 8

Key findings 9

1. Introduction: Citizen participation in Cohesion Policy 11

Setting the scene: Cohesion Policy is the main investment policy in the European Union 12

Citizen participation in Cohesion Policy 13

Cohesion Policy and the OECD-DG REGIO collaboration 15

References 18

2. The experience of 11 pilots across seven EU countries 19

Selection of participating territories 20

The 11 OECD-DG REGIO pilots 20

Beyond individual pilots: Citizen participation as a versatile toolbox to improve Cohesion Policy at the subnational level 30

References 37

3. Lessons learned: Well-designed participation improves policies while strengthening trust and legitimacy 39

Designing and implementing meaningful participatory processes 41

Achieving policy impact: participation can increase policy effectiveness 48

Building democratic skills and increasing public trust 50

Challenges identified through the OECD-DG REGIO pilots 52

References 55

4. Beyond experimentation: Transforming local governance to embed meaningful participation in Cohesion Policy 57

Strengthening the preconditions that enable meaningful participation 58

Conclusion 64

Next steps: Key actions for Cohesion Policy to increase the value and impact of participation 65

References 68

Glossary 70

Key terms on EU Cohesion Policy 70

Key terms on participation 71

References 73

Tables 7

Table 2.1. Summary of the selected pilots for the OECD-DG REGIO project 21

Table 2.2. Participants per pilot of the OECD-DG REGIO project "Innovative Implementation of the Partnership Principle in Cohesion Policy" 31

Figures 7

Figure 1.1. Pilot territories participating in the project "Innovative Implementation of the Partnership Principle in Cohesion Policy" 17

Boxes 7

Box 1.1. European Union's Cohesion Policy 12

Box 1.2. OECD and European Commission work on Citizen Participation and Deliberation 14

Box 2.1. Multilevel coordination and support to increase impact of participatory processes in Romania 32

Box 2.2. Multi-staged processes can involve citizens at different stages of the policy cycle 34

Box 3.1. OECD's Guiding Principles for Citizen Participation Processes 42

Box 3.2. Involving people with disabilities in Poland 43

Box 3.3. Closing the feedback loop: good practices 45

Box 3.4. Using different media supports to increase the reach and impact of participation in Romania 47

Box 3.5. Banská Bystrica digital democracy platform 52

Box 4.1. A sound environment for participatory processes in Catalonia 59

Box 4.2. Banská Bystrica digital democracy platform 61

Box 4.3. Local resolutions to enable deliberative democracy in Romania 63