권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Title page
Contents
Acknowledgements 4
Abstract 5
Résumé 6
Acronyms and Concepts 10
1. Introduction 11
1.1. Scope and overview 11
2. Antimicrobial resistance in long-term care facilities is a unique threat 15
2.1. Long-term care residents are at higher risk of health care associated infections compared to older people living in the community 15
2.2. Infection prevention and control is more challenging in long-term care facilities than in acute care hospitals 16
2.3. Multi-drug resistant organisms are more prevalent and severe in long-term care facilities than in the community 17
3. Trends in antimicrobial use and resistance in long-term care 18
3.1. Empirical prescribing and extended prophylaxis are common in long-term care facilities 19
3.2. A significant share of antimicrobial prescriptions in long-term care facilities are inappropriate 20
3.3. Inappropriate antimicrobial consumption in long-term care facilities puts all residents at risk, not just those taking antimicrobials 22
3.4. Factors behind inappropriate use of antimicrobials in long-term care facilities relate to residents and their relatives, prescribers, facilities, health care... 23
3.5. Resistant organisms are becoming more prevalent in long-term care facilities 24
3.6. There is resistance in long-term care facilities to critically important antimicrobials 25
4. Interventions to tackle antimicrobial resistance in long-term care 27
4.1. Better surveillance of antimicrobial resistance and more testing in long-term care settings are needed 27
4.2. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes can prevent antimicrobial resistance in long-term care facilities 29
4.3. Infection prevention and control should be implemented alongside antimicrobial stewardship programmes 35
5. Conclusion 42
References 44
Annex A. Data Sources 59
Annex B. Literature sources reporting on inappropriate use of antimicrobials in long-term care facilities 60
Annex C. Choosing Wisely minimum criteria for urinary tract infections 62
OECD Health Working Papers 63
Figure 1.1. Wide variation in the average age of long-term care facility residents surveyed in point prevalence surveys in EU/EEA and Australia 13
Figure 2.1. Results of point prevalence surveys of health care associated infections among long-term care facility residents in participating OECD countries,... 16
Figure 3.1. Use of antimicrobials in long-term care facilities in OECD and EU/EEA countries 18
Figure 3.2. Indication for antimicrobial use among long-term care facility residents in EU/EEA countries, 2016-17 20
Figure 3.3. A significant share of antimicrobial prescriptions are considered inappropriate 21
Figure 3.4. ECDC Composite Index of AMR in bacteria from health care associated infections among long-term care facilities residents in participating OECD... 25
Figure 4.1. EVIPNet Europe's three viable options to promote optimal antimicrobial use in long-term care facilities 28
Figure 4.2. Best practice recommendations for infection prevention and control in long-term care facilities 36
Figure 4.3. Costs of controlling a drug-resistant K. pneumoniae outbreak in The Netherlands 41
Boxes
Box 1.1. Gaps in data availability restrict focus to long-term care facility residents 12
Box 1.2. The impact of COVID-19 on antimicrobial resistance in long-term care facilities 14
Box 3.1. The ECDC Composite Index of AMR in isolates recovered from health care associated infections 25
Box 4.1. United States CDC core elements of antibiotic stewardship in long-term care facilities 32
Box 4.2. A community wide programme for the wise use of antimicrobials in Canadian long-term care facilities 35
Box 4.3. A national implementation project to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in long-term care facility residents 38
Box 4.4. The business case for infection prevention and control in a long-term care facility 41
Annex Tables
Table A.1. Data sources used in this report 59
Table B.1. Literature on inappropriate use of antimicrobials in long-term care facilities, by criteria 60
Table C.1. Choosing Wisely minimum criteria for urinary tract infections 62
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.